1
|
Harlos CH, Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers A, Mahmud SM, Czaykowski PM. The risk of colorectal cancer is not increased after a diagnosis of urothelial cancer: a population-based study. Curr Oncol 2017; 23:391-397. [PMID: 28050135 DOI: 10.3747/co.23.3304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The data about whether patients with a prior urothelial cancer (uca) are at increased risk of colorectal cancer (crc) are conflicting. We used a competing risks analysis to determine the risk of crc after uca. METHODS Historical cohorts were assembled by record linkage of Manitoba Cancer Registry and Manitoba Health databases. The incidence of crc for individuals with uca as their first cancer between 1987 and 2009 was compared with the incidence for randomly selected age-and sex-matched individuals without a cancer diagnosis at the index date (uca diagnosis date). Three competing outcomes (crc, another primary cancer, and death) were evaluated by competing risks proportional hazards models with adjustment for relevant confounders. RESULTS The cohorts of 4591 patients with uca and 22,312 without uca were followed for a total of 179,287 person-years (py). After uca, the rate of subsequent colon cancer in uca patients was 4.5 per 1000 py compared with 3.6 per 1000 py in the non-cancer cohort. In the multivariable analysis, no overall increase in crc risk was observed for patients first diagnosed with uca (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 1.1; p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS Because of similar crc risk, a similar crc screening strategy should be applied for individuals with and without uca.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Harlos
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba
| | - H Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba; Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba and
| | - Z Nugent
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Cancer-Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - A Demers
- Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba and; Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Cancer-Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - S M Mahmud
- Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba and
| | - P M Czaykowski
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba; Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba; Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba and
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Easaw JC, Shea-Budgell MA, Wu CMJ, Czaykowski PM, Kassis J, Kuehl B, Lim HJ, MacNeil M, Martinusen D, McFarlane PA, Meek E, Moodley O, Shivakumar S, Tagalakis V, Welch S, Kavan P. Canadian consensus recommendations on the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Part 2: treatment. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 22:144-55. [PMID: 25908913 DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (vte). Anticoagulation therapy is used to treat vte; however, patients with cancer have unique clinical circumstances that can often make decisions surrounding the administration of therapeutic anticoagulation complicated. No national Canadian guidelines on the management of established cancer-associated thrombosis have been published. We therefore aimed to develop a consensus-based, evidence-informed guideline on the topic. PubMed was searched for clinical trials and meta-analyses published between 2002 and 2013. Reference lists of key articles were hand-searched for additional publications. Content experts from across Canada were assembled to review the evidence and make recommendations. Low molecular weight heparin is the treatment of choice for cancer patients with established vte. Direct oral anticoagulants are not recommended for the treatment of vte at this time. Specific clinical scenarios, including the presence of an indwelling venous catheter, renal insufficiency, and thrombocytopenia, warrant modifications in the therapeutic administration of anticoagulation therapy. Patients with recurrent vte should receive extended (>3 months) anticoagulant therapy. Incidental vte should generally be treated in the same manner as symptomatic vte. There is no evidence to support the monitoring of anti-factor Xa levels in clinically stable cancer patients receiving prophylactic anticoagulation; however, levels of anti-factor Xa could be checked at baseline and periodically thereafter in patients with renal insufficiency. Follow-up and education about the signs and symptoms of vte are important components of ongoing patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Easaw
- Alberta: Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary (Easaw, Shea-Budgell); Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary (Shea-Budgell); Division of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Wu); Guideline Utilization Resource Unit, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary (Meek)
| | - M A Shea-Budgell
- Alberta: Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary (Easaw, Shea-Budgell); Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary (Shea-Budgell); Division of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Wu); Guideline Utilization Resource Unit, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary (Meek)
| | - C M J Wu
- Alberta: Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary (Easaw, Shea-Budgell); Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary (Shea-Budgell); Division of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Wu); Guideline Utilization Resource Unit, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary (Meek)
| | - P M Czaykowski
- Manitoba: Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (Czaykowski)
| | - J Kassis
