Inhibitory tagging both speeds and strengthens saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during visual search

It has been suggested that, during difficult visual search tasks involving time pressure and multiple saccades, inhibitory tagging helps to facilitate efficient saccade target selection by reducing responses to objects in the scene once they have been searched and rejected. The superior colliculus (SC) is a midbrain structure involved in target selection, and recent findings suggest an influence of inhibitory tagging on SC activity. Precisely how, and by how much, inhibitory tagging influences target selection by SC neurons, however, is unclear. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to characterize and quantify the influence of inhibitory tagging on target selection in the SC. Rhesus monkeys performed a visual search task involving time pressure and multiple saccades. Early in the fixation period between saccades in the context of this task, a subset of SC neurons reliably discriminated the stimulus selected as the next saccade goal, consistent with a role in target selection. Discrimination occurred earlier and was more robust, however, when unselected stimuli in the search array had been previously fixated on the same trial. This indicates that inhibitory tagging both speeds and strengthens saccade target selection in the SC during multisaccade search. The results provide constraints on models of target selection based on SC activity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY An important aspect of efficient behavior during difficult, time-limited visual search tasks is the efficient selection of sequential saccade targets. Inhibitory tagging, i.e., a reduction of neural activity associated with previously fixated objects, may help to facilitate such efficient selection by modulating the selection process in the superior colliculus (SC). In this study, we characterized and quantified this modulation and found that, indeed, inhibitory tagging both speeds and strengthens target selection in the SC.

Inhibitory tagging both speeds and strengthens saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during visual search

It has been suggested that, during difficult visual search tasks involving time pressure and multiple saccades, inhibitory tagging helps to facilitate efficient saccade target selection by reducing responses to objects in the scene once they have been searched and rejected. The superior colliculus (SC) is a midbrain structure involved in target selection, and recent findings suggest an influence of inhibitory tagging on SC activity. Precisely how, and by how much, inhibitory tagging influences target selection by SC neurons, however, is unclear. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to characterize and quantify the influence of inhibitory tagging on target selection in the SC. Rhesus monkeys performed a visual search task involving time pressure and multiple saccades. Early in the fixation period between saccades, a subset of SC neurons reliably discriminated the stimulus selected as the next saccade goal, consistent with a role in target selection. Discrimination occurred earlier and was more robust, however, when unselected stimuli in the search array had been previously fixated on the same trial. This indicates that inhibitory tagging both speeds and strengthens saccade target selection in the SC during multisaccade search. The results provide constraints on models of target selection based on SC activity.

Inhibitory tagging in the superior colliculus during visual search

Inhibitory tagging is an important feature of many models of saccade target selection, in particular those that are based on the notion of a neural priority map. The superior colliculus (SC) has been suggested as a potential site of such a map, yet it is unknown whether inhibitory tagging is represented in the SC during visual search. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that SC neurons represent inhibitory tagging during search, as might be expected if they contribute to a priority map. To do so, we recorded the activity of SC neurons in a multisaccade visual-search task. On each trial, a single reward-bearing target was embedded in an array of physically identical, potentially reward-bearing targets and physically distinct, non-reward-bearing distractors. The task was to fixate the reward-bearing target. We found that, in the context of this task, the activity of many SC neurons was greater when their response field stimulus was a target than when it was a distractor and was reduced when it had been previously fixated relative to when it had not. Moreover, we found that the previous-fixation-related reduction of activity was larger for targets than for distractors and decreased with increasing time (or number of saccades) since fixation. Taken together, the results suggest that fixated stimuli are transiently inhibited in the SC during search, consistent with the notion that inhibitory tagging plays an important role in visual search and that SC neurons represent this inhibition as part of a priority map used for saccade target selection.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Searching a cluttered scene for an object of interest is a ubiquitous task in everyday life, which we often perform relatively quickly and efficiently. It has been suggested that to achieve such speed and efficiency an inhibitory-tagging mechanism inhibits saccades to objects in the scene once they have been searched and rejected. Here, we demonstrate that the superior colliculus represents this type of inhibition during search, consistent with its role in saccade target selection.

