1
|
Piedimonte S, Tsang K, Jembere N, Murphy J, Karapetian T, Gao J, McCurdy B, Sacco J, Kupets R. Defining the Longitudinal Risk of CIN 3+ for <CIN 2 Colposcopy for Patients Referred With High-Grade Cytology. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2024; 28:7-11. [PMID: 37906611 DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the baseline and cumulative risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)3 and invasive cervical cancer in participants referred to colposcopy with high-grade cytology and METHODS The authors linked administrative databases including cytology, pathology, cancer registries, and physician billing history to identify participants referred to colposcopy between January 2012 and December 2013 with high-grade cytology (atypical squamous cells [ASC]-H, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL], invasive squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, atypical glandular cells [AGC], adenocarcinoma in situ) and had RESULTS Among 4,168 women referred to colposcopy for ASC-H, HSIL, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma, the 3- and 5-year CIN3 incidence rates were 17.7%/20.0% no biopsy, 13.0%/15.1% negative biopsy, and 18.9%/20.0% low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) biopsies. The 3- and 5-year incidences of invasive cancer were: 1.25%/1.68% no biopsy, 0.78%/1.04% negative biopsy, and 0%/0% LSIL biopsy. When the initial cytology was AGC/adenocarcinoma in situ (n = 944), the 3- and 5-year rates of CIN3 were 7.42%/8.39% no biopsy, 7.41%/9.26% negative biopsy, and 7.69%/7.69% LSIL biopsy. The invasive cancer rates were 1.12%/1.54% no biopsy, 0.46%/0.46% negative biopsy, and 0.0%/0.0% LSIL biopsy. By screening cytology, participants referred for HSIL had the highest 3- and 5-year rates of CIN3 (18.9% and 21%) compared with AGC (7.22%/8.28%) and ASC-H (15.5%/18%). The 3- and 5-year invasive cancer rates were 1.38%/1.75% HSIL, 0.85%/1.17% AGC, and 0.91%/1.36% ASC-H. CONCLUSIONS In participants referred for high-grade cytology where colposcopy shows
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Piedimonte
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kyle Tsang
- Cancer Prevention, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Joan Murphy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tina Karapetian
- Cancer Prevention, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Gao
- Cancer Prevention, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bronwen McCurdy
- Cancer Prevention, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jocelyn Sacco
- Cancer Prevention, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Swift BE, Mazuryk J, Yermakhanova O, Green B, Ferguson SR, Kupets R. Access to Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2024; 46:102226. [PMID: 37742834 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on endometrial cancer stage and surgical treatment in Ontario, Canada. METHODS This descriptive study identified cases from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 from endometrial cancer hysterectomy specimens in the Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, ePath system. Endometrial biopsy records from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2021 were matched to surgical specimens by provincial health card number. Time to surgery and surgical stage were compared before (2017-2019) and during (2020-2021) the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS There were 10 446 women treated with hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in Ontario from 2017-2021. In April and May 2020, corresponding with the provincial state of emergency, there was a 56% relative reduction in endometrial biopsies. Despite this 2-month reduction in endometrial biopsy volume, there was no change in surgical volume for endometrial cancer treatment. The median time from endometrial biopsy to surgery was 56 days (IQR 40, 80) during the pandemic (2020-2021) compared to 58 days (IQR 43, 82) prior to the pandemic (2017-2019) (P < 0.001). There was no upstaging of endometrial cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS The Ontario healthcare system continued to prioritize service delivery to endometrial cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite the increase in virtual care and decrease in operating room time. There were no significant surgical delays or upstaging of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna E Swift
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | | | | | - Bo Green
- Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
| | - Sarah R Ferguson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kulkarni A, Covens A, Durand N, Ghorab Z, Gien LT, Osborne R, Vicus D, Kupets R. Role of HPV in the Prediction of Persistence/Recurrence After Treatment for Cervical Precancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2023; 45:102171. [PMID: 37343621 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (1) To determine the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing after excisional treatment of cervical precancer. (2) To determine clinical factors associated with persistence of cervical precancer post-treatment. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted including patients who had a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3/adenocarcinoma in situ/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSIL]). All patients treated between 2016 and 2018 at a tertiary centre colposcopy unit were included. Persistence/recurrence of disease was defined as high-grade cytology or histology identified during the time of follow-up. Univariate and multivariate regression models were performed to identify factors associated with persistence/recurrence and HPV positivity at exit testing. RESULTS A total of 284 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 19 months. Of the LEEP specimens, 90.8% (n = 258) demonstrated HSIL and 3.9% (n = 11) had adenocarcinoma in situ. 28.5% (n = 81) of the LEEP specimens had positive margins. In follow-up, 72.9% had negative cytology, 17.6% had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade SIL, 1.8% had atypical squamous cells, HSIL cannot be excluded/low-grade SIL-H, and 6.7% had HSIL. At the final follow-up, 27.8% (n = 79) were HPV+. Overall rate of persistence/recurrence was 11.3% (n = 32); median time to persistence/recurrence was 6.5 months. Multivariate regression models demonstrated that follow-up HPV positivity (OR = 22.0) and positive margins (OR = 3.7) were significantly associated with persistence/recurrence. Similarly, in univariate regression models, positive margins were significant (OR = 2.2) for predicting HPV positivity in exit testing. CONCLUSIONS Persistence/recurrence of precancer can occur due to incomplete treatment of lesions by local excision and by the persistence of HPV infection. Surveillance strategies for women treated for cervical precancer require a risk-based approach and should rely on HPV testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Kulkarni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Al Covens
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Nancy Durand
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Zeina Ghorab
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Lilian T Gien
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Ray Osborne
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spénard E, Geerts W, Lin Y, Gien LT, Kupets R, Covens A, Vicus D. Apixaban for extended postoperative thromboprophylaxis in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 172:9-14. [PMID: 36905769 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Venous thromboembolic events represent the second most frequent cause of mortality in cancer patients. Recent literature shows that direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are at least as effective and safe as low molecular weight heparin for postoperative thromboprophylaxis. However, this practice has not been broadly adopted in gynecologic oncology. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical effectiveness and safety of apixaban for extended thromboprophylaxis in comparison to enoxaparin after laparotomies for gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS The Gynecologic Oncology Division at a large tertiary center transitioned from enoxaparin 40 mg daily to apixaban 2.5 mg BID for 28 days after laparotomies for gynecologic malignancies in November 2020. This real-world study compared patients post-transition (November 2020 to July 2021 (n = 112)) to a historical cohort (January to November 2020 (n = 144)), using the institutional National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. All Canadian gynecologic oncology centers were surveyed to assess postoperative DOAC utilization. RESULTS Patient characteristics were similar between groups. No difference was found between total venous thromboembolism rates (4% vs. 3%, p = 0.49). No difference was found in postoperative readmission (5% vs. 6%, p = 0.50). Of the 7 readmissions in the enoxaparin group, one was due to bleeding requiring transfusion; there were no readmissions for bleeding in the apixaban group. No patient required a reoperation for bleeding. Thirteen percent of the 20 Canadian centers have transitioned to extended apixaban thromboprophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS Apixaban for 28-day postoperative thromboprophylaxis was found to be an effective and safe alternative to enoxaparin after laparotomies in a real-world cohort of gynecologic oncology patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Spénard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William Geerts
- Department of Medicine and Thromboembolism Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yulia Lin
- Precision Diagnostics and Therapeutics Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lilian T Gien
