Experience of palliative care for patients with head and neck cancer through the eyes of next of kin: impact of an Expert Center

BACKGROUND

Literature is scarce on the palliative care experiences of patients with head and neck cancer. We report our experience in this patient population after the establishment of our Expert Center.

METHODS

We administered a questionnaire to 40 surviving relatives of patients with head and neck cancer after the establishment of our Expert Center and compared the results to a similar group of patients with head and neck cancer before the establishment of our Expert Center.

RESULTS

Since the establishment of our Expert Center, we found: an improved evaluation of the psychosocial support offered; better contact between head and neck surgeons, the patients, and families; and improvement in the quantity of information in the palliative phase. Some relatives, however, reported that patients received treatment against their wishes and life was not made as comfortable as possible.

CONCLUSION

Important aspects of palliative care, such as psychosocial support and contact between patient and surgeon, have been improved since the establishment of our Expert Center.

Palliative care for head and neck cancer patients in general practice

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study justify the goals of the Expert Centre such as the improvement of somatic and psychosocial care and consultation.

OBJECTIVE

A recent review showed that little attention is paid to palliative care for head and neck patients. The Erasmus MC has initiated an Expert Centre of Palliative Care Head and Neck Oncology with special interest in patient care, consultation and research. In this study the experience of general practitioners (GPs) in their care of palliative head and neck cancer patients before the start of the Expert Centre is assessed. The aim of the study was to find possible gaps in care and communication and to use GP's ideas to improve the centre's functioning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five GPs with a patient in their practice who died from head and neck cancer between January 2003 and July 2004 after being treated in the Erasmus MC were included. The GPs were asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding their experience in the care of palliative head and neck cancer patients, the communication between first- and third-line care providers and the work of both the GP and the specialist involved.

RESULTS

The response rate was 75%. The palliative stage lasted approximately 4 months. The GPs felt that symptom control was generally not sufficient. Also improvements were necessary in psychosocial care and in the communication between first- and third-line care providers. They also experienced gaps in their knowledge of specific head and neck oncologic palliative care.

Osteoblastoma of the larynx: a case report

We describe a unique case of an osteoblastoma in the cricoid cartilage of a 50-year-old man who presented with hoarseness and progressive dyspnea. Panendoscopic examination revealed a reddish tumor at the left side of the cricoid cartilage. Computed tomography (CT) imaging showed a sclerotic lesion involving the cricoid cartilage, protruding in the airway lumen. The tumor was removed via an external procedure. Histology confirmed the diagnosis of osteoblastoma.

Physical and psychosocial correlates of head and neck cancer: an update of the literature and challenges for the future (1996-2003)

An update of the literature on physical and psychosocial aspects of head and neck cancer, with special emphasis on effects of treatment, patient-related factors and psychosocial intervention on quality of life (QoL). QoL deteriorates during and directly after treatment and returns only slowly to pre-treatment values. Organ preservation, gender and coping-strategies are factors related to QoL after treatment. As prognosis and survival were found to be comparable under different treatment regimes, we noticed a gradual shift in therapy towards organ preservation. Systematic care, using specific instruments is important for improving the QoL. We feel that more attention should be given to improving support, in order to optimize the QoL of patients during the palliative stage.