1
|
Viard MC, Grandgenèvre P, Bubrovszky M, Coisne E, Plancke L, Notredame CE, Wathelet M. [Impact of the suicidal crisis intervention training program on the confidence and skills of hospital professionals in the Hauts-de-France region]. Encephale 2023; 49:504-509. [PMID: 35985851 DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Suicide is a major public health issue given its huge human and economic consequences. Symptoms prior to suicide are often not specific. Nevertheless, the majority of suicidal people express suicidal thoughts, and nearly one in two meet a health professional in the period preceding the act. Being able to recognize the warnings and intervene during the suicidal crisis, defined as a mental crisis where the major risk is suicide, is to seize the opportunity to postpone the suicidal plan and to gain time to implement in place lasting strategies to combat suffering. Thus, the training for suicidal crisis intervention is a major axis of the suicide prevention strategy. Recently, crisis intervention training programs have been updated with knowledge accumulated since the early 2000's. In France, one of the countries most concerned by suicide, the Hauts-de-France region is one of the most impacted. In this context, the Regional Health Agency of Hauts-de-France included in its Regional Health Program of 2018-2023 the training of healthcare workers who work with high suicidal risk patients. The suicidal crisis intervention training program (SCIT) has been introduced to hospital staffs in Hauts-de-France. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this program. METHODS Eight training sessions with 15 to 21 participants were carried out from 2019 November to 2021 January in the Hauts-de-France region. Participants were volunteer healthcare professionals in direct contact with suicidal crisis patients. The training included three modules. The first one concerned the suicidal crisis intervention training: definition of the suicidal crisis, typology of the crisis, vulnerability development, crisis evaluation and crisis intervention practice. The second concerned the evaluation with the RED scale (Risk-Emergency-Danger) and the adequate patient orientation to a psychiatric unit. The third was dedicated to the Gatekeeper training with the constitution of a Gatekeeper network to enhance the capacity to detect suicidal risk and to orient the concerned person towards an adequate evaluation or care organization. We evaluated the first two levels of the Kirkpatrick's model: level 1) the participant's satisfaction (rated out of 10), and level 2) the degree of confidence in their professional abilities (rated out of 10) and their skills in responding to a person in a suicidal crisis (using the SIRI-2-VF - French version of the Suicide Intervention Response Inventory-2). The participants were interviewed before (T0), just after (T1) and at one month of training (T2). RESULTS Among the 141 health professionals who followed the training, 139 answered the questionnaire at least one time (13 psychologists, 22 doctors, 97 nurses and 7 head nurses). The participation rates were 99.3 % at T0, 96.4 % at T1 and 46.0 % at T2. Most of the participants were nurses (69.8 %), and 33.1 % of the respondents declared they had already followed a suicidal crisis training. The satisfaction with the training was evaluated at 8.6 (± 1.3) out of 10. There was no significant difference among the professions, neither between those having already received or not a previous training. The self-perceived capacity to manage a suicidal crisis was rate 6.8 (± 1.8) out of 10 at T0. There was a significant increase just after the training (8.1±1.2 vs 6,8±1,8, p<0,001) which persisted at 1 month (8.1±1.1 vs 6.8±1.8, P<0.001). The score at the SIRI-2-VF was 15.0 (± 4.2) out of 30 at T0. There was a significant increase just after the training (17.5±3.5 vs 15.0±4.2, P<0.001), which persisted at 1 month (17.0±4.0 vs 15.0±4.2, P<0.001). DISCUSSION This is the first evaluation of the suicidal crisis intervention training program. This program increased and homogenized the competency of the participants to manage suicidal ideation and behaviors. Those who followed a previous training maintained higher scores than the others, which shows the importance of repeated training to maintain a satisfying level of knowledge over the long term. One of the strengths of this training is the use of roleplay which enhances the learning and abilities to interact with people at suicidal risk. It seems important to integrate a suicidal crisis intervention training in the cursus of health students to avoid suicide and the dramatic consequences for the entourage and the health professionals who are confronted with it. CONCLUSION The SCIT program showed encouraging results in terms of confidence and capacity of the healthcare professionals to intervene in suicidal crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M-C Viard
- Fédération régionale de recherche en santé mentale et psychiatrie (F2RSMPsy) Hauts-de-France, Saint-André-lez-Lille, France
| | - P Grandgenèvre
- Université de Lille, Inserm, CHU de Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, 59000 Lille, France; Département de psychiatrie, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - M Bubrovszky
- Fédération régionale de recherche en santé mentale et psychiatrie (F2RSMPsy) Hauts-de-France, Saint-André-lez-Lille, France; Établissement Public de santé mentale de l'agglomération Lilloise (EPSM-AL), Saint-André-lez-Lille, France
| | - E Coisne
- Fédération régionale de recherche en santé mentale et psychiatrie (F2RSMPsy) Hauts-de-France, Saint-André-lez-Lille, France
| | - L Plancke
- Fédération régionale de recherche en santé mentale et psychiatrie (F2RSMPsy) Hauts-de-France, Saint-André-lez-Lille, France
| | - C-E Notredame
- Université de Lille, Inserm, CHU de Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, 59000 Lille, France; Département de psychiatrie, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - M Wathelet