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Al Covens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mirkovic J, Olkhov-Mitsel E, Amemiya Y, Al-Hussaini M, Nofech-Mozes S, Djordjevic B, Kupets R, Seth A, McCluggage WG. Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma of the Female Genital Tract: Novel Observations and Detailed Molecular Characterisation of Mixed Tumours and Mesonephric-like Carcinosarcomas. Histopathology 2023; 82:978-990. [PMID: 36860193 DOI: 10.1111/his.14892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To report novel observations in five mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas (MLAs) of the female genital tract. METHODS AND RESULTS We report two endometrial MLAs in association with endometrioid carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia and three (one endometrial, two ovarian) cases with a sarcomatoid component (mesonephric-like carcinosarcoma). Pathogenic KRAS mutations, which are characteristic of MLA, were identified in all cases, although interestingly in one of the mixed carcinomas, this was confined to the endometrioid component. The concurrent MLA, endometrioid carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia components in one case harboured identical EGFR, PTEN, and CCNE1 mutations, suggesting that the atypical hyperplasia gave rise to a Müllerian carcinoma with both endometrioid and mesonephric-like components. The carcinosarcomas all contained a component of MLA and a sarcomatous component with chondroid elements. In the ovarian carcinosarcomas, the coexisting epithelial and sarcomatous components shared some mutations including KRAS and CREBBP, suggesting that they are clonally related. Furthermore, in one case CREBBP and KRAS mutations detected in the MLA and sarcomatous components were also detected in an associated undifferentiated carcinoma component, suggesting that it was clonally related to the MLA and sarcomatous components. CONCLUSIONS Our observations provide additional evidence that MLAs have a Müllerian origin and characterize mesonephric-like carcinosarcomas in which chondroid elements appear to be characteristic. In reporting these findings, we provide recommendations for distinction between a mesonephric-like carcinosarcoma and a MLA with a spindle cell component.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Mirkovic
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yutaka Amemiya
- Genomics Core Facility, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maysa Al-Hussaini
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bojana Djordjevic
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arun Seth
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Genomics Core Facility, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Benseler A, Vicus D, Covens A, Kupets R, Parra-Herran C, Gien L. Are negative pelvic sentinel lymph nodes reflective of negative para-aortic nodes in high grade endometrial cancer? (071). Gynecol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(22)01288-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
7
|
Leung E, Gladwish AP, Davidson M, Taggar A, Velker V, Barnes E, Mendez L, Donovan E, Gien LT, Covens A, Vicus D, Kupets R, MacKay H, Han K, Cheung P, Zhang L, Loblaw A, D’Souza DP. Quality-of-Life Outcomes and Toxic Effects Among Patients With Cancers of the Uterus Treated With Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy: The SPARTACUS Phase 1/2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1-9. [PMID: 35420695 PMCID: PMC9011178 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Adjuvant radiation plays an important role in reducing locoregional recurrence in patients with uterine cancer. Although hypofractionated radiotherapy may benefit health care systems and the global community while decreasing treatment burden for patients traveling for daily radiotherapy, it has not been studied prospectively nor in randomized trials for treatment of uterine cancers, and the associated toxic effects and patient quality of life are unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate acute genitourinary and bowel toxic effects and patient-reported outcomes following stereotactic hypofractionated adjuvant radiation to the pelvis for treatment of uterine cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Cancers of the Uterus (SPARTACUS) phase 1/2 nonrandomized controlled trial of patients accrued between May 2019 and August 2021 was conducted as a multicenter trial at 2 cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. In total, 61 patients with uterine cancer stages I through III after surgery entered the study. INTERVENTIONS Stereotactic adjuvant pelvic radiation to a dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions administered every other day or once weekly. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Assessments of toxic effects and patient-reported quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and endometrial EN24) were collected at baseline, fractions 3 and 5, and at 6 weeks and 3 months of follow-up. Descriptive analysis was conducted, calculating means, SDs, medians, IQRs, and ranges for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. Univariate generalized linear mixed models were generated for repeated measurements on the quality-of-life scales. RESULTS A total of 61 patients were enrolled (median age, 66 years; range, 51-88 years). Tumor histologic results included 39 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 15 serous or clear cell, 3 carcinosarcoma, and 4 dedifferentiated. Sixteen patients received sequential chemotherapy, and 9 received additional vault brachytherapy. Median follow-up was 9 months (IQR, 3-15 months). Of 61 patients, worst acute gastrointestinal tract toxic effects of grade 1 were observed in 33 patients (54%) and of grade 2 in 8 patients (13%). For genitourinary worst toxic effects, grade 1 was observed in 25 patients (41%) and grade 2 in 2 patients (3%). One patient (1.6%) had an acute grade 3 gastrointestinal tract toxic effect of diarrhea at fraction 5 that resolved at follow-up. Only patient-reported diarrhea scores were both clinically (scores ≥10) and statistically significantly worse at fraction 5 (mean [SD] score, 35.76 [26.34]) compared with baseline (mean [SD] score, 6.56 [13.36]; P < .001), but this symptom improved at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this phase 1/2 nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that stereotactic hypofractionated radiation was well tolerated at short-term follow-up for treatment of uterine cancer. Longer follow-up and future randomized studies are needed to further evaluate this treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04866394.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Leung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam P. Gladwish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Victoria Hospital, University of Toronto, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amandeep Taggar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vikram Velker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lucas Mendez
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elysia Donovan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian T. Gien
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Covens
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Helen MacKay
- Divison of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathy Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David P. D’Souza
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Walker MJ, Wang J, Mazuryk J, Skinner SM, Meggetto O, Ashu E, Habbous S, Nazeri Rad N, Espino-Hernández G, Wood R, Chaudhry M, Vahid S, Gao J, Gallo-Hershberg D, Gutierrez E, Zanchetta C, Langer D, Zwicker V, Rey M, Tammemägi MC, Tinmouth J, Kupets R, Chiarelli AM, Singh S, Warde P, Forbes L, Dobranowski J, Irish J, Rabeneck L. Delivery of Cancer Care in Ontario, Canada, During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e228855. [PMID: 35467731 PMCID: PMC9039771 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted cancer systems worldwide. Quantifying the changes is critical to informing the delivery of care while the pandemic continues, as well as for system recovery and future pandemic planning. OBJECTIVE To quantify change in the delivery of cancer services across the continuum of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based cohort study assessed cancer screening, imaging, diagnostic, treatment, and psychosocial oncological care services delivered in pediatric and adult populations in Ontario, Canada (population 14.7 million), from April 1, 2019, to March 1, 2021. Data were analyzed from May 1 to July 31, 2021. EXPOSURES COVID-19 pandemic. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cancer service volumes from the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, defined as April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, were compared with volumes during a prepandemic period of April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020. RESULTS During the first year of the pandemic, there were a total of 4 476 693 cancer care services, compared with 5 644 105 services in the year prior, a difference of 20.7% fewer services of cancer care, representing a potential backlog of 1 167 412 cancer services. While there were less pronounced changes in systemic treatments, emergency and urgent imaging examinations (eg, 1.9% more parenteral systemic treatments) and surgical procedures (eg, 65% more urgent surgical procedures), major reductions were observed for most services beginning in March 2020. Compared with the year prior, during the first pandemic year, cancer screenings were reduced by 42.4% (-1 016 181 screening tests), cancer treatment surgical procedures by 14.1% (-8020 procedures), and radiation treatment visits by 21.0% (-141 629 visits). Biopsies to confirm cancer decreased by up to 41.2% and surgical cancer resections by up to 27.8% during the first pandemic wave. New consultation volumes also decreased, such as for systemic treatment (-8.2%) and radiation treatment (-9.3%). The use of virtual cancer care increased for systemic treatment and radiation treatment and psychosocial oncological care visits, increasing from 0% to 20% of total new or follow-up visits prior to the pandemic up to 78% of total visits in the first pandemic year. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, large reductions in cancer service volumes were observed. While most services recovered to prepandemic levels at the end of the first pandemic year, a substantial care deficit likely accrued. The anticipated downstream morbidity and mortality associated with this deficit underscore the urgent need to address the backlog and recover cancer care and warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan J. Walker
