1
|
Lo Y, Lester SC, Ellis IO, Lanjewar S, Laurini J, Patel A, Bhattarai A, Ustun B, Harmon B, Kleer CG, Ross D, Amin A, Wang Y, Bradley R, Turashvili G, Zeng J, Baum J, Singh K, Hakima L, Harigopal M, Komforti M, Shin SJ, Abbott SE, Jaffer S, Badve SS, Khoury T, D'Alfonso TM, Ginter PS, Collins V, Towne W, Gan Y, Nassar A, Sahin AA, Flieder A, Aldrees R, Ngo MH, Edema U, Sapna F, Schnitt SJ, Fineberg SA. Identification of Glandular (Acinar)/Tubule Formation in Invasive Carcinoma of the Breast: A Study to Determine Concordance Using the World Health Organization Definition. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2024:498575. [PMID: 38244086 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0163-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The Nottingham Grading System (NGS) developed by Elston and Ellis is used to grade invasive breast cancer (IBC). Glandular (acinar)/tubule formation is a component of NGS. OBJECTIVE.— To investigate the ability of pathologists to identify individual structures that should be classified as glandular (acinar)/tubule formation. DESIGN.— A total of 58 hematoxylin-eosin photographic images of IBC with 1 structure circled were classified as tubules (41 cases) or nontubules (17 cases) by Professor Ellis. Images were sent as a PowerPoint (Microsoft) file to breast pathologists, who were provided with the World Health Organization definition of a tubule and asked to determine if a circled structure represented a tubule. RESULTS.— Among 35 pathologists, the κ statistic for assessing agreement in evaluating the 58 images was 0.324 (95% CI, 0.314-0.335). The median concordance rate between a participating pathologist and Professor Ellis was 94.1% for evaluating 17 nontubule cases and 53.7% for 41 tubule cases. A total of 41% of the tubule cases were classified correctly by less than 50% of pathologists. Structures classified as tubules by Professor Ellis but often not recognized as tubules by pathologists included glands with complex architecture, mucinous carcinoma, and the "inverted tubule" pattern of micropapillary carcinoma. A total of 80% of participants reported that they did not have clarity on what represented a tubule. CONCLUSIONS.— We identified structures that should be included as tubules but that were not readily identified by pathologists. Greater concordance for identification of tubules might be obtained by providing more detailed images and descriptions of the types of structures included as tubules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yungtai Lo
- From the Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (Lo) and Pathology (Fineberg, Lanjewar, Laurini, Ustun, Harmon, Edema, Sapna), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Susan C Lester
- the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Lester, Aldrees, Ngo, Schnitt)
| | - Ian O Ellis
- the Department of Histopathology, University of Nottingham/Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom (Ellis)
| | - Sonali Lanjewar
- From the Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (Lo) and Pathology (Fineberg, Lanjewar, Laurini, Ustun, Harmon, Edema, Sapna), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Javier Laurini
- From the Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (Lo) and Pathology (Fineberg, Lanjewar, Laurini, Ustun, Harmon, Edema, Sapna), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Ami Patel
- the Department of Pathology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York (Patel)
| | - Ava Bhattarai
- the Department of Pathology, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee (Bhattarai, Bradley)
| | - Berrin Ustun
- From the Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (Lo) and Pathology (Fineberg, Lanjewar, Laurini, Ustun, Harmon, Edema, Sapna), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Bryan Harmon
- From the Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (Lo) and Pathology (Fineberg, Lanjewar, Laurini, Ustun, Harmon, Edema, Sapna), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Celina G Kleer
- the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Kleer, Abbott)
| | - Dara Ross
- the Department of Pathology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Ross, D'Alfonso)
| | - Ali Amin
- the Department of Pathology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Amin, Wang, Singh)
| | - Yihong Wang
- the Department of Pathology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Amin, Wang, Singh)
| | - Robert Bradley
- the Department of Pathology, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee (Bhattarai, Bradley)
| | - Gulisa Turashvili
- the Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia (Turashvili, Badve)
| | - Jennifer Zeng
- the Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (Zeng, Collins)
| | - Jordan Baum
- the Department of Pathology, NYU Langone Hospital, Mineola, New York (Baum, Ginter, Flieder)
| | - Kamaljeet Singh
- the Department of Pathology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Amin, Wang, Singh)
| | - Laleh Hakima
- the Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill (Hakima)
| | - Malini Harigopal
- the Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Harigopal)
| | - Miglena Komforti
- the Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida (Komforti, Nassar)
| | - Sandra J Shin
- the Department of Pathology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York (Shin)
| | - Sara E Abbott
- the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Kleer, Abbott)
| | - Shabnam Jaffer
- the Department of Pathology, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, New York (Jaffer)
| | - Sunil Shankar Badve
- the Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia (Turashvili, Badve)
| | - Thaer Khoury
- the Department of Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Khoury)
| | - Timothy M D'Alfonso
- the Department of Pathology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Ross, D'Alfonso)
| | - Paula S Ginter
- the Department of Pathology, NYU Langone Hospital, Mineola, New York (Baum, Ginter, Flieder)
| | - Victoria Collins
- the Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (Zeng, Collins)
| | - William Towne
- the Department of Pathology, Columbia University/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York (Towne)