- Quebec: Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal (Kassis); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal (Tagalakis); Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal (Kavan)
| | - B Kuehl
- Ontario: Scientific Insights Consulting Group, Mississauga (Kuehl); Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto (McFarlane); Department of Oncology, Western University, London (Welch)
| | - H J Lim
- British Columbia: Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Lim); BC Provincial Renal Agency and Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia and Royal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria (Martinusen)
| | - M MacNeil
- Nova Scotia: Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax (MacNeil); Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University and Capital District Health Authority, Halifax (Shivakumar)
| | - D Martinusen
- British Columbia: Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Lim); BC Provincial Renal Agency and Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia and Royal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria (Martinusen)
| | - P A McFarlane
- Ontario: Scientific Insights Consulting Group, Mississauga (Kuehl); Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto (McFarlane); Department of Oncology, Western University, London (Welch)
| | - E Meek
- Alberta: Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary (Easaw, Shea-Budgell); Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary (Shea-Budgell); Division of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Wu); Guideline Utilization Resource Unit, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary (Meek)
| | - O Moodley
- Saskatchewan: Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon (Moodley)
| | - S Shivakumar
- Nova Scotia: Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax (MacNeil); Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University and Capital District Health Authority, Halifax (Shivakumar)
| | - V Tagalakis
- Quebec: Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal (Kassis); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal (Tagalakis); Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal (Kavan)
| | - S Welch
- Ontario: Scientific Insights Consulting Group, Mississauga (Kuehl); Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto (McFarlane); Department of Oncology, Western University, London (Welch)
| | - P Kavan
- Quebec: Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal (Kassis); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal (Tagalakis); Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal (Kavan)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dowling AJ, Czaykowski PM, Krahn MD, Moore MJ, Tannock IF. Prostate specific antigen response to mitoxantrone and prednisone in patients with refractory prostate cancer: prognostic factors and generalizability of a multicenter trial to clinical practice. J Urol 2000; 163:1481-5. [PMID: 10751862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We determine prostate specific antigen (PSA) response and durability, and prognostic factors associated with response and survival in patients with symptomatic hormone refractory prostate cancer treated with mitoxantrone and prednisone at a single institution. We then compare the results with those of a randomized phase III clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of all 133 patients treated with mitoxantrone and prednisone at Princess Margaret Hospital since 1994 was performed. PSA response and duration, and overall survival were determined as well as the influence of baseline factors on these outcome parameters. Results were compared to those for patients randomized to receive mitoxantrone and prednisone in the Canadian clinical trial which demonstrated palliative benefit of this regimen. RESULTS Patients treated after trial closure had shorter survival (p = 0.003) but represented a poorer prognosis cohort. PSA response of the trial and post-trial cases was 34% and 28%, respectively (p = 0.36), and median duration of response was 118 and 175 days or greater, respectively. Factors predictive of PSA response in the non-trial cohort were longer time from diagnosis of prostate cancer (p = 0. 027) and higher baseline PSA (p = 0.013). Factors predictive of increased survival in both groups were younger age (p <0.04), better baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p <0. 02), and higher hemoglobin (p </=0.05) and PSA response (p <0.0001). Gleason score was not predictive of response or survival. CONCLUSIONS Although patients treated outside of the trial had poorer prognostic features, rates of PSA response to mitoxantrone and prednisone were comparable. Factors predictive of survival were similar in the 2 cohorts. Results of the randomized trial are generalizable to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Dowling
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, British Columbia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Czaykowski PM, Moore MJ, Tannock IF. High risk of vascular events in patients with urothelial transitional cell carcinoma treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy. J Urol 1998; 160:2021-4. [PMID: 9817314 DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199812010-00022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We define the incidence of thromboembolic events in patients receiving multiagent chemotherapy for urothelial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review of 271 consecutive patients who received multi-agent cisplatin based chemotherapy for transitional cell carcinoma at Princess Margaret Hospital between 1986 and 1996 was performed. Indications for chemotherapy included adjuvant treatment following resection of high risk disease (13%), and primary management