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Eta Ashu
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ryan Wood
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Saba Vahid
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - Julia Gao
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - Daniela Gallo-Hershberg
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Michelle Rey
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - Martin C. Tammemägi
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St Catharines, Canada
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna M. Chiarelli
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Simron Singh
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, , Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Leta Forbes
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, R.S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Oshawa, Canada
| | - Julian Dobranowski
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Niagara Health, St Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Irish
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Ontario Health–Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nica A, Sutradhar R, Kupets R, Covens A, Vicus D, Li Q, Ferguson SE, Gien LT. Pre-operative wait times in high-grade non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: Do surgical delays impact patient survival? Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:333-340. [PMID: 34895897 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Practice guidelines advocating for regionalization of endometrial cancer surgery to gynecologic oncologists practicing in designated gynecologic oncology centres were published in Ontario in June 2013. Our objectives were to determine whether this policy affected surgical wait times, and whether longer wait time to surgery is a predictor of survival in high grade endometrial cancer patients. METHODS This was a population-based retrospective cohort study, which included patients diagnosed with high-grade non-endometrioid endometrial cancer who had a hysterectomy between 2003 and 2017. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with a spline function was used to model the relationship between surgical wait time and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified 3518 patients who underwent hysterectomy for high-grade non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. Patients who had surgery with a gynecologic oncologist had a median surgical wait time from diagnosis to hysterectomy of 53 days compared to 57 days pre-regionalization (p = 0.0007), and from first gynecologic oncology consultation to hysterectomy of 29 days compared to 32 days pre-regionalization (p = 0.0006). Survival was inferior for patients who had surgery within 14 days of diagnosis (HR death 2.7 for 1-7 days, 95% CI 1.61-4.51, and HR death 1.96 for 8-14 days, 95% CI 1.50-2.57), reflective of disease severity. Decreased survival occurred with surgical wait times of more than 45 days from the patient's first gynecologic oncology appointment (HR death 1.19 for 46-60 days, 95% CI 1.04-1.36, and HR death 1.42 for 61-75 days, 95% CI 1.11-1.83). CONCLUSIONS Regionalization of surgery for high-grade endometrial cancer has not had an impact on surgical wait times. Patients who have surgery more than 45 days after surgical consultation have reduced survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra Nica
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Rachel Kupets
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allan Covens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sarah E Ferguson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lilian T Gien
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bouvard V, Wentzensen N, Mackie A, Berkhof J, Brotherton J, Giorgi-Rossi P, Kupets R, Smith R, Arrossi S, Bendahhou K, Canfell K, Chirenje ZM, Chung MH, Del Pino M, de Sanjosé S, Elfström M, Franco EL, Hamashima C, Hamers FF, Herrington CS, Murillo R, Sangrajrang S, Sankaranarayanan R, Saraiya M, Schiffman M, Zhao F, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Indave Ruiz BI, Mosquera-Metcalfe I, Lauby-Secretan B. The IARC Perspective on Cervical Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1908-1918. [PMID: 34758259 DOI: 10.1056/nejmsr2030640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Bouvard
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Anne Mackie
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Julia Brotherton
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Paolo Giorgi-Rossi
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Rachel Kupets
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Robert Smith
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Silvina Arrossi
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Karima Bendahhou
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Karen Canfell
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Z Mike Chirenje
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Michael H Chung
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Marta Del Pino
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Silvia de Sanjosé
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Miriam Elfström
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Eduardo L Franco
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Chisato Hamashima
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Françoise F Hamers
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - C Simon Herrington
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Raúl Murillo
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Suleeporn Sangrajrang
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Mona Saraiya
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Mark Schiffman
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Fanghui Zhao
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Marc Arbyn
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Walter Prendiville
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Blanca I Indave Ruiz
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Isabel Mosquera-Metcalfe
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Béatrice Lauby-Secretan
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leung E, Gladwish A, Davidson M, Taggar A, Barnes E, Donovan E, Gien L, Covens A, Vicus D, Kupets R, Han K, Velker V, Mendez L, MacKay H, Cheung P, Loblaw D, D'Souza D. Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Cancers of the Uterus (SPARTACUS): A Multicenter Prospective Trial Evaluating Acute Toxicities and Patient Reported Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
12
|
Leung E, Gladwish A, Davidson M, Taggar A, Barnes E, Donovan E, Gien L, Covens A, Vicus D, Kupets R, Han K, Velker V, Mendez L, MacKay H, Cheung P, Loblaw A, D’Souza. 57: Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Cancers of the Uterus (Spartacus): A Multi-Centre Prospective Trial Evaluating Acute Toxicities and Patient Reported Outcomes. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)08935-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
13
|
Walker MJ, Meggetto O, Gao J, Espino-Hernández G, Jembere N, Bravo CA, Rey M, Aslam U, Sheppard AJ, Lofters AK, Tammemägi MC, Tinmouth J, Kupets R, Chiarelli AM, Rabeneck L. Measuring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on organized cancer screening and diagnostic follow-up care in Ontario, Canada: A provincial, population-based study. Prev Med 2021; 151:106586. [PMID: 34217413 PMCID: PMC9755643 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
It is essential to quantify the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening, including for vulnerable sub-populations, to inform the development of evidence-based, targeted pandemic recovery strategies. We undertook a population-based retrospective observational study in Ontario, Canada to assess the impact of the pandemic on organized cancer screening and diagnostic services, and assess whether patterns of cancer screening service use and diagnostic delay differ across population sub-groups during the pandemic. Provincial health databases were used to identify age-eligible individuals who participated in one or more of Ontario's breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer screening programs from January 1, 2019-December 31, 2020. Ontario's screening programs delivered 951,000 (-41%) fewer screening tests in 2020 than in 2019 and volumes for most programs remained more than 20% below historical levels by the end of 2020. A smaller percentage of cervical screening participants were older (50-59 and 60-69 years) during the pandemic when compared with 2019. Individuals in the oldest age groups and in lower-income neighborhoods were significantly more likely to experience diagnostic delay following an abnormal breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening test during the pandemic, and individuals with a high probability of living on a First Nation reserve were significantly more likely to experience diagnostic delay following an abnormal fecal test. Ongoing monitoring and management of backlogs must continue. Further evaluation is required to identify populations for whom access to cancer screening and diagnostic care has been disproportionately impacted and quantify impacts of these service disruptions on cancer incidence, stage, and mortality. This information is critical to pandemic recovery efforts that are aimed at achieving equitable and timely access to cancer screening-related care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan J Walker