| | - Yujun Gan
- the Department of Pathology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire (Gan)
| | - Aziza Nassar
- the Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida (Komforti, Nassar)
| | - Aysegul A Sahin
- the Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Sahin)
| | - Andrea Flieder
- the Department of Pathology, NYU Langone Hospital, Mineola, New York (Baum, Ginter, Flieder)
| | - Rana Aldrees
- the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Lester, Aldrees, Ngo, Schnitt)
| | - Marie-Helene Ngo
- the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Lester, Aldrees, Ngo, Schnitt)
| | - Ukuemi Edema
- From the Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (Lo) and Pathology (Fineberg, Lanjewar, Laurini, Ustun, Harmon, Edema, Sapna), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Fnu Sapna
- From the Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (Lo) and Pathology (Fineberg, Lanjewar, Laurini, Ustun, Harmon, Edema, Sapna), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Stuart J Schnitt
- the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Lester, Aldrees, Ngo, Schnitt)
| | - Susan A Fineberg
- From the Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (Lo) and Pathology (Fineberg, Lanjewar, Laurini, Ustun, Harmon, Edema, Sapna), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Whaley RD, Aldrees R, Dougherty RE, Prieto Granada C, Badve SS, Al Diffalha S. Breast Implant Capsule-Associated Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Report of 2 Patients. Int J Surg Pathol 2022; 30:900-907. [PMID: 35300538 DOI: 10.1177/10668969221086940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Breast implant augmentation is a low-risk procedure with few life-threatening complications. Capsular contracture and rupture/leakage of the implant are the most common complications encountered. Malignant breast implant augmentation-associated lesions are rare, with anaplastic large cell lymphoma being the most common. Squamous cell carcinomas associated with breast implant augmentation are exceedingly rare, with only eight patients reported. Breast implant capsule-associated squamous cell carcinoma occurs in patients with long standing breast implant augmentations (>11 years). We report two additional patients with breast implant capsule-associated squamous cell carcinoma. Review of the literature reveals that invasion beyond the breast implant capsule into the adjacent tissue by the squamous cell carcinoma appears to have negative prognostic implications, and possibly warrants close clinical follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rumeal D Whaley
- 12250Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Rana Aldrees
- 9968Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rae E Dougherty
- 12250Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Carlos Prieto Granada
- 9968Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sunil S Badve
- 12250Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sameer Al Diffalha
- 9968Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aldrees R, Gao X, Zhang K, Siegal GP, Wei S. Validation of the revised 8th AJCC breast cancer clinical prognostic staging system: analysis of 5321 cases from a single institution. Mod Pathol 2021; 34:291-299. [PMID: 32778677 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-00650-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The anatomic stage groups (ASG) have been arguably the most powerful in predicting breast cancer (BC) outcomes. Recognizing the prognostic influence of histologic grade and receptor status, the 8th AJCC mandates their incorporation into the newly established prognostic stage groups (PSG). This staging scheme was subsequently revised to provide pathological and clinical prognostic stage tables (PPSG/CPSG) due to its incapability to categorize a significant subset of BCs, with the former only used for patients having surgical resection as the initial treatment, and the latter for all patients. Given the increasingly used neoadjuvant therapy, PPSG cannot be assigned in a significant proportion of higher staged BCs. In this study, we validated the CPSG in a cohort of 5321 BCs. Compared to ASG, the application of CPSG resulted in assigning 16.1% and 27.2% of cases to a higher or a lower stage group in non-stage IV BCs, respectively. The changes were seen mostly frequently in ASG IB, followed by IIIC, IIB, IIA, IIIA, IIIB, and IA. In 7.9% of cases, the assigned CPSG changed more than one stage group from the ASG. CPSG provided an improved overall discriminating power in predicting BC-specific survival when compared to ASG. Pairwise comparison using the Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated further advantages for CPSG as the latter showed a significant difference in all categories when compared to their proximate groups, except IIA vs. IB and IIIA vs. IIIB. In contrast, a significantly different hazard was only seen when comparing IIB vs. IIA, IIIA vs. IIB, and IV vs. IIIC for ASG. Thus, the revised 8th AJCC CPSG provided a superior overall staging scheme for predicting prognostic outcomes in BC patients receiving standard of care treatment. Further validation using the available data with larger populations and longer follow-up may be needed to refine and improve this table.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rana Aldrees
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Xiaoqing Gao
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
| | - Kui Zhang
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
| | - Gene P Siegal
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Shi Wei
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aldrees R, Wei S, Prieto-Granada C, Patel C. Primary Clear Cell Sarcoma of the Breast: A Case Report. Am J Clin Pathol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa161.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Casestudy: Clear cell sarcoma (CCS), also known as malignant melanoma of soft parts, is a primary soft tissue neoplasm exhibiting evidence of melanocytic differentiation. It is an uncommon aggressive tumor that arises in tendons and aponeuroses of the distal extremities. Here, we report the first case of primary CCS of the breast.