Fundus imaging of retinal ganglion cells transduced by retrograde transport of rAAV2-retro

Access of adeno-associated virus (AAV) to ganglion cells following intravitreal injection for gene therapy is impeded by the internal limiting membrane of the retina. As an alternative, one could transduce ganglion cells via retrograde transport after virus injection into a retinal target nucleus. It is unknown if recombinant AAV2-retro (rAAV2-retro), a variant of AAV2 developed specifically for retrograde transport, is capable of transducing retinal ganglion cells. To address this issue, equal volumes of rAAV2-retro-hSyn-EGFP and rAAV2-retro-hSyn-mCherry were mixed in a micropipette and injected into the rat superior colliculus. The time-course of viral transduction was tracked by performing serial in vivo fundus imaging. Cells that were labeled by the fluorophores within the first week remained consistent in distribution and relative signal strength on follow-up imaging. Most transduced cells were double-labeled, but some were labeled by only EGFP or mCherry. Fundus images were later aligned with retinal wholemounts. Ganglion cells in the wholemounts matched precisely the cells imaged by fundus photography. As seen in the fundus images, ganglion cells in wholemounts were sometimes labeled by only EGFP or mCherry. Overall, there was detectable label in 32-41% of ganglion cells. Analysis of the number of cells labeled by 0, 1, or 2 fluorophores, based on Poisson statistics, yielded an average of 0.66 virions transducing each ganglion cell. Although this represents a low number relative to the quantity of virus injected into the superior colliculus, the ganglion cells showed sustained and robust fluorescent labeling. In the primate, injection of rAAV2-retro into the lateral geniculate nucleus might provide a viable approach for the transduction of ganglion cells, bypassing the obstacles that have prevented effective gene delivery via intravitreal injection.

Columnar and Laminar Segregation of Retinal Input to the Primate Superior Colliculus Revealed by Anterograde Tracer Injection Into Each Eye

Purpose

After the lateral geniculate nucleus, the superior colliculus is the richest target of retinal projections in primates. Hubel et al. used tritium autoradiography to show that axon terminals emanating from one eye form irregular columns in the stratum griseum superficiale. Unlabeled gaps were thought to be filled by the other eye, but this assumption was never tested directly.

Methods

Experiments were performed in two normal macaques. In monkey 1, [³H]proline was injected into the left eye and the pattern of radiolabeling was examined in serial cross-sections through the entire superior colliculus. In monkey 2, cholera toxin subunit B conjugated to Alexa 488 was injected into the right eye and cholera toxin subunit B - Alexa 594 was injected into the left eye. The two fluorescent labels were compared in a reconstruction of the superior colliculus prepared from serial sections.

Results

In monkey 1, irregular columns of axon terminals were present in the superficial grey. The projection from the peripheral retina was stronger than the projection from the macula. In monkey 2, the two fluorescent Alexa tracers mainly interdigitated: a conspicuous gap in one label was usually filled by a clump of the other label. There was also partial laminar segregation of ocular inputs. In the far peripheral field representation, the contralateral eye's input generally terminated closer to the tectal surface. In the midperiphery the eyes switched, bringing the ipsilateral input nearer the surface.

Conclusions

Direct retinal input to the macaque superior colliculus is segregated into alternating columns and strata, despite the fact that tectal cells respond robustly to stimulation of either eye.

Microsaccades and attention in a high-acuity visual alignment task

While aiming and shooting, we make tiny eye movements called microsaccades that shift gaze between task-relevant objects within a small region of the visual field. However, in the brief period before pressing the trigger, microsaccades are suppressed. This might be due to the lack of a requirement to shift gaze as the retinal images of the two objects begin to overlap on the fovea. Alternatively, we might actively suppress microsaccades to prevent any disturbances in visual perception caused by microsaccades around the time of their occurrence and their subsequent effect on shooting performance. In this study we looked at microsaccade rates while participants performed a simulated shooting task under two conditions: a normal condition in which they moved their eyes freely, and an eccentric condition in which they maintained gaze on a fixed target while performing the shooting task at 5° eccentricity. As expected, microsaccade rate dropped near the end of the task in the normal viewing condition. However, we also found the same decrease for the eccentric condition in which microsaccades did not shift gaze between the task objects. Microsaccades are also produced in response to shifts in covert attention. To test whether disengagement of covert attention from the eccentric shooting location caused the drop in microsaccade rate, we monitored the location of participants' spatial attention by using a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) task simultaneously at a location opposite to the shooting task. Target letter detection at the RSVP location did not improve during the drop in microsaccade rate, suggesting that covert attention was maintained at the shooting task location. We conclude that in addition to their usual gaze-shifting function, microsaccades during fine-acuity tasks might be modulated by cognitive processes other than spatial attention.