1
|
Plutino FM, Del Medico P, Vescio G, Fava MG. A peculiar case of Paget's disease of the breast. Ann Ital Chir 2022; 11:S2239253X22037525. [PMID: 35588206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Mammary Paget's disease is a disorder of the nipple-areola complex of the breast that, while rare, is often associated with an underlying carcinoma. The typical aspect is usually an eczematoid change of the nipple or a red and ulcerative nipple's lesion or erythematous and crusted lesion, with or without mass-like lesion and infiltration and inversion of the nipple. It was described at first by Sir James Paget in 1874, [1] who classified the disease in mammary and extramammary type. The mammary type (Paget' s Breast Cancer: PBC) has rare frequency. PBC occurs in 0.5-5% of all cases of breast cancer, it affects the mouth of the excretory ducts of the nipple, which is characterized by lesion of nipple's large ducts. PBC can be a superficial lesion or a nodule-tumor and it can be associated with underlying carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in more than 95% of cases, especially in postmenopausal women. In a small percentage of cases, PBC can also be associated with an invasive breast cancer. Accuracy in the diagnostic phase, in order to distinguish PBC from others diseases is paramount and histological examination of lesion's biopsy has a crucial role. Prognosis and treatment depend on the type of underlying breast cancer and are based on the stage of cancer, but more importantly, on the prompt of an adequate multidisciplinary diagnostic pathway. KEY WORDS: Histopathological Report, Oncological Outcomes Paget's Breast Cancer.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bon G, Pizzuti L, Laquintana V, Loria R, Porru M, Marchiò C, Krasniqi E, Barba M, Maugeri-Saccà M, Gamucci T, Berardi R, Livi L, Ficorella C, Natoli C, Cortesi E, Generali D, La Verde N, Cassano A, Bria E, Moscetti L, Michelotti A, Adamo V, Zamagni C, Tonini G, Barchiesi G, Mazzotta M, Marinelli D, Tomao S, Marchetti P, Valerio MR, Mirabelli R, Russo A, Fabbri MA, D'Ostilio N, Veltri E, Corsi D, Garrone O, Paris I, Sarobba G, Giotta F, Garufi C, Cazzaniga M, Del Medico P, Roselli M, Sanguineti G, Sperduti I, Sapino A, De Maria R, Leonetti C, Di Leo A, Ciliberto G, Falcioni R, Vici P. Loss of HER2 and decreased T-DM1 efficacy in HER2 positive advanced breast cancer treated with dual HER2 blockade: the SePHER Study. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2020; 39:279. [PMID: 33302999 PMCID: PMC7731769 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-020-01797-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HER2-targeting agents have dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC). Within a short time frame, the rapid introduction of new therapeutics has led to the approval of pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and a taxane in first-line, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in second-line. Thereby, evidence of T-DM1 efficacy following trastuzumab/pertuzumab combination is limited, with data from some retrospective reports suggesting lower activity. The purpose of the present study is to investigate T-DM1 efficacy in pertuzumab-pretreated and pertuzumab naïve HER2 positive ABC patients. We also aimed to provide evidence on the exposure to different drugs sequences including pertuzumab and T-DM1 in HER2 positive cell lines. METHODS The biology of HER2 was investigated in vitro through sequential exposure of resistant HER2 + breast cancer cell lines to trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and their combination. In vitro experiments were paralleled by the analysis of data from 555 HER2 + ABC patients treated with T-DM1 and evaluation of T-DM1 efficacy in the 371 patients who received it in second line. Survival estimates were graphically displayed in Kaplan Meier curves, compared by log rank test and, when possibile, confirmed in multivariate models. RESULTS We herein show evidence of lower activity of T-DM1 in two HER2+ breast cancer cell lines resistant to trastuzumab+pertuzumab, as compared to trastuzumab-resistant cells. Lower T-DM1 efficacy was associated with a marked reduction of HER2 expression on the cell membrane and its nuclear translocation. HER2 downregulation at the membrane level was confirmed in biopsies of four trastuzumab/pertuzumab-pretreated patients. Among the 371 patients treated with second-line T-DM1, median overall survival (mOS) from diagnosis of advanced disease and median progression-free survival to second-line treatment (mPFS2) were 52 and 6 months in 177 patients who received trastuzumab/pertuzumab in first-line, and 74 and 10 months in 194 pertuzumab-naïve patients (p = 0.0006 and 0.03 for OS and PFS2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Our data support the hypothesis that the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab reduces the amount of available plasma membrane HER2 receptor, limiting the binding of T-DM1 in cancer cells. This may help interpret the less favorable outcomes of second-line T-DM1 in trastuzumab/pertuzumab pre-treated patients compared to their pertuzumab-naïve counterpart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Bon
- Cellular Network and Molecular Therapeutic Target Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rossella Loria
- Cellular Network and Molecular Therapeutic Target Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuela Porru
- Area of Translational Research, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Marchiò
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Eriseld Krasniqi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, "Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona" Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Clara Natoli
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University Gabriele D'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Nicla La Verde
- Oncology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco-PO Fatebenefratelli, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cassano
- Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli, University Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli, University Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Adamo