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Olivia Meggetto
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Gao
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Michelle Rey
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Usman Aslam
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amanda J Sheppard
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aisha K Lofters
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontairo, Canada; IC/ES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Martin C Tammemägi
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; IC/ES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna M Chiarelli
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; IC/ES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nica A, Sutradhar R, Kupets R, Covens A, Vicus D, Li Q, Ferguson S, Gien L. Preoperative wait times in high-grade endometrial cancer: do surgical delays impact patient survival? Gynecol Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(21)00692-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
15
|
Meggetto O, Jembere N, Gao J, Walker MJ, Rey M, Rabeneck L, Murphy KJ, Kupets R. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Ontario Cervical Screening Program, colposcopy and treatment services in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. BJOG 2021; 128:1503-1510. [PMID: 33982870 PMCID: PMC8209864 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Objective To describe the immediate impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on cervical screening, colposcopy and treatment volumes in Ontario, Canada. Design Population‐based retrospective observational study. Setting Ontario, Canada. Population People with a cervix age of 21–69 years who completed at least one cervical screening cytology test, colposcopy or treatment procedure for cervical dysplasia between January 2019 and August 2020. Methods Administrative databases were used to compare cervical screening cytology, colposcopy and treatment procedure volumes before (historical comparator) and during the first 6 months of the COVID‐19 pandemic (March–August 2020). Main outcome measures Changes in cervical screening cytology, colposcopy and treatment volumes; individuals with high‐grade cytology awaiting colposcopy. Results During the first 6 months of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the monthly average number of cervical screening cytology tests, colposcopies and treatments decreased by 63.8% (range: −92.3 to −41.0%), 39.7% (range: −75.1 to −14.3%) and 31.1% (range: −43.5 to −23.6%), respectively, when compared with the corresponding months in 2019. Between March and August 2020, on average 292 (−51.0%) fewer high‐grade cytological abnormalities were detected through screening each month. As of August 2020, 1159 (29.2%) individuals with high‐grade screening cytology were awaiting follow‐up colposcopy. Conclusions The COVID‐19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on key cervical screening and follow‐up services in Ontario. As the pandemic continues, ongoing monitoring of service utilisation to inform system response and recovery is required. Future efforts to understand the impact of COVID‐19‐related disruptions on cervical cancer outcomes will be needed. Tweetable abstract COVID‐19 has had a substantial impact on cervical screening and follow‐up services in Ontario, Canada. COVID‐19 has had a substantial impact on cervical screening and follow‐up services in Ontario, Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Meggetto
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - N Jembere
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J Gao
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M J Walker
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Rey
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Rabeneck
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - K J Murphy
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada.,Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga/Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Kupets
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nica A, Marchocki Z, Gien LT, Kupets R, Vicus D, Covens A. Cervical conization and lymph node assessment for early stage low-risk cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:447-451. [PMID: 33649012 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There has been a contemporary shift in clinical practice towards tailoring treatment in patients with early cervical cancer and low-risk features to non-radical surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the oncologic, fertility, and obstetric outcomes after cervical conization and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with early stage low-risk cervical cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review in patients with early cervical cancer treated with cervical conization and lymph node assessment between November 2008 and February 2020. Eligibility criteria included patients with a histologic diagnosis of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IA1 with positive lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), stage IA2, or stage IB1 (≤2 cm) with less than two-thirds (<10 mm) cervical stromal invasion. RESULTS A total of 44 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 31 years (range 19-61) and 20 patients (45%) were nulliparous. One patient had a 25 mm tumor while the remaining patients had tumors smaller than 20 mm. Eighteen (41%) patients had LVSI. Median follow-up was 44 months (range 6-137). A total of 17 (39%) patients had negative margins on the diagnostic excisional procedure, and none had residual disease on the repeat cone biopsy. Three (6.8%) patients had micrometastases detected in the SLNs and underwent ipsilateral lymphadenectomy; all remaining non-SLN lymph nodes were negative. Six (13.6%) patients required more definitive surgical or adjuvant treatment due to high-risk pathologic features. There were no recurrences documented. Three patients developed cervical stenosis. The live birth rate was 85% and 16 (94%) of 17 patients had live births at term. CONCLUSION Cervical conization with SLN biopsy appears to be a safe treatment option in selected patients with early cervical cancer. Future results of prospective trials may shed definitive light on fertility-sparing options in this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra Nica
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zbigniew Marchocki
- Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian T Gien
- Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Covens
- Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nica A, Sutradhar R, Kupets R, Covens A, Vicus D, Li Q, Ferguson SE, Gien LT. Outcomes after the regionalization of care for high-grade endometrial cancers: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224:274.e1-274.e10. [PMID: 32931769 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In June 2013, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), the agency responsible for advancing cancer care in Ontario, Canada, published practice guidelines recommending that gynecologic oncologists at tertiary care centers manage the treatment of patients with high-grade endometrial cancers. This study examines the effects of this regionalization of care on patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the regionalization of surgery for high-grade endometrial cancer on patient and treatment outcomes. STUDY DESIGN In this retrospective cohort study, patients diagnosed with nonendometrioid high-grade endometrial cancer from 2003 to 2017 were identified using province-wide administrative databases. To allow 6 months for knowledge translation, 2 periods were defined, with January 1, 2014, as the cutoff. Methods for segmented regression were used to test the effect of the guidelines. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate whether regionalization of care had an impact on patient survival. RESULTS There were 3518 patients with nonendometrioid high-grade endometrial cancer identified. The case mix as represented by patient comorbidities and the disease stage distribution did not differ significantly between the 2 regionalization periods. There was a significant increase (69%-85%; P<.001) in the proportion of primary surgeries performed by gynecologic oncologists after regionalization, which was not explained by secular trends. After regionalization, the proportion of patients who had surgical staging (50%-63%; P<.001) and the proportion of patients who received adjuvant treatment (65%-71%; P<.001) increased significantly. After adjusting for age, stage, and comorbidities, there was a decrease in the hazard of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.85 [95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.99]; P=.04) after regionalization. CONCLUSION The publication of a regionalization policy for the treatment of high-grade endometrial cancers in Ontario led to an increase in the proportion of surgeries performed by gynecologic oncologists. This also translated into a significant improvement in patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra Nica
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Covens
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Qing Li
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah E Ferguson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian T Gien
