A phase 1/2 clinical trial of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NMMA and taxane for treating chemoresistant triple-negative breast cancer

[Figure: see text].

The impact of HER2-directed targeted therapy on HER2-positive DCIS of the breast

Background

In invasive breast cancer, HER2 is a well-established negative prognostic factor. However, its significance on the prognosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is unclear. As a result, the impact of HER2-directed therapy on HER2-positive DCIS is unknown and is currently the subject of ongoing clinical trials. In this study, we aim to determine the possible impact of HER 2-directed targeted therapy on survival outcomes for HER2-positive DCIS patients.

Materials and methods

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to retrieve patients with biopsy-proven DCIS diagnosed from 2004-2015. Patients were divided into two groups based on the adjuvant therapy they received: systemic HER2-directed targeted therapy or no systemic therapy. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving systemic therapy, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS.

Results

Altogether, 1927 patients met inclusion criteria; 430 (22.3%) received HER2-directed targeted therapy; 1497 (77.7%) did not. Patients who received HER2-directed targeted therapy had a higher 5-year OS compared to patients that did not (97.7% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.043). This survival benefit remained on multivariable analysis. Factors associated with worse OS on multivariable analysis included Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Score ≥ 2 and no receipt of hormonal therapy.

Conclusion

In this large study evaluating HER2-positive DCIS patients, the receipt of HER2-directed targeted therapy was associated with an improvement in OS. The results of currently ongoing clinical trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Abstract CT052: A Phase Ib and II clinical trial investigating the efficacy of nitric oxide deprivation and docetaxel in triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease that currently lacks an efficacious form of therapy. Cancer relapse is thought to be initiated by chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs). Our previous studies revealed that BCSCs utilize inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-derived nitric oxide to promote their proliferation, migration, and self-renewal capacity. In an effort to target BCSCs, we found that iNOS inhibition with NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) sensitized BCSCs to docetaxel in TNBC xenograft models, leading to decreased tumor burden. These findings suggest that BCSC resist conventional therapy in a nitric oxide-dependent manner and that combination of L-NMMA with docetaxel will effectively target BCSCs to prevent further relapse. A phase Ib/II clinical trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose (R2PD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and efficacy of the L-NMMA and docetaxel combination in chemo-refractory Stage III and IV TNBC patients. For the phase Ib portion of the study, a standard Bayesian continual reassessment method is being used to investigate 7 dose levels of L-NMMA (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, and 20 mg/kg) and two dose levels of docetaxel (75 and 100 mg/m2). Twenty patients have been recruited to date, and based on current pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety data, the RP2D is expected to be docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (Day 1) and L-NMMA 20 mg/kg (Days 1-5) every 3 weeks. At the RP2D, 87.5% of the patients experienced a decrease in total serum nitrates and nitrates at Day 2 (p = 0.0156, Wilcoxon Signed-Rank) as compared to baseline, and 75% experienced a decrease at Day 5 (p = 0.1484). Two and three patients received 15 mg/kg L-NMMA + 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 17.5 mg/kg L-NMMA + 100 mg/m2 docetaxel, respectively. Of these 5 patients, one partial responder completed 8 cycles before discontinuing treatment due to taxane-associated neuropathy. Among the nine patients treated at the RP2D, only one taxane-associated DLT occurred. The overall response rate for patients treated at the higher doses was 33.3% as determined by RECIST 1.1. Early results of the phase Ib/II trial indicate the safety, tolerability, and promising activity of the first-in-class pan-NOS inhibitor L-NMMA in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of chemo-refractory TNBC.

Citation Format: Andrew W. Chung, Joe E. Ensor, Jorge Darcourt, Anna Belcheva, Tejal Patel, Jenny C. Chang, Polly A. Niravath. A Phase Ib and II clinical trial investigating the efficacy of nitric oxide deprivation and docetaxel in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT052.

Abstract P6-17-26: Care 001: multi-center randomized open-label phase II trial of neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in combination with lapatinib and nab-paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab in HER2-neu over-expressed breast cancer patients (TEAL study)

Background: We conducted a multicenter, randomized open-label phase II neoadjuvant study of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1), Lapatinib (L) and Nab Paclitaxel (Nab-P) compared to standard of care (SOC) Paclitaxel (Pac), Trastuzumab (T), and Pertuzumab (P) in patients with HER2 over-expressed breast cancer.