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O. Papardo & Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Addarii Institute of Oncology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Oncology, University Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Barchiesi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Mazzotta
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Marinelli
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, University La Sapienza, Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rosanna Mirabelli
- Department of Ematology & Oncology, Pugliese-Ciaccio Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Medical Oncology, Paolo Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Enzo Veltri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Domenico Corsi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ornella Garrone
- Medical Oncology AO S. Croce and Carle Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Gynaecology - Oncology Unit, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Giotta
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
| | - Carlo Garufi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Pescara Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Marina Cazzaniga
- Research Unit Phase I Trials and Oncology Unit, ASST, Monza, Italy
| | - Pietro Del Medico
- Division of Medical Oncology, Reggio Calabria General Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Mario Roselli
- Department of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Sapino
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Ruggero De Maria
- Institute of General Pathology, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Foundation University A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Leonetti
- Area of Translational Research, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Di Leo
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Rita Falcioni
- Cellular Network and Molecular Therapeutic Target Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krasniqi E, Pizzuti L, Barchiesi G, Sergi D, Carpano S, Botti C, Kayal R, Sanguineti G, Marchetti P, Botticelli A, Marinelli D, Gamucci T, Natoli C, Grassadonia A, Tinari N, Tomao S, Tonini G, Santini D, Michelotti A, Mentuccia L, Vaccaro A, Magnolfi E, Gelibter A, Magri V, Cortesi E, D'Onofrio L, Cassano A, Cazzaniga M, Moscetti L, Fabbri A, Scinto AF, Corsi D, Carbognin L, Bria E, La Verde N, Garufi C, Di Stefano P, Mirabelli R, Veltri E, Paris I, Giotta F, Lorusso V, Landucci E, Ficorella C, Roselli M, Adamo V, Ricciardi G, Russo A, Valerio MR, Berardi R, Pistelli M, Cannita K, Zamagni C, Garrone O, Baldini E, Livi L, Meattini I, Del Medico P, Generali D, De Maria R, Risi E, Ciliberto G, Villa A, Sperduti I, Mazzotta M, Barba M, Giordano A, Vici P. Impact of BMI on HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients treated with pertuzumab and/or trastuzumab emtansine. Real-world evidence. J Cell Physiol 2020; 235:7900-7910. [PMID: 31943171 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.29445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Body mass index (BMI) is a main indicator of obesity and its association with breast cancer is well established. However, little is known in the metastatic setting, especially in HER2-positive patients. We assessed the influence of BMI on clinical outcomes of patients treated with pertuzumab and/or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC). BMI was addressed as a categorical variable, being classified on the basis of the following ranges, that is, 18.5-24.9, 25-29.9, and 30.0-34.9, namely, normal weight, overweight, and Class I obesity. The outcomes chosen were progression-free survival to first-line chemotherapy (PFS1) and overall survival (OS). Overall (N = 709), no impact of BMI was observed on PFS1 (p = .15), while BMI ≥ 30 was associated with worse OS (p = .003). In subjects who progressed to first line (N = 575), analyzing data across PFS1 quartiles and strata of disease burden, BMI predicted lower PFS1 in patients within the I PFS1 quartile and with the lowest disease burden (p = .001). Univariate analysis showed a detrimental effect of BMI ≥ 30 on OS for women within the I PFS1 quartile (p = .03). Results were confirmed in multivariate analysis. According to PFS1 quartiles a higher percentage of patients with high BMI and low disease burden progressed within 6 months of therapy. The effect of BMI on prognosis was also confirmed in multivariate analysis of OS for overall population. In our cohort, a BMI ≥ 30 correlated with worse OS in patients with HER2+ mBC who received pertuzumab and/or T-DM1 but had no impact on PFS to first line. BMI predicted worse I PFS1 quartile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eriseld Krasniqi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Barchiesi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Sergi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Carpano
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Botti
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Ramy Kayal
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Medical Oncology Unit B, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.,Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Marinelli
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Clara Natoli
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and CeSI-MeT, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Antonino Grassadonia
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and CeSI-MeT, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Nicola Tinari
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and CeSI-MeT, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Oncology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Oncology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Aandrea Michelotti
- Dipartimento di Oncologia, Dei Trapianti e Delle Nuove Tecnologie, UO Oncologia Medica I, S. Chiara Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Alain Gelibter
- Medical Oncology Unit B, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Cortesi
- Medical Oncology Unit B, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Loretta D'Onofrio
- Department of Oncology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cassano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy
| | - Marina Cazzaniga
- Research Unit Phase I Trials and Oncology Unit, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Agnese Fabbri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Domenico Corsi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Carbognin
