Chronic schistosomiasis imported in France: A retrospective multicentre analysis of 532 patients, calling for international recommendations

BACKGROUND

Schistosomiasis is a major public health issue for migrants. This study aims to describe the clinical presentation and management of imported schistosomiasis in France.

METHODS

We included all new cases of schistosomiasis in patients aged ≥18 years, defined by a positive specific Western blot and/or a positive parasitological analysis of urine, stool or biopsy, between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, in 4 laboratories in Paris and Western France.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 532 patients were included. Mean age was 37 years (18-91), and 461/532 (87 %) were men. Among 476/532 (89 %) patients born in an endemic area, 433 (91 %) were born in sub-Saharan Africa. Most of the patients (405/532, 76 %) had only a positive serology, and 127/532 (24 %) had ova on microscopic examination. Among 361/532 (68 %) who had at least one urine, stool or biopsy analysis, microscopic analysis was positive in 127 (35 %). Imaging showed lesions compatible with schistosomiasis in 88/164 (54 %) patients with clinical symptoms and 13/29 (45 %) patients without (p = 0.5). Patients who arrived in France less than one year before diagnosis were more likely to have clinical symptoms than those who arrived in France 1-5 years and >5 years prior to diagnosis (52 %, 41 % and 43 %, respectively, p = 0.03). Two-hundred and seventeen patients (40.8 %) were left untreated.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 50 % of patients with imported chronic schistosomiasis have radiological abnormalities, whether they are symptomatic or not, and management is heterogeneous. Multidisciplinary international guidelines are requested to clarify the management of this neglected disease.

Prognostic value of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels in COVID-19 pneumonia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), expressed by damaged type II pneumocytes, is useful in the diagnosis and severity assessment of many diffuse interstitial lung diseases. The objective of our study was to determine the prognostic value of the initial KL-6 plasma level in COVID-19 pneumonia.

METHODS

All patients hospitalized for a suspected COVID-19 pneumonia between March and May 2020 in our Chest department of a French university hospital were included. KL-6 serum concentrations were measured within 72 h of diagnostic suspicion by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay Survival analysis was performed using a Cox regression and modeled by a Kaplan-Meier curve.

RESULTS

Sixty-six COVID-19 patients (average age = 64 ± 14 years, 71.2 % males) with KL-6 serum measurement were included. Median KL-6 serum concentration was 409 ± 312 U/mL. KL-6 was significantly higher in men (p = 0.003), elders (p = 0.0001) and in patients with greater Charlson's score (p = 0.002). Higher KL-6 concentration was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (HR: 8.66; 95 % CI:1.1-69.2, p = 0.014), radiological extension of lesions on chest CT scan (p = 0.004) and higher WHO severity score (p = 0.042), but not with admission in intensive care unit. In 9 (14 %) non-surviving COVID-19 patients, KL-6 serum concentration increased whereas it remained stable or decreased in survivors. At 3 months follow-up (n = 48), DLCO was negatively correlated with the initial KL-6 value (r = 0.47, p = 0.001), while FVC, FEV1 and MRC score were not.

CONCLUSION

Initial KL-6 serum concentration is significantly associated with in-hospital mortality, unfavorable outcome, and persistent impairment of DLCO at 3 months. Initial KL-6 plasma determination appears as a prognostic biomarker in COVID-19 pneumonia.

Cell and cytokine analyses from bronchoalveolar lavage in non-critical COVID-19 pneumonia

Cell and cytokine analyses from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia are poorly described. This study focused on patients hospitalized in the non-intensive care unit for either suspected COVID-19 pneumonia or persistent respiratory symptoms following proven COVID-19 pneumonia. Overall, 54 patients who underwent BAL between April 2020 and February 2021 for suspected or follow-up of proven COVID-19 pneumonia were included. Based on SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test results and clinical follow-up, three pulmonary disease groups were defined: non-COVID-19 (n = 20), acute COVID-19 (n = 13), and post-COVID-19 (n = 24) pneumonia patients. Cytological and cytokine analyses were performed on BAL fluid (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ, HGF, and TGF-β), with investigators blinded to the patient groups. Lymphocytic alveolitis with plasmocytes was observed in acute COVID-19 pneumonia, returning to normal post-COVID-19. The highest cytokine levels were observed in COVID-19 patients, with significantly increased IFN-γ, IL-10, and HGF levels compared to non-COVID-19 patients, while significantly decreased IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and HGF levels were noted in post-COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19 patients, correlations between IL-10, TNF-α and IFN-γ concentrations were found. Lymphocytic alveolitis with plasmacytosis was found in non-critical COVID-19 pneumonia This alveolitis is associated with the presence of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ and HGF. Alveolitis and cytokines levels decreased in post-COVID-19 pneumonia.

Respiratory recovery trajectories after severe-to-critical COVID-19: a 1-year prospective multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Survivors of severe-to-critical COVID-19 may have functional impairment, radiological sequelae and persistent symptoms requiring prolonged follow-up. This pragmatic study aimed to describe their clinical follow-up and determine their respiratory recovery trajectories, and factors that could influence them and their health-related quality of life.

METHODS

Adults hospitalised for severe-to-critical COVID-19 were evaluated at 3 months and up to 12 months post-hospital discharge in this prospective, multicentre, cohort study.

