1
|
Lucendo AJ, Santander C, Savarino E, Guagnozzi D, Pérez-Martínez I, Perelló A, Guardiola-Arévalo A, Barrio J, Elena Betoré-Glaria M, Gutiérrez-Junquera C, Ciriza de los Ríos C, Racca F, Fernández-Fernández S, Blas-Jhon L, Lund Krarup A, de la Riva S, Naves JE, Carrión S, Rodríguez Oballe JA, García-Morales N, Tamarit-Sebastián S, Navarro P, Arias Á, Laserna-Mendieta EJ, Casabona-Francés S, Pérez-Fernández T, Llerena Castro R, Ghisa M, Manie D, Pellegatta G, Suárez A, Alcedo J, Gil Simón P, Teresa Palomeque M, Asensio T, Granja-Navacerrada A, de Mendoza Guena LH, Rodríguez Sánchez A, Masiques Mas L, Dainese R, Feo-Ortega S. EoE CONNECT, the European Registry of Clinical, Environmental, and Genetic Determinants in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: rationale, design, and study protocol of a large-scale epidemiological study in Europe. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221074204. [PMID: 35126668 PMCID: PMC8814964 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221074204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The growing prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) represents a considerable burden to patients and health care systems. Optimizing cost-effective management and identifying mechanisms for disease onset and progression are required. However, the paucity of large patient cohorts and heterogeneity of practice hinder the defining of optimal management of EoE. METHODS EoE CONNECT is an ongoing, prospective registry study initiated in 2016 and currently managed by EUREOS, the European Consortium for Eosinophilic Diseases of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Patients are managed and treated by their responsible specialists independently. Data recorded using a web-based system include demographic and clinical variables; patient allergies; environmental, intrapartum, and early life exposures; and family background. Symptoms are structurally assessed at every visit; endoscopic features and histological findings are recorded for each examination. Prospective treatment data are registered sequentially, with new sequences created each time a different treatment (active principle, formulation, or dose) is administered to a patient. EoE CONNECT database is actively monitored to ensure the highest data accuracy and the highest scientific and ethical standards. RESULTS EoE CONNECT is currently being conducted at 39 centers in Europe and enrolls patients of all ages with EoE. In its aim to increase knowledge, to date EoE CONNECT has provided evidence on the effectiveness of first- and second-line therapies for EoE in clinical practice, the ability of proton pump inhibitors to induce disease remission, and factors associated with improved response. Drug effects to reverse fibrous remodeling and endoscopic features of fibrosis in EoE have also been assessed. CONCLUSION This prospective registry study will provide important information on the epidemiological and clinical aspects of EoE and evidence as to the real-world and long-term effectiveness and safety of therapy. These data will potentially be a vital benchmark for planning future EoE health care services in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cecilio Santander
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain,Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Danila Guagnozzi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain,Digestive System Research Unit, Unitat de Fisiología I Fisiopatología Digestiva, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Pérez-Martínez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Antonia Perelló
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Guardiola-Arévalo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Barrio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | | | - Constanza Ciriza de los Ríos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesca Racca
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Clinic, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Sonia Fernández-Fernández
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University Hospital Severo Ochoa, Leganés, Spain
| | - Leonardo Blas-Jhon
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anne Lund Krarup
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark,Department of Acute Medicine and Trauma Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark,Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Susana de la Riva
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Juan E. Naves
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, CIBERehd, Badalona, Spain
| | - Silvia Carrión
- Gastrointestinal Motility Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Hospital de Mataró, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Mataró, Spain
| | - Juan Armando Rodríguez Oballe
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Santa María and University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Sonsoles Tamarit-Sebastián
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Tomelloso, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), Spain
| | - Pilar Navarro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Tomelloso, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), Spain
| | - Ángel Arias
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain,Research Unit, Hospital General Mancha Centro, Alcázar de San Juan, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), Spain
| | - Emilio J. Laserna-Mendieta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Tomelloso, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), Spain,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain,Clinical Laboratory, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Law ST, De La SernaHiguera C, Simón PG, Pérez-MirandaCastillo M. Comparison of clinical efficacies and safeties of lumen-apposing metal stent and conventional-type metal stent-assisted EUS-guided pancreatic wall-off necrosis drainage: a real-life experience in a tertiary hospital. Surg Endosc 2017; 32:2448-2453. [PMID: 29101565 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5946-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic wall-off necrosis (WON) with transmural stent is regarded as firstline therapy. We aimed at comparing its efficacy and safety with using fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) and lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). METHODS A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive patients with pancreatic WONs who underwent EUS-guided drainage by either FCSEMS or LAMS. RESULTS From 2011 to 2016, 68 patients (66.2% male, median age, 66.5 years) underwent WON drainage (22/68 (32.4%) using FCSEMSs of size 10 × 60 mm (14/22, Hanarostent; 8/22 Wallflex); 46/68 (67.6%) using LAMSs (38/46 and 8/46 with AXIOS of size 15 × 10 mm and 10 × 10 mm, respectively). These two groups were matched for age (66 vs. 70 years, p 0.514), APACHE II (11.5 vs. 10, p 0.693), causes [72.7 vs. 80.4% by gallstone pancreatitis (p 0.472); 9.1 vs. 10.9% by alcoholism (p 0.818)], WON size (8.5 vs. 9 cm, p 0.322), location (36.4 vs. 26.1% at pancreatic head, p 0.384; 54.5 vs. 65.2% at body/tail, p 0.395), and enterostomy site [63.6 vs. 76.1% via transgastric (p 0.285); 31.8 vs. 19.6% via transduodenal (p 0.267)] and their number of necrosectomy (p 0.978). The technical (100 vs. 93.5%, p 0.219) and clinical (95.5 vs. 93.5%, p 0.749) success and adverse event (22.7 vs. 39.1%, p 0.180; 9.1 vs. 19.6% with bleeding, p 0.271; 4.5 vs. 13% with spontaneous stent migration, p 0.28; 9.1 vs. 6.5% with dislodgement during necrosectomy, p 0.704) of the two groups were comparable without significant different. However, the LAMS group associated with early stent revision compared with FCSEMS group (log rank p 0.048). CONCLUSIONS EUS-guided drainage of WON using FCSEMSs and LAMSs are comparable in efficacy and safety; however, the latter is associated with early stent revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siu Tong Law
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong.
| | - Carlos De La SernaHiguera
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Paula Gil Simón
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|