1
|
Liao W, Fehnel C, Goss J, Shepherd CJ, Qureshi T, Matthews AT, Ray MA, Faris NR, Pinsky PF, Smeltzer MP, Osarogiagbon RU. Incidentally Detected Lung Cancer in Persons Too Young or Too Old for Lung Cancer Screening in a Mississippi Delta Cohort. J Thorac Oncol 2024; 19:589-600. [PMID: 37984678 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer risk in screening age-ineligible persons with incidentally detected lung nodules is poorly characterized. We evaluated lung cancer risk in two age-ineligible Lung Nodule Program (LNP) cohorts. METHODS Prospective observational study comparing 2-year cumulative lung cancer diagnosis risk, lung cancer characteristics, and overall survival between low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening participants aged 50 to 80 years and LNP participants aged 35 to younger than 50 years (young) and older than 80 years (elderly). RESULTS From 2015 to 2022, lung cancer was diagnosed in 329 (3.43%), 39 (1.07%), and 172 (6.87%) LDCT, young, and elderly LNP patients, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence was 3.0% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.6%-3.4%) versus 0.79% (CI: 0.54%-1.1%) versus 6.5% (CI: 5.5%-7.6%), respectively, but lung cancer diagnosis risk was similar between young LNP and Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) 1 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.88 [CI: 0.50-1.56]) and Lung-RADS 2 (aHR = 1.0 [0.58-1.72]). Elderly LNP risk was greater than Lung-RADS 3 (aHR = 2.34 [CI: 1.50-3.65]), but less than 4 (aHR = 0.28 [CI: 0.22-0.35]). Lung cancer was stage I or II in 62.92% of LDCT versus 33.33% of young (p = 0.0003) and 48.26% of elderly (p = 0.0004) LNP cohorts; 16.72%, 41.03%, and 29.65%, respectively, were diagnosed at stage IV. The aggregate 5-year overall survival rates were 57% (CI: 48-67), 55% (CI: 39-79), and 24% (CI: 15-40) (log-rank p < 0.0001). Results were similar after excluding persons with any history of cancer. CONCLUSIONS LNP modestly benefited persons too young or old for screening. Differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes suggest differences in biological characteristics of lung cancer in these three patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liao
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jordan Goss
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Talat Qureshi
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Meredith A Ray
- School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Nicholas R Faris
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Paul F Pinsky
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Griffin JM, Kroner BL, Wong SL, Preiss L, Wilder Smith A, Cheville AL, Mitchell SA, Lancki N, Hassett MJ, Schrag D, Osarogiagbon RU, Ridgeway JL, Cella D, Jensen RE, Flores AM, Austin JD, Yanez B. Disparities in electronic health record portal access and use among patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:476-484. [PMID: 37930884 PMCID: PMC10919330 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health record-linked portals may improve health-care quality for patients with cancer. Barriers to portal access and use undermine interventions that rely on portals to reduce cancer care disparities. This study examined portal access and persistence of portal use and associations with patient and structural factors before the implementation of 3 portal-based interventions within the Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium. METHODS Portal use data were extracted from electronic health records for the 12 months preceding intervention implementation. Sociodemographic factors, mode of accessing portals (web vs mobile), and number of clinical encounters before intervention implementation were also extracted. Rurality was derived using rural-urban commuting area codes. Broadband access was estimated using the 2015-2019 American Community Survey. Multiple logistic regression models tested the associations of these factors with portal access (ever accessed or never accessed) and persistence of portal use (accessed the portal ≤20 weeks vs ≥21 weeks in the 35-week study period). RESULTS Of 28 942 eligible patients, 10 061 (35%) never accessed the portal. Male sex, membership in a racial and ethnic minority group, rural dwelling, not working, and limited broadband access were associated with lower odds of portal access. Younger age and more clinical encounters were associated with higher odds of portal access. Of those with portal access, 25% were persistent users. Using multiple modalities for portal access, being middle-aged, and having more clinical encounters were associated with persistent portal use. CONCLUSION Patient and structural factors affect portal access and use and may exacerbate disparities in electronic health record-based cancer symptom surveillance and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan M Griffin
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Robert E. and Patricia D. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Barbara L Kroner
- Center for Clinical Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Liliana Preiss
- Center for Clinical Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Wilder Smith
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrea L Cheville
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicola Lancki
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jennifer L Ridgeway
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Robert E. and Patricia D. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roxanne E Jensen
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ann Marie Flores
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jessica D Austin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Betina Yanez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paudel R, Enzinger AC, Uno H, Cronin C, Wong SL, Dizon DS, Hazard Jenkins H, Bian J, Osarogiagbon RU, Jensen RE, Mitchell SA, Schrag D, Hassett MJ. Effects of a change in recall period on reporting severe symptoms: an analysis of a pragmatic multisite trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024:djae049. [PMID: 38445744 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal methods for deploying electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) to manage symptoms in routine oncologic practice remain uncertain. The eSyM symptom management program asks chemotherapy and surgery patients to self-report 12 symptoms regularly. Feedback from nurses and patients led to changing the recall period from the past 7 days to the past 24 hours. METHODS Using questionnaires submitted during the 16-weeks surrounding the recall period change, we assessed the likelihood of reporting a severe, or a moderate-severe, symptom across all 12 symptoms and separately for the 5 most prevalent symptoms. Interrupted time series analyses modeled the effects of the change using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Surgery and chemotherapy cohorts were analyzed separately. Study-wide effects were estimated using a meta-analysis method. RESULTS In total, 1,692 patients from 6 institutions submitted 7,823 eSyM assessments during the 16-weeks surrounding the recall period change. Shortening the recall period was associated with lower odds of severe symptom reporting in the surgery cohort (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.93; p = .02) and lower odds of moderate-severe symptom reporting in the chemotherapy cohort (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.97; p = .02). Among the most prevalent symptoms, 24-hour recall was associated with lower rate of reporting post-operative constipation, but no differences in reporting rates for other symptoms. CONCLUSION A shorter recall period was associated with a reduction in the proportion of patients reporting moderate-severe symptoms. The optimal recall period may vary depending on whether ePROs are collected for active symptom management, as a clinical trial endpoint, or another purpose. (Clinicaltrails.gov (NCT03850912).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hajime Uno
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sandra L Wong
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Don S Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Osarogiagbon RU, Ray MA, Fehnel C, Akinbobola O, Saulsberry A, Dortch K, Faris NR, Matthews AT, Smeltzer MP, Spencer D. Two Interventions on Pathologic Nodal Staging in a Population-Based Lung Cancer Resection Cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 2024; 117:576-584. [PMID: 37678613 PMCID: PMC10912374 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its prognostic importance, poor pathologic nodal staging of lung cancer prevails. We evaluated the impact of 2 interventions to improve pathologic nodal staging. METHODS We implemented a lymph node specimen collection kit to improve intraoperative lymph node collection (surgical intervention) and a novel gross dissection method for intrapulmonary node retrieval (pathology intervention) in nonrandomized stepped-wedge fashion, involving 12 hospitals and 7 pathology groups. We used standard statistical methods to compare surgical quality and survival of patients who had neither intervention (group 1), pathology intervention only (group 2), surgical intervention only (group 3), and both interventions (group 4). RESULTS Of 4019 patients from 2009 to 2021, 50%, 5%, 21%, and 24%, respectively, were in groups 1 to 4. Rates of nonexamination of lymph nodes were 11%, 9%, 0%, and 0% and rates of nonexamination of mediastinal lymph nodes were 29%, 35%, 2%, and 2%, respectively, in groups 1 to 4 (P < .0001). Rates of attainment of American College of Surgeons Operative Standard 5.8 were 22%, 29%, 72%, and 85%; and rates of International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer complete resection were 14%, 21%, 53%, and 61% (P < .0001). Compared with group 1, adjusted hazard ratios for death were as follows: group 2, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.76-1.15); group 3, 0.91 (0.78-1.03); and group 4, 0.75 (0.64-0.87). Compared with group 2, group 4 adjusted hazard ratio was 0.72 (0.57-0.91); compared with group 3, it was 0.83 (0.69-0.99). These relationships remained after exclusion of wedge resections. CONCLUSIONS Combining a lymph node collection kit with a novel gross dissection method significantly improved pathologic nodal evaluation and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meredith A Ray
- School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Olawale Akinbobola
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Andrea Saulsberry
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kourtney Dortch
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Nicholas R Faris
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Anberitha T Matthews
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - David Spencer
