Physiologically based modelling of inhibition of metabolism and assessment of the relative potency of drug and metabolite: dextromethorphan vs. dextrorphan using quinidine inhibition

AIMS

To define the relative antitussive effect of dextromethorphan (DEX) and its primary metabolite dextrorphan (DOR) after administration of DEX.

METHODS

Data were analysed from a double-blind, randomized cross-over study in which 22 subjects received the following oral treatments: (i) placebo; (ii) 30 mg DEX hydro-bromide; (iii) 60 mg DEX hydro-bromide; and (iv) 30 mg DEX hydro-bromide preceded at 1 h by quinidine HCl (50 mg). Cough was elicited using citric acid challenge. Pharmacokinetic data from all non-placebo arms of the study were fitted simultaneously. The parameters were then used as covariates in a link PK-PD model of cough suppression using data from all treatment arms.

RESULTS

The best-fit PK model assumed two- and one-compartment PK models for DEX and DOR, respectively, and competitive inhibition of DEX metabolism by quinidine. The intrinsic clearance of DEX estimated from the model ranged from 59 to 1536 l x h(-1), which overlapped with that extrapolated from in vitro data (12-261 l x h(-1)) and showed similar variation (26- vs. 21-fold, respectively). The inhibitory effect of quinidine ([I]/Ki) was 19 (95% confidence interval of mean: 18-20) with an estimated average Ki of 0.017 microM. Although DEX and DOR were both active, the potency of the antitussive effect of DOR was 38% that of DEX. A sustained antitussive effect was related to slow removal of DEX/DOR from the effect site (ke0 = 0.07 h(-1)).

CONCLUSIONS

Physiologically based PK modelling with perturbation of metabolism using an inhibitor allowed evaluation of the antitussive potency of DOR without the need for separate administration of DOR.

The placebo response to citric acid-induced cough: pharmacodynamics and gender differences

Characteristics of the response to placebo in a citric acid-induced cough challenge were investigated as part of a randomized, double-blind crossover trial to assess the antitussive effect of dextromethorphan. Baseline cough responses were established on two occasions in 22 healthy subjects. They received 60 ml placebo antitussive syrup and cough frequency following five inhalations of 10% citric acid over 5 min was measured at regular intervals up to 12 h. Response-time models of varying complexity were used to describe the placebo cough suppression data. The cough response to placebo was also compared to that of the untreated state. The placebo cough response was best characterized by a non-linear increase in cough suppression up to a maximum reduction of 1.6 coughs from baseline at 4-4.5 h, followed by a non-linear return to baseline. The cough response in the untreated state was not different from that of placebo (P=0.99). Females coughed more frequently than males (median number of coughs=10.5 vs. 9.0, respectively P<0.001; Mann-Whitney U test), and adaptation to the cough stimulus was significantly more rapid in females (P<0.025). Accordingly, in trials that use citric acid-induced cough, gender should be considered in study design, particularly in relation to the timing of measurements.

Contribution of dihydrocodeine and dihydromorphine to analgesia following dihydrocodeine administration in man: a PK-PD modelling analysis

AIMS

It is not clear whether the analgesic effect following dihydrocodeine (DHC) administration is due to either DHC itself or its metabolite, dihydromorphine (DHM). We examined the relative contribution of DHC and DHM to analgesia following DHC administration in a group of healthy volunteers using a PK-PD link modelling approach.

METHODS

A single oral dose of DHC (90 mg) was administered to 10 healthy volunteers in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A computerized cold pressor test (CPT) was used to measure analgesia. On each study day, the volunteers performed the CPT before study medication and at 1.25, 2.75, 4.25 and 5.75 h postdose. Blood samples were taken at 0.25 h (predose) and then at half hourly intervals for 5.75 h postdose. PK-PD link modelling was used to describe the relationships between DHC, DHM and analgesic effect.

RESULTS

Mean pain AUCs following DHC administration were significantly different to those following placebo administration (P = 0.001). Mean pain AUC changes were 91 score x s(-1) for DHC and -17 score x s(-1) for placebo (95% CI = +/- 36.5 for both treatments). The assumption of a simple linear relationship between DHC concentration and effect provided a significantly better fit than the model containing DHM as the active moiety (AIC = 4.431 vs 4.668, respectively). The more complex models did not improve the likelihood of model fits significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the analgesic effect following DHC ingestion is mainly attributed to the parent drug rather than its DHM metabolite. It can thus be inferred that polymorphic differences in DHC metabolism to DHM have little or no effect on the analgesic affect.