Differential occupational risks to healthcare workers from SARS-CoV-2 observed during a prospective observational study

We conducted voluntary Covid-19 testing programmes for symptomatic and asymptomatic staff at a UK teaching hospital using naso-/oro-pharyngeal PCR testing and immunoassays for IgG antibodies. 1128/10,034 (11.2%) staff had evidence of Covid-19 at some time. Using questionnaire data provided on potential risk-factors, staff with a confirmed household contact were at greatest risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.82 [95%CI 3.45-6.72]). Higher rates of Covid-19 were seen in staff working in Covid-19-facing areas (22.6% vs. 8.6% elsewhere) (aOR 2.47 [1.99-3.08]). Controlling for Covid-19-facing status, risks were heterogenous across the hospital, with higher rates in acute medicine (1.52 [1.07-2.16]) and sporadic outbreaks in areas with few or no Covid-19 patients. Covid-19 intensive care unit staff were relatively protected (0.44 [0.28-0.69]), likely by a bundle of PPE-related measures. Positive results were more likely in Black (1.66 [1.25-2.21]) and Asian (1.51 [1.28-1.77]) staff, independent of role or working location, and in porters and cleaners (2.06 [1.34-3.15]).

Total flucloxacillin plasma concentrations poorly reflect unbound concentrations in hospitalized patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

AIMS

Flucloxacillin dosing may be guided by measurement of its total plasma concentrations. Flucloxacillin is highly protein bound with fraction unbound in plasma (f_u ) of around 0.04 in healthy individuals. The utility of measuring unbound flucloxacillin concentrations for patients outside the intensive care unit (ICU) is not established. We aimed to compare flucloxacillin f_u in non-ICU hospitalised patients against healthy volunteers, and to examine the performance of a published model for predicting unbound concentrations, using total flucloxacillin and plasma albumin concentrations.

METHODS

Data from 12 healthy volunteers (248 samples) and 47 hospitalized patients (61 samples) were examined. Plasma flucloxacillin concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Flucloxacillin f_u for the two groups was compared using a generalized estimating equation model to account for clustered observations. The performance of the single protein binding site prediction model in hospitalized patients was compared with measured unbound concentrations using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

The median (range) flucloxacillin f_u for healthy (median albumin 45 g l^-1 ) and hospitalized individuals (median albumin 30 g l^-1 ) were 0.04 (0.02-0.07) and 0.10 (0.05-0.37), respectively (P < 0.0001). The prediction model underpredicted unbound flucloxacillin concentrations with a mean bias (95% limits of agreement) of -54% (-137%, +30%).

CONCLUSIONS

The flucloxacillin f_u values observed in our cohort of hospitalized patients had a wide range and were greater than those of healthy individuals. Unbound flucloxacillin plasma concentrations were predicted poorly by the model. Instead, unbound concentrations should be measured to guide dosing.