- Pathology Group of the Mid-South, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liao W, Ray M, Fehnel C, Goss J, Shepherd CJ, Patel A, Qureshi T, Caro F, Roma J, Derrick A, Matthews AT, Faris NR, Smeltzer M, Osarogiagbon RU. Program-Based Lung Cancer Care: A Prospective Observational Tumor Registry Linkage Study. JTO Clin Res Rep 2024; 5:100629. [PMID: 38322712 PMCID: PMC10845058 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Low-dose computed tomography screening (LDCT) and lung nodule programs (LNP) promote early lung cancer detection, improve survival; Multidisciplinary Care Programs (MDC) promote guideline-concordant care. The impact of such program-based care on "real-world" lung cancer survival is unquantified. We evaluated outcomes of lung cancer care delivered through structured programs in a community health care system. Methods We conducted a cohort study linking institutional prospective observational LDCT, LNP and MDC databases with Tumor Registry of Baptist Cancer Center facilities. We categorized all patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2011 and 2021 into program-based care versus non-program-based care cohorts. We compared patient characteristics, stage distribution, treatment modalities, survival and mortality in each pathway of care. Results Of 12,148 patients, 237, 1,165, 1,140 and 9,606 were diagnosed through the LDCT, LNP, MDC or no program, respectively; non-program-based care sequentially diminished from 96.3% to 66.5%, diagnosis through LDCT increased from 0.5% to 7.1%, LNP from 3.5% to 20.8%; and MDC alone decreased from a high of 12.8% in 2014 to 5.6% in 2021. Program-based care was associated with earlier stage (p < 0.001), higher surgical resection rates (p < 0.001), greater use of adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001), better aggregate and stage-stratified survival (p < 0.001), and lower all-cause and lung cancer-specific mortality (p < 0.001). Recipients of non-program-based care were considerably less likely to receive lung cancer treatment; results remained consistent when patients receiving no treatment were excluded. Conclusions Program-based care was associated with substantially better survival. Increasing access to program-based care should be explored as a matter of urgent public policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liao
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Meredith Ray
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jordan Goss
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Catherine J Shepherd
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Anita Patel
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Talat Qureshi
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Federico Caro
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jessica Roma
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Anna Derrick
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Anberitha T Matthews
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Nicholas R Faris
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Matthew Smeltzer
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Raymond U Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hassett MJ, Dias S, Cronin C, Schrag D, McCleary N, Simpson J, Poirier-Shelton T, Bian J, Reich J, Dizon D, Begnoche M, Jenkins HH, Tasker L, Wong S, Pearson L, Paudel R, Osarogiagbon RU. Strategies for Implementing an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes-Based Symptom Management Program Across Six Cancer Centers. Res Sq 2024:rs.3.rs-3879836. [PMID: 38343857 PMCID: PMC10854305 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3879836/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
Background Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom management improves cancer patients' outcomes. However, implementation of ePROs is challenging, requiring technical resources for integration into clinical systems, substantial buy-in from clinicians and patients, novel workflows to support between-visit symptom management, and institutional investment. Methods The SIMPRO Research Consortium developed eSyM, an electronic health record-integrated, ePRO-based symptom management program for medical oncology and surgery patients and deployed it at six cancer centers between August 2019 and April 2022 in a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized stepped-wedge study. Sites documented implementation strategies monthly using REDCap, itemized them using the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) list and mapped their target barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to inform eSyM program enhancement, facilitate inter-consortium knowledge sharing and guide future deployment efforts. Results We documented 226 implementation strategies: 35 'foundational' strategies were applied consortium-wide by the coordinating center and 191 other strategies were developed by individual sites. We consolidated these 191 site-developed strategies into 64 unique strategies (i.e., removed duplicates) and classified the remainder as either 'universal', consistently used by multiple sites (N=29), or 'adaptive', used only by individual sites (N=35). Universal strategies were perceived as having the highest impact; they addressed eSyM clinical preparation, training, engagement of patients/clinicians, and program evaluation. Across all documented SIMPRO strategies, 44 of the 73 ERIC strategies were addressed and all 5 CFIR barriers were addressed. Conclusion Methodical collection of theory-based implementation strategies fostered the identification of universal, high-impact strategies that facilitated adoption of a novel care-delivery intervention by patients, clinicians, and institutions. Attention to the high-impact strategies identified in this project could support implementation of ePROs as a component of routine cancer care at other institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Don Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lam S, Bai C, Baldwin DR, Chen Y, Connolly C, de Koning H, Heuvelmans MA, Hu P, Kazerooni EA, Lancaster HL, Langs G, McWilliams A, Osarogiagbon RU, Oudkerk M, Peters M, Robbins HA, Sahar L, Smith RA, Triphuridet N, Field J. Current and Future Perspectives on Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: A Roadmap From 2023 to 2027 From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2024; 19:36-51. [PMID: 37487906 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer substantially reduces mortality from lung cancer, as revealed in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. This review is based on the ninth CT screening symposium of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, which focuses on the major themes pertinent to the successful global implementation of LDCT screening and develops a strategy to further the implementation of lung cancer screening globally. These recommendations provide a 5-year roadmap to advance the implementation of LDCT screening globally, including the following: (1) establish universal screening program quality indicators; (2) establish evidence-based criteria to identify individuals who have never smoked but are at high-risk of developing lung cancer; (3) develop recommendations for incidentally detected lung nodule tracking and management protocols to complement programmatic lung cancer screening; (4) Integrate artificial intelligence and biomarkers to increase the prediction of malignancy in suspicious CT screen-detected lesions; and (5) standardize high-quality performance artificial intelligence protocols that lead to substantial reductions in costs, resource utilization and radiologist reporting time; (6) personalize CT screening intervals on the basis of an individual's lung cancer risk; (7) develop evidence to support clinical management and cost-effectiveness of other identified abnormalities on a lung cancer screening CT; (8) develop publicly accessible, easy-to-use geospatial tools to plan and monitor equitable access to screening services; and (9) establish a global shared education resource for lung cancer screening CT to ensure high-quality reading and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Lam
- Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Chunxue Bai
- Shanghai Respiratory Research Institute and Chinese Alliance Against Cancer, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - David R Baldwin
- Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Services (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Yan Chen
- Digital Screening, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Casey Connolly
- International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Denver, Colorado
| | - Harry de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein A Heuvelmans
- University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; The Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ping Hu
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ella A Kazerooni
- Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Harriet L Lancaster
- University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; The Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Georg Langs
- Computational Imaging Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Annette McWilliams
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Australia University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
| | | | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- Center for Medical Imaging and The Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew Peters
- Woolcock Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hilary A Robbins
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Liora Sahar
- Data Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert A Smith
- Early Cancer Detection Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - John Field
