Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND

The best treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes in whom treatment with metformin alone fails to achieve adequate glycaemic control is debated. We aimed to compare the long-term effects of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas, given in addition to metformin, on cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

TOSCA.IT was a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic clinical trial, in which patients aged 50-75 years with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy (2-3 g per day) were recruited from 57 diabetes clinics in Italy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), by permuted blocks randomisation (block size 10), stratified by site and previous cardiovascular events, to add-on pioglitazone (15-45 mg) or a sulfonylurea (5-15 mg glibenclamide, 2-6 mg glimepiride, or 30-120 mg gliclazide, in accordance with local practice). The trial was unblinded, but event adjudicators were unaware of treatment assignment. The primary outcome, assessed with a Cox proportional-hazards model, was a composite of first occurrence of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or urgent coronary revascularisation, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned participants with baseline data available and without any protocol violations in relation to inclusion or exclusion criteria). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00700856.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 18, 2008, and Jan 15, 2014, 3028 patients were randomly assigned and included in the analyses. 1535 were assigned to pioglitazone and 1493 to sulfonylureas (glibenclamide 24 [2%], glimepiride 723 [48%], gliclazide 745 [50%]). At baseline, 335 (11%) participants had a previous cardiovascular event. The study was stopped early on the basis of a futility analysis after a median follow-up of 57·3 months. The primary outcome occurred in 105 patients (1·5 per 100 person-years) who were given pioglitazone and 108 (1·5 per 100 person-years) who were given sulfonylureas (hazard ratio 0·96, 95% CI 0·74-1·26, p=0·79). Fewer patients had hypoglycaemias in the pioglitazone group than in the sulfonylureas group (148 [10%] vs 508 [34%], p<0·0001). Moderate weight gain (less than 2 kg, on average) occurred in both groups. Rates of heart failure, bladder cancer, and fractures were not significantly different between treatment groups.

INTERPRETATION

In this long-term, pragmatic trial, incidence of cardiovascular events was similar with sulfonylureas (mostly glimepiride and gliclazide) and pioglitazone as add-on treatments to metformin. Both of these widely available and affordable treatments are suitable options with respect to efficacy and adverse events, although pioglitazone was associated with fewer hypoglycaemia events.

FUNDING

Italian Medicines Agency, Diabete Ricerca, and Italian Diabetes Society.

Erlotinib enhances the proapoptotic activity of cytotoxic agents and synergizes with paclitaxel in poorly-differentiated thyroid carcinoma cells

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic role of EGFR inhibitors in thyroid malignancies is still controversial even though the full activation of EGF signaling has recently been proposed as involved in the dedifferentiation of human thyroid cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Agents which target EGFR signaling (erlotinib, cetuximab and panitumumab) were evaluated at preclinical level in a panel of thyroid tumor cell lines.

RESULTS

Erlotinib induced a dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation together with inhibition of EGF-induced AKT and ERK1/2 signaling only in poorly-differentiated thyroid carcinoma FRO cells. By contrast, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies were inactive. Of note, erlotinib enhanced the proapoptotic activity of doxorubicin and paclitaxel and exhibited synergy with paclitaxel in poorly-differentiated thyroid carcinoma cells.

CONCLUSION

EGFR signaling may represent a molecular target only in poorly-differentiated thyroid carcinoma cells, and agents that inhibit EGFR tyrosine kinase may be more effective than monoclonal antibodies which target the extracellular domain of the receptor.