Methods: Patients in the experimental arm received a biologic window of targeted therapies alone for 6 weeks (T-DM1 and L) followed by T-DM1 3.0 mg/kg Q3W, L 750mg oral daily and Nab-P 80 mg/m2 weekly (QW) X 12 weeks. Patients in SOC arm received targeted therapies alone for 6 weeks (T and P) followed by Pac 80mg/m2QW, T 2mg/kg QW, and P 420mg Q3W X 12 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients with residual cancer burden (RCB) 0 or 1. Key secondary objectives included correlative assessments of PIK3CA mutations, PTEN expression, and HER2 subtypes which are being reported.

Results: Thirty of the 33 enrolled patients were evaluable. Patient demographics were well balanced. HER2 subtypes and altered PIK3CA (low PTEN or PIK3CA mutations) pathway were not statistically different between both arms. We have previously reported that all patients achieved RCB 0 & I in the T-DM1, L and Nab-P arm, compared to SOC (100% vs. 62.5%, p 0.0035). In the SOC arm, the 6 week change in tumor size on breast MRI during targeted biologic window treatment is significantly different between the responders and non-responders based on two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test (p =0.0065). Consistent with literature, among ER positive patients treated with SOC, PTEN low expressers were less likely to respond (0%, 0 of 2) than PTEN high expressers (67%, 2 of 3). In the experimental arm, all patients responded regardless of PTEN. There was only 1 PIK3CA mutation on the experimental arm where all responded.

Table 1:Breast MRI Tumor Size Standard of Care ArmResponseNMeanStandard Deviation95% CL MeanMinimumMaximumNo6-0.13330.4457-0.60110.3344-1.00.3Yes52.58001.88330.24154.91850.24.9Sixteen patients total were present in standard of care arm but 5 had incomplete imaging data.

Conclusions: TDM1 plus L and Nab-P therapy was well tolerated with noteworthy responses in all patients, including in PTEN low expressers. Change in tumor size at 6 weeks of biologic therapies was significant between responders and non-responders and can be evaluated as a surrogate for future studies.

Citation Format: Creamer SL, Patel TA, Ensor JE, Rodriguez AA, Niravath PA, Darcourt JG, Kaklamani VG, Meisel JL, Li X, Zhao J, Kuhn JG, Rosato RR, Qian W, Belcheva A, Boone T, Chang J. Care 001: multi-center randomized open-label phase II trial of neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in combination with lapatinib and nab-paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab in HER2-neu over-expressed breast cancer patients (TEAL study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-26.

Abstract OT3-08-01: A phase Ib/II clinical trial investigating the efficacy of nitric oxide deprivation and docetaxel in triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease that currently lacks an efficacious form of therapy. Although chemotherapy is the current standard of care for metastatic TNBC, the 5-year prognosis remains grim with a high rate of disease recurrence. Cancer relapse is thought to be initiated by chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs). These BCSCs give rise to a diverse clonal population that results in a heterogeneous cancer, which complicates targeted therapeutic strategies. Our previous studies revealed that BCSCs utilize inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-derived nitric oxide to promote their proliferation, migration, and self-renewal capacity. In an effort to target the BCSC population, we found that iNOS inhibition with NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) sensitized BCSCs to docetaxel in vivo in TNBC xenograft models, leading to decreased BCSC viability and tumor burden. These findings suggest that BCSC resist conventional therapy in a nitric oxide-dependent manner and that combination of L-NMMA with docetaxel will effectively target BCSCs to prevent further relapse. A phase Ib/II clinical trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose (R2PD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and efficacy of the L-NMMA and docetaxel combination in TNBC patients with chemotherapy-refractory locally advanced or metastatic disease. For the phase Ib portion of the study, a standard Bayesian continual reassessment method is being used to investigate 7 dose levels of L-NMMA (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, and 20 mg/kg) and two dose levels of docetaxel (75 and 100 mg/m2). Sixteen patients have been recruited to date, and based on current pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety data, the RP2D is expected to be docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (Day 1) and L-NMMA 20 mg/kg (Days 1-5) every 3 weeks. Two and three patients received 15 mg/kg L-NMMA + 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 17.5 mg/kg L-NMMA + 100 mg/m2 docetaxel, respectively. Of these 5 patients, one partial responder completed 8 cycles before discontinuing treatment due to taxane-associated neuropathy. Among the five patients treated at the RP2D, only one taxane-associated DLT occurred. The overall response rate for patients treated at the higher doses was 22.2%. Early results of the phase Ib/II trial indicate the safety, tolerability, and promising activity of the first-in-class pan-NOS inhibitor L-NMMA in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of chemotherapy-refractory TNBC.