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paudel R, Tramontano AC, Cronin C, Wong SL, Dizon DS, Jenkins HH, Bian J, Osarogiagbon RU, Schrag D, Hassett MJ. Assessing Patient Readiness for an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Symptom Management Intervention in a Multisite Study. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:77-84. [PMID: 38011613 PMCID: PMC10827290 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE While the use of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) in routine clinical practice is increasing, barriers to patient engagement limit adoption. Studies have focused on technology access as a key barrier, yet other characteristics may also confound readiness to use ePROs including patients' confidence in using technology and confidence in asking clinicians questions. METHODS To assess readiness to use ePROs, adult patients from six US-based health systems who started a new oncology treatment or underwent a cancer-directed surgery were invited to complete a survey that assessed access to and confidence in the use of technology, ease of asking clinicians questions about health, and symptom management self-efficacy. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression models were fit to assess the association between technology confidence, ease of asking questions, and symptom management self-efficacy. RESULTS We contacted 3,212 individuals, and 1,043 (33%) responded. The median age was 63 years, 68% were female, and 75% reported having access to patient portals. Over 80% had two or more electronic devices. Most patients reported high technology confidence, higher ease of asking clinicians questions, and high symptom management self-efficacy (n = 692; 66%). Patients with high technology confidence also reported higher ease of asking nurses about their health (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.58 [95% CI, 2.36 to 8.87]; P ≤ .001). Those who reported higher ease of asking nurses questions were more likely to report higher confidence in managing symptoms (AOR, 30.54 [95% CI, 12.91 to 72.30]; P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION Patient readiness to use ePROs likely depends on multiple factors, including technology and communication confidence, and symptom management self-efficacy. Future studies should assess interventions to address these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith JD, Norton WE, Mitchell SA, Cronin C, Hassett MJ, Ridgeway JL, Garcia SF, Osarogiagbon RU, Dizon DS, Austin JD, Battestilli W, Richardson JE, Tesch NK, Cella D, Cheville AL, DiMartino LD. The Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS): feasibility, usability, and pilot testing of a novel method. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:153. [PMID: 38017582 PMCID: PMC10683230 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00529-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic approaches are needed to accurately characterize the dynamic use of implementation strategies and how they change over time. We describe the development and preliminary evaluation of the Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS), a novel methodology to document and characterize implementation strategies use over time. METHODS The development and initial evaluation of the LISTS method was conducted within the Improving the Management of SymPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Research Consortium (supported by funding provided through the NCI Cancer MoonshotSM). The IMPACT Consortium includes a coordinating center and three hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies testing routine symptom surveillance and integration of symptom management interventions in ambulatory oncology care settings. LISTS was created to increase the precision and reliability of dynamic changes in implementation strategy use over time. It includes three components: (1) a strategy assessment, (2) a data capture platform, and (3) a User's Guide. An iterative process between implementation researchers and practitioners was used to develop, pilot test, and refine the LISTS method prior to evaluating its use in three stepped-wedge trials within the IMPACT Consortium. The LISTS method was used with research and practice teams for approximately 12 months and subsequently we evaluated its feasibility, acceptability, and usability using established instruments and novel questions developed specifically for this study. RESULTS Initial evaluation of LISTS indicates that it is a feasible and acceptable method, with content validity, for characterizing and tracking the use of implementation strategies over time. Users of LISTS highlighted several opportunities for improving the method for use in future and more diverse implementation studies. CONCLUSIONS The LISTS method was developed collaboratively between researchers and practitioners to fill a research gap in systematically tracking implementation strategy use and modifications in research studies and other implementation efforts. Preliminary feedback from LISTS users indicate it is feasible and usable. Potential future developments include additional features, fewer data elements, and interoperability with alternative data entry platforms. LISTS offers a systematic method that encourages the use of common data elements to support data analysis across sites and synthesis across studies. Future research is needed to further adapt, refine, and evaluate the LISTS method in studies with employ diverse study designs and address varying delivery settings, health conditions, and intervention types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin D Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Spencer Fox Eccles, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science and Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Wynne E Norton
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christine Cronin
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Quality & Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jennifer L Ridgeway
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery and Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sofia F Garcia
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science and Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Raymond U Osarogiagbon
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Don S Dizon
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Legoretta Cancer Center, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, USA
| | - Jessica D Austin
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Whitney Battestilli
- Center for Clinical Research Informatics, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joshua E Richardson
- Center for Health Informatics, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Fayetteville, NC, USA
| | - Nathan K Tesch
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrea L Cheville
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lisa D DiMartino
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shao H, Faris NR, Ward KD, Chen W, McHugh L, Smeltzer M, Ray MA, Osarogiagbon RU. Lung Cancer Patients' and Caregivers' Satisfaction With Multidisciplinary Versus Serial Care in a Community Healthcare Setting: A Prospective Comparative-Effectiveness Cohort Study. Clin Lung Cancer 2023; 24:e267-e274. [PMID: 37451932 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary Care is recommended for complex oncologic conditions. We compared lung cancer patients' and caregivers' satisfaction with Multidisciplinary Care to routine, serial care. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed validated surveys administered at baseline, 3 and 6 months to patients and their caregivers enrolled in a prospective cohort comparative-effectiveness study of Multidisciplinary versus Serial Care (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02123797). Multivariate mixed linear models examined the cross-group differences, time-related variances, and how interaction between groups and time-periods influenced satisfaction. RESULTS Compared to serial care (N = 297), the Multidisciplinary Care cohort (N = 159), was older (69 vs. 66 years), had earlier clinical stage (41% vs. 33% stage I/II), and less severe symptoms (45% vs. 35% asymptomatic). Demographic and social-economic characteristics of caregivers (N = 99 for Multidisciplinary and 123 for Serial Care, respectively) were similar. Multidisciplinary Care patients and caregivers were more likely to perceive their care to be better than that of other patients (p < .01). Although Serial Care patients and caregivers expressed greater satisfaction with their treatment plan (p < .01 patients, p = 0.04 caregivers), Multidisciplinary Care patients showed greater improvement at 6-months (p < .01). Multidisciplinary Care patients and caregivers reported better overall satisfaction with team members (p < .01) while Serial Care patients had greater improvement in their satisfaction with team members at 6-months (p = .04). Multidisciplinary Care patients perceived more financial burden at 6-months compared to Serial Care patients (p = .04). CONCLUSION Patient-caregiver dyads had mixed perceptions of their care experience. Recipients of Multidisciplinary Care perceived better experience with care and team members; Serial Care recipients expressed greater satisfaction with their treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huibo Shao
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Nicholas R Faris
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Kenneth D Ward
- School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Weiyu Chen
- School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Laura McHugh
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Matthew Smeltzer
- School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Meredith A Ray
- School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Raymond U Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Smith AW, DiMartino L, Garcia SF, Mitchell SA, Ruddy KJ, Smith JD, Wong SL, Cahue S, Cella D, Jensen RE, Hassett MJ, Hodgdon C, Kroner B, Osarogiagbon RU, Popovic J, Richardson K, Schrag D, Cheville AL. Systematic symptom management in the IMPACT Consortium: rationale and design for 3 effectiveness-implementation trials. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad073. [PMID: 37930033 PMCID: PMC10627528 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer and its treatment produce deleterious symptoms across the phases of care. Poorly controlled symptoms negatively affect quality of life and result in increased health-care needs and hospitalization. The Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium was created to develop 3 large-scale, systematic symptom management systems, deployed through electronic health record platforms, and to test them in pragmatic, randomized, hybrid effectiveness and implementation trials. Here, we describe the IMPACT Consortium's conceptual framework, its organizational components, and plans for evaluation. The study designs and lessons learned are highlighted in the context of disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Wilder Smith
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lisa DiMartino
- Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- RTI International, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sofia F Garcia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Justin D Smith
- Division of Health Systems Innovation and Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - September Cahue
- American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roxanne E Jensen
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christine Hodgdon
- Guiding Researchers and Advocates to Scientific Partnerships, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea L Cheville