- University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicla La Verde
- Oncology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco Presidio Ospedaliero Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy
| | - Carlo Garufi
- Medical Oncology, "Santo Spirito" Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Pia Di Stefano
- Medical Oncology, "Santo Spirito" Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Rossana Mirabelli
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese-Ciaccio, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Enzo Veltri
- Oncology Unit, S. Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Giotta
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Giovanni Paolo II" Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Vito Lorusso
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Giovanni Paolo II" Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Elisa Landucci
- Dipartimento di Oncologia, Dei Trapianti e Delle Nuove Tecnologie, UO Oncologia Medica I, S. Chiara Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Corrado Ficorella
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, Medical Oncology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Mario Roselli
- Department of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Adamo
- Department of Human Pathology, Medical Oncology Unit A.O. Papardo, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Ricciardi
- Department of Human Pathology, Medical Oncology Unit A.O. Papardo, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Valerio
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Mirco Pistelli
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Katia Cannita
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Addarii Institute of Oncology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ornella Garrone
- Medical Oncology, A.O. Ospedale di Insegnamento S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio," Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio," Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Del Medico
- Division of Medical Oncology, Reggio Calabria General Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Daniele Generali
- Breast Cancer Unit & Translational Research Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Ruggero De Maria
- Institute of General Pathology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Risi
- Department of "Sandro Pitigliani" Medical Oncology, Santo Stefano Hospital, Prato, Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alice Villa
- Endocrinology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Department of Bio-Statistics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Mazzotta
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Giordano
- Department of Biology, Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pizzuti L, Krasniqi E, Barchiesi G, Della Giulia M, Izzo F, Sanguineti G, Marchetti P, Mazzotta M, Giusti R, Botticelli A, Gamucci T, Natoli C, Grassadonia A, Tinari N, Iezzi L, Tomao S, Tomao F, Tonini G, Santini D, Astone A, Michelotti A, De Angelis C, Mentuccia L, Vaccaro A, Magnolfi E, Gelibter A, Magri V, Cortesi E, D'Onofrio L, Cassano A, Rossi E, Cazzaniga M, Moscetti L, Omarini C, Piacentini F, Fabbri MA, Scinto AF, Corsi D, Carbognin L, Bria E, La Verde N, Samaritani R, Garufi C, Barni S, Mirabelli R, Sarmiento R, Veltri EM, D'Auria G, Paris I, Giotta F, Lorusso V, Cardillo F, Landucci E, Mauri M, Ficorella C, Roselli M, Adamo V, Ricciardi GRR, Russo A, Berardi R, Pistelli M, Fiorio E, Cannita K, Sini V, D'Ostilio N, Foglietta J, Greco F, Zamagni C, Garrone O, Di Cocco B, Baldini E, Livi L, Desideri I, Meattini I, Sarobba G, Del Medico P, De Tursi M, Generali D, De Maria R, Risi E, Ciliberto G, Sperduti I, Villa A, Barba M, Di Leo A, Vici P. Distinct HR expression patterns significantly affect the clinical behavior of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer and degree of benefit from novel anti-HER2 agents in the real world setting. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:1917-1929. [PMID: 31330065 PMCID: PMC7027476 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
We analyzed data from 738 HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer (mbc) patients treated with pertuzumab‐based regimens and/or T‐DM1 at 45 Italian centers. Outcomes were explored in relation to tumor subtype assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The median progression‐free survival at first‐line (mPFS1) was 12 months. Pertuzumab as first‐line conferred longer mPFS1 compared to other first‐line treatments (16 vs. 9 months, p = 0.0001), regardless of IHC subtype. Median PFS in second‐line (mPFS2) was 7 months, with no difference by IHC subtype, but it was more favorable with T‐DM1 compared to other agents (7 vs. 6 months, p = 0.03). There was no PFS2 gain in patients with tumors expressing both hormonal receptors (HRs; p = 0.17), while a trend emerged for tumors with one HR (p = 0.05). Conversely, PFS2 gain was significant in HRs‐negative tumors (p = 0.04). Median overall survival (mOS) was 74 months, with no significant differences by IHC subtypes. Survival rates at 2 and 3 years in patients treated with T‐DM1 in second‐line after pertuzumab were significantly lower compared to pertuzumab‐naïve patients (p = 0.01). When analyzed by IHC subtype, the outcome was confirmed if both HRs or no HRs were expressed (p = 0.02 and p = 0.006, respectively). Our results confirm that HRs expression impacts the clinical behavior and novel treatment‐related outcomes of HER2‐positive tumors when treatment sequences are considered. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that HRs expression had no effect on PFS and OS. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings and clarify the interplay between HER2 and estrogen receptor pathways in HER2‐positive (mbc) patients. What's new? About half of breast cancers positive for human epidermal growth factor (HER2) also express hormone receptors but the impact of hormone receptor status on the success of HER2‐directed treatments is not fully explored. Here the authors retrospectively assessed tumor behavior and treatment outcomes in 738 women with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer treated with new generation anti‐HER2 agents. Distinct hormone receptor expression patterns significantly affected the progression free and overall survival, justifying further studies to define optimal treatment regimens and the interplay between hormone receptor and HER2 signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Eriseld Krasniqi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Barchiesi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Marina Della Giulia
