Functional outcomes and perceived quality of life following fixation of femoral neck fractures in adults from 18 to 69 years using dynamic hip screw (DHS) and an additional anti-rotation screw- a retrospective analysis of 53 patients after a mean follow-up time of 4 years

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the study was to explore the functional outcome after osteosynthesis with dynamic hip screw (DHS) for adults up to 69 years, and identify potential predictive indicators of either positive impact on quality of life or increase the incidence of complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Out of 85 patients 53 could be contacted, 36 were followed up clinically and radiologically, 17 patients could be interviewed by phone. All fractures have been treated by osteosynthesis with DHS and one additional anti-rotation screw. Functional outcome and quality of life were measured with use of Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF 12). The mean values were compared to two random sample t tests and ANOVA for independent random samples. The connection between an aim variable and selected variables of influence was examined by regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean HHS showed good functional results with 88 points (median 95.6). Good or excellent results were achieved in 80.4% of cases. The current investigation also delivers promising results with regard to the complication rate: avascular femoral head necrosis (AVN) in 11.3% of cases (n = 6), 9.4% showed non-union (n = 5) and cut out (n = 3) occurred in 5.7%. A secondary conversion to hip arthroplasty (n = 7) had a strong negative impact on everyday life (HHS = 63.3 points, Physical Health Summary Score SF-12 = 34.9 points).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study are promising showing uncomplicated fracture healing in 84.9% of intracapsular femoral neck fractures and a low incidence of complications after osteosynthesis with DHS in patients aged up to 69 years. The quality of the fracture reduction achieved in the axial view and a small tip apex index after an osteosynthetically treated femoral neck fracture with DHS are significant predictive indicators for complications. Diabetes, age > 65 years, osteoporosis, ASA III may also be significant factors for worse results, but showed no statistical significance in our analysis.

Concomitant injuries in patients with thoracic vertebral body fractures-a systematic literature review

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to give a systematic overview over the rate and location of concomitant injuries, the probability of suffering from neurological deficits, and to give evidence of the timing of surgery in severely injured patients with unstable thoracic vertebral body fractures.

METHODS

This review is based on articles retrieved by a systematic search in the PubMed and Web of Science database for publications up to November 2020 dealing with unstable fractures of the mid-thoracic spine.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1109 articles were retrieved from the literature search. A total of 1095 articles were excluded. Thus, 16 remaining original articles were included in this systematic review depicting the topics timing of surgery in polytraumatized patients, outcome neurologic deficits, and impact of concomitant injuries. The overall level of evidence of the vast majority of studies is low.

CONCLUSION

The evidence of the available literature is low. The cited studies reveal that thoracic spinal fractures are associated with a high number of neurological deficits and concomitant injuries, particularly of the thoracic cage and the lung. Thereby, diagnostic algorithm should include computer tomography of the whole thoracic cage if there is any clinical sign of concomitant injuries. Patients with incomplete neurologic deficits benefit from early surgery consisting of decompression and long-segmental stabilization.

OF-Pelvis classification of osteoporotic sacral and pelvic ring fractures

Objectives

Osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis (OFP) are an increasing issue in orthopedics. Current classification systems (CS) are mostly CT-based and complex and offer only moderate to substantial inter-rater reliability (interRR) and intra-rater reliability (intraRR). MRI is thus gaining importance as a complement.

This study aimed to develop a simple and reliable CT- and MRI-based CS for OFP.

Methods

A structured iterative procedure was conducted to reach a consensus among German-speaking spinal and pelvic trauma experts over 5 years. As a result, the proposed OF-Pelvis CS was developed. To assess its reliability, 28 experienced trauma and orthopedic surgeons categorized 25 anonymized cases using X-ray, CT, and MRI scans twice via online surveys. A period of 4 weeks separated the completion of the first from the second survey, and the cases were presented in an altered order. While 13 of the raters were also involved in developing the CS (developing raters (DR)), 15 user raters (UR) were not deeply involved in the development process.

To assess the interRR of the OF-Pelvis categories, Fleiss’ kappa (κ_F) was calculated for each survey. The intraRR for both surveys was calculated for each rater using Kendall’s tau (τ_K). The presence of a modifier was calculated with κ_F for interRR and Cohen’s kappa (κ_C) for intraRR.

Results

The OF-Pelvis consists of five subgroups and three modifiers. Instability increases from subgroups 1 (OF1) to 5 (OF5) and by a given modifier. The three modifiers can be assigned alone or in combination.

In both surveys, the interRR for subgroups was substantial: κ_F = 0.764 (Survey 1) and κ_F = 0.790 (Survey 2). The interRR of the DR and UR was nearly on par (κ_F Survey 1/Survey 2: DR 0.776/0.813; UR 0.748/0.766). The agreement for each of the five subgroups was also strong (κ_F min.–max. Survey 1/Survey 2: 0.708–0.827/0.747–0.852). The existence of at least one modifier was rated with substantial agreement (κ_F Survey 1/Survey 2: 0.646/0.629).