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huang J, Osarogiagbon RU, Giroux DJ, Nishimura KK, Bille A, Cardillo G, Detterbeck F, Kernstine K, Kim HK, Lievens Y, Lim E, Marom E, Prosch H, Putora PM, Rami-Porta R, Rice D, Rocco G, Rusch VW, Opitz I, Vasquez FS, Van Schil P, Jeffrey Yang CF, Asamura H. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2023:S1556-0864(23)02310-9. [PMID: 37866624 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The accurate assessment of nodal (N) status is crucial to the management and prognostication of nonmetastatic NSCLC. We sought to determine whether the current N descriptors should be maintained or revised for the upcoming ninth edition of the international TNM lung cancer staging system. METHODS Data were assembled by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer on patients with NSCLC, detailing both clinical and pathologic N status, with information about anatomical location and individual station-level identification. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic groups were assessed by a Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Data for clinical N and pathologic N status were available in 45,032 and 35,009 patients, respectively. The current N0 to N3 descriptors for both clinical N and pathologic N categories reflect prognostically distinct groups. Furthermore, single-station N2 involvement (N2a) exhibited a better prognosis than multistation N2 involvement (N2b) in both clinical and pathologic classifications, and the differences between all neighboring nodal subcategories were highly significant. The prognostic differences between N2a and N2b were robust and consistent across resection status, histologic type, T category, and geographic region. CONCLUSIONS The current N descriptors should be maintained, with the addition of new subdescriptors to N2 for single-station involvement (N2a) and multiple-station involvement (N2b).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Raymond U Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Andrea Bille
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kings College University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Giuseppe Cardillo
- Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy; UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Kemp Kernstine
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Hong Kwan Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eric Lim
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; The Academic Division of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Edith Marom
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Helmut Prosch
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ramon Rami-Porta
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain; Network of Centres for Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES) Lung Cancer Group, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Paul Van Schil
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hisao Asamura
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Akinbobola O, Ray MA, Smeltzer MP, Osarogiagbon RU. In Response: Taichiro Goto "Kit Use May Not Be Key To Improved Prognosis"; Response to "Akinbobola O, Ray MA, Fehnel C, et al. Institution-Level Evolution of Lung Cancer Resection Quality With Implementation of a Lymph Node Specimen Collection Kit". J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:e80-e81. [PMID: 37479331 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Olawale Akinbobola
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Meredith A Ray
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Matthew P Smeltzer
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Raymond U Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ray MA, Akinbobola O, Fehnel C, Saulsberry A, Dortch K, Wolf B, Valaulikar G, Patel HD, Ng T, Robbins T, Smeltzer MP, Faris NR, Osarogiagbon RU. Surgeon Quality and Patient Survival After Resection for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3616-3628. [PMID: 37267506 PMCID: PMC10325770 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The quality and outcomes of curative-intent lung cancer surgery vary in populations. Surgeons are key drivers of surgical quality. We examined the association between surgeon-level intermediate outcomes differences, patient survival differences, and potential mitigation by processes of care. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using a baseline population-based surgical resection cohort, we derived surgeon-level cut points for rates of positive margins, nonexamination of lymph nodes, nonexamination of mediastinal lymph nodes, and wedge resections. Applying the baseline cut points to a subsequent cohort from the same population-based data set, we assign surgeons into three performance categories in reference to each metric: 1 (<25th percentile), 2 (25th-75th percentile), and 3 (>75th percentile). The sum of performance scores created three surgeon quality tiers: 1 (4-6, low), 2 (7-9, intermediate), and 3 (10-12, high). We used chi-squared, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare patient characteristics between the baseline and subsequent cohorts and across surgeon tiers. We applied Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between patient survival and surgeon performance tier, sequentially adjusting for clinical stage, patient characteristics, and four specific processes. RESULTS From 2009 to 2021, 39 surgeons performed 4,082 resections across the baseline and subsequent cohorts. Among 31 subsequent cohort surgeons, five were tier 1, five were tier 2, and 21 were tier 3. Tier 1 and 2 surgeons had significantly worse outcomes than tier 3 surgeons (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.72 and 1.19; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.43, respectively). Adjustment for specific processes mitigated the surgeon-tiered survival differences, with adjusted HRs of 1.02 (95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.7 to 1.25), respectively. CONCLUSION Readily accessible intermediate outcomes metrics can be used to stratify surgeon performance for targeted process improvement, potentially reducing patient survival disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carrie Fehnel
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Andrea Saulsberry
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Kourtney Dortch
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Ng
- Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Todd Robbins
- Baptist Memorial Hospital—Memphis, Memphis TN
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Nicholas R. Faris
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Raymond U. Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Akinbobola O, Ray MA, Fehnel C, Saulsberry A, Dortch K, Smeltzer M, Faris NR, Osarogiagbon RU. Institution-Level Evolution of Lung Cancer Resection Quality With Implementation of a Lymph Node Specimen Collection Kit. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:858-868. [PMID: 36931504 PMCID: PMC10505555 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer surgery with a lymph node kit improves patient-level outcomes, but institution-level impact is unproven. METHODS Using an institutional stepped-wedge implementation study design, we compared lung cancer resection quality between institutions in preimplementation and postimplementation phases of kit deployment and, within implementing institutions, resections without versus with the kit. Benchmarks included rates of nonexamination of lymph nodes, nonexamination of mediastinal lymph nodes, and attainment of American College of Surgeons Operative Standard 5.8. We report institution-level adjusted ORs (aORs) for attaining quality benchmarks. RESULTS From 2009 to 2020, three preimplementing hospitals had 953 resections; 11 implementing hospitals had 4013 resections, 58% without and 42% with the kit. Quality was better in implementing institutions and with kit cases. Compared with preimplementing institutions, the aOR for nonexamination of lymph nodes was 0.62 (0.49-0.8, p = 0.002), nonexamination of mediastinal lymph nodes was 0.56 (0.47-0.68, p < 0.0001), and attainment of Operative Standard 5.8 was 7.3 (5.6-9.4, p < 0.0001); aORs for kit cases were 0.01 (0.001-0.06), 0.08 (0.06-0.11), and 11.6 (9.9-13.7), respectively (p < 0.0001 for all). Surgical quality was persistently poor in preimplementing institutions but sequentially improved in implementing institutions in parallel with kit adoption. In implementing institutions, resections with the kit had a uniformly high level of quality, whereas nonkit cases had a low level of quality, approximating that of preimplementing institutions. Within implementing institutions, 5-year overall survival was 61% versus 51% after surgery with versus without the kit (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Surgery with a lymph node specimen collection kit improved institution-level quality of curative-intent lung cancer resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olawale Akinbobola
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Meredith A Ray
- School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Andrea Saulsberry
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kourtney Dortch
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Matthew Smeltzer
- School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Nicholas R Faris
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Raymond U Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smeltzer MP, Liao W, Osarogiagbon RU. In Response: Letter to the Editor: Re "Smeltzer MP, Liao W, Faris NR, et al. Potential Impact of Criteria Modifications on Race and Sex Disparities in Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening". J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:e58-e59. [PMID: 37210182 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Smeltzer
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Wei Liao
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Raymond U Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shao H, Lee YS, Fehnel C, Akinbobola O, Saulsberry A, Dortch K, Matthews AT, Faris NR, Smeltzer M, Ray MA, Osarogiagbon RU. Abstract 3216: Comparative characteristics of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients segregated by quality of surgery and survival in a population-based cohort. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-3216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction. Poor quality NSCLC resection impairs survival, but some patients survive irrespective. We explored characteristics of patients in 4 cohorts defined by surgery quality and survival.
Methods. We analyzed stage I resections in a population-based cohort surviving >120 days post-op from 2009-2018. Using the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer’s stringent definition of ‘complete resection’ and 3-year survival as ‘good’, we categorized patients into 4 dyads: 1) Good surgery/good survival; 2) Good surgery/poor survival; 3) Poor surgery/good survival (reference); 4) Poor surgery/poor survival. We used Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis test for description, multivariable multinomial logistic regression to estimate Odds Ratio (OR) of surgery quality and survival.