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Fiorentino Izzo
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit B, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Mazzotta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaele Giusti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Clara Natoli
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Centro Scienze dell'Invecchiamento e Medicina Traslazionale -CeSI-MeT, Chieti, Italy
| | - Antonino Grassadonia
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Centro Scienze dell'Invecchiamento e Medicina Traslazionale -CeSI-MeT, Chieti, Italy
| | - Nicola Tinari
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Centro Scienze dell'Invecchiamento e Medicina Traslazionale -CeSI-MeT, Chieti, Italy
| | - Laura Iezzi
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Centro Scienze dell'Invecchiamento e Medicina Traslazionale -CeSI-MeT, Chieti, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Urology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Oncology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Oncology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Astone
- Division of Medical Oncology, Villa San Pietro Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Michelotti
- UO Oncologia Medica I, S. Chiara Hospital, Dipartimentodi Oncologia, Dei Trapianti e Delle Nuove Tecnologie, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Claudia De Angelis
- UO Oncologia Medica I, S. Chiara Hospital, Dipartimentodi Oncologia, Dei Trapianti e Delle Nuove Tecnologie, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Alain Gelibter
- Medical Oncology Unit B, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Cortesi
- Medical Oncology Unit B, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Loretta D'Onofrio
- Department of Oncology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cassano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.,Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| | - Ernesto Rossi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy
| | - Marina Cazzaniga
- Research Unit Phase I trials and Oncology Unit, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Claudia Omarini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Federico Piacentini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Maria A Fabbri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Angelo F Scinto
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Corsi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Carbognin
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.,Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| | - Nicla La Verde
- Oncology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco Presidio Ospedaliero Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Garufi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Pescara Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Sandro Barni
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy
| | - Rosanna Mirabelli
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese-Ciaccio, Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Enzo M Veltri
- Oncology Unit, S. Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | | | - Ida Paris
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Giotta
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Giovanni PaoloII" Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Vito Lorusso
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Giovanni PaoloII" Institute, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Elisabetta Landucci
- UO Oncologia Medica I, S. Chiara Hospital, Dipartimentodi Oncologia, Dei Trapianti e Delle Nuove Tecnologie, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Maria Mauri
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado Ficorella
- Medical Oncology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Mario Roselli
- Department of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Adamo
- Medical Oncology Unit A.O. Papardo & Department Human Pathology University of Messina
| | | | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Mirco Pistelli
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Elena Fiorio
- U.O.C. Oncology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Katia Cannita
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Valentina Sini
- Oncology Unit, ASL Roma 1, Santo Spirito Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Filippo Greco
- Department of Pathology, Surgery and Oncology, "Mater Salutis" Hospital, ULSS21, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Addarii Institute of Oncology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ornella Garrone
- Medical Oncology, A.O. Ospedale di Insegnamento S. Crocee Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit and Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology Unit and Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit and Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Del Medico
- Division of Medical Oncology, Reggio Calabria General Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Michele De Tursi
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Centro Scienze dell'Invecchiamento e Medicina Traslazionale -CeSI-MeT, Chieti, Italy
| | - Daniele Generali
- Breast Cancer Unit & Translational Research Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Ruggero De Maria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.,Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| | - Emanuela Risi
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Bio-Statistics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alice Villa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.,Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Di Leo