Citation Format: Chung AW, Ensor JE, Darcourt J, Belcheva A, Patel T, Chang JC, Niravath PA. A phase Ib/II clinical trial investigating the efficacy of nitric oxide deprivation and docetaxel in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-08-01.

Abstract P5-13-03: The use of a behavior-modification clinical solution application to improve breast cancer survivors' accountability and health outcomes

Background: Studies have demonstrated that obesity increases the risk of breast cancer recurrence and death in survivors but only 34% of breast cancer survivors engage in the recommended level of physical activity. This low percentage is related to a lack of accountability and motivation. We hypothesize that using a mobile application (app) incorporating the concept of cognitive-behavioral therapy and dietary and physical activity recommendations will improve breast cancer survivors' accountability and help them reach their personalized health goals; specifically with diet and exercise. Methods: We have created an app, METHODIST HOSPITAL CANCER HEALTH APPLICATION (MOCHA) for the purpose of patient self-reinforcement through the daily accounting of activity and nutrition as well as group feedback and direct interaction with clinical dietician. To test the MOCHA app's feasibility, we enrolled 33 breast cancer survivors with a body mass index (BMI) over 25 who were at least 6 months post active treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation) for a 4 week feasibility trial. During these 4 weeks, the users used the app to track wellness (mood, sleep or pain), diet (calorie intake) and exercise (walking or steps). Our primary objective was to demonstrate adherence, defined as the number of days recorded on MOCHA during week 2 and 3 of the 4 week study period (14 days). A registered dietitian assigned personalized goals for each user and monitored their usage of the app and followed the progress of their goals. Additionally, the dietitian sent daily push notifications to encourage the user to stay on track. Results: Our results suggests a correlation between utilization of the app and achievement of the goals of weight loss and increased motivation to exercise. The average number of daily uses of the app was approximately 3.76 (0-12) and 50% of enrolled users lost average of 2.14 lbs (0-6lbs) weight during this short 4 week study; preliminary correlation analysis suggest a correlation coefficient of -0.42 between these two variables. This is noteworthy as traditionally we would expect weight increase in this group of users. Our secondary objective was to determine MOCHA's usability using System Usability Scale (SUS) scale. Our average score on the SUS scale is 77%, which is above average. Lastly, users have stated that access to the dietitian in the app improves their food choices and accountability. Conclusion: This study provides essential data that emphasizes the importance of using technology to improve patients' goal adherence by providing real-time feedback and accountability with their healthcare team. Most health mobile apps focus on data acquisition but without the engagement of the health care team, this aspect differentiates MOCHA from the other apps. Our future directions will focus on using our MOCHA app in breast cancer survivors in a long term behavior modification study.

Citation Format: Stubbins RE, Cheng TH, Yu X, Puppala M, Chen S, Valdivia Y Alvarado M, Niravath PA, Chang JC, Wong ST, Patel TA. The use of a behavior-modification clinical solution application to improve breast cancer survivors' accountability and health outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-03.

Systematic Literature Review of the Impact of Endocrine Monotherapy and in Combination with Targeted Therapy on Quality of Life of Postmenopausal Women with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

A major treatment goal for advanced breast cancer (ABC) is to maintain or ideally improve patient quality of life (QoL). Given the changing disease landscape, this systematic literature review (SLR) aims to assess the impact of endocrine therapies (ET), including ET monotherapy (ET mono) and ET combined with targeted therapy (ET + TT), on QoL of women with HR+/HER2- ABC.