- Fédération régionale de recherche en santé mentale et psychiatrie (F2RSMPsy) Hauts-de-France, Saint-André-lez-Lille, France; Université de Lille, Inserm, CHU de Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, 59000 Lille, France; Département de psychiatrie, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France; Centre National de Ressources et Résilience (CN2R), 59000 Lille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Notredame CE, Wathelet M, Morgiève M, Grandgenèvre P, Debien C, Mannoni C, Pauwels N, Ducrocq F, Leaune E, Binder P, Berrouiguet S, Walter M, Courtet P, Vaiva G, Thomas P. The 3114: A new professional helpline to swing the French suicide prevention in a new paradigm. Eur Psychiatry 2022:1-11. [PMID: 36203338 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C-E Notredame
- CHU Lille, Psychiatry Department, F-59000Lille, France
- PSY Lab, Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Centre, INSERM U1172, Lille University, F-59000Lille, France
- Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, F-86280 Saint-Benoît, France
| | - M Wathelet
- CHU Lille, Psychiatry Department, F-59000Lille, France
- Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, F-86280 Saint-Benoît, France
- Fédération Régionale de Recherche en Psychiatrie et Santé Mentale des Hauts-de-France, F-59350St-André, France
- Centre National de Ressources et Résilience pour les psychotraumatismes (Cn2r), F-75000 Paris and F-59000Lille, France
| | - M Morgiève
- Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, F-86280 Saint-Benoît, France
- CERMES3, CNRS, INSERM, University of Paris, F-75006, Paris, France
| | - P Grandgenèvre
- CHU Lille, Psychiatry Department, F-59000Lille, France
- PSY Lab, Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Centre, INSERM U1172, Lille University, F-59000Lille, France
- Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, F-86280 Saint-Benoît, France
| | - C Debien
- CHU Lille, Psychiatry Department, F-59000Lille, France
- Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, F-86280 Saint-Benoît, France
| | - C Mannoni
- Fédération Régionale de Recherche en Psychiatrie et Santé Mentale des Hauts-de-France, F-59350St-André, France
| | - N Pauwels
- Fédération Régionale de Recherche en Psychiatrie et Santé Mentale des Hauts-de-France, F-59350St-André, France
| | - F Ducrocq
- CHU Lille, Psychiatry Department, F-59000Lille, France
- Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, F-86280 Saint-Benoît, France
| | - E Leaune
- Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, F-86280 Saint-Benoît, France
- Center for Suicide Prevention, Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, F-69500Bron, France
| | - P Binder
- Department of general medicine, Medicine and pharmacy University of Poitiers, F-86000Poitiers, France
| | - S Berrouiguet
- Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, F-86280 Saint-Benoît, France
- LaTIM, INSERM, UMR1101, F-29200Brest, France
- CHU Brest, Psychiatry Department, F-29609Brest, France
| | - M Walter
- Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, F-86280 Saint-Benoît, France
- EA 7479 SPURBO, West Brittany University, F-29238Brest, France
- Department of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, CHU Montpellier, F-34000Montpellier, France
| | - P Courtet
- Department of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, CHU Montpellier, F-34000Montpellier, France
- IGF, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, F-34000Montpellier, France
| | - G Vaiva
- CHU Lille, Psychiatry Department, F-59000Lille, France
- PSY Lab, Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Centre, INSERM U1172, Lille University, F-59000Lille, France
- Groupement d'Étude et de Prévention du Suicide, F-86280 Saint-Benoît, France
- Centre National de Ressources et Résilience pour les psychotraumatismes (Cn2r), F-75000 Paris and F-59000Lille, France
| | - P Thomas
- CHU Lille, Psychiatry Department, F-59000Lille, France
- PSY Lab, Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Centre, INSERM U1172, Lille University, F-59000Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kiesmann E, Grandgenèvre P, Mallet J, Dubertret C, Vaiva G. Impact of emotional and cognitive saliency on visual search in post-traumatic stress disorder. Eur Psychiatry 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionPatients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have shown disturbances in visual information treatment. However, most of studies demonstrated attentional bias towards emotional stimuli by using non-ecological paradigm. The paradigm of change blindness offers the possibility of studying sensitivity to the sudden irruption of visual information with ecological stimuli.Objectives/AimsTo compare the explicit detection with the implicit detection by using respectively motor response and eye tracking in patients with PSTD and controls.MethodsFifteen patients with PTSD and fifteen healthy controls had to detect changes in 96 scenes with (1) no change, (2) one neutral change or (3) one emotional pleasant or unpleasant change. We measured the participant's speed and accuracy in explicitly reporting the changes via motor responses, and their capacity to implicitly detect changes via eye movements.ResultsThe patients showed a trend towards slower explicit detection for the emotional change (P = 0.06) and more specifically for unpleasant change (P = 0.054). The two groups did not differ for implicit detection.ConclusionPatients tend to explicitly detect more slowly emotional change (but not neutral), especially for unpleasant change. This could be the result of a lack of access to consciousness of the emotional information. The emotional visual information treatment in PSTD could require more attentional processes than the non-emotional visual information and then lead to a decrease of the available attentional resources for the explicit task.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
Collapse
|