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giannicola R, D'Arrigo G, Botta C, Agostino R, Del Medico P, Falzea AC, Barbieri V, Staropoli N, Del Giudice T, Pastina P, Nardone V, Monoriti M, Calabrese G, Tripepi G, Pirtoli L, Tassone P, Tagliaferri P, Correale P. Early blood rise in auto-antibodies to nuclear and smooth muscle antigens is predictive of prolonged survival and autoimmunity in metastatic-non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1 immune-check point blockade by nivolumab. Mol Clin Oncol 2019; 11:81-90. [PMID: 31289683 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2019.1859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune-checkpoint blockade by Nivolumab, a human monoclonal antibody to programmed cell death receptor-1, is an emerging treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). In order to prolong patient survival, this treatment requires a continuous cross-priming of tumor derived-antigens to supply fresh tumor-specific immune-effectors; a phenomenon that may also trigger auto-immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The present study therefore investigated the prognostic value of multiple autoimmunity-associated parameters in patients with mNSCLC who were undergoing Nivolumab treatment. This retrospective study included 92 mNSCLC patients who received salvage therapy with Nivolumab (3 mg/kg, biweekly) between September 2015 and June 2018. Log-rank test, Mantel-Cox and McPherson analyses were conducted to correlate patient progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with different parameters including blood cell counts, serum inflammatory markers and auto-antibodies (AAbs). A median PFS and OS of 10 [inter-quartile range (IQR): 5.8-14.2] and 16 [IQR: 6.2-25.8] months, respectively, were recorded, which did not correlated with age, histology or the number of previous chemotherapy lines. Male gender, the type of therapeutic regimens received prior to Nivolumab, and the occurrence of irAEs were revealed to be positive predictors of prolonged survival (P<0.05). Early detection (within 30 days) of >1AAbs among anti-nuclear antigens (ANAs), extractable nuclear antigens (ENAs) and anti-smooth cell antigens (ASMAs) correlated with prolonged PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08-0.62; P=0.004] and OS [HR=0.28 (95% CI: 0.09-0.88), P=0.03], with the type of treatment received prior to nivolumab (P=0.007) and with the risk of irAEs (P=0.002). In conclusion, increased serum levels of ANA, ENA and/or ASMA are consequential to Nivolumab administration and are predictive of a positive outcome in mNSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco Giannicola
- Medical Oncology Unit, 'Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli' Grand Metropolitan Hospital, I-89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy
| | - Graziella D'Arrigo
- Statistical Unit, National Council of Research (CNR), Grand Metropolitan Hospital-IFC, I-89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy
| | - Cirino Botta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Rita Agostino
- Medical Oncology Unit, 'Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli' Grand Metropolitan Hospital, I-89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy
| | - Pietro Del Medico
- Medical Oncology Unit, 'Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli' Grand Metropolitan Hospital, I-89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy
| | - Antonia Consuelo Falzea
- Medical Oncology Unit, 'Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli' Grand Metropolitan Hospital, I-89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy
| | - Vito Barbieri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Staropoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Teresa Del Giudice
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Pastina
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Siena University Hospital, I-53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Siena University Hospital, I-53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Marika Monoriti
- Autoimmunity Laboratory, 'Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli' Grand Metropolitan Hospital, I-89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy
| | - Graziella Calabrese
- Radiology Unit, 'Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli' Grand Metropolitan Hospital, I-89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tripepi
- Statistical Unit, National Council of Research (CNR), Grand Metropolitan Hospital-IFC, I-89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy
| | - Luigi Pirtoli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Siena University Hospital, I-53100 Siena, Italy.,Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - Pierfrancesco Tassone
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy.,Translational Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Pierosandro Tagliaferri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy.,Translational Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Correale
- Medical Oncology Unit, 'Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli' Grand Metropolitan Hospital, I-89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maisano R, Azzarello D, Del Medico P, Maisano M, Bottari M, Egitto G, Nardi M. Alkaline Phosphatase Levels as a Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with the FOLFOX 4 Regimen: A Monoinstitutional Retrospective Study. Tumori 2018; 97:39-42. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161109700108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Aims and background Metastatic colorectal cancer has a heterogeneous behavior, and a set of patients will have minimal response and rapid disease progression. To understand this heterogeneity, studies have evaluated biological and clinical prognostic factors. Alkaline phosphatase seems to be a key prognostic factor, so we have reviewed the outcomes of our patients with respect to alkaline phosphatase levels. Methods and study design Between January 2003 and December 2008, we treated with the FOLFOX 4 regimen 103 consecutive patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Thirty-two patients had alkaline phosphatase ≥300 U/l. Results Median time to progression was 4 months for patients with high alkaline phosphatase levels and 8 months for those with low alkaline phosphatase levels. Median overall survival was 8 and 17.5 months, respectively. Only 3 patients in the high alkaline phosphatase group obtained partial response (9.4%) compared to 3 complete responses and 24 partial responses (41.5%) in low alkaline phosphatase group. Toxicity was substantially different, with more grade 3–4 neutropenia, diarrhea and oral mucositis in the high than low alkaline phosphatase group. Conclusions Alkaline phosphatase is an uncomplicated and potent prognostic factor. Patients with high alkaline phosphatase levels had a poor prognosis. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.it