Results. Of 1,515 patients, 31%, 7%, 51%, and 12% were in Groups 1-4, respectively. In the ‘mis-match dyads’ (Groups 2 and 3), Group 2 was more likely to be elderly (70 vs. 66, p<0.01), on Medicaid (p=0.01), have ever smoked (96% vs. 85%, p<0.01), have squamous cell carcinoma.
Older (OR=1.06), male (OR=1.78), Medicaid patients (OR=2.16) with smoking history (OR=3.25) had poorer survival despite good surgery rather than survival despite bad surgery. With poor surgery, male (OR=2.01) patients tumor 2-3 and >3 cm (OR=1.77 and 1.64) had poorer survival; commercially insured patients had 36% reduced risk of poor survival. Compared to open thoracotomy, patients with robotic-assisted surgery were >4-fold more likely to have good surgery rather than poor surgery but good survival.
Conclusion. Differentiating characteristics associated with good/bad survival after good/bad quality lung cancer surgery provide opportunity to compare biomarker profiles between dyads.
Citation Format: Huibo Shao, Yu-Sheng Lee, Carrie Fehnel, Olawale Akinbobola, Andrea Saulsberry, Kourtney Dortch, Anberitha T. Matthews, Nicholas R. Faris, Matthew Smeltzer, Meredith A. Ray, Raymond U. Osarogiagbon. Comparative characteristics of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients segregated by quality of surgery and survival in a population-based cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3216.
Collapse
|
18
|
Shao H, Lee YS, Fehnel C, Akinbobola O, Saulsberry A, Dortch K, Matthews AT, Faris NR, Ray MA, Smeltzer M, Osarogiagbon RU. Abstract 4372: Hierarchy of prognostic quality markers after curative-intent resection of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-4372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction. 5-year disease-free survival after curative-intent resection of stage IA NSCLC approximates 65%. The quality of resection and differences in cancer biology probably account for most curative-intent treatment failure. We evaluated the hazard associated with markers of surgical quality.
Methods. Using the population-based Mid-South Quality of Surgical Resection cohort, we compared outcomes of pathologic IA NSCLC resections from 2009 to 2021. With the stringent International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer complete (R0) resection for reference, we evaluated eight quality benchmarks: wedge resection; resections with positive margins; non-examination of lymph nodes (LN) from anywhere (pNX), mediastinal (pNXmed), intrapulmonary, hilar, low paratracheal and subcarinal stations. We evaluated hazard ratios (HR), adjusted for age, sex, insurance, histology, comorbidity, preoperative staging and technique of resection (95% CI) from Proportional Hazards models.
Results. Of 2,243 resections, 906 (41%) were R0; 1,333 were non-R0, including 3% R1/R2, 13% pNX, 15% wedge resections, 15% pNXmed, 45% without subcarinal, 41% without hilar, 47% without low paratracheal, and 36% without intrapulmonary LNs.Compared to IASLC-R0, adjusted HRs were: 2.04 (1.21-3.44) for R1/R2; 1.75 (1.33-2.31) for pNX; 1.64 (1.26-2.14) for wedge resections; 1.35 (1.12-1.63) for non-examination of intrapulmonary LN; 1.33 (1.03-1.72), pNXmed; 1.25 (1.02-1.53), non-examination of hilar LN; 1.15 (0.95 - 1.39) missing station 4; and 1.11 (0.90-1.37) missing station 7 LNs.
Conclusion. Surgical quality, indicated by markers of LN evaluation, have significant impact on long-term survival and should be required selection criteria or stratification factors in lung cancer surgery trials.
Citation Format: Huibo Shao, Yu-Sheng Lee, Carrie Fehnel, Olawale Akinbobola, Andrea Saulsberry, Kourtney Dortch, Anberitha T. Matthews, Nicholas R. Faris, Meredith A. Ray, Matthew Smeltzer, Raymond U. Osarogiagbon. Hierarchy of prognostic quality markers after curative-intent resection of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4372.
Collapse
|
19
|
Akinbobola O, Ray MA, Fehnel C, Saulsberry A, Dortch K, Matthews AT, Faris NR, Godfrey CM, Smeltzer M, Osarogiagbon RU. Abstract 4382: Evolution of curative-intent lung cancer surgery in a 4 eras in the population-based mid-south quality of surgical resection (MS-QSR) cohort. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-4382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background. Most patients die within 5 years of curative-intent lung cancer surgery
Differences in surgical quality and cancer biology drive long-term overall survival (OS) differences after curative-intent resection. From 2009 onward, we implemented a sequence of interventions to improve surgical quality and pathologic evaluation in a regional population. We evaluated population-level surgical quality and OS in the MS-QSR cohort.
Methods. We categorized the MS-QSR into 4 (approximately) 5-year eras: 1) 2004-08, baseline; 2) 2009-13 (quality feedback and pilot intervention studies); 3) 2014-18 (surgical intervention with a lymph node collection kit); 4) 2019-22 (dual surgical and pathology intervention with novel gross dissection method). We compared surgical quality and OS across eras using standard statistical methods.
Results. Of 6,701 resections, 15%, 33%, 32%, and 20% were in Eras 1-4, respectively. American College of Surgeons Operative Standard 5.8 quality was attained in 4%, 22%, 45%, and 65% of resections in Eras 1-4, respectively; the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer’s stringent definition of ‘complete resection’ was achieved in 0%, 9%, 20%, and 31%, respectively; 120-Day mortality rates were 10%, 9%, 7%, and 4%; 3-year OS rates were 49%, 64%, 71%, and 84%; 5-year OS, 34%, 52%, and 61%, in Eras 1-3 (too early for Era 4); p<0.0001 for all comparisons.
Conclusion. Population-level surgical quality and OS have improved sequentially in parallel with implementation of interventions to surgical and pathology practices. The higher OS threshold in the MS-QSR creates a platform to interrogate the biologic drivers of surgical outcomes differences.
Citation Format: Olawale Akinbobola, Meredith A. Ray, Carrie Fehnel, Andrea Saulsberry, Kourtney Dortch, Anberitha T. Matthews, Nicholas R. Faris, Caroline M. Godfrey, Matthew Smeltzer, Raymond U. Osarogiagbon. Evolution of curative-intent lung cancer surgery in a 4 eras in the population-based mid-south quality of surgical resection (MS-QSR) cohort. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4382.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ray MA, Fehnel C, Akinbobola O, Saulsberry A, Dortch K, Matthews A, Anga A, Giampapa C, Sales E, Okun S, Robbins ET, Wolf B, Levy P, Wiggins HL, Ng T, Sachdev V, Valaulikar G, Patel HD, Faris NR, Smeltzer M, Osarogiagbon RU. Abstract 4359: Interventions to improve pathologic nodal staging of curatively resected lung cancer: A population-based implementation study. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-4359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction. Despite its importance, pathologic nodal (pN) staging of lung cancer remains poor. We evaluated the quality and survival impact of two interventions to improve pN staging.
Methods. Using a non-randomized stepped-wedge design, we implemented use of a lymph node (LN) specimen collection kit to improve intraoperative LN collection (surgical intervention) and a novel gross dissection method for intrapulmonary LN retrieval (pathology intervention) in 12 hospitals in five contiguous Hospital Referral Regions in AR, MS and TN (2009-2021). With appropriate statistical methods we compared surgical quality and survival of patients among: neither (Group 1), pathology only (Group 2), surgical only (Group 3), and both (Group 4) interventions.