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cusimano MC, Vicus D, Pulman K, Maganti M, Bernardini MQ, Bouchard-Fortier G, Laframboise S, May T, Hogen LF, Covens AL, Gien LT, Kupets R, Rouzbahman M, Clarke BA, Mirkovic J, Cesari M, Turashvili G, Zia A, Ene GEV, Ferguson SE. Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs Lymphadenectomy for Intermediate- and High-Grade Endometrial Cancer Staging. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:157-164. [PMID: 33175109 PMCID: PMC7658802 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Question What is the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) compared with lymphadenectomy in women with intermediate- and high-grade endometrial cancer? Findings In this cohort study of 156 patients with endometrial cancer (126 with high-grade histologic subtypes), SLNB had a sensitivity of 96% and a negative predictive value of 99% for the detection of nodal metastasis. A total of 26% of patients with node-positive cancer were identified outside lymphadenectomy boundaries or required immunohistochemistry for diagnosis. Meaning In this study, SLNB had similar diagnostic accuracy and prognostic ability as lymphadenectomy in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer at greatest risk for nodal metastasis. Importance Whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can replace lymphadenectomy for surgical staging in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer (EC) is unclear. Objective To examine the diagnostic accuracy of, performance characteristics of, and morbidity associated with SLNB using indocyanine green in patients with intermediate- and high-grade EC. Design, Setting, and Participants In this prospective, multicenter cohort study (Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs Lymphadenectomy for Intermediate- and High-Grade Endometrial Cancer Staging [SENTOR] study), accrual occurred from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2019, with early stoppage because of prespecified accuracy criteria. The study included patients with clinical stage I grade 2 endometrioid or high-grade EC scheduled to undergo laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy with an intent to complete staging at 3 designated cancer centers in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Exposures All patients underwent SLNB followed by lymphadenectomy as the reference standard. Patients with grade 2 endometrioid EC underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) alone, and patients with high-grade EC underwent PLND and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALND). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was sensitivity of the SLNB algorithm. Secondary outcomes were additional measures of diagnostic accuracy, sentinel lymph node detection rates, and adverse events. Results The study enrolled 156 patients (median age, 65.5 years; range, 40-86 years; median body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], 27.5; range, 17.6-49.3), including 126 with high-grade EC. All patients underwent SLNB and PLND, and 101 patients (80%) with high-grade EC also underwent PALND. Sentinel lymph node detection rates were 97.4% per patient (95% CI, 93.6%-99.3%), 87.5% per hemipelvis (95% CI, 83.3%-91.0%), and 77.6% bilaterally (95% CI, 70.2%-83.8%). Of 27 patients (17%) with nodal metastases, 26 patients were correctly identified by the SLNB algorithm, yielding a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 81%-100%), a false-negative rate of 4% (95% CI, 0%-19%), and a negative predictive value of 99% (95% CI, 96%-100%). Only 1 patient (0.6%) was misclassified by the SLNB algorithm. Seven of 27 patients with node-positive cancer (26%) were identified outside traditional PLND boundaries or required immunohistochemistry for diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance In this prospective cohort study, SLNB had acceptable diagnostic accuracy for patients with high-grade EC at increased risk of nodal metastases and improved the detection of node-positive cases compared with lymphadenectomy. The findings suggest that SLNB is a viable option for the surgical staging of EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Cusimano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Pulman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Gynecologic Oncology Program, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manjula Maganti
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Genevieve Bouchard-Fortier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephane Laframboise
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Taymaa May
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liat F Hogen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan L Covens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian T Gien
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marjan Rouzbahman
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Blaise A Clarke
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jelena Mirkovic
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Cesari
- Laboratory Medicine and Genetics Program, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gulisa Turashvili
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aysha Zia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gabrielle E V Ene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah E Ferguson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A population-level retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the influence of cervical screening history on the survival from cervical cancer in women 50 years or older. METHODS The study included women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer in Ontario, Canada, between 2005 and 2012, who were followed for at least 4 years. Screening history was observed for the 5 years before diagnosis. Health care administrative databases were linked to determine demographic, affiliation with primary care physicians, stage (available 2010-2012), treatment, and survival data. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were carried out to evaluate the impact of cervical screening on overall survival (OS). RESULTS There were eligible 1,422 women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer between 2005 and 2012 of whom 566 had been screened within the 5 years before diagnosis. There were 856 women who did not undergo screening within the 5 years before diagnosis. Unscreened women were more likely to present with locally advanced disease (69.3%) compared with the screened women (42.9%). Four-year OS was significantly greater in the screened group (79.9% vs 58.2%). In our univariate analysis, screening was significantly related to survival (hazard ratio = 2.1, p < .01). In our multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, treatment, affiliation with a primary care physician, and income, screening was still significantly associated with improved survival (hazard ratio = 1.5, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate a survival benefit to screening in women 50 years or older who are diagnosed with cervical cancer. Screening participation must be encouraged in women older than 50 years as rates decline in this age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Clark
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Li Wang
- Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nica A, Kim SR, Gien LT, Covens A, Bernardini MQ, Bouchard-Fortier G, Kupets R, May T, Vicus D, Laframboise S, Hogen L, Cusimano MC, Ferguson SE. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1864-1870. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesMinimally invasive radical hysterectomy is associated with decreased survival in patients with early cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of an intra-uterine manipulator at the time of laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy is associated with inferior oncologic outcomes.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was carried out of all patients with cervical cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma) International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stages IA1 (with positive lymphovascular space invasion) to IIA who underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy at two academic centers between January 2007 and December 2017. Treatment, tumor characteristics, and survival data were retrieved from hospital records.ResultsA total of 224 patients were identified at the two centers; 115 had surgery with the use of an intra-uterine manipulator while 109 did not; 53 were robotic and 171 were laparoscopic. Median age was 44 years (range 38–54) and median body mass index was 25.8 kg/m2 (range 16.6–51.5). Patients in whom an intra-uterine manipulator was not used at the time of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy were more likely to have residual disease at hysterectomy (p<0.001), positive lymphovascular space invasion (p=0.02), positive margins (p=0.008), and positive lymph node metastasis (p=0.003). Recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 80% in the no intra-uterine manipulator group and 94% in the intra-uterine manipulator group. After controlling for the presence of residual cancer at hysterectomy, tumor size and high-risk pathologic criteria (positive margins, parametria or lymph nodes), the use of an intra-uterine manipulator was no longer significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.0, p=0.05). The only factor which was consistently associated with recurrence-free survival was tumor size (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.0, for every 10 mm increase, p<0.001).ConclusionAfter controlling for adverse pathological factors, the use of an intra-uterine manipulator in patients with early cervical cancer who underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was not an independent factor associated with rate of recurrence.
