Erythropoiesis in Cushing syndrome: sex-related and subtype-specific differences. Results from a monocentric study

CONTEXT

Cushing syndrome (CS) is associated with different hematological abnormalities. Nevertheless, conflicting data about erythropoiesis in CS have been reported. Furthermore, it is unclear whether CS sex and subtype-specific alterations in red blood cells (RBC) parameters are present.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate sex and subtype-specific changes in RBC in patients with CS at initial diagnosis and after remission.

DESIGN

Retrospective, monocentric study including 210 patients with CS (women, n = 162) matched 1:1 for sex and age to patients with pituitary microadenomas or adrenal incidentalomas (both hormonally inactive). RBC parameters were evaluated at initial diagnosis and after remission.

RESULTS

Women with CS had higher hematocrit (median 42.2 vs 39.7%), hemoglobin (14.1 vs 13.4 g/dl) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (91.2 vs 87.9 fl) compared to the controls (all p < 0.0001). Women with Cushing disease (CD) showed higher hematocrit, RBC and hemoglobin levels than those with ectopic Cushing (ECS) (all p < 0.005). Men with CS had lower hematocrit (42.9 vs 44.7%), RBC count (4.8 vs 5.1n*106/µl) and hemoglobin (14.2 vs 15.4 g/dl), but higher MCV (90.8 vs 87.5 fl) than controls (all p < 0.05). In men with CS, no subtype-specific differences were identified. Three months after remission hemoglobin decreased in both sexes.

CONCLUSION

CS is characterized by sexual and subtype-specific differences in RBC parameters. Compared to controls, women with CS showed higher hematocrit/hemoglobin levels, whereas men had lower hematocrit/hemoglobin, which further decreased directly after remission. Therefore, anemia should be considered as complication of CS in men. In women, differences in RBC parameters may help to differentiate CD from ECS.

Outcome of Immunotherapy in Adrenocortical Carcinoma - A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) have yielded contradictory results. We aimed to evaluate treatment response and safety of ICI in ACC in a real-life setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of 54 patients with advanced ACC receiving ICI as compassionate use at six German reference centres between 2016 and 2022.

METHODS

Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were assessed.

RESULTS

In 52 patients surviving at least 4 weeks after initiation of ICI, ORR was 13.5% (6-26) and DCR 24% (16-41). PFS was 3.0 months (95%CI 2.3-3.7). In all patients, median OS was 10.4 months (3.8-17). 17 TRAE occurred in 15 patients, which was associated with a longer PFS of 5.5 (1.9-9.2) vs. 2.5 (2.0- 3.0) months (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.13-0.66, p=0.001) and OS of 28.2 (9.5-46.8) vs. 7.0 (4.1-10.2) months (HR 0.34, 95%CI 0.12-0.93). Positive tissue staining for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was associated with a longer PFS of 3.2 (2.6-3.8) vs. 2.3 (1.6-3.0, p<0.05) months. Adjusted for concomitant mitotane use, treatment with nivolumab was associated with lower risk of progression (HR 0.36, 0.15-0.90) and death (HR 0.20, 0.06-0.72) compared to pembrolizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-life setting we observe a response comparable to other second-line therapies and an acceptable safety profile in ACC patients receiving different ICI. The relevance of PD-L1 as a marker of response and the potentially more favourable outcome in nivolumab treated patients require confirmation.

S-GRAS score for prognostic classification of adrenocortical carcinoma: an international, multicenter ENSAT study

OBJECTIVE

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) has an aggressive but variable clinical course. Prognostic stratification based on the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours stage and Ki67 index is limited. We aimed to demonstrate the prognostic role of a points-based score (S-GRAS) in a large cohort of patients with ACC.

DESIGN

This is a multicentre, retrospective study on ACC patients who underwent adrenalectomy.

METHODS

The S-GRAS score was calculated as a sum of the following points: tumour stage (1-2 = 0; 3 = 1; 4 = 2), grade (Ki67 index 0-9% = 0; 10-19% = 1; ≥20% = 2 points), resection status (R0 = 0; RX = 1; R1 = 2; R2 = 3), age (<50 years = 0; ≥50 years = 1), symptoms (no = 0; yes = 1), and categorised, generating four groups (0-1, 2-3, 4-5, and 6-9). Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The discriminative performance of S-GRAS and its components was tested by Harrell's Concordance index (C-index) and Royston-Sauerbrei's R2D statistic.

RESULTS

We included 942 ACC patients. The S-GRAS score showed superior prognostic performance for both PFS and DSS, with best discrimination obtained using the individual scores (0-9) (C-index = 0.73, R2D = 0.30, and C-index = 0.79, R2D = 0.45, respectively, all P < 0.01vs each component). The superiority of S-GRAS score remained when comparing patients treated or not with adjuvant mitotane (n = 481 vs 314). In particular, the risk of recurrence was significantly reduced as a result of adjuvant mitotane only in patients with S-GRAS 4-5.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic performance of S-GRAS is superior to tumour stage and Ki67 in operated ACC patients, independently from adjuvant mitotane. S-GRAS score provides a new important guide for personalised management of ACC (i.e. radiological surveillance and adjuvant treatment).