Results. Of 4,019 patients, 50%, 5%, 21% and 24%, were in Groups 1-4 respectively. Rates of non-examination of LNs and non-examination of mediastinal LNs: 11%, 9%, 0% and 0%; 29%, 35%, 2% and 2% respectively in Groups 1-4 (p<0.0001). Attainment of American College of Surgeons Operative Standard 5.8: 22%, 29%, 72%, 85%; International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer’s stringent definition of ‘complete resection’: 14%, 21%, 53%, 61% (p<0.0001). Compared to Group 1, adjusted hazard ratios, aHR (95% CI), were: Group 2, 0.93 (0.76-1.15); Group 3, 0.91 (0.78-1.03); Group 4, 0.75 (0.64-0.87). Compared to Group 2, Group 4 aHR- 0.72 (0.57-0.91); compared to Group 3, was 0.83 (0.69-0.99). These relationships remained after excluding wedge resections.
Discussion. Combining a LN collection kit and novel gross dissection method significantly improved pN evaluation and survival in a population-based cohort.
Citation Format: Meredith A. Ray, Carrie Fehnel, Olawale Akinbobola, Andrea Saulsberry, Kourtney Dortch, Anberitha Matthews, Amal Anga, Christopher Giampapa, Elizabeth Sales, Sherry Okun, Edward T. Robbins, Bradley Wolf, Paul Levy, Horace L. Wiggins, Thomas Ng, Vishal Sachdev, Ganpat Valaulikar, Hetal D. Patel, Nicholas R. Faris, Matthew Smeltzer, Raymond U. Osarogiagbon. Interventions to improve pathologic nodal staging of curatively resected lung cancer: A population-based implementation study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4359.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Amal Anga
- 3Veterans Affair Medical Center, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | | | | | - Bradley Wolf
- 8Baptist Memorial Hospital - DeSoto, Southaven, MS
| | - Paul Levy
- 9Baptist Memorial Hospital - North Mississippi, Oxford, MS
| | | | - Thomas Ng
- 11Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fox AH, Nishino M, Osarogiagbon RU, Rivera MP, Rosenthal LS, Smith RA, Farjah F, Sholl LM, Silvestri GA, Johnson BE. Acquiring tissue for advanced lung cancer diagnosis and comprehensive biomarker testing: A National Lung Cancer Roundtable best-practice guide. CA Cancer J Clin 2023. [PMID: 36859638 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in biomarker-driven therapies for patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) both provide opportunities to improve the treatment (and thus outcomes) for patients and pose new challenges for equitable care delivery. Over the last decade, the continuing development of new biomarker-driven therapies and evolving indications for their use have intensified the importance of interdisciplinary communication and coordination for patients with or suspected to have lung cancer. Multidisciplinary teams are challenged with completing comprehensive and timely biomarker testing and navigating the constantly evolving evidence base for a complex and time-sensitive disease. This guide provides context for the current state of comprehensive biomarker testing for NSCLC, reviews how biomarker testing integrates within the diagnostic continuum for patients, and illustrates best practices and common pitfalls that influence the success and timeliness of biomarker testing using a series of case scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam H Fox
- Division of Pulmonary Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Mizuki Nishino
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raymond U Osarogiagbon
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - M Patricia Rivera
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Lauren S Rosenthal
- Prevention and Early Detection Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Robert A Smith
- Prevention and Early Detection Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Farhood Farjah
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lynette M Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gerard A Silvestri
- Division of Pulmonary Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Bruce E Johnson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Osarogiagbon RU, Liao W, Faris NR, Fehnel C, Goss J, Shepherd CJ, Qureshi T, Matthews AT, Smeltzer MP, Pinsky PF. Evaluation of Lung Cancer Risk Among Persons Undergoing Screening or Guideline-Concordant Monitoring of Lung Nodules in the Mississippi Delta. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e230787. [PMID: 36848089 PMCID: PMC9972195 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Guideline-concordant management of lung nodules promotes early lung cancer diagnosis, but the lung cancer risk profile of persons with incidentally detected lung nodules differs from that of screening-eligible persons. OBJECTIVE To compare lung cancer diagnosis hazard between participants receiving low-dose computed tomography screening (LDCT cohort) and those in a lung nodule program (LNP cohort). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective cohort study included LDCT vs LNP enrollees from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021, who were seen in a community health care system. Participants were prospectively identified, data were abstracted from clinical records, and survival was updated at 6-month intervals. The LDCT cohort was stratified by Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System as having no potentially malignant lesions (Lung-RADS 1-2 cohort) vs those with potentially malignant lesions (Lung-RADS 3-4 cohort), and the LNP cohort was stratified by smoking history into screening-eligible vs screening-ineligible groups. Participants with prior lung cancer, younger than 50 years or older than 80 years, and lacking a baseline Lung-RADS score (LDCT cohort only) were excluded. Participants were followed up to January 1, 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Comparative cumulative rates of lung cancer diagnosis and patient, nodule, and lung cancer characteristics between programs, using LDCT as a reference. RESULTS There were 6684 participants in the LDCT cohort (mean [SD] age, 65.05 [6.11] years; 3375 men [50.49%]; 5774 [86.39%] in the Lung-RADS 1-2 and 910 [13.61%] in the Lung-RADS 3-4 cohorts) and 12 645 in the LNP cohort (mean [SD] age, 65.42 [8.33] years; 6856 women [54.22%]; 2497 [19.75%] screening eligible and 10 148 [80.25%] screening ineligible). Black participants constituted 1244 (18.61%) of the LDCT cohort, 492 (19.70%) of the screening-eligible LNP cohort, and 2914 (28.72%) of the screening-ineligible LNP cohort (P < .001). The median lesion size was 4 (IQR, 2-6) mm for the LDCT cohort (3 [IQR, 2-4] mm for Lung-RADS 1-2 and 9 [IQR, 6-15] mm for Lung-RADS 3-4 cohorts), 9 (IQR, 6-16) mm for the screening-eligible LNP cohort, and 7 (IQR, 5-11) mm for the screening-ineligible LNP cohort. In the LDCT cohort, lung cancer was diagnosed in 80 participants (1.44%) in the Lung-RADS 1-2 cohort and 162 (17.80%) in the Lung-RADS 3-4 cohort; in the LNP cohort, it was diagnosed in 531 (21.27%) in the screening-eligible cohort and 447 (4.40%) in the screening-ineligible cohort. Compared with Lung-RADS 1-2, the fully adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were 16.2 (95% CI, 12.7-20.6) for the screening-eligible cohort and 3.8 (95% CI, 3.0-5.0) for the screening-ineligible cohort; compared with Lung-RADS 3-4, the aHRs were 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0-1.5) and 0.3 (95% CI, 0.2-0.4), respectively. The stage of lung cancer was I to II in 156 of 242 patients (64.46%) in the LDCT cohort, 276 of 531 (52.00%) in the screening-eligible LNP cohort, and 253 of 447 (56.60%) in the screening-ineligible LNP cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, the cumulative lung cancer diagnosis hazard of screening-age persons enrolled in the LNP was higher than that in a screening cohort, irrespective of smoking history. The LNP provided access to early detection for a higher proportion of Black persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond U. Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Wei Liao
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Nicholas R. Faris
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jordan Goss
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Catherine J. Shepherd
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Talat Qureshi
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Anberitha T. Matthews
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Paul F. Pinsky
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yao S, Ambrosone CB, Osarogiagbon RU, Morrow GR, Kamen C. A biopsychosocial model to understand racial disparities in the era of cancer immunotherapy. Trends Cancer 2023; 9:6-8. [PMID: 36280546 PMCID: PMC9797434 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The approval and wide uptake of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in oncology practice raise the concerns of possibly worsened racial disparities in cancer treatment due to biological and psychosocial reasons. We propose a multilevel biopsychosocial model to understand the opportunities and challenges to racial disparities in the era of cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Yao
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Christine B. Ambrosone
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - Gary R. Morrow
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Charles Kamen