The patient was a 43-year-old female who presented with a left breast mass and underwent surgical resection at an outside hospital. No history of melanoma or any other malignancies was reported. Grossly, it was described as a 2 x 1.5 x 1.5 cm, well-demarcated, white nodular mass. Microscopic examination showed a malignant neoplasm composed of short spindle cells with ill-defined, eosinophilic cytoplasm and ovoid nuclei with finely stippled chromatin and exhibiting moderate pleomorphism. The lesional cells were arranged in short interlacing fascicles with abundant collagen, with brisk mitotic activity (>15/10 HPF). The differential diagnosis included spindle cell carcinoma, myoepithelial carcinoma and melanocytic neoplasm. The tumor cells were immunoreactive for S-100 protein, SOX10, Mart-1, HMB45 and MiTF, but negative for multiple cytokeratins (including high and low molecular weight keratins), p63, EMA, CEA, Caldesmon, smooth muscle myosin, calponin, desmin, ERG, and CD31, thus confirming melanocytic origin. EWSR1 gene rearrangement was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using break-apart probes. Overall, the histomorphology combined with the immunophenotype and cytogenetic characteristics, was most consistent with a CCS. To our knowledge, no primary CCS of the breast has been previously reported in the English language literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Aldrees
- Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - S Wei
- Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - C Prieto-Granada
- Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - C Patel
- Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aldrees R, Rosenblum F, Eltoum I. Pancreatic/Peripancreatic Spindle Cell Lesions Cytology: A 15-Year Review. Am J Clin Pathol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa161.204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction/Objective
Spindle cell lesions (SCL) are diagnostically challenging, especially on cytology specimens where entities have overlapping features. Neoplastic and non-neoplastic SCL are uncommonly encountered in the pancreas/peripancreatic tissue. The sensitivity and specificity of EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions both approach 95%. In this study, we assess the frequency of SCL found in pancreas/peripancreatic tissue on cytology specimens, the frequency of performing IHC stains and the most useful IHC panels. We also evaluate histology-cytology discrepancies and pitfalls.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of all pancreas/peripancreatic cytology specimen results between January 2004 - August 2019 was conducted. A total of 5,132 cases were identified. The number of spindle cell lesions was 27 (0.52%), with surgical pathology results available for 15 cases (55%). IHC stains were performed on 18 cell blocks (66%) and 9 surgical pathology specimens (60%).
Results
Of the 27 SCL identified, 22 lesions were neoplastic (81%), and 5 lesions were non-neoplastic (19%). The Neoplastic cases were: 10 GISTs (37%), 4 spindle cell lesions, NOS (14.8%), 2 metastatic sarcomas (7.4%), 1 pheochromocytoma (3.7%), 1 leiomyoma (3.7%), 1 schwannoma (3.7%), 1 malignant fibrous histiocytoma (3.7%), 1 granular cell tumor (3.7%), and 1 neuroendocrine carcinoma (3.7%). Of the neoplastic cases, 10 were lesions originating in a different organ with direct extension/distant metastasis to the pancreas (71%), with the most common organ being the stomach, 6 cases (60%). The non-neoplastic cases were: 4 granulomas (14.8%), and 1 accessory spleen (3.7%). IHC stains were performed on 18 cell blocks (66%), and attempted unsuccessfully on 2 cell blocks.
The most commonly utilized stains were: CD117, 15 cases (83%), SMA, 11 cases (61%), S-100, 9 cases (50%), CD34, 5 cases (27%) and Cytokeratin, 5 cases (27%). IHC stains assisted with proper classification in 9 cytology cases (50%). There was one interpretation error*, and the histology-cytology discrepancy rate was 6%.
Conclusion
Pancreatic and peripancreatic spindle cell lesions are uncommon (520/100,000), and are particularly challenging on cytology specimens. If neoplastic, the majority originate in an organ other than the pancreas. If non- neoplastic, the majority are granulomas. Immunohistochemical staining is required for proper classification. And in this small series, cytology is highly accurate for diagnosis (96%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Aldrees
- Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, UNITED STATES
| | - F Rosenblum
- Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, UNITED STATES
| | - I Eltoum
- Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|