METHODS

A SLR was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the following criteria: (1) included ET mono or ET + TT, (2) reported QoL outcomes, (3) focused on women with HR+/HER2- ABC, and (4) published after 2007 (when standardized HER2 testing became available). The databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and key conference proceedings from 2013 to 2016. QoL outcomes for ET mono, ET + TT, and comparisons between the two were summarized from the identified trials.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies (representing 6 RCTs) were identified. The study populations included first-line (5 studies) and ET-failure settings (6 studies). Across settings, global health status (GHS) maintained or deteriorated slightly on these treatments during the trial period. Time to deterioration (TTD) in QoL measured by GHS was analyzed in 6 studies and 4 RCTs. In the first-line setting, reported median TTD in GHS was similar between ET mono and ET + TT (7.2-13.8 months in ET mono; 11.1 months in ET + TT). In the ET-failure setting, ET + TT showed significantly longer TTD vs. ET mono in GHS (median 5.6-8.4 months in ET mono and 8.3-11.7 months in ET + TT) and some additional domains.

CONCLUSIONS

ET + TT users experienced similar QoL in the first-line and ET-failure setting relative to patients on ET mono. Moreover, ET + TT users experienced better QoL outcomes in some domains in the ET-failure setting relative to ET mono users.

FUNDING

Novartis.

Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 022: A Phase II Trial of Neratinib for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

Evidence-based treatments for metastatic, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer in the CNS are limited. Neratinib is an irreversible inhibitor of erbB1, HER2, and erbB4, with promising activity in HER2-positive breast cancer; however, its activity in the CNS is unknown. We evaluated the efficacy of treatment with neratinib in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases in a multicenter, phase II open-label trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were those with HER2-positive brain metastases (≥ 1 cm in longest dimension) who experienced progression in the CNS after one or more line of CNS-directed therapy, such as whole-brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and/or surgical resection. Patients received neratinib 240 mg orally once per day, and tumors were assessed every two cycles. The primary endpoint was composite CNS objective response rate (ORR), requiring all of the following: ≥ 50% reduction in volumetric sum of target CNS lesions and no progression of non-target lesions, new lesions, escalating corticosteroids, progressive neurologic signs/symptoms, or non-CNS progression--the threshold for success was five of 40 responders.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled between February 2012 and June 2013; 78% of patients had previous whole-brain radiotherapy. Three women achieved a partial response (CNS objective response rate, 8%; 95% CI, 2% to 22%). The median number of cycles received was two (range, one to seven cycles), with a median progression-free survival of 1.9 months. Five women received six or more cycles. The most common grade ≥ 3 event was diarrhea (occurring in 21% of patients taking prespecified loperamide prophylaxis and 28% of those without prophylaxis). Patients in the study experienced a decreased quality of life over time.

CONCLUSION

Although neratinib had low activity and did not meet our threshold for success, 12.5% of patients received six or more cycles. Studies combining neratinib with chemotherapy in patients with CNS disease are ongoing.

Abstract CT319: A randomized, controlled trial of high dose vs. standard dose vitamin D for aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer survivors

Aromatase inhibitors (AI's) are the most effective adjuvant anti-hormonal therapy for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) post-menopausal breast cancer patients, with superior disease free survival over tamoxifen. However, approximately half of the women who take this drug will develop significant joint pains, termed Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Arthralgia (AIA). Though this medicine should be taken for 5 years, the joint pain can be so troublesome that 13-20% may prematurely discontinue it because of the arthralgia, thus sacrificing their best chance of disease free survival. Furthermore, daily quality of life is significantly affected by this chronic pain while taking AI therapy. Nonetheless, neither the etiology nor the treatment of AIA is well-understood within the medical community.

It is known that low estrogen levels, as seen on AI therapy, decrease the amount of available, active vitamin D. Low Vitamin D is implicated in non-specific musculoskeletal pain in non-cancer patients, possibly mediated by higher levels of inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-alpha in a low vitamin D state. Vitamin D replacement has been shown to be helpful for AIA in some small clinical trials. We therefore propose to test the hypothesis that AIA can be effectively prevented by high dose Vitamin D supplementation, and that effective prophylaxis of the problem will lead to improved compliance with AI therapy.