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Maurizio Maisano
- Unità Operativa di Anatomia Patologica, AO “Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli”, Reggio Calabria
| | - Maria Bottari
- Direzione Sanitaria di Presidio, AOU “G. Martino”, Policlinico Universitario, Messina, Italy
| | - Giovanni Egitto
- Direzione Sanitaria di Presidio, AOU “G. Martino”, Policlinico Universitario, Messina, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Giotta F, Acito L, Candeloro G, Del Medico P, Gadaleta-Caldarola G, Giordano G, Gueli R, Lugini A, Magri V, Mandarà M, Masci G, Pisconti S, Pistelli M, Rizzi A, Salesi N, Schirone A, Scognamiglio G, Tedeschi M, Zucchinelli P. Eribulin in Male Patients With Breast Cancer: The First Report of Clinical Outcomes. Oncologist 2016; 21:1298-1305. [PMID: 27742906 PMCID: PMC5189626 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2016] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence on the management and treatment of male breast cancer is scant. We report the analysis of a multicenter Italian series of patients with male breast cancer treated with eribulin. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the use or eribulin in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were retrospectively identified in 19 reference centers. All patients received eribulin treatment, according to the standard practice of each center. Data on the identified patients were collected using a standardized form and were then centrally reviewed by two experienced oncologists. RESULTS A total of 23 patients (median age, 64 years; range, 42-80) were considered. The median age at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer was 57 years (range, 42-74). HER2 status was negative in 14 patients (61%), and 2 patients (9%) had triple-negative disease. The most common metastatic sites were the lung (n = 14; 61%) and bone (n = 13; 56%). Eribulin was administered for a median of 6 cycles (range, 3-15). All patients reported at least stable disease; two complete responses (9%) were documented. Eribulin was well-tolerated, with only four patients (17%) reporting grade 3 adverse events and two (9%) with treatment interruptions because of toxicity. Eight subjects (35%) did not report any adverse event during treatment. For patients with a reported fatal event, the median overall survival from the diagnosis of metastatic disease was 65 months (range, 22-228). CONCLUSION Although hampered by all the limitations of any retrospective case series, the results of the present study suggest, for the first time, the use of eribulin as therapy for male breast cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Evidence on the management and treatment of male breast cancer is eagerly awaited. Although hampered by all the limitations of any retrospective case series, the results of the present study suggest, for the first time, the use of eribulin as therapy for male breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giotta
- Oncologia Medica, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II," Bari, Italy
| | - Luigi Acito
- Oncologia Medica, Ospedale A. Murri, Fermo, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Guido Giordano
- Ospedale Sacro Cuore di Gesú Fatebenefratelli, Benevento, Italy
| | - Rossana Gueli
- Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Varese, Varese, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alessio Schirone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Meldola, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Di Lauro L, Pizzuti L, Barba M, Sergi D, Sperduti I, Mottolese M, Del Medico P, Belli F, Vici P, De Maria R, Maugeri-Saccà M. Efficacy of chemotherapy in metastatic male breast cancer patients: a retrospective study. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2015; 34:26. [PMID: 25888204 PMCID: PMC4393564 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-015-0143-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Accepted: 03/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic male breast cancer patients remains unknown, and the only available evidence stem from small, retrospective series evaluating outdated drugs and/or regimens. Methods In this retrospective study we evaluated the activity of polychemotherapy, consisting of three-drug (anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free) regimens, as a first-line therapy for metastatic male breast cancer patients who had received at least one prior endocrine therapy. Results Fifty patients treated between 1978 and 2013 were included in the present analysis. Regarding best response, we recorded 1 (2%) complete response and 27 (54%) partial responses, for an overall response rate of 56% (95% CI, 42.2-69.8). Considering stable disease, the disease control rate was 84%. Median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.9-8.5), and median overall survival was 14.2 months (95% CI, 12.2-16.2). Albeit we observed some differences for all the outcomes explored when comparing anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free regimens, they were not statistically significant. Conclusions Chemotherapy, consisting in both anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free regimens, showed encouraging antitumor activity in metastatic male breast cancer patients previously treated with endocrine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Di Lauro
- Division of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy. .,Scientific Direction, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Domenico Sergi
- Division of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Biostatistics Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Marcella Mottolese
- Department of Pathology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Pietro Del Medico
- Division of Medical Oncology, Reggio Calabria General Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
| | - Franca Belli
- Division of Oncology, Spolverini Hospital, Ariccia, Italy.