Collapse
|
21
|
Clark M, Jembere N, Kupets R. The impact of a universal HPV vaccination program on lower genital tract dysplasia and genital warts. Gynecol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
22
|
Nica A, Kim S, Gien L, Covens A, Bernardini M, Bouchard-Fortier G, Kupets R, Hogen L, Laframboise S, May T, Vicus D, Ferguson S. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: Is the uterine manipulator to blame? Gynecol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
23
|
Cusimano M, Vicus D, Pulman K, Bernardini M, Laframboise S, May T, Bouchard-Fortier G, Hogen L, Gien L, Covens A, Kupets R, Clarke B, Cesari M, Rouzbahman M, Mirkovic J, Turashvili G, Maganti M, Zia A, Ene G, Ferguson S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus lymphadenectomy for high-grade endometrial cancer staging (SENTOR trial): A prospective multicenter cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
24
|
Buick C, Jembere N, Wang L, Kupets R. Cervical Screening and Colposcopy Management of Women Age 24 and Under. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2020; 42:1518-1524. [PMID: 32988802 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In 2012, Ontario's cervical cancer screening program changed the age of initial screening from 18 years of age to 21 and identified women aged 21-24 years as a special population whose cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions should be managed conservatively. In order to provide insight into these changes, we sought to examine patient, provider, and clinical characteristics of cervical cancer screening and colposcopy care in women aged 12-24 years. METHODS We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study of all women in Ontario, aged 12-24 years, who underwent a Pap test between 2012 and 2014. Variables measured included, patient age, cytologic result of the index Pap test; colposcopy and definitive treatment within 1.5 years of the index Pap test; and carcinoma in situ (CIS) and invasive cervical cancer (ICC) 1.5 years after the index Pap test. Descriptive statistics were calculated for variables, and incidence rates per 100 000 women screened were calculated for CIS and ICC. RESULTS A total of 270 391 index Pap tests were performed. The majority of patients were between 18 and 24 years of age (12-17 y: 5.5%; 18-20 y: 24.3%; 21-24 y: 70.1%). Overall, 87.0% of Pap tests were normal, 6.9% of women underwent subsequent colposcopy, and 1.1% received any treatment. Of women with a high-grade result, 86.6% (n = 1279) underwent colposcopy and 42.8% (n=632) received any treatment. Of women with a low-grade result, 42.3% (n = 13 856) underwent colposcopy, and 6.0% (n = 1955) had any treatment. Age-standardized rates of CIS and ICC in were 161.5 and 1.0 per 100 000 women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Despite the change in the screening guidelines, women under the age of 21 continue to be screened. This study highlights the low risk of ICC in women under age 25 and lays groundwork for re-examining screening guidelines for women in this age group. Furthermore, colposcopy referrals for women with a low-grade result on an index Pap test, and treatment of women under 24 years of age continue to be high. Future work must address the over-utilization of population-based screening, as well as factors related to adherence to screening guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona Buick
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Nathaniel Jembere
- Department of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON; Ontario Cervical Cancer Screening Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON; University of Toronto, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Toronto, ON.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nguyen JMV, Gien LT, Covens A, Kupets R, Osborne RJ, Sadeghi M, Nathens AB, Vicus D. Dual mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis decreases risk of pulmonary embolus after laparotomy for gynecologic malignancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 32:55-61. [PMID: 32571889 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with gynecologic malignancies have high rates of post-operative venous thromboembolism. Currently, there is no consensus for peri-operative thromboprophylaxis specific to gynecologic oncology. We aimed to compare rates of symptomatic pulmonary embolus within 30 days post-operatively, and to identify risk factors for pulmonary embolus. METHODS The Division of Gynecologic Oncology at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre implemented dual thromboprophylaxis for laparotomies in December 2017. We conducted a prospective study of laparotomies for gynecologic malignancies from December 2017 to October 2018, with comparison to historical cohort from January 2016 to November 2017 using the institutional National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP). Pre-intervention, patients received low molecular weight heparin during admission and extended 28-day prophylaxis was continued at the surgeon's discretion. Post-intervention, all patients received both mechanical thromboprophylaxis with sequential compression devices during admission and 28-day prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin. RESULTS There were 371 and 163 laparotomies pre- and post-intervention, respectively. Patient characteristics (age, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, tumor stage), rate of malignant cases, operative blood loss and duration, and length of stay were similar between groups. After implementation, pulmonary emboli rates decreased from 5.1% to 0% (p=0.001). There were more cytoreductive procedures pre-intervention (p≤0.0001) but surgical complexity scores were similar (p=0.82). Univariate analysis revealed that surgery pre-intervention (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.04 to 17.43, p=0.04), length of stay ≥5 days (OR 11.94, 95% CI 2.65 to 53.92, p=0.002), and operative blood loss ≥500 mL (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.05 to 7.8, p=0.04) increased risk of pulmonary embolus. On multivariable analysis, surgery pre-intervention remained associated with more pulmonary emboli (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.03 to 16.79, p=0.045), when adjusting for operative blood loss. CONCLUSION Dual thromboprophylaxis after laparotomy significantly reduced rates of pulmonary embolus in this high-risk patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lilian T Gien
- Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Covens
- Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raymond J Osborne
- Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mahsa Sadeghi
- Division of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Avery B Nathens
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kulkarni A, Policarpio M, Strub S, Jembere N, Kupets R. Performance Indicators for Colposcopy in Ontario. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019; 42:144-149.e1. [PMID: 31679921 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to evaluate the delivery of colposcopy assessments and treatments in Ontario from 2009 to 2017 according to specific performance measures, derived from guidelines on colposcopy use. METHODS This population-based descriptive analysis included screen-eligible women ages 21 to 69 in Ontario who underwent cervical screening between 2009 and 2017. Performance measures that describe the quality of colposcopy services in the province were calculated. RESULTS Five performance measures were used to assess the use of colposcopy in Ontario from 2009 to 2017. From 2013 to 2017, the percentage of women seen for colposcopy after a first diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), without evidence of repeat cytology, remained stable, ranging from 5.9% to 6.3%. The median wait time to colposcopy for atypical glandular cells (AGC), atypical squamous cells (ASC-H), cannot rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), remained relatively stable from 2013 to 2017. In addition, the percentage of women with high-grade Pap test results who were seen in colposcopy within 6 months increased from 74.7% to 83.5%. The percentage of women who were not seen in follow-up within 12 months after treatment for cervical dysplasia remained stable, as did the percentage of women who discontinued colposcopy after three normal Pap test results following treatment for cervical dysplasia. CONCLUSION This study developed five performance indicators and used them to assess the delivery of colposcopic services in Ontario from 2009 to 2017. Performance indicators have previously been used effectively in the field of colorectal cancer screening to identify strengths and weaknesses in the delivery of healthcare services. This had never previously been done in colposcopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Kulkarni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, ON
| | | | - Samara Strub
- Cancer Prevention, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
| | | | - Rachel Kupets
- Cancer Prevention, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON; Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, ON; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Clark M, Lee A, Kupets R. Limitations in Correspondence Programs for Cervical Cancer Screening: Who Are the Women We Are Missing? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2019; 41:1410-1415. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
28
|
Nica A, Covens A, Vicus D, Kupets R, Gien LT. Long term outcomes in patients with sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified by injecting remaining scar after previously excised vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 155:83-87. [PMID: 31451293 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Previous excision of the vulvar tumor may disrupt lymphatic channels and alter the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. The purpose of this study was to measure outcomes after SLN biopsy in patients with and without previous excision of the vulvar tumor. METHODS Retrospective study of patients at a single institution with primary vulvar cancer, clinically negative nodes, and vulvar tumors < 4 cm treated with surgical excision who had SLN biopsy (2008-2015). RESULTS There were 106 cases of concomitant wide local excision (WLE) and SLN biopsy and 24 additional cases of patients who had previous vulvar surgery and no visible tumor; these patients underwent scar re-excision and SLN biopsy. Median follow-up was 31 months. Patients who had previous tumor excision were more likely to be of younger age (p = 0.0001), have a smaller tumor (p = 0.002), and less depth of invasion (p = 0.02). In the wide local excision of the scar specimen, 11 patients (46%) had no residual disease left, 8 patients (33%) had only vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VINIII), 4 patients (17%) had carcinoma in situ with focal invasion and 1 patient (4%) had invasive carcinoma within the second specimen, resected with clear margins. There were no groin recurrences in patients who underwent scar re-excision and who had a negative SLN biopsy. CONCLUSION SLN biopsy is feasible and safe in patients who have had previous excision of the vulvar tumor and present with a scar. When a SLN is detected by injecting the remaining scar, this accurately reflects the nodal status and does not negatively impact oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra Nica
- University of Toronto, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Covens
- University of Toronto, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- University of Toronto, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- University of Toronto, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian T Gien
