WITHDRAWN Simulation training in pediatric anesthesia

Ahead of Print article withdrawn by publisher Although anesthesia has become increasingly safe, there remain significant differences among countries in terms of training standards and practice regulations. There is evidence and widespread consensus that the occasional practice of pediatric anesthesia should be avoided, and there is a trend towards the centralization of pediatric surgical activity. Limited access to adequate learning opportunities and reduced practice in non-pediatric centers can be addressed with the integrated use of traditional and modern training tools, and the availability of different pediatric simulator mannequins is rapidly filling the previously existing gap in simulation training. Medical simulation can be particularly useful in allowing the teaching and integration of technical and non-technical skills, and simulation courses for training and continuing medical education in pediatric anesthesia have been designed. In recent years, focus has been directed at validating the efficacy of simulation training and at its cost-effectiveness for improving learning and patient outcomes. Future challenges will include the best way to integrate simulation into the existing pediatric anesthesia training curricula, the determination of better evidence of its impact on clinical performance and the design and validation of assessment tools for technical and non-technical skills.

Postoperative Sedation and Analgesia After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

The goal of sedation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is to produce a calm and comfortable child, free from pain and discomfort. Children receiving liver transplantation need analgesics to control pain from surgical incisions, drains, vascular access, or endotracheal suctioning. Sedatives are used to facilitate the delivery of nursing care, to prevent self-extubation, and to facilitate mechanical ventilation. Optimal sedation produces a state in which the patient is somnolent, responsive to the environment but untroubled by it, and with no excessive movements. A common problem in the PICU is the fluctuation in the delivery of sedatives and analgesics depending on the health care providers and on a breakdown in communication between physicians and nurses to define end points for pharmacological therapy. This variability more often leads to oversedation rather than undersedation. Oversedation delays extubation, promotes ventilator-associated pneumonia, and increases the risk of reintubation. The use of written sedation policies to guide practice at the bedside reduces the length of time for which patients require mechanical ventilation and the length of PICU stay. Protocols for drug administration practices increase patient safety during mechanical ventilation, promote nursing autonomy, and facilitate communication between nurses and physicians as well as between nurses.

Randomized, double-blind, phase III, controlled trial comparing levobupivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% by the caudal route in children

BACKGROUND

The rationale for replacing racemic bupivacaine with the s-enantiomers levobupivacaine and ropivacaine is to provide a wider margin of safety with the same analgesic efficacy and less postoperative motor block. In a randomized, double-blind, phase III, controlled trial we compared the caudal administration of levobupivacaine 0.25% and ropivacaine 0.25% with bupivacaine 0.25% in children.

METHODS

Ninety-nine ASA I-II children less than 10 yr old scheduled for elective sub-umbilical surgery were randomized to receive caudal block with bupivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.25% or levobupivacaine 0.25%. The primary outcome of the study was the clinical efficacy of the caudal block during the operation. Secondary outcome measures were analgesic onset time, pain relief after the operation and residual motor blockade.

RESULTS

The proportion of children with effective analgesia during the operation was similar among groups. There were no significant differences in the analgesic onset time of the caudal block. Bupivacaine produced a significant incidence of residual motor block compared with levobupivacaine or ropivacaine at wake-up (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in the number of patients receiving rescue analgesia after surgery. However, analgesic block lasted significantly longer in patients receiving bupivacaine (P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

During sub-umbilical surgery, caudal levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine provided comparable analgesic efficacy. Bupivacaine produced a higher incidence of residual motor blockade and a longer analgesic block than ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.

Importance of monitoring in high risk surgical patients

Increased metabolic requirements by surgical trauma is responsible of the changes in cardiac index and oxygen delivery (DO2), represent compensatory adaptation in circulatory functions stimulated by increased metabolic needs. The amount of this compensation varies with age, gender, severity of illness, operation type, associated medical conditions, shock duration, complications, organ failure, and outcome. Hypotension, low cardiac index, arterial hemoglobin desaturation, low oxygen delivery, and low oxygen consumption served and sometimes are persistent over time; these abnormalities were more notorious in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors. Lethal circulatory dysfunctions may begin during the intraoperative period but become more apparent before and are responsible of organ failure during postoperative stages. An approach that measures adequacy of tissue perfusion is a fundamental objective in anesthesia and critical care medicine. Traditional measures of tissue perfusion have included arterial pressure monitoring, urine output, arterial pH and blood lactate. These measures have major limitations, and changes in these measures may significantly lag behind clinical interventions. After trauma and major surgery despite normalization of these variables, global tissue hypoxia may still persist. Unrecognized or untreated conditions may lead to organ failure and death. In critical or high risk patients, early invasive monitoring is necessary to precisely define the adequacy of the cardiac response and to individually tailor therapy. The care provided in the first hours significantly impacts the progression of organ failure and mortality. Although this period is brief compared with the total length of hospitalization, physiological determinants of outcome may be established before ICU admission. Early postoperative monitoring revealed differences in survivor and nonsurvivor patterns and provided goals for improving outcome.