The intraRR for subgroups showed almost perfect agreement (τ_K = 0.894, DR: τ_K = 0.901, UR: τ_K = 0.889). The modifier had an intraRR of κ_C = 0.684 (DR: κ_C = 0.723, UR: κ_C = 0.651), which is also considered substantial.

Conclusion

The OF-Pelvis is a reliable tool to categorize OFP with substantial interRR and almost perfect intraRR. The similar reliabilities between experienced DRs and URs demonstrate that the training status of the user is not important. However, it may be a reliable basis for an indication of the treatment score.

Dresdener Network Osteoporosis

PURPOSE

On a global scale the main focus of traumatological therapy lies in the treatment of unintentional injuries or victims of violence. People of all ages and through all economic groups can be affected. Due to demographic change in Western industrial countries, however, this focus increasingly shifts towards fragility fractures. In Europe osteoporosis is the most common bone disease in advanced age. Secondary prevention programs like the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) are becoming increasingly prevalent, especially in Anglo-American health care systems. In German orthopedic and trauma wards and hospitals, however, the FLS is still relatively uncommon. This article will examine the question whether secondary prevention programs like FLS need to be established in the German health care system. This study aims at finding out, whether in the area of a medium sized German city there is a difference regarding the initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and therapy between the regular aftercare by the general practitioner or the orthopedic surgeon and the aftercare by a specialist trained in osteology (Osteologe).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the open, randomized prospective study 70 patients with low energy fractures were recruited, who were older than 60 years and have been treated in our department.

RESULTS

58 out of 70 patients have completed the study, which amounts to a follow-up of 82.9%. Limited mobility and a high degree of organizational effort were the main reasons for early termination of the study. While in the group with regular aftercare, only 2 out of 29 patients received a specific osteoporosis treatment, in group who were directly transferred to a specialist trained in osteology 17 out of 29 patients received specific treatment. After re-evaluation of group with regular aftercare in 21 out of 29 cases a specific osteoporosis treatment was recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

It could be established that there is a significant diagnosis and treatment gap regarding the aftercare of patients with fractures caused by osteoporosis between general practitioners or orthopedic surgeons on the one hand and the specialists trained in osteology on the other hand. To improve the aftercare of fracture patients, cross sectoral networks with a background in geriatrics and orthopedic-trauma surgery like a FLS need to be established in the German healthcare system.

[Management of pre-existing anticoagulation for timely treatment of proximal femoral fractures]

Proximal femoral fractures are urgent indications for surgery. In cases of delayed surgical treatment more than 48 h after hospital admittance, increased rates of general complications, local complications and mortality have been proven. Since 2015, the quality target for the external quality assurance by order of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) is surgical treatment within 24 h after hospital admittance for osteosynthesis and within 48 h for joint replacement. The foundations for these time intervals are the S2e guidelines for the treatment of femoral neck fractures of adults from the German Society of Trauma Surgery (DGU) and the Austrian Society of Trauma Surgery (ÖGU) and several other international guidelines. The distinction of the temporal specifications between osteosynthesis and joint replacement in Germany is unusual in comparison with other countries. For 15% of each group of patients a prolonged preoperative preparation is accepted. In the structured dialog within the external quality management anticoagulants are quoted as the most frequent reason for delayed surgery. The present review provides a way to achieve compliance with statutory provisions, to minimize the risks of both bleeding and thromboembolism and to achieve surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures within the agreed time limit.

Reduced complication rates for unstable trochanteric fractures managed with third-generation nails: Gamma 3 nail versus PFNA

INTRODUCTION

Third-generation nails for the management of unstable trochanteric fractures were evaluated with regard to outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective observational study comparing the Gamma 3 nail and the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) in 106 unstable trochanteric fractures confirms the recently reported low intra- and postoperative complication rates from retrospective cohort studies.

RESULTS

Studies of same generations of both intramedullary nail systems did not reveal significant differences in intra- or postoperative complications. Intraoperative dislocation during nail insertion occurred 7 times for the Gamma nail and 9 times for the PFNA. The standard PFNA had to be exchanged intraoperatively for a shorter one on two occasions. Superficial wound healing disorders and hematoma requiring revision were observed in four patients in the Gamma 3 nail group and in three patients in the PFNA group. No deep infections were documented. Mechanical complications required revision in four patients (7.5%) after Gamma nailing and in two patients (3.8%) after PFNA. Postoperative rotation of the head-neck fragment was observed for the Gamma nail in three patients, not in the PFNA group. This was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). There were neither incidences of cut out without renewed trauma nor intraoperative fracture or postoperative femoral fracture. Nonunion affected 1 of 18 patients in late follow-up (p = 0.3) in the Gamma 3 nail group.

DISCUSSION

The Gamma 3 nail and the PFNA yielded comparable clinical results and significantly improved outcomes for unstable trochanteric fractures compared to older nail generations.

