Stage IVB endometrial cancer: clinical course and survival of patients with single and multiple metastases

OBJECTIVE

Metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) at initial presentation is a rare disease. The present aim was to evaluate prognostic factors and overall survival in patients diagnosed with metastatic EC.

STUDY DESIGN

Using data from the Geneva Cancer Registry, the authors included all patients diagnosed with Stage IVB EC from 1980-2007. Estimates of survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were identified. The most frequent metastases were peritoneal or pleural carcinomatosis (66%, n=25) and hematogenous metastases (53%, n=20). Five-year survival rate was 5.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.0-13.3), and median survival was 7.6 months. Survival of patients with a single metastasis at the time of diagnosis was longer than for patients with multiple metastases (16 versus two months, respectively; p < 0.00 1).

CONCLUSION

Metastatic EC is rare disease with very poor prognosis particularly for patients with multiple site metastases.

The structure of human aldose reductase bound to the inhibitor IDD384

The crystallographic structure of the complex between human aldose reductase (AR2) and one of its inhibitors, IDD384, has been solved at 1.7 A resolution from crystals obtained at pH 5.0. This structure shows that the binding of the inhibitor's hydrophilic head to the catalytic residues Tyr48 and His110 differs from that found previously with porcine AR2. The difference is attributed to a change in the protonation state of the inhibitor (pK(a) = 4.52) when soaked with crystals of human (at pH 5.0) or pig lens AR2 (at pH 6.2). This work demonstrates how strongly the detailed binding of the inhibitor's polar head depends on its protonation state.

Breast reconstruction and tissue expansion in irradiated versus not irradiated women after mastectomy

Thirty-five women whose breast cancer had been treated by radiation and 111 in whom it had not underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with the tissue expansion technique after modified radical mastectomy. Their records were reviewed and in a questionnaire the patients reported their own opinion on the results. The two groups differed significantly, because those patients who had been irradiated had a more painful course of expansion and a less over-expansion. Their reconstructed breasts were harder, had more deformities, and they required significantly more capsulotomies. The irradiated group also reported less satisfaction with the cosmetic results and more unfulfilled expectations. Tissue expansion cannot therefore be recommended as a routine procedure for breast reconstruction in patients after irradiation. However, our results do not show whether other methods are better for these patients.