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Smeltzer MP, Ray MA, Faris NR, Meadows-Taylor MB, Rugless F, Berryman C, Jackson B, Fehnel C, Pacheco A, McHugh L, Robbins ET, Ward KD, Klesges LM, Osarogiagbon RU. Prospective Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Multidisciplinary Lung Cancer Care Within a Community-Based Health Care System. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e15-e24. [PMID: 35609221 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Multidisciplinary lung cancer care is assumed to improve care delivery by increasing transparency, objectivity, and shared decision making; however, there is a lack of high-level evidence demonstrating its benefits, especially in community-based health care systems. We used implementation and team science principles to establish a colocated multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic in a large community-based health care system and evaluated patient experience and outcomes within and outside this clinic. METHODS We conducted a prospective frequency-matched comparative effectiveness study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02123797) evaluating the thoroughness of lung cancer staging, receipt of stage-appropriate treatment, and survival between patients receiving care in the multidisciplinary clinic and those receiving usual serial care. Target enrollment was 150 patients on the multidisciplinary arm and 300 on the serial care arm. We frequency-matched patients by clinical stage, performance status, insurance type, race, and age. RESULTS A total of 526 patients were enrolled: 178 on the multidisciplinary arm and 348 on the serial care arm. After adjusting for other factors, multidisciplinary patients had significantly higher odds (odds ratio [OR]: 2.3 [95% CI, 1.5 to 3.4]) of trimodality staging compared with serial care. Patients on the multidisciplinary arm also had higher odds of receiving invasive stage confirmation (OR: 2.0 [95% CI, 1.4 to 3.1]) and mediastinal stage confirmation (OR: 1.9 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.8]). Additionally, patients receiving multidisciplinary care were significantly more likely to receive stage-appropriate treatment (OR: 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1 to 3.0]). We found no significant difference in overall or progression-free survival between study arms. CONCLUSION The multidisciplinary clinic delivered significant improvements in evidence-based quality care on multiple levels. Even in the absence of a demonstrable survival benefit, these findings provide a strong rationale for recommending this model of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Smeltzer
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - Meredith A Ray
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - Nicholas R Faris
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Meghan B Meadows-Taylor
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.,Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Fedoria Rugless
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Courtney Berryman
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Bianca Jackson
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Alicia Pacheco
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Laura McHugh
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Edward T Robbins
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Kenneth D Ward
- Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - Lisa M Klesges
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.,Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Osarogiagbon RU, Yang PC, Sequist LV. Expanding the Reach and Grasp of Lung Cancer Screening. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e389958. [PMID: 37098234 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_389958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
Low-dose computer tomographic (LDCT) lung cancer screening reduces lung cancer-specific and all-cause mortality among high-risk individuals, but implementation has been challenging. Despite health insurance coverage for lung cancer screening in the United States since 2015, fewer than 10% of eligible persons have participated; striking geographic, racial, and socioeconomic disparities were already evident, especially in the populations at greatest risk of lung cancer and, therefore, most likely to benefit from screening; and adherence to subsequent testing is significantly lower than that reported in clinical trials, potentially reducing the realized benefit. Lung cancer screening is a covered health care benefit in very few countries. Obtaining the full population-level benefit of lung cancer screening will require improved participation of already eligible persons (the grasp of screening) and improved eligibility criteria that more closely match up with the full spectrum of persons at risk (the reach of screening), irrespective of smoking history. We used the socioecological framework of health care to systematically review implementation barriers to lung cancer screening and discuss multilevel solutions. We also discussed guideline-concordant management of incidentally detected lung nodules as a complementary approach to early lung cancer detection that can extend the reach and strengthen the grasp of screening. Furthermore, we discussed ongoing efforts in Asia to explore the possibility of LDCT screening in populations in whom lung cancer risk is relatively independent of smoking. Finally, we summarized innovative technological solutions, including biomarker selection and artificial intelligence strategies, to improve the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond U Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Pan-Chyr Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Lecia V Sequist
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rami-Porta R, Edwards JG, Osarogiagbon RU. Is it time to revise the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer definitions of completeness of lung cancer resection? Transl Cancer Res 2022; 11:4474-4478. [PMID: 36644172 PMCID: PMC9834576 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-2426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ramón Rami-Porta
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain;,Network of Centres for Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES) Lung Cancer Group, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - John G. Edwards
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Raymond U. Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA;,Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bian JJ, Cronin C, Tramontano A, Schrag D, Osarogiagbon RU, Dizon DS, Wong SL, Hazard-Jenkins HW, Hassett MJ. Severe symptom reporting in medical oncology patients at community cancer centers assessed through eSyM. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
242 Background: Among cancer patients (pts) treated with chemotherapy, electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom management programs at quaternary cancer care institutions have improved outcomes. Uptake of ePRO programs in the real-world setting, where less is known about severe symptom reporting, is often complicated by perceptions of increased workload and erroneous severe symptom reporting. The SIMPRO study group, which includes 6 diverse health systems, are implementing an integrated electronic symptom management (eSyM) program to address these challenges. Methods: SIMPRO sites deployed the Epic-embedded eSyM program for thoracic (THOR), gastrointestinal (GI), and gynecologic (GYN) medical oncology (MO) pts, who received PRO-CTCAE-based questionnaires via the patient portal twice weekly for 6 months after starting a new chemotherapy regimen. Symptoms were scored 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) and automatically transmitted to care teams within Epic. The distribution and predictors of severe symptom reporting were assessed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression modeling. Results: From September 2019 – March 2022, 47% of eligible pts (2679/5716) submitted 27,062 questionnaires (median age of 67 years, 55% female, 78% white, 53% married, and 49% retired). 17% of eSyM questionnaires included at least 1 severe symptom (15% for GI, 14% for GYN, and 18% for THOR). Table displays the frequencies of all symptoms reported with fatigue, general pain, and constipation being most common. Among respondents, older, black, and employed pts reported significantly fewer severe symptoms (p < 0.03); cancer type was not associated with a greater likelihood of severe symptom reporting. Conclusions: Only approximately 1 of every 6 eSyM responses included a severe symptom, suggesting that routine monitoring in the real-world could help identify patients experiencing bothersome symptoms with minimal disruption to clinical workload. The mix of symptoms commonly reported as severe are challenging to treat with medications alone, arguing that symptom management strategies should provide multidisciplinary supportive care. Interventions that aide both patients and care teams and are embedded within eSyM or Epic could help address these symptoms without overburdening care teams. Clinical trial information: NCT03850912. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cronin C, Tramontano A, Schrag D, Wong SL, Osarogiagbon RU, Hazard-Jenkins HW, Dizon DS, Bian JJ, Hassett MJ. Evaluating the use of web versus mobile devices for ePRO reporting and severe symptom responses at 6 cancer centers. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
241 Background: Monitoring electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) improves quality of life, reduces acute care, and extends survival in cancer patients. Different modalities for collecting ePROs exist. Many efforts focus on mobile apps, but optimal methods for reporting are not well established. We sought to determine whether patient engagement and symptom reporting patterns differed by submission modality. Methods: Through the SIMPRO Consortium, ePRO questionnaires (eSyM) were collected from medical oncology (MO) and surgical (SUR) patients at six health systems between September 2019-March 2022. Questionnaires assessing 12 symptoms plus functional status and overall wellbeing were sent 2-3 times per week via patient portal and made accessible through two modalities: a web platform or mobile device app (mobile). Patterns and predictors of reporting modality were ascertained using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: In total, 6460 patients submitted 47,736 questionnaires: 74% via web and 26% via mobile. Of 2679 MO responders, 53% reported via web, 0.7% via mobile only, and 43% via both. Older, black, and unemployed MO patients were more likely to report via web only. Of 3781 SUR responders, 55% reported via web, 0.3% via mobile only, and 45% via both. Older and unemployed SUR patients were more likely to report via web only; disabled SUR patients were less likely to use web only. Patients utilizing both modalities reported significantly more moderate-severe symptoms than web only responders [Table]. Conclusions: Very few patients reported via mobile only, which was unexpected in the context of trends toward mobile-based patient engagement. Moderate-severe symptoms were reported more frequently by dual-modality responders. Patients with access to both modalities may be more likely to report symptoms in real-time compared to web-users who may delay reporting until they have access to a device. The resulting difference between web and mobile reporting modalities could be due to age, race, and employment; future studies should assess other factors, such as locality and cellular coverage. This work emphasizes the importance of deploying ePROs via multiple modalities to maximize accessibility and response rates. Clinical trial information: NCT03850912. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wong SL, Hazard-Jenkins HW, Schrag D, Osarogiagbon RU, Dizon DS, Bian JJ, Cronin C, Tramontano A, Hassett MJ. Severe symptom reporting in surgical patients assessed through an EHR-integrated ePRO questionnaire at 6 cancer centers. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
