Study protocol paper for the multi-site feasibility evaluation of mobile and technology-assisted aftercare services for crisis stabilization units

BACKGROUND

Law enforcement frequently responds to substance abuse and mental health crises. Crisis stabilization units (CSUs) operate as a public-receiving facility to provide short-term stabilization services for individuals experiencing these crises and offer law enforcement an important alternative to arrest. However, there is limited understanding about how and when law enforcement decides to use CSUs. There is also the challenge of retaining individuals in treatment after CSU stabilization to prevent future crises and persistent engagement with police. This study will respond to these gaps by exploring CSU procedures and examining the feasibility and acceptability of a technology-assisted mobile aftercare intervention designed for individuals brought to a CSU by law enforcement.

METHODS

This study will consist of three aims. Aim 1 will include qualitative interviews with law enforcement and CSU-affiliated mental health staff (n=80) regarding CSU utilization and collaboration logistics between the groups. Findings from Aim 1 will be synthesized for the development of an implementation guide of our intervention, mobile, and technology-assisted aftercare, designed for individuals brought to a CSU by law enforcement, during Aim 2. During Aim 2, intervention services will be pilot-tested for 6 months through a small sample (n=24), randomized control trial (RCT). Control participants will receive standard services available for individuals discharging from a CSU. Treatment participants will receive the mobile aftercare intervention. Qualitative and quantitative data will be collected at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-recruitment for all study participants. Aims 1 and 2 will inform the design of a multi-site RCT to compare CSUs with and without mobile and technology-assisted aftercare (Aim 3).

DISCUSSION

The study will offer decision making and procedural insight into law enforcement use of CSUs as an alternative to jail and provide opportunities to inform that process. This research will provide outcome trends for those who go through standard CSU services compared to those who receive mobile and technology-assisted aftercare services. The current study will inform a larger RCT efficacy study of CSUs with and without technology-assisted aftercare services.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (reference #NCT04899934) on May 25, 2021.

Effects of Three Methods of Restraint on Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Testing in Rhesus and African Green Monkeys

The intravenous administration of 0.75 gm glucose per kg and the measurement of serum glucose pretest and at 10, 20, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes constitute a satisfactory protocol for intravenous glucose tolerance testing of Rhesus (Macaca mulatto) and African Green (Cercopithecus aethiops) monkeys. No significant differences were noted between animals restrained with ketamine hydrochloride and those restrained with sodium pentobarbital, but the African Green males and females and the male Rhesus monkeys yielded significantly different results while being manually restrained.

The documentation dilemma: an integrated solution

Every home healthcare manager must contend with the demands of documentation. One approach to ensure quality and address staff concerns is presented.

The Slingerland tests: reliability and validity

This study analyzed the reliability and validity of two widely–used screening tests for academic readiness and for specific language disability: the Pre–Reading Screening Procedures and the Slingerland Screening Tests for Identifying Children with Specific Language Disability. These tests were administered to 1021 heterogeneous students in grades one through six. Student background data, handwriting samples, and Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills scores were also collected and analyzed. The study's design allowed researchers to develop estimates of reliability (alpha, test–retest, and inter–rater) and validity, including factor analysis. The results indicate that reliability and validity coefficients are well within acceptable limits for the purposes of the tests, and that educational programming decisions can confidently be based on the test results.