- University of Toronto, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Decker K, Baines N, Muzyka C, Lee M, Mayrand MH, Yang H, Fung S, Mercer D, McFaul S, Kupets R, Savoie R, Lotocki R, Bentley J. Measuring colposcopy quality in Canada: development of population-based indicators. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 26:e286-e291. [PMID: 31285670 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Colposcopy is a key part of cervical cancer control. As cervical cancer screening and prevention strategies evolve, monitoring colposcopy performance will become even more critical. In the present paper, we describe population-based colposcopy quality indicators that are recommended for ongoing measurement by cervical cancer screening programs in Canada. Methods The Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Network established a multidisciplinary expert working group to identify population-based colposcopy quality indicators. A systematic literature review was conducted to ascertain existing population and program-level colposcopy quality indicators. A systems-level cervical cancer screening pathway describing each step from an abnormal screening test, to colposcopy, and back to screening was developed. Indicators from the literature were assigned a place on the pathway to ensure that all steps were measured. A prioritization matrix scoring system was used to score each indicator based on predetermined criteria. Proposed colposcopy quality indicators were shared with provincial and territorial screening programs and subsequently revised. Results The 10 population-based colposcopy quality indicators identified as priorities were colposcopy uptake, histologic investigation (biopsy) rate, colposcopy referral rate, failure to attend colposcopy, treatment frequency in women 18-24 years of age, re-treatment proportion, colposcopy exit-test proportion, histologic investigation (biopsy) frequency after low-grade Pap test results, length of colposcopy episode of care, and operating room treatment rate. Two descriptive indicators were also identified: colposcopist volume and number of colposcopists per capita. Summary High-quality colposcopy services are an essential component of provincial cervical cancer screening programs. The proposed quality and descriptive indicators will permit colposcopy outcomes to be compared between provinces and across Canada so as to identify opportunities for improving colposcopy services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Decker
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.,Research Institute in Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - N Baines
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON
| | - C Muzyka
- Department of Epidemiology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | | | - M H Mayrand
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC
| | - H Yang
- Population, Public and Aboriginal Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB
| | - S Fung
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON
| | - D Mercer
- Cervical Screening Initiatives Program, Eastern Health, St. John's, NL
| | - S McFaul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - R Kupets
- Ontario Cervical Screening Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
| | - R Savoie
- New Brunswick Department of Health, Fredericton, NB
| | - R Lotocki
- CervixCheck Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - J Bentley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tavasoli SM, Kane E, Kupets R. Impact of Patient-Directed Cytology Results Correspondence Program on Follow-Up of High-Grade Pap Tests. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019; 41:1461-1469. [PMID: 31053566 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Proper follow-up of high-grade (HG) Pap tests is critical to the prevention of cervical cancer. This study evaluated the impact of a patient-directed cytology results correspondence program on follow-up of HG Pap tests among at-risk women aged 21 to 69 in Ontario. METHODS A cohort study with a historical control was used to investigate the impact of a result letter on adherence to follow-up after an HG Pap test. Analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The intervention group was defined as women with an HG Pap test in 2014-2016, and the control group included women with an HG Pap test in 2010-2012. Follow-up was defined as a colposcopy or related treatments within 6 months of an HG Pap test. Factors that could influence adherence to follow-up were included as covariates in a multivariable logistic regression model (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). RESULTS The study population comprised 7088 women in the intervention group and 6887 women in the non-intervention group. The follow-up rate in the intervention group was 86.2% compared with 81.0% in the non-intervention group. Controlling for covariates, women in the intervention group were more likely to have a follow-up (adjusted odds ratio 1.5; 95% confidence interval 1.3-1.6). Other significant factors included being registered to a family physician and the physician's gender. CONCLUSIONS A patient-directed correspondence program that provides Pap test results directly to the woman may reduce loss to follow-up for an HG abnormality, with an increased likelihood that these women will seek and complete a colposcopy and related treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon M Tavasoli
- Department of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
| | - Eli Kane
- Department of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Department of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nguyen JMV, Sadeghi M, Gien LT, Covens A, Kupets R, Nathens AB, Vicus D. Impact of a preventive bundle to reduce surgical site infections in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 152:480-485. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 08/12/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
32
|
Nica A, Covens A, Vicus D, Kupets R, Osborne R, Cesari M, Gien LT. Sentinel lymph nodes in vulvar cancer: Management dilemmas in patients with positive nodes and larger tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 152:94-100. [PMID: 30454877 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been routinely used in the treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), questions still remain regarding the management of patients with positive nodes, as well as its use in patients with larger tumors. METHODS Retrospective study of all patients at a single institution with primary vulvar cancer who had SLN biopsy (2008-2015). Patient and tumor characteristics were collected from hospital records. For patients with positive SLN and for those with tumors ≥40 mm, recurrence rates and location were specifically recorded. RESULTS SLN biopsy was successful in 159 patients (245 groins). Median follow-up was 31 months. 120 patients (187 groins) had a negative SLN without an inguinofemoral lymph node dissection (IFL); there were 6 ipsilateral groin recurrences (5%). 7 patients had micrometastasis (≤2 mm) in the SLN and were treated by radiotherapy. There were no recurrences in the irradiated groins. 19 patients with a positive unilateral SLN had bilateral IFL. One (5.3%) had a positive node in the contralateral groin. 9 patients with positive unilateral SLN had subsequent ipsilateral IFL; there were no groin recurrences in the contralateral groin. 20 patients had tumor size ≥40 mm. 11 patients had a negative SLN biopsy, and thus no IFL; of these patients, 1 had an isolated groin recurrence (9%). CONCLUSION These data suggest it is reasonable to omit a full groin dissection for micrometastatic disease in the SLN, and to perform a unilateral groin dissection in patients with unilateral SLN metastasis. SLN alone in larger tumors may have a higher groin recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra Nica
- University of Toronto, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Covens
- University of Toronto, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- University of Toronto, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- University of Toronto, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ray Osborne
- University of Toronto, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Cesari
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian T Gien
- University of Toronto, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Philp L, Jembere N, Wang L, Gao J, Maguire B, Kupets R. Pap tests in the diagnosis of cervical cancer: Help or hinder? Gynecol Oncol 2018; 150:61-66. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
34
|
Cusimano M, Vicus D, Bernardini M, Zia A, Ene G, Bouchard-Fortier G, May T, Laframboise S, Covens A, Gien L, Kupets R, Cesari M, Shaw P, Ferguson S. Prospective validation of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging in high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
35
|
Tavasoli SM, Kane E, Chiarelli AM, Kupets R. Women's Behaviors Toward Mammogram and Pap Test: Opportunities to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Participation Rates among Older Women. Womens Health Issues 2018; 28:42-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
36
|
Jonah L, Pefoyo AK, Lee A, Hader J, Strasberg S, Kupets R, Chiarelli AM, Tinmouth J. Evaluation of the effect of an audit and feedback reporting tool on screening participation: The Primary Care Screening Activity Report (PCSAR). Prev Med 2017; 96:135-143. [PMID: 27923667 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Revised: 11/28/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Participation in cancer screening is critical to its effectiveness in reducing the burden of cancer. The Primary Care Screening Activity Report (PCSAR), an electronic report, was developed as an innovative audit and feedback tool to increase screening participation in Ontario's cancer screening programs. This study aims to assess its impact on patient screening participation. This study used a retrospective cohort design to evaluate the effectiveness of the 2014 PCSAR on screening participation in Ontario's three screening programs (breast, cervix and colorectal). The 3 cohorts comprised all participants eligible for each of the programs enrolled with a primary care physician in Ontario. Two exposures were evaluated for each cohort: enrollment with a physician who was registered to receive the PCSAR and enrollment with a registered physician who also logged into the PCSAR. Logistic regression modelling was used to assess the magnitude of the effect of PCSAR on participation, adjusting for participant and physician characteristics. Across all three screening programs, 63% of eligible physicians registered to receive the PCSAR and 38% of those registered logged-in to view it. Patients of physicians who registered were significantly more likely to participate in screening, with odds ratios ranging from 1.06 [1.04;1.09] to 1.15 [1.12;1.19]. The adjusted odds ratios associated with PCSAR log-in were 1.07 [1.03;1.12] to 1.18 [1.14;1.22] across all screening programs. Implementation of the PCSAR was associated with a small increase in screening participation. The PCSAR appears to be modestly effective in assisting primary care physicians in optimizing cancer screening participation among their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leigh Jonah
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna Kone Pefoyo
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alex Lee
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joanne Hader
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Rachel Kupets
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna M Chiarelli
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kupets R, Le T. Rôle du traitement adjuvant en matière de cancer de l'endomètre. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2017; 38:S208-S219. [PMID: 28063536 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
38
|
Tavasoli SM, Pefoyo AJK, Hader J, Lee A, Kupets R. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program. Prev Med 2016; 88:230-6. [PMID: 27143497 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2015] [Revised: 04/18/2016] [Accepted: 04/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Study's Objective was to explore the impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation among eligible Ontario women 30 to 69years of age. A cross-sectional study was used to describe factors and screening patterns for 1,150,783 eligible women. A cohort design was used to compare the impact of invitation and reminder letters on Pap uptake comparing women who received the intervention (n=99,278) with a historical non-intervention group (n=130,181). Factors that might influence screening participation were included as covariates in a multivariable logistic regression models. Overall, 26.7% of women who had a Pap test 3 to 5years prior and 9.8% of women with no Pap test in the previous 5years were screened within 9months after the intervention. On cohort analysis, 14.1% of women in the intervention group and 8.5% of women in the non-intervention group were screened within 9months. Being mailed an invitation letter was associated with greater likelihood of screening (OR=1.8, CI 1.7-1.8). Controlling for covariates, the letter intervention was associated with 9month screening for both women with a Pap test 3 to 5years prior (AOR=1.7, CI 1.6-1.8) and those with no Pap test in the previous 5years (AOR=1.8, CI 1.7-1.9). There was a significant effect of all covariates on the participation. The invitation and reminder letter strategy increased cervical cancer screening participation. Additional strategies that could encourage eligible women to participate and/or removing barriers to screening for eligible women may be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon M Tavasoli
- Department of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, 505 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1X3, Canada.
