An algorithmic approach to the use of rapid molecular diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2, influenza viruses, and other respiratory pathogens during an unprecedented respiratory season

Introduction/Objective

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated deficiencies of testing personnel, reagents, supplies and disposables, instruments, and automation in many clinical laboratories. Upon entering respiratory season, a strategy was warranted to optimize laboratory resources when supplies were already limited and expected respiratory season test volume was unknown. An algorithm was devised to prioritize test ordering and TAT based on patient clinical scenario.

Methods/Case Report

The institutional respiratory season SARS-CoV-2 algorithm was constructed by a multidisciplinary team including infectious disease, infection prevention, laboratory, and IT/LIS leadership. CDC guidance on influenza testing was incorporated. Antigen-based testing was discontinued; only molecular amplification- based platforms with FDA EUA were utilized. Platforms had a range of TAT (20 minutes to 8 hours) and included fully- automated high throughput, rapid random access, point-of-care, and CDC SARS-CoV-2 assays. Test bundles included SARS-CoV-2 (monoplex), or SARS-CoV-2 + fluA&B (triplex), or SARS-CoV-2 + respiratory pathogen panel (multiplex RPP; includes 22 targets, including flu A&B).

Results (if a Case Study enter NA)

Key factors in the algorithm included whether the patient was outpatient or inpatient, hospital employee or not, symptomatic or not, immunocompetent or immunocompromised, and whether a concurrent order for other respiratory pathogens was included or not. Clinician responses for these factors determined the type of swab collected (wet swab in VTM or dry swab) and how quickly the TAT was indicated for a given patient using a colored-dot sticker system. Priority TAT in decreasing order was symptomatic inpatients, asymptomatic pre- procedure patients, asymptomatic admissions, symptomatic employees, and symptomatic outpatients.

Conclusion

An algorithm for respiratory pathogen testing during an unprecedented respiratory season prioritizes result TAT to an individual patient’s clinical situation while maximizing laboratory stewardship by eliminating redundant influenza testing and requiring ‘all upfront’ orders to avoid add-on orders that require ‘dumpster diving’ for samples. Limitations include inherent differences in sensitivity, LOD, and specificity when multiple different platforms are utilized to detect the same analytes.

Performance of ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility testing methods against clinically relevant Gram-negative organisms

OBJECTIVES

To ensure the accuracy of susceptibility testing methods for ceftazidime/avibactam.

METHODS

The performances of the Etest (bioMérieux), 30/20 μg disc (Hardy diagnostics) and 10/4 μg disc (Mast Group) were evaluated against the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method for 102 clinically relevant Gram-negative organisms: 69 ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and 33 MDR non-K. pneumoniae. Essential and categorical agreement along with major and very major error rates were determined according to CLSI guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 78% of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. None of the three methods met the defined equivalency threshold against all 102 organisms. The Etest performed the best, with categorical agreement of 95% and major errors of 6.3%. Against the 69 ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, only the Etest and the 10/4 μg disc met the equivalency threshold. None of the three methods met equivalency for the 33 MDR isolates. There were no very major errors observed in any analysis. These results were pooled with those from a previous study of 74 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and data from the ceftazidime/avibactam new drug application to define optimal 30/20 μg disc thresholds using the error-rate bound model-based approaches of the diffusion breakpoint estimation testing software. This analysis identified a susceptibility threshold of ≤19 mm as optimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the Etest is a suitable alternative to BMD for testing ceftazidime/avibactam against ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. The 30/20 μg discs overestimate resistance and may lead to the use of treatment regimens that are more toxic and less effective.