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Division of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Ruggero De Maria
- Scientific Direction, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- Division of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy. .,Scientific Direction, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vici P, Pizzuti L, Gamucci T, Sergi D, Conti F, Zampa G, Del Medico P, De Vita R, Pozzi M, Botti C, Di Filippo S, Tomao F, Sperduti I, Di Lauro L. Non-pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in sequential regimens with taxanes as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. J Cancer 2014; 5:398-405. [PMID: 24847380 PMCID: PMC4026993 DOI: 10.7150/jca.9132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 04/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Chemotherapy regimens containing anthracyclines and taxanes represent the landmark of neoadjuvant systemic therapy of breast cancer. In advanced breast cancer patients liposomal anthracyclines (LA) have shown similar efficacy and less cardiac toxicity when compared to conventional anthracyclines. We performed this retrospective analysis in order to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant regimens including LA outside of clinical trials in routine clinical practice. Methods: Fifty operable or locally advanced, HER2 negative, breast cancer patients were retrospectively identified in 5 Italian cancer centres. Nineteen patients had received 4 cycles of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) and cyclophosphamide, followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel, every 3 weeks. In 25 patients the reverse sequence was employed, and a third subgroup of 6 patients received 4 cycles of NPLD/cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks followed by 4 cycles of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. Results: We observed 10 pathological complete responses (pCR) (20.0%, 95%CI, 9% to 31%), and 35 (70%, 95%CI, 57.3% to 82.7%) partial responses (pPR), whereas no patients progressed onto therapy. In the small subset of triple negative tumors the pCR rate was 37.5%, and in tumors expressing ER and/or PgR it was 16.7%. A pCR rate of 26.5% was observed in tumors with high Ki-67, whereas in tumors with low Ki-67 only one (6.2%) pCR was observed (p=0.14). Treatments were well tolerated. The most common toxicities were myelosuppression and palmar-plantar erytrodysesthesia; 4 asymptomatic and transient LVEF decrease have been recorded, without any case of clinical cardiotoxicity. Conclusions: NPLD-cyclophosphamide and taxanes sequential regimens were proven effective and well tolerated in breast cancer patients with contra-indication to conventional anthracyclines undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, even outside of clinical trials in everyday clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Vici
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy, Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- 2. Medical Oncology Unit ASL Frosinone, Via Armando Fabi, 03100, Frosinone, Italy
| | - Domenico Sergi
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Conti
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy, Rome, Italy
| | - Germano Zampa
- 3. Oncology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Via Emilio Morosini 30, 00153, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Del Medico
- 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Reggio Calabria General Hospital, via Melacrino, 89100 Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Roy De Vita
- 5. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Pozzi
- 5. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Botti
- 6. Department of Breast Surgery, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Di Filippo
- 7. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- 8. Department of Gynecologic and Obstetric Sciences, La Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- 9. Biostatistics Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Di Lauro
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Di Lauro L, Vici P, Del Medico P, Laudadio L, Tomao S, Giannarelli D, Pizzuti L, Sergi D, Barba M, Maugeri-Saccà M. Letrozole combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog for metastatic male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 141:119-23. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2675-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2013] [Accepted: 08/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
11
|
Spampinato MG, Mandalá L, Quarta G, Del Medico P, Baldazzi G. One-stage, totally laparoscopic major hepatectomy and colectomy for colorectal neoplasm with synchronous liver metastasis: safety, feasibility and short-term outcome. Surgery 2012; 153:861-5. [PMID: 22853855 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2012] [Accepted: 06/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simultaneous surgery for primary colorectal tumor with synchronous liver metastasis has been showed to be safe and effective. One-stage, totally laparoscopic colorectal and minor liver resections have been reported, but there are no data regarding patients requiring simultaneous major hepatectomies and colorectal surgery. We aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes of a small cohort of highly selected patients treated by 1-stage, totally laparoscopic major hepatectomy and colorectal resection. METHODS From January 2009 to July 2011, 5 patients (3 women and 2 men) with primary colorectal neoplasm and synchronous monolobar liver metastasis requiring a major hepatectomy underwent attempt of 1-stage, totally laparoscopic approach after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A retrospective analysis of prospective collected data was performed. RESULTS There were no conversions to open procedures. All the patients but 1 underwent a 1-stage laparoscopic resection. Among these, liver procedures were 3 right and 1 left hepatectomy; colonic procedures were 3 sigmoidectomies and 1 anterior resection of the rectum. Median operative time was 495 minutes, and duration of hospital stay, 6 days. Median estimated blood loss was 475 mL (range, 300-630) with no mortality observed. An R0 resection was always achieved. Median follow-up was 14 months (range, 7-20) with 1 recurrence observed in the liver. CONCLUSION In highly selected patients, a totally laparoscopic approach is a feasible and safe option to treat primary colorectal neoplasm with synchronous liver metastasis requiring major hepatectomies. These results need to be validated by larger, prospective, randomized studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato
