Return to Golf After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of the Literature

CONTEXT

Patients experiencing pain from femoral acetabular impingement and considering hip arthroscopy may be concerned about their timeline to resume activities they enjoy, such as golf.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to review current literature on return-to-play data after hip arthroscopy and to provide clinicians with data to set proper expectations with patients.

DATA SOURCES

The following terms were used to search PubMed and Embase electronic databases on October 18, 2023: hip, arthroscopy, arthroscopic, golf.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they were in the English language, of Level 1 to 4 evidence, and contained data specific to golfers undergoing hip arthroscopy. Studies were excluded if they did not designate participants as golfers or did not specify return-to-play data. Editorials, case reports, and review articles were excluded. Screening was completed by 2 authors in a blind and duplicate manner.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

DATA EXTRACTION

The following datapoints were extracted from each study: hip pathology and arthroscopic procedure data; number of players returning to golf and time from surgery to return; outcome score(s); and rehabilitation details. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.

RESULTS

The search returned 400 studies, of which 4 were included for analysis. Of these 4 studies, 2 specified return-to-play time. Of 95 golfers, 90 (94.7%) returned to golf successfully after arthroscopic hip surgery. Subjective and objective outcome scores improved postoperatively, including an increased average drive distance.

CONCLUSION

Return to golf after hip arthroscopy is highly probable, with approximately 95% of patients throughout literature returning to play. A mean return time of 4.7 months for professional golfers and 7.2 months for amateurs, alongside improved subjective outcomes and performance metrics postsurgery, suggest patients can expect a relatively quick return to the course with similar or improved performance.

The Effects of Single Accreditation and Pass/Fail Licensing Exams on Osteopathic Medical Students Applying to Surgical Residency Programs

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of single accreditation and pass/fail licensing exams on osteopathic (DO) medical students applying for surgical residency.

DESIGN

Electronic surveys were distributed to 1509 program directors (PD) in 10 surgical specialties. PDs were separated into 2categories based on their program's accreditation status prior to single accreditation: formerly accredited by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) or not accredited by the AOA. Separate chi-squared and binomial tests were used to determine statistical differences between PDs in each category and within each surgical specialty.

SETTING

Voluntary, anonymous, electronic survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred survey responses were received (response rate 19.8%) and 234 responses were included in statistical analyses. Sixty-six responses were excluded because the survey was incomplete, the survey was not completed by a PD, or the PD indicated disqualification of DO applicants from matching at that program.

RESULTS

The majority of PDs in both categories recommend or require that DO students take both United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step1 [Χ2 (2, N = 234) = 8.939, p = 0.011] and USMLE Step 2 CK [Χ2 (2, N = 234) = 4.161, p = 0.125] despite pass/fail outcomes only on Step 1 and Level 1. When deciding whom to interview, PDs in both categories highly ranked USMLE Step 2 CK scores and letters of recommendation (LOR). Formerly-AOA-accredited programs highly ranked COMLEX-USA Level 2 scores (p = < 0.001) and completion of an audition rotation (p = 0.001). Non-AOA-accredited programs highly ranked the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) (p = < 0.001) and clerkship grades/evaluations (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences exist in programs despite single accreditation. DO applicants should take both USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK to be considered competitive for any surgical specialty. Additionally, DO students should prioritize formerly-AOA-accredited programs for audition rotations.

The Complication of a Retained Broken Distal Interlocking Screw Within a Cephalomedullary Nail During Conversion Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report

In patients who undergo femoral fracture fixation with a cephalomedullary nail, the breakage of one or more of the distal interlocking screws is a well-described phenomenon. The presence of a broken interlocking screw in patients who require the removal of their cephalomedullary nail presents a unique challenge. The broken interlocking screw may be retrieved, or the screw may be retained if it is not engaged within the nail and the nail can safely be removed while leaving the broken screw fragment behind. We report a hip conversion arthroplasty case with a broken interlocking screw where the nail was removed with ease and the broken screw was assumed to have been left behind. Cerclage wires were placed for an apparent proximal femoral fracture. Postoperative X-rays demonstrated a large lucency tracking from the prior location of the distal interlocking screw to the calcar region. This finding made it evident that the broken screw had been retained in the nail and was dragged up the femur upon nail removal, causing a large gouge spanning the entire femur.