Public Health Efforts Can Impact Adoption of Current Susceptibility Breakpoints, but Closer Attention from Regulatory Bodies Is Needed

Microbiological testing, including interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results using current breakpoints, is crucial for clinical care and infection control. Continued use of obsolete Enterobacteriaceae carbapenem breakpoints is common in clinical laboratories. The purposes of this study were (i) to determine why laboratories failed to update breakpoints and (ii) to provide support for breakpoint updates. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health conducted a 1-year outreach program for 41 hospitals in Los Angeles County that had reported, in a prior survey of California laboratories, using obsolete Enterobacteriaceae carbapenem breakpoints. In-person interviews with hospital stakeholders and customized expert guidance and resources were provided to aid laboratories in updating breakpoints, including support from technical representatives from antimicrobial susceptibility testing device manufacturers. Forty-one hospitals were targeted, 7 of which had updated breakpoints since the prior survey. Of the 34 remaining hospitals, 27 (79%) assumed that their instruments applied current breakpoints, 17 (50%) were uncertain how to change breakpoints, and 10 (29%) lacked resources to perform a validation study for off-label use of the breakpoints on their systems. Only 7 hospitals (21%) were familiar with the FDA/CDC Antibiotic Resistance Isolate Bank. All hospitals launched a breakpoint update process; 16 (47%) successfully updated breakpoints, 12 (35%) received isolates from the CDC in order to validate breakpoints on their systems, and 6 (18%) were planning to update within 1 year. The public health intervention was moderately successful in identifying and overcoming barriers to updating Enterobacteriaceae carbapenem breakpoints in Los Angeles hospitals. However, the majority of targeted hospitals continued to use obsolete breakpoints despite 1 year of effort. These findings have important implications for the quality of patient care and patient safety. Other public health jurisdictions may want to utilize similar resources to bridge the patient safety gap, while manufacturers, the FDA, and others determine how best to address this growing public health issue.

Evaluation of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion and MIC Breakpoints Established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for Detection of mecA-Mediated Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus schleiferi

Staphylococcus schleiferi is a beta-hemolytic, coagulase-variable colonizer of small animals that can cause opportunistic infections in humans. In veterinary isolates, the rate of mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance is significant, with reported resistance rates of >39%. The goal of this study was to evaluate oxacillin and cefoxitin disk diffusion (DD) and MIC breakpoints for detection of mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in 52 human and 38 veterinary isolates of S. schleiferi Isolates were tested on multiple brands of commercial media and according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods. Zone diameters and MIC values were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints (CLSI, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. M100-S27, 2017) for Staphylococcus aureus/Staphylococcus lugdunensis, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Results were compared to those of mecA PCR. Twenty-nine of 90 (32%) isolates were mecA positive. Oxacillin inhibition zone sizes and MICs interpreted by S. pseudintermedius breakpoints reliably differentiated mecA-positive and mecA-negative isolates, with a categorical agreement (CA) of 100% and no very major errors (VMEs) or major errors (MEs) for all media. For cefoxitin DD results interpreted using S. aureus/S. lugdunensis and CoNS breakpoints, CA values were 85% and 75%, respectively, and there were 72% and 64% VMEs, respectively, and 0 MEs. For cefoxitin MICs interpreted using S. aureus/S. lugdunensis breakpoints, CA was 81%, and there were 60% VMEs and no MEs. Our data demonstrate that oxacillin DD or MIC testing methods using the current S. pseudintermedius breakpoints reliably identify mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in S. schleiferi, while cefoxitin DD and MIC testing methods perform poorly.

Emerging Resistance, New Antimicrobial Agents … but No Tests! The Challenge of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in the Current US Regulatory Landscape

Accurate and timely performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by the clinical laboratory is paramount to combating antimicrobial resistance. The ability of laboratories in the United States to effectively perform ASTs is challenged by several factors. Some, such as new resistance mechanisms and the associated evolution of testing recommendations and breakpoints, are inevitable. Others are entirely man-made. These include unnecessarily strict US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) limitations on how commercial AST systems can be used for diagnostic testing, the absence of up-to-date performance data on these systems, and the lack of commercially available FDA-cleared tests for newer antimicrobial agents or for older agents with updated breakpoints. This viewpoint will highlight contemporary AST challenges faced by the clinical laboratory, and propose some solutions.