Ancestry, race and ethnicity: the role and relevance of language in clinical genetics practice

BACKGROUND

The terms ancestry, race and ethnicity are used variably within the medical literature and within society and clinical care. Biological lineage can provide an important context for the interpretation of genomic data, but the language used, and practices around when to ascertain this, vary.

METHODS

Using a fictional case scenario we explore the relevance of questions around ancestry, race and ethnicity in clinical genetic practice.

RESULTS

In the UK, data on 'ethnicity' are routinely collected by those using genomic medicine, as well as within the wider UK National Health Service, although the reasons for this are not always clear to practitioners and patients. Sometimes it is requested as a proxy for biological lineage to aid variant interpretation, refine estimations of carrier frequency and guide decisions around the need for pharmacogenetic testing.

CONCLUSION

There are many challenges around the use and utility of these terms. Currently, genomic databases are populated primarily with data from people of European descent, and this can lead to health disparities and poorer service for minoritised or underserved populations. Sensitivity and consideration are needed when communicating with patients around these areas. We explore the role and relevance of language around biological lineage in clinical genetics practice.

A decline in the occurrence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in retail chicken meat in the UK between 2013 and 2018

AIMS

The aim of this study was to report on the occurrence of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) Escherichia coli from retail chicken meat samples in the UK, with particular focus on AmpC and extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production and carbapenem resistance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Methods from EU protocols were used for selective isolation of AmpC-/ESBL-producing E. coli, carbapenem-resistant E. coli and for performing minimum inhibitory concentrations. Additional work not part of EU protocols included viable counts, detection by PCR of bla_CTX-M , bla_OXA, bla_SHV and bla_TEM genes in ESBL-phenotype E. coli and screening for mcr plasmid-mediated colistin resistance. From the 313/309 retail chicken meat samples tested in 2016/2018, carbapenem or mcr plasmid-mediated colistin-resistant E. coli were not detected. For 2016/2018 chicken samples, 141/42 (45·0%/13·6%), 90/23 (28·8%/7·4%), 48/16 (15·3%/5·2%) and 3/3 (1·0%/1·0%) were positive for ESBL- and/or AmpC-, ESBL- alone AmpC- alone and AmpC+ESBL-phenotype E. coli respectively. ESBL-producing E. coli were predominantly bla_CTX-M-1 . All AmpC and/or ESBL-phenotype E. coli were sensitive to colistin, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, temocillin and tigecycline, applying epidemiological cut-off values.

CONCLUSIONS

A previous study in 2013/14 showed that 65·4% of retail chicken meat samples tested in the UK were positive for ESBL-producing (mainly CTX-M) E. coli. Since then the proportion of samples positive in the UK has dropped significantly to 7·4% in 2018.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

Significant reductions in antimicrobials used in the UK poultry meat sector between 2012 and 2016 may be linked to significant reductions in AmpC/ESBL-phenotype E. coli in retail chicken between 2013/14 and 2018.