Prognostic utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing indices in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Introduction

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has an established role in the clinical evaluation of exercise intolerance and in the risk stratification of patients with heart failure. There is limited data assessing its prognostic utility in the evaluation of patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC). The predisposition of patients with ARVC for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death has led to recommendations for exercise restrictions and limits our understanding of how the impairment in oxygen extraction and cardiac output impact disease progression and outcomes in these patients.

Purpose

We examined the association between CPET indices and event free survival (time to mortality or cardiac transplantation) in patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC).

Methods

Patients with definite ARVC based on 2010 task force criteria and genetically positive were enrolled into our institutional ARVC registry. 43 patients underwent CPET and have been included in our analyses. Indications for testing included: Evaluation of exercise-induced palpitations/arrhythmias or syncope (37%), pharmacotherapy optimization (28%), heart failure evaluation (19%), and ARVC management decisions (16%). CPET data (peak oxygen consumption (pVO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), and ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2) were assessed in patients at time of initial evaluation. Median follow-up time was 4.9 years (IQR 9 years).

Results

126 patients were studied (age 43.7+ 15 yrs; 41% women; LVEF 57+ 11%; 15% with LVEF <50%) and 43 underwent CPET evaluation. 41 patients (95%) performed at near maximal effort (RER >1) and no fatal events were reported during testing. During the follow up period, the outcome (death or cardiac transplantation) occurred in 31 patients. On Kaplan Meier analysis, pVO2 ≤14 mL/kg/min was associated with worse outcomes (unadjusted p<0.001). Peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) ≤14 mL/kg/min and ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2) >34 were associated with shorter event free survival (HR 5.58, p=0.002 and HR 5.56 p=0.005, respectively). After adjusting for age, sex, and right ventricular function, the association between peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) and event free survival remained significant (p=0.02).

Conclusions

In patients with ARVC, peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) was a prognostic indicator of worse outcomes. Our findings suggest a potential role for pVO2 in disease surveillance and early assessment for advanced heart failure therapies.

Figure 1. KM plot pVO2 & event free survival

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): Mayo Clinic

3260Prognostic value of cardiac power reserve in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing exercise stress echocardiography

Background

Cardiac power output-to-mass (CPOM) ratio is a measure of myocardial performance that incorporates both pressure and flow output, normalized to left ventricular (LV) mass generating that cardiac work. Prior small studies have shown that CPOM predicts outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and reduced LV ejection fraction (EF). We sought to evaluate the prognostic significance of peak exercise CPOM and power reserve (increase from rest to peak exercise) in patients with normal EF.

Methods and results

Retrospective study in 24,783 patients (age 59±13 years, 45% females) with EF≥50% and no significant valve disease or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, undergoing exercise stress echocardiography between 2004–2018. CPOM was calculated as previously described (0.222 x cardiac output x mean blood pressure / LV mass) and expressed in Watts/100g myocardium. Power reserve was calculated as difference in CPOM between peak stress and rest. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Patients were divided into quartiles of power reserve. Patients with higher power reserve were younger, had higher blood pressure and heart rate, lower LV mass, and lower prevalence of prior myocardial infarction. (Table). During follow-up (median (IQR) 3.9 (0.6–8.3) years), 931 (3.8%) patients died. Progressively lower power reserve was associated with increasing mortality (Figure A). Compared to patients with abnormal stress test, patients with the lowest power reserve but otherwise normal stress test had the same survival as those with infarction/cardiomyopathy or ischemia on stress test (Figure B). Resting CPOM had lower predictive value. After adjusting for age, sex, METs achieved, ischemia/infarction on stress test results, and diastolic function grade, both peak exercise CPOM and power reserve were independent predictors of mortality (p<0.0001), incremental to conventional measures.

Conclusion

Cardiac power output and reserve measured during exercise stress echo provides independent prognostic information in patients with normal resting EF and no significant valve disease or RV dysfunction. The survival of patients with low power reserve but normal stress test was similar to patients with prior infarction/ cardiomyopathy or ischemia on stress test.