243 Background: Patients (pts) undergoing surgery for suspected malignancy may experience burdensome post-operative symptoms which can compromise outcomes and necessitate acute care. In prior randomized controlled trials at academic medical centers, patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based symptom management solutions improved clinical outcomes. Attempts to generalize this approach to real-world surgical pts have been challenged by perceptions that severe symptoms rarely occur, responding to severe symptoms can be burdensome, and uncertainty about which symptoms are likely to be severe and need interventions. Methods: Six US-based healthcare systems deployed eSyM, an EHR-integrated symptom management program. Pts undergoing surgery for suspected or confirmed thoracic (THOR), gastrointestinal (GI), and gynecologic (GYN) malignancies received automated questionnaires via MyChart portal 1-3 times weekly for up to 3 months after discharge. Questionnaires based on the PRO-CTCAE included 10 required and 20 optional symptoms, all scored as 0 (no symptoms), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe). Additional questions assessed functional status, overall wellbeing, wound discharge, and wound redness. Frequency and predictors of severe reporting were assessed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression modeling. Results: 21,012 surgical eSyM questionnaires were submitted between October 2019 - March 2022 by 3,781 unique pts (median age 63 years, 66.9% female, 92.1% white, 57.9% married, and 37.5% retired). 17% of questionnaires (16% of GI, 14% of GYN, and 21% of THOR) included at least 1 severe symptom. Frequencies of severe symptom reporting appear in Table with physical function impairment, general pain, and fatigue as the top three. Severe symptoms were more likely to be reported by younger, female, or unemployed pts(p < 0.01). In comparison to GI pts, GYN pts reported fewer and THOR pts reported more severe symptoms (p < 0.03). Conclusions: A meaningful minority of pts reported severe symptoms, suggesting that symptom monitoring could benefit pts without over-taxing clinicians. There were few strong patient-level predictors of severe symptoms, arguing that population surveillance may be preferable to targeted surveillance. Interventions are needed to address common severe symptoms and future studies should define most effective mitigation strategies for these symptoms. Clinical trial information: NCT03850912. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bhatia S, Landier W, Paskett ED, Peters KB, Merrill JK, Phillips J, Osarogiagbon RU. Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:940-952. [PMID: 35148389 PMCID: PMC9275775 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer care disparities among rural populations are increasingly documented and may be worsening, likely because of the impact of rurality on access to state-of-the-art cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment services, as well as higher rates of risk factors such as smoking and obesity. In 2018, the American Society of Clinical Oncology undertook an initiative to understand and address factors contributing to rural cancer care disparities. A key pillar of this initiative was to identify knowledge gaps and promote the research needed to understand the magnitude of difference in outcomes in rural vs nonrural settings, the drivers of those differences, and interventions to address them. The purpose of this review is to describe continued knowledge gaps and areas of priority research to address them. We conducted a comprehensive literature review by searching the PubMed (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published in English between 1971 and 2021 and restricted to primary reports from populations in the United States and abstracted data to synthesize current evidence and identify continued gaps in knowledge. Our review identified continuing gaps in the literature regarding the underlying causes of rural-urban disparities in cancer outcomes. Rapid advances in cancer care will worsen existing disparities in outcomes for rural patients without directed effort to understand and address barriers to high-quality care in these areas. Research should be prioritized to address ongoing knowledge gaps about the drivers of rurality-based disparities and preventative and corrective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Bhatia
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Wendy Landier
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hassett MJ, Wong S, Osarogiagbon RU, Bian J, Dizon DS, Jenkins HH, Uno H, Cronin C, Schrag D. Implementation of patient-reported outcomes for symptom management in oncology practice through the SIMPRO research consortium: a protocol for a pragmatic type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation multi-center cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial. Trials 2022; 23:506. [PMID: 35710449 PMCID: PMC9202326 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06435-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Many cancer patients experience high symptom burden. Healthcare in the USA is reactive, not proactive, and doctor-patient communication is often suboptimal. As a result, symptomatic patients may suffer between clinic visits. In research settings, systematic assessment of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs), coupled with clinical responses to severe symptoms, has eased this symptom burden, improved health-related quality of life, reduced acute care needs, and extended survival. Implementing ePRO-based symptom management programs in routine care is challenging. To study methods to overcome the implementation gap and improve symptom control for cancer patients, the National Cancer Institute created the Cancer-Moonshot funded Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium. Methods Symptom Management IMplementation of Patient Reported Outcomes in Oncology (SIMPRO) is one of three research centers that make up the IMPACT Consortium. SIMPRO, a multi-disciplinary team of investigators from six US health systems, seeks to develop, test, and integrate an electronic symptom management program (eSyM) for medical oncology and surgery patients into the Epic electronic health record (EHR) system and associated patient portal. eSyM supports real-time symptom tracking for patients, automated clinician alerts for severe symptoms, and specialized reports to facilitate population management. To rigorously evaluate its impact, eSyM is deployed through a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial. The primary study outcome is the occurrence of an emergency department treat-and-release event within 30 days of starting chemotherapy or being discharged following surgery. Secondary outcomes include hospitalization rates, chemotherapy use (time to initiation and duration of therapy), and patient quality of life and satisfaction. As a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, facilitators and barriers to implementation are assessed throughout the project. Discussion Creating and deploying eSyM requires collaboration between dozens of staff across diverse health systems, dedicated engagement of patient advocates, and robust support from Epic. This trial will evaluate eSyM in routine care settings across academic and community-based healthcare systems serving patients in rural and metropolitan locations. This trial’s pragmatic design will promote generalizable results about the uptake, acceptability, and impact of an EHR-integrated, ePRO-based symptom management program. Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03850912. Registered on February 22, 2019. Last updated on November 9, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Hassett
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Sandra Wong
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | | | - Don S Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Hajime Uno
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Christine Cronin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hassett MJ, Cronin C, McCleary NJ, Bian JJ, Wong SL, Hazard-Jenkins HW, Dias S, Johnson J, Schrag D, Dizon DS, Osarogiagbon RU. Strategies for implementing an ePRO-based symptom management program (eSyM) across six cancer centers. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.12017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
12017 Background: Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom management can improve cancer care outcomes. However, implementation is challenging as it requires 1) tremendous technical resources to integrate ePROs into the electronic health record (EHR), 2) substantial buy-in from clinicians and patients, 3) between visit symptom management, and 4) institutional investment to support engagement. Methods: The SIMPRO Consortium developed and deployed eSyM, an EHR-integrated ePRO-based symptom management program for medical oncology and surgery patients, at 6 cancer centers between September 2019-March 2022. Site teams document new and changes to implementation strategies monthly using REDCap (data collection is ongoing). Strategies are itemized using the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) list and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) list of barriers. The SIMPRO Coordinating Center (Dana-Farber) reviews all ