Rosai-Dorfman: Rare Manifestations of a Rare Disease

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is an exceedingly rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis of uncertain etiology that most commonly presents in children as self-limited, painless, massive cervical lymphadenopathy. However, extranodal disease occurs in 43% of cases and has a wide range of phenotypic presentations. The pathogenesis has not been clearly understood in the literature and coupled with a wide range of clinical manifestations, early diagnosis and initiation of an appropriate treatment modality have been challenging. Herein, we describe a cohort of five cases that occurred at the same institution within a 12-month period. These cases highlight unique and atypical presentations of an already rare disease, outline the varying and tailored diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and propose a novel environmental predisposing factor given the exceptionally high incidence at our institution over a short period of time. We emphasize the need for further investigation of predisposing factors and to discern targeted therapies that may offer benefits.

Comparison of outcomes for elderly patients treated with weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus the standard 3-weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes between elderly (aged > or = 70 years) patients treated with paclitaxel on a weekly basis and with carboplatin (every 4 weeks) versus the standard 3-weekly regimen of carboplatin and paclitaxel for first-line therapy of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Of the 444 patients enrolled, 136 (31%) were aged > or = 70 years. Seventy-two patients were randomized to the weekly schedule (paclitaxel, 100 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks; carboplatin, area under the curve [AUC] = 6 mg/mL.min on Day 1 every 4 weeks), and 64 patients were randomized to the standard schedule (paclitaxel, 225 mg/m(2); carboplatin, AUC = 6 mg/mL.min on Day 1 every 21 days). Patients with stable disease or objective response after 4 cycles of therapy were eligible for maintenance therapy with weekly paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2), 3 of 4 weeks).

RESULTS

The response rate for elderly patients was 26% on the weekly regimen and 19% on the standard schedule. The median survival duration for the weekly and the standard schedules was 37 weeks and 31 weeks, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were similar at 31% and 33%. Grade 3 to 4 anemia was more common on the weekly schedule (16% vs 6%), whereas grade 3 neuropathy was less common (5.5% vs 9.5%). Nausea and emesis were also less frequent on the weekly schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy was similar between the weekly regimen and the standard regimen of carboplatin and paclitaxel for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and may be advantageous based on its favorable tolerability profile.

Randomized, phase III study of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus standard every-3-weeks administration of carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin administered every 4 weeks to the standard regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred forty-four patients with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to either arm 1 (n = 223), paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) = 6 mg/mL x min on day 1 of each 4 week cycle, or arm 2 (n = 221), paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 6 on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. After four cycles of therapy, patients in both treatment arms were eligible to continue weekly paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2), 3 of 4 weeks) as maintenance therapy until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.

RESULTS

The objective response rate was 27.6% for arm 1 and 19.2% for arm 2. Median time to progression (TTP) was 18.4 and median survival (MS) was 38.6 weeks for arm 1. For arm 2, the median TTP and MS were 16.7 weeks and 42.9 weeks respectively. Grade 3/4 anemia was more common with arm 1, although grade 2/3 neuropathy and arthralgia were less common. The remainder of the toxicities were similar between the two arms.

CONCLUSION

All efficacy parameters were similar between the two treatment arms. The favorable nonhematologic toxicity profile of arm 1 makes this an alternative treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC.

A Protac-based screening test for activated protein C-resistant factor Va and other defects of the protein C anticoagulant pathway

We have standardized a simple screening test for abnormalities of the protein C anticoagulant system. The test is basically a modified prothrombin time in which one aliquot of a test plasma is incubated for 3 min at 37 degrees C with Protac and another is incubated with buffer. During the incubation the Protac activates both protein C and factor V. The plasmas are then clotted with thromboplastin plus Ca2+, and the clotting time difference reflects the ability of the activated protein C (APC) to inactivate factor Va. With the use of Thromboplastin C Plus as the activator, clotting time differences found in 31 normal subjects (10.4 +/- 3.5 s, mean +/- 2SD) were distinct from clotting time differences found in 57 of 58 subjects with established APC-resistant factor Va (3.6 +/- 3.0 s). In addition, the Protac-based test detected six of seven patients with isolated protein C deficiency and 20 of 28 patients with isolated protein S deficiency. Because of the reported high prevalence of heterozygous APC-resistant factor Va in Caucasian populations, it should be particularly useful in determining whether this genetic risk is present in individuals who have experienced or are at increased environmental risk of venous thrombosis.