of locally advanced and metastatic disease (87%). RESULTS Vascular events occurred in 35 patients (12.9%) receiving chemotherapy, including 18 deep vein thromboses, 9 pulmonary emboli, 7 arterial thromboses, 3 cerebrovascular events, 1 superficial phlebitis and 1 angina pectoris (4 patients had deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus). Three events were directly fatal. Overall, 3.6% of chemotherapy cycles were complicated by vascular events with 27 events (77%) occurring during the first 2 cycles. Risk factors for vascular events included a large pelvic mass and concomitant peripheral vascular or coronary artery disease. Substantial morbidity was associated with vascular events and median hospital stay of 10 days. CONCLUSIONS There is a substantial risk of venous and arterial vascular events in patients receiving cisplatin based chemotherapy for urothelial transitional cell carcinoma. Prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered in patients with risk factors for thromboembolic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M Czaykowski
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Michael M, Tannock IF, Czaykowski PM, Moore MJ. Adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk urothelial transitional cell carcinoma: the Princess Margaret Hospital experience. Br J Urol 1998; 82:366-72. [PMID: 9772872 DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00746.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the outcome of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy after surgery for patients with locally advanced urothelial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder and upper urinary tract who were at high risk for recurrence or metastatic spread. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five patients (27 men and eight women, median age 59 years) received adjuvant chemotherapy and were followed for a median of 31 months from surgery (range 12-109). All patients had undergone surgery (cystectomy, nephrectomy, nephrouretectomy), with removal of all evident tumour from the following primary sites: bladder (29), renal pelvis (three) and ureter (three). Thirty patients had stage pT3 or greater, 22 had node-positive disease and 16 had vascular invasion. The median interval from surgery to chemotherapy was 2 months. Patients received a median of four courses of cisplatin, methotrexate and vinblastine (n = 23) or the same drugs with doxorubicin (n = 12). RESULTS Toxicity included nine episodes of febrile neutropenia (one fatal) and six episodes of thromboembolism (one fatal). Eighteen patients (51%) remain alive and free of apparent disease with a median follow-up of 31 months. Actuarial overall and relapse-free survival were 64% and 57% at 2 years and 47% and 53% at 5 years, respectively. For the 22 node-positive patients, the median relapse-free survival and overall survival was 22 months and 33 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients with urothelial TCC at high risk of relapse after radical surgery can have a reasonable chance of long-term survival with systemic adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment is associated with toxicity. The benefits of treatment should be addressed in a large randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Michael
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Siu LL, Czaykowski PM, Tannock IF. Phase I/II study of the CAPABLE regimen for patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma of the nasopharynx. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:2514-21. [PMID: 9667272 DOI: 10.1200/jco.1998.16.7.2514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of aggressive combination chemotherapy in patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma of the nasopharynx (NPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In a prospective phase I/II study, 90 chemotherapy-naive patients with NPC (21 with very advanced locoregional disease, 18 with locoregional persistent and/or recurrent disease postradiotherapy, and 51 with metastatic disease) were treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, methotrexate, and bleomycin (CAPABLE). Two schedules of this regimen were used over a 9-year period, with the second schedule being a modification of the first in an attempt to minimize treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS Of 21 patients with very advanced local disease, one had a complete response (CR) and 17 had partial responses (PRs) (response rate, 86%). Seventeen of these 21 patients had subsequent radiotherapy. Of 17 patients with measurable locoregional disease either persistent and/or recurrent postradiotherapy, there were four CRs and three PRs (response rate, 41%). Of 44 patients with measurable metastatic disease, there were three CRs and 32 PRs (response rate, 80%). The median survival durations for these three groups of patients were 47, 16, and 14 months, respectively. The two chemotherapy schedules had similar received dose-intensities (RDIs) and produced similar response rates and survival. Toxicity was severe with frequent mucositis and myelosuppression. Overall, 37 patients required at least one hospital admission for management of toxic side effects and there were seven drug-related deaths. Three of the deaths were due to fulminant hepatitis, likely from reactivation of hepatitis B. CONCLUSION This aggressive regimen provides a high rate of tumor response, but limited palliation for most patients with recurrent or metastatic NPC. The results with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy for patients with very advanced local disease are encouraging, but proof of benefit would require evaluation in a randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L L Siu
- Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|