[Thoracolumbar spinal fractures in the elderly : Classification and treatment]

Thoracolumbar fractures in the elderly are frequently associated with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis can cause fractures or be a significant comorbidity in traumatic fractures. The OF classification is based on conventional X‑ray, computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is easy to use and provides a clinically relevant classification of the fractures. Therapeutic decisions are made based on the clinical and radiological situation by using the OF score. The score takes the current clinical situation including patient-specific comorbidities into consideration. The treatment recommendations are based on an expert consensus opinion and include conservative and operative options. If surgery is indicated, vertebral body augmentation, percutaneous stabilization and even open surgery can be used.

Imaging of Sacral Stress and Insufficiency Fractures

Fractures of the os sacrum without relevant trauma history are defined as stress or insufficiency fractures and often affect the anterior pelvis. Sacral insufficiency fractures are associated with osteoporosis and occur under physiological load. In contrast, sacral stress fractures are caused by mechanical overloading. Diagnostic confirmation is delayed in many of these patients. Thus, MRI and/or CT should be performed early. Fracture stability should be evaluated by CT. MRI is the better approach to rule out fractures and is highly sensitive. It is indicated in young patients and in patients with non-specific lumbosacral pain. Nuclear imaging techniques are viable alternatives in patients with a contraindication for MRI.

[The new treatment procedure of the German statutory accident insurance: From the perspective of a community hospital]

The requirements of the German statutory accident insurance (DGUV) for the new treatment procedure were presented on 1 January 2013 in a new catalogue. The implementation of the certification of hospitals for the very severe injury procedure (SAV) by the DGUV should have been completed by 2014. These requirements placed high demands on trauma-oriented hospitals because of the high structural and personnel prerequisites. The background to the new organization was the wish of the DGUV for quality improvement in patient treatment in hospitals for patients with very severe occupational and occupation-related trauma by placement in qualified centers with high case numbers. No increase in income was planned for the hospitals to cope with the necessary improvements in quality. After 2 years of experience with the SAV we can confirm for a community hospital that the structural requirements could be improved (e.g. establishment of departments of neurosurgery, plastic surgery and thoracic surgery) but the high requirements for qualification and attendance of physicians on duty are a continuous problem and are also costly. The numbers of severely injured trauma patients have greatly increased, particularly in 2015. The charges for the complex treatment are not adequately reflected in the German diagnosis-related groups system and no extra flat rate funding per case is explicitly planned in the DRG remuneration catalogue. The invoicing of a center surcharge in addition to the DRG charges has not been introduced.

[Traumatic dissection of the internal carotid artery following whiplash injury. Diagnostic workup and therapy of an often overlooked but potentially dangerous additional vascular lesion]

We report on the case of a 33-year-old male patient who was brought to the emergency room of our hospital after suffering a high-energy trauma due to an automobile accident. Besides a scaphoid fracture there were no signs of any neurological deficits. After several hours without clinical symptoms the patient developed dysarthria as the first manifestation of local cerebral ischemia based on a traumatic dissection of the internal carotid artery. Under systemic high-dose heparin therapy, fast and complete remission of all neurological disorders could be achieved. In the course of time a dissecting aneurysm developed. Temporary anticoagulation with phenprocoumon was started in the meantime and no further complications have appeared up to now. Besides presenting this absorbing case, this article highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic regime in cases of a traumatic dissection of supra-aortal arteries for rapid and adequate management of this rare but potentially dangerous complication.

[CT-findings in penetrating captive bolt injuries to the head and brain: analysis of the trauma-related CT-findings and review of the literature]

Penetrating gunshot injuries to the head and brain are rare in Germany and the rest of Western Europe. Due to the small number of cases over here no consistent diagnostic and therapeutic standards exist in this respect. Thus these kinds of injuries present a great challenge to the attending physicians. Most of these violations are a result of a suicidal attempt or an accident. Beside violations by firearms also penetrating injuries to the head and brain due to captive bolt devices, as used in slaughtery business for the "humane" killing of animals, occur from time to time. The impact on the head differs from that caused by firearms because no projectile is leaving the barrel and the used bolt, as a fix part of the device, does not remain in the affected tissue. That implies characteristic results within the radiological imaging that might be pathbreaking for the further treatment, because the origin of such a head injury is often unknown during primary care. Consequently the knowledge of these specific findings is central to the radiologist to make the appropriate diagnosis. Based on some clinical examples the trauma-related CT-findings are introduced and a short overview of the relevant literature is also given.

Fractures of the femoral neck

The ideal treatment of the intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck still is subject of discussion. The demographic development of the population in Europe with fractures of the neck of femur being typical in the older patient, requires conclusive and stringent concepts of treatment. Adequate and patient oriented therapy should be promoted, regional differences and provisional deficiencies need to be adjusted in order to minimize the rate of complications. The guideline "Schenkelhalsfraktur" of the German board of trauma surgeons, the 'Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie', and the article at hand are meant to serve as a manual for the trauma surgeon. Based on evaluated data it simplifies rational decision-making for treatment of fractures of the proximal femur. Moreover, secondary prophylaxis as well as the subsequent outpatient treatment and the social reintegration of the patients recovering from fractures of the femoral neck remains vital- ly important. After all, even with ideal treatment of the fracture more than half of the patients are impaired for a long time and one out of four permanently depends on nursing assistance.