Prediction of CYP‐mediated DDIs involving inhibition: Approaches to address the requirements for system qualification of the Simcyp Simulator

Physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is being increasingly used in drug development to avoid unnecessary clinical drug–drug interaction (DDI) studies and inform drug labels. Thus, regulatory agencies are recommending, or indeed requesting, more rigorous demonstration of the prediction accuracy of PBPK platforms in the area of their intended use. We describe a framework for qualification of the Simcyp Simulator with respect to competitive and mechanism‐based inhibition (MBI) of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4/5. Initially, a DDI matrix, consisting of a range of weak, moderate, and strong inhibitors and substrates with varying fraction metabolized by specific CYP enzymes that were susceptible to different degrees of inhibition, were identified. Simulations were run with 123 clinical DDI studies involving competitive inhibition and 78 clinical DDI studies involving MBI. For competitive inhibition, the overall prediction accuracy was good with an average fold error (AFE) of 0.91 and 0.92 for changes in the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration (AUC) time profile, respectively, as a consequence of the DDI. For MBI, an AFE of 1.03 was determined for both C_max and AUC. The prediction accuracy was generally comparable across all CYP enzymes, irrespective of the isozyme and mechanism of inhibition. These findings provide confidence in application of the Simcyp Simulator (V19 R1) for assessment of the DDI potential of drugs in development either as inhibitors or victim drugs of CYP‐mediated interactions. The approach described herein and the identified DDI matrix can be used to qualify subsequent versions of the platform.

A Mechanistic Absorption and Disposition Model of Ritonavir to Predict Exposure and Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of CYP3A4/5 and CYP2D6 Substrates

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Due to health authority warnings and the recommended limited use of ketoconazole as a model inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 in clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies, there is a need to search for alternatives. Ritonavir is a strong inhibitor for CYP3A4/5-mediated DDIs and has been proposed as a suitable alternative to ketoconazole. It can also be used as a weak inhibitor for CYP2D6-mediated DDIs. Most of the currently available physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) inhibitor models developed for predicting DDIs use first-order absorption models, which do not mechanistically capture the effect of formulations on the systemic exposure of the inhibitor. Thus, the main purpose of the current study was to verify the predictive performance of a mechanistic absorption and disposition model of ritonavir when it was applied to the inhibition of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4/5 by ritonavir.

METHODS

A PBPK model that incorporates formulation characteristics and enzyme kinetic parameters for post-absorptive pharmacokinetic processes of ritonavir was constructed. Key absorption-related parameters in the model were determined using mechanistic modelling of in vitro biopharmaceutics experiments. The model was verified for systemic exposure and DDI risk assessment using clinical observations from 13 and 18 studies, respectively.

RESULTS

Maximal inhibition of hepatic (3.53% of the activity remaining) and gut (5.16% of the activity remaining) CYP3A4 activity was observed when ritonavir was orally administered in doses of 100 mg or higher. The PBPK model accurately described the concentrations of ritonavir in the different simulated studies. The prediction accuracy for maximum concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) were assessed. The bias (average fold error, AFE) for the prediction of C_max and AUC was 0.92 and 1.06, respectively, and the precision (absolute average fold error, AAFE) was 1.29 and 1.23, respectively. The PBPK model predictions for all C_max and AUC ratios when ritonavir was used as an inhibitor of CYP metabolism fell within twofold of the clinical observations. The prediction accuracy for C_max and AUC ratios had a bias (AFE) of 0.85 and 0.99, respectively, and a precision (AAFE) of 1.21 and 1.33, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current model, which incorporates formulation characteristics and mechanistic disposition parameters, can be used to assess the DDI potential of CYP3A4/5 and CYP2D6 substrates administered with a twice-daily dose of 100 mg of ritonavir for 14 days.