- HPB and Advanced Laparoscopic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Policlinico of Abano Terme, Abano Terme, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pignata S, Scambia G, Ferrandina G, Savarese A, Sorio R, Breda E, Gebbia V, Musso P, Frigerio L, Del Medico P, Lombardi AV, Febbraro A, Scollo P, Ferro A, Tamberi S, Brandes A, Ravaioli A, Valerio MR, Aitini E, Natale D, Scaltriti L, Greggi S, Pisano C, Lorusso D, Salutari V, Legge F, Di Maio M, Morabito A, Gallo C, Perrone F. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel versus carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as first-line treatment for patients with ovarian cancer: the MITO-2 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:3628-35. [PMID: 21844495 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.33.8566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Carboplatin/paclitaxel is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer-2 (MITO-2), an academic multicenter phase III trial, tested whether carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was more effective than standard chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IC to IV ovarian cancer (age ≤ 75 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2) were randomly assigned to carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) or to carboplatin AUC 5 plus PLD 30 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks for six cycles. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). With 632 events in 820 enrolled patients, the study would have 80% power to detect a 0.80 hazard ratio (HR) of PFS. RESULTS Eight hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned. Disease stages III and IV were prevalent. Occurrence of PFS events substantially slowed before obtaining the planned number. Therefore, in concert with the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, final analysis was performed with 556 events, after a median follow-up of 40 months. Median PFS times were 19.0 and 16.8 months with carboplatin/PLD and carboplatin/paclitaxel, respectively (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.13; P = .58). Median overall survival times were 61.6 and 53.2 months with carboplatin/PLD and carboplatin/paclitaxel, respectively (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.12; P = .32). Carboplatin/PLD produced a similar response rate but different toxicity (less neurotoxicity and alopecia but more hematologic adverse effects). There was no relevant difference in global quality of life after three and six cycles. CONCLUSION Carboplatin/PLD was not superior to carboplatin/paclitaxel, which remains the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. However, given the observed CIs and the different toxicity, carboplatin/PLD could be considered an alternative to standard therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Pignata
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ferrandina G, Ludovisi M, Lorusso D, Pignata S, Breda E, Savarese A, Del Medico P, Scaltriti L, Katsaros D, Priolo D, Scambia G. Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Progressive or Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:890-896. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.13.6606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We aimed at investigating the efficacy, tolerability, and quality of life (QOL) of gemcitabine (GEM) compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in the salvage treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods A phase III randomized multicenter trial was planned to compare GEM (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days) with PLD (40 mg/m2 every 28 days) in ovarian cancer patients who experienced treatment failure with only one platinum/paclitaxel regimen and who experienced recurrence or progression within 12 months after completion of primary treatment. Results One hundred fifty-three patients were randomly assigned to PLD (n = 76) or GEM (n = 77). Treatment arms were well balanced for clinicopathologic characteristics. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more frequent in GEM-treated patients versus PLD-treated patients (P = .007). Grade 3 or 4 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was documented in a higher proportion of PLD patients (6%) versus GEM patients (0%; P = .061). The overall response rate was 16% in the PLD arm compared with 29% in the GEM arm (P = .056). No statistically significant difference in time to progression (TTP) curves according to treatment allocation was documented (P = .411). However, a trend for more favorable overall survival was documented in the PLD arm compared with the GEM arm, although the P value was of borderline statistical significance (P = .048). Statistically significantly higher global QOL scores were found in PLD-treated patients at the first and second postbaseline QOL assessments. Conclusion GEM does not provide an advantage compared with PLD in terms of TTP in ovarian cancer patients who experience recurrence within 12 months after primary treatment but should be considered in the spectrum of drugs to be possibly used in the salvage setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Ferrandina
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| | - Manuela Ludovisi
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| | - Sandro Pignata
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| | - Enrico Breda
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| | - Antonella Savarese
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| | - Pietro Del Medico
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| | - Laura Scaltriti
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| | - Dionyssios Katsaros
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| | - Domenico Priolo
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- From the Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Rome; Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli; Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples; Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria; Department of Medical Oncology, “Ramazzini” Hospital, Carpi; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Turin; and
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To show the most representative capillaroscopic findings in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHOD Capillaroscopic evaluation was performed with a videomicroscope at 100 times and 200 times magnification. Representative images of the nailbed microcirculation were obtained in 20 healthy subjects and in 75 patients with SSc. RESULTS Capillary abnormalities were seen at the nailfold in more than 90% of patients with SSc. Capillary involvement included several morphologic changes, which are easily distinguished from the pattern of healthy controls. Architectural disruption of the nailfold microvascular network, enlarged loops, neoformation of capillaries, loss of capillaries, and avascular areas are the main abnormalities detected in SSc patients. CONCLUSIONS Nailfold capillary microscopy is one of the most valuable tools for the early diagnosis of SSc and related disorders. Rheumatologists and internists should be able to recognize these abnormalities because of their diagnostic relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Grassi
- Department of Rhematology, University of Ancona, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|