In this clinical trial, we will enroll 184 women who are beginning adjuvant AI therapy and randomize half of them to receive high dose vitamin D (50,000 IU Vitamin D3 per week for 12 weeks, followed by 2000 IU Vitamin D3 daily for 40 weeks), and the other half to receive standard dose vitamin D (800 IU Vitamin D3 daily for 52 weeks). We will assess each woman's baseline joint pains via a questionnaire (Health Assessment Questionnaire-II). We hypothesize that AIA can be effectively prevented with high dose vitamin D, and this will correlate to increased compliance in the high dose vitamin D arm.. The primary endpoint is development of AIA as measured by a defined change in HAQ-II score between baseline and 12 wks. This randomized Phase 2 study is powered to detect an improvement from an expected 33% incidence of AIA in the standard dose group to 18% or less in the high-dose group (alpha=10%, one-tailed). Finally, as an exploratory objective, we will determine whether those in the standard dose vitamin D arm have a correlation between higher levels of inflammatory cytokines and development of AIA.

This study targets a very common cause of pain among breast cancer survivors and aims to offer an effective treatment strategy to alleviate pain and improve quality of life as well as medication compliance.

Citation Format: Polly A. Niravath, Sue Hilsenbeck, Tao Wang, Mothaffar Rimawi. A randomized, controlled trial of high dose vs. standard dose vitamin D for aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer survivors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr CT319. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-CT319

Abstract OT1-1-11: TBCRC 022: Phase II Trial of Neratinib for Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Breast cancer and Brain Metastases

Background: 1/3 of women with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer will develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases yet evidence-based treatments for women with progressive CNS disease are limited. Neratinib is an irreversible inhibitor of erbB1, HER2, and erbB4 which has promising activity in HER2+ breast cancer. Preclinical evidence suggests it may cross the blood brain barrier.

Trial Design: This is a multicenter, phase II, open-label study of neratinib for patients with HER2+ breast cancer and brain metastases. Neratinib is administered at 240 mg orally daily during a 28 day cycle. Two cohorts will be enrolled: Cohort 1 will enroll 40 patients with progressive CNS disease; cohort 2 will enroll ≤5 patients who are candidates for surgical excision of intracranial disease. Surgical candidates receive neratinib 7–21 days preoperatively and resume postoperatively. All patients are re-staged every 2 cycles. Those who develop non-CNS progression have an option to extend therapy with trastuzumab+neratinib. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are collected at baseline and progression; neurocognitive testing, HADS and EORTC QLQ30/BN20 measures are administered at baseline, cycle 2, cycle 3, and progression (cohort 1). Intracranial tumor, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma are collected at surgery (cohort 2).

Specific Aims: The primary endpoint is CNS objective response rate (ORR) by composite criteria. Additional endpoints include: non-CNS ORR, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), site of 1st progression, and toxicity. Correlative and exploratory endpoints include association of CTC count and OS and longitudinal neurocognitive function and quality of life. In an exploratory analysis (cohort 2), we will quantify neratinib concentrations in CSF, intracranial tissue, and plasma and examine associations with response.

Eligibility: Patients must have confirmed HER2+ metastatic disease with ≥1 parenchymal brain lesion measuring ≥10 mm that is new or progressed after completing ≥1 line of standard CNS-directed treatment (cohort 1) or CNS disease that is amenable for surgery, including those without prior CNS treatments (cohort 2). Additional eligibility criteria (cohorts 1,2) include: adequate performance status and end organ/marrow function, and ejection fraction ≥50%. Any number of prior lines of therapy is allowed, including prior lapatinib.

Statistical Methods: Cohort 1 has a 2-stage design with up to 40 patients. CNS ORR is defined as ≥50% reduction in sum volume of CNS target lesions, without evidence of new lesions, progression of non-target CNS lesions, non-CNS disease progression, worsening neurological symptoms, or increase in corticosteroids. CNS lesion measurements are performed centrally by the Harvard Tumor Imaging Metrics Core. If 1/18 patients have a CNS response in the 1st stage, another 22 patients will enroll. With this design, if ≥5 of 40 patients achieve a CNS response, the drug will be deemed worthy of future study. This 2-stage design has 92% power to distinguish between a true CNS ORR of 20% and a null of 6% (one-sided type I error rate=9%).

Accrual: Accrual has begun. Target=45 (cohort 1=40, cohort 2=5)

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-1-11.