Mouse Behavior in the Open-field Test after Meloxicam Administration

Several analgesics are suggested for pain management in mice. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatories (NSAIDs), such as meloxicam can be administered for the treatment of inflammation and acute pain; however, several side effects can occur which include gastrointestinal ulceration and renal and hepatic toxicity. We previously performed a pilot study to test the antinociceptive activity of meloxicam in mice, but we observed behavioral changes in unoperated control mice. These observations spurred further investigation. One hypothesis for the result was potential differences in formulation between commercial brands of meloxicam. Thus, this current study aimed to evaluate the effects of 3 different commercial brands of meloxicam (20 mg/kg) in the general activity of mice using the open field test. Our results showed that meloxicam had several effects on mouse behavior and caused the formation of skin lesions at the injection site, depending on the brand of the drug. The most significant adverse effect observed was decreased exploratory activity. Grooming frequency was reduced in all groups. These adverse effects might be related to the quality of the drugs because meloxicam formulations can contain crystal polymorphisms that affect drug quality and efficacy. This study points out the importance of drug quality variation that can affect the outcome of behavioral studies in mice.

A Simple and Fast Battery Test for Phenotypic Characterization of Mice

Despite the great number of test batteries already known to assess the behavior of genetically modified and inbred strains of mice, only a few of them focus on basic neurological parameters. The purpose of the battery test proposed is to settle a specific methodology to characterize the phenotype of neurological disease models in mutant or genetically modified mice. This methodology is simple and efficient in order to analyze several parameters, including general activity, sensory nervous system, sensorimotor system, central nervous system and autonomous nervous system. This can aid the choice of specific additional tests as well as the determination of an interrelationship among phenotypic alterations observed. Although being efficient for a first analysis of a mouse model, interpretation of the results must be carefully made because phenotype manifestation may vary due to many parameters, including mouse strain, environmental and housing condition, animal-experimenter interaction, sample size and tests order. It is important to consider as a critical point if handling procedures are aversive. The results acquired with the analysis of 18 parameters together provide preliminary data to characterize mouse phenotype and helps selecting more specific tests.