1
|
Hoekstra NJ, Schulte RPO, Forrestal PJ, Hennessy D, Krol DJ, Lanigan GJ, Müller C, Shalloo L, Wall DP, Richards KG. Scenarios to limit environmental nitrogen losses from dairy expansion. Sci Total Environ 2020; 707:134606. [PMID: 31877400 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Increased global demand for dairy produce and the abolition of EU milk quotas have resulted in expansion in dairy production across Europe and particularly in Ireland. Simultaneously, there is increasing pressure to reduce the impact of nitrogen (N) losses to air and groundwater on the environment. In order to develop grassland management strategies for grazing systems that meet environmental targets and are economically sustainable, it is imperative that individual mitigation measures for N efficiency are assessed at farm system level. To this end, we developed an excel-based N flow model simulating an Irish grass-based dairy farm, to evaluate the effect of farm management on N efficiency, N losses, production and economic performance. The model was applied to assess the effect of different strategies to achieve the increased production goals on N utilization, N loss pathways and economic performance at farm level. The three strategies investigated included increased milk production through increased grass production, through increased concentrate feeding and by applying a high profit grass-based system. Additionally, three mitigation measures; low ammonia emission slurry application, the use of urease and nitrification inhibitors and the combination of both were applied to the three strategies. Absolute N emissions were higher for all intensification scenarios (up to 124 kg N ha-1) compared to the baseline (80 kg N ha-1) due to increased animal numbers and higher feed and/or fertiliser inputs. However, some intensification strategies showed the potential to reduce the emissions per ton milk produced for some of the N-loss pathways. The model showed that the assessed mitigation measures can play an important role in ameliorating the increased emissions associated with intensification, but may not be adequate to entirely offset absolute increases. Further improvements in farm N use efficiency and alternatives to mineral fertilisers will be required to decouple production from reactive N emissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N J Hoekstra
- Teagasc Crops, Environment and Land Use Programme, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland; UCD, School of Biology and Environmental Science, UCD Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981AJ Bunnik, the Netherlands
| | - R P O Schulte
- Wageningen University, Department of Plant Sciences, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - P J Forrestal
- Teagasc Crops, Environment and Land Use Programme, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland
| | - D Hennessy
- Teagasc, Animal and Grassland and Innovation Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork. Ireland
| | - D J Krol
- Teagasc Crops, Environment and Land Use Programme, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland
| | - G J Lanigan
- Teagasc Crops, Environment and Land Use Programme, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland
| | - C Müller
- UCD, School of Biology and Environmental Science, UCD Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; Institute of Plant Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - L Shalloo
- Teagasc, Animal and Grassland and Innovation Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork. Ireland
| | - D P Wall
- Teagasc Crops, Environment and Land Use Programme, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland
| | - K G Richards
- Teagasc Crops, Environment and Land Use Programme, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lalor STJ, Schröder JJ, Lantinga EA, Oenema O, Kirwan L, Schulte RPO. Nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of cattle slurry in grassland as affected by method and timing of application. J Environ Qual 2011; 40:362-373. [PMID: 21520743 DOI: 10.2134/jeq2010.0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Slurry application with methods such as trailing shoe (TS) results in reduced emissions of ammonia (NH3) compared with broadcast application using splashplate (SP). Timing the application during cool and wet weather conditions also contributes to low NH3 emissions. From this perspective, we investigated whether reduced NH3 emissions due to improved slurry application method and timing results in an increase in the nitrogen (N) fertilizer replacement value (NFRV). The effects of application timing (June vs. April) and application method (TS vs. SP) on the apparent N recovery (ANR) and NFRV from cattle slurry applied to grassland were examined on three sites over 3 yr in randomized block experiments. The NFRV was calculated using two methods: (i) NFRV(N) based on the ANR of slurry N relative to mineral N fertilizer; and (ii) NFRV(DM) based on DM yield. The TS method increased the ANR, NFRV(N), and NFRV(DM) compared with SP in the 40- to 50-d period following slurry application by 0.09, 0.10, and 0.10 kg kg(-1), respectively. These values were reduced to 0.07, 0.06, and 0.05 kg kg(-1), respectively, when residual harvests during the rest of the year were included. The highest NFRV(DM) for the first harvest period was with application in April using STS (0.30 kg kg(-1)), while application in June with SP had the Slowest (0.12 kg kg(-1)). The highest NFRV(DM) for the cumulative harvest period was with application in April using TS (0.38 kg kg(-1)), while application in June with SP had the lowest (0.17 kg kg(-1)). Improved management of application method, by using TS instead of SP, and timing, by applying slurry in April rather than June, offer potential to increase the NFRV(DM) of cattle slurry applied to grassland.
Collapse
|