| | - Anna J Kone Pefoyo
- Department of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, 505 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1X3, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada.
| | - Joanne Hader
- Department of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, 505 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1X3, Canada.
| | - Alex Lee
- Department of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, 505 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1X3, Canada.
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Department of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, 505 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1X3, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, etc., 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Tavasoli S, Kone A, Lee A, Kupets R. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation in Ontario. Gynecol Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
40
|
Kupets R, Giede KC, Power P, Agrawal A. The Investigations Required Before Referring a Patient to a Gynaecologic Oncologist. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2016; 38:164-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Accepted: 08/12/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
41
|
Bouchard-Fortier G, Rosen B, Vyarvelska I, Pasetka M, Covens A, Gien LT, Kupets R, Pulman K, Ferguson SE, Vicus D. A comparison of the toxicity and tolerability of two intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 140:36-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2015] [Revised: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 11/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
42
|
Kupets R, Lu Y, Vicus D, Paszat L. Are There Flaws in the Follow-Up of Women With Low-Grade Cervical Dysplasia in Ontario? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2014; 36:892-899. [DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30438-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
43
|
Kupets R, Paszat L. Patterns of care of women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities. Gynecol Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
44
|
Vicus D, Sutradhar R, Lu Y, Elit L, Kupets R, Paszat L. The association between cervical cancer screening and mortality from cervical cancer: a population based case-control study. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 133:167-71. [PMID: 24589414 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2014] [Revised: 02/21/2014] [Accepted: 02/24/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the effect of cervical cancer screening on mortality from cervical cancer in women between the ages of 20 and 69 residing in Ontario by 5 year age groups. METHODS An Ontario population based case-control study of women between ages 20 and 69 was performed. Cases were women who were diagnosed with cervical cancer between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2008 who died from cervical cancer within this period. Controls were women without a diagnosis of cervical cancer between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2008 who were alive on the case's date of death. Exposure was defined as cervical cytology history. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the strength of association between mortality from cervical cancer and screening in 5 year incremental age intervals. RESULTS We identified 1052 cases and 10,494 controls. Less than 2.5% of women who died from cervical cancer were under the age of 30. Cervical cancer screening performed 3-36 months prior to the date of diagnosis was found to be protective of mortality from cervical cancer in women over the age of 30 (odds ratio=0.28-0.60; p<0.05 in all strata). In women under the age of 30 cervical cancer screening was not found to be protective of mortality from cervical cancer (odds ratio=1.58-2.43; non significant). CONCLUSION No association between cervical cancer screening and mortality from cervical cancer under the age of 30 was found. This could be due to there being a small or having no effect or due to the fact that mortality from cervical cancer under the age of 30 is extremely rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Vicus
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institue of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institue of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yan Lu
- Institue of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laurie Elit
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institue of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Paszat
- Institue of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Miroshnichenko G, Kupets R, Paszat L. Referral patterns and association with excessive imaging and delays to surgical treatment among patients with gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
46
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence relating to the use of adjuvant therapy after surgical treatment for endometrial cancer. OPTIONS Women with endometrial cancer can be given the option of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy according to pathologic findings at time of surgery. OUTCOMES The outcomes measured are postoperative progression-free and overall survival in endometrial cancer patients. EVIDENCE Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library, using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., endometrial neoplasms) and key words (e.g., endometrium cancer, endometrial carcinoma). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to December 31, 2011. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, national and international medical specialty societies, and recent conference abstracts. VALUES The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS This guideline is intended to help standardize postoperative treatment of endometrial cancer and minimize undertreatment and overtreatment. VALIDATION The guideline was reviewed for accuracy by content experts in pathology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology. Guideline content was also compared with relevant documents from the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Collapse
|
47
|
Giede C, Le T, Power P, Le T, Bentley J, Farrell S, Fortier MP, Giede C, Kupets R, Plante M, Power P, Renaud MC, Schepansky A, Senikas V, Kwon J, Préfontaine M, Germain I, Pearcey R, D'Souza D, Senterman M, Hoskins P. Archivée: Rôle de la chirurgie en matière de cancer de l’endomètre. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30967-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
48
|
Renaud MC, Le T, Le T, Bentley J, Farrell S, Fortier MP, Giede C, Kupets R, Plante M, Power P, Renaud MC, Schepansky A, Senikas V, Kwon J, Préfontaine M, Germain I, Pearcey R, D'Souza D, Senterman M, Hoskins P. Épidémiologie et explorations visant la présence soupçonnée d’un cancer de l’endomètre. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30971-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
49
|
Kupets R, Le T, Le T, Bentley J, Farrell S, Fortier MP, Giede C, Kupets R, Plante M, Power P, Renaud MC, Schepansky A, Senikas V, Kwon J, Préfontaine M, Germain I, Pearcey R, D'Souza D, Senterman M, Hoskins P. Archivée: Rôle du traitement adjuvant en matière de cancer de l’endomètre. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30969-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
50
|
Giede C, Le T, Power P, Le T, Bentley J, Farrell S, Fortier MP, Giede C, Kupets R, Plante M, Power P, Renaud MC, Schepansky A, Senikas V, Kwon J, Préfontaine M, Germain I, Pearcey R, D’Souza D, Senterman M, Hoskins P. The Role of Surgery in Endometrial Cancer. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2013; 35:370-371. [DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30966-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|