RESULTS

Among 485 enrolled participants, 293 (60%) were reassessed at 6 months and 163 (35%) at 12 months; 89 (51%) and 47 (27%) of the 173 ones initially managed with standard oxygen were reassessed at 6 and 12 months, respectively. At 3 months, 34%, 70% and 56% of the participants had a restrictive lung defect, impaired DL_CO and significant radiological sequelae, respectively. During extended follow-up, DL_CO and FVC (% of predicted value) increased by means of +4 points at 6 months, and +6 points at 12 months. Sex, body mass index, chronic respiratory disease, immunosuppression, pneumonia extent or corticosteroid use during acute COVID-19 and prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were associated with DL_CO at month 3, but not its trajectory thereafter. Among 475 (98%) patients with at least one chest computed-tomography scan during follow-up, 196 (41%) had significant sequelae on their last images.

CONCLUSION

Although pulmonary function and radiological abnormalities improved up to 1 year post-acute-COVID-19, high percentages of severe-to-critical disease survivors, including a notable proportion of those managed with standard oxygen, had significant lung sequelae and residual symptoms justifying prolonged follow-up.

Sarilumab in adults hospitalised with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia (CORIMUNO-SARI-1): An open-label randomised controlled trial

Background

Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia can have increased inflammation and elevated cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, which might be deleterious. Thus, sarilumab, a high-affinity anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, might improve the outcome of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Methods

We did a multicentric, open-label, Bayesian randomised, adaptive, phase 2/3 clinical trial, nested within the CORIMUNO-19 cohort, to test a superiority hypothesis. Patients 18 years or older hospitalised with COVID-19 in six French centres, requiring at least 3L/min of oxygen but without ventilation assistance and a WHO Clinical Progression Scale [CPS] score of 5 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based system, according to a randomisation list stratified on centre and with blocks randomly selected among 2 and 4, to receive usual care plus 400 mg of sarilumab intravenously on day 1 and on day 3 if clinically indicated (sarilumab group) or usual care alone (usual care group). Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with WHO-CPS scores greater than 5 on the 10-point scale on day 4 and survival without invasive or non-invasive ventilation at day 14. This completed trial is closed to new participants and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04324073.

Findings

165 patients were recruited from March 27 to April 6, 2020, and 148 patients were randomised (68 patients to the sarilumab group and 80 to the usual care group) and followed up for 90 days. Median age was 61·7 years [IQR 53·0–71·1] in the sarilumab group and 62·8 years [56·0–71·7] in the usual care group. In the sarilumab group 49 (72%) of 68 were men and in the usual care group 59 (78%) of 76 were men. Four patients in the usual care group withdrew consent and were not analysed. 18 (26%) of 68 patients in the sarilumab group had a WHO-CPS score greater than 5 at day 4 versus 20 (26%) of 76 in the usual care group (median posterior absolute risk difference 0·2%; 90% credible interval [CrI] −11·7 to 12·2), with a posterior probability of absolute risk difference greater than 0 of 48·9%. At day 14, 25 (37%) patients in the sarilumab and 26 (34%) patients in the usual care group needed ventilation or died, (median posterior hazard ratio [HR] 1·10; 90% CrI 0·69–1·74) with a posterior probability HR greater than 1 of 37·4%. Serious adverse events occurred in 27 (40%) patients in the sarilumab group and 28 (37%) patients in the usual care group (p=0·73).

Interpretation

Sarilumab treatment did not improve early outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the effect of sarilumab on long-term survival.

Funding

Assistance publique—Hôpitaux de Paris

Daily multidisciplinary COVID-19 meeting: Experiences from a French university hospital

Objectives

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic. In absence of official recommendations, implementing daily multidisciplinary team (MDT) COVID-19 meetings was urgently needed. Our aim was to describe our initial institutional standard operating procedures for implementing these meetings, and their impact on daily practice.

Methods

All consecutive patients who were hospitalized in our institution due to COVID 19, from March 31 to April 15, 2020, were included. Criteria to be presented at MDT meetings were defined as a proven COVID-19 by PCR or strongly suspected on CT scan, requiring hospitalization and treatment not included in the standard of care. Three investigators identified the patients who met the predefined criteria and compared the treatment and outcomes of patients with predefined criteria that were presented during MDT meeting with those not presented during MDT meeting. COVID-19 MDT meeting implementation and adhesion were also assessed by a hospital medical staff survey.

Results

In all, 318 patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 were examined in our hospital. Of these, 230 (87%) were hospitalized in a COVID-19 unit, 91 (40%) of whom met predefined MDT meeting criteria. Fifty (55%) patients were presented at a MDT meeting versus 41 (45%) were not. Complementary exploration and inclusion in the CorImmuno cohort were higher in MDT meeting group (respectively 35 vs. 15%, P = 0.03 and 80 versus 49%, P = 0.0007). Prescription of hydrocortisone hemisuccinate was higher in group of patients not presented during MDT meeting (24 vs. 51%, P = 0.007). Almost half of the patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were not presented at MDT meeting, which can be partly explained by technical software issues.

Conclusions

Multidisciplinary COVID-19 meetings helped implementing a single standard of care, avoided using treatments that were untested or currently being tested, and facilitated the inclusion of patients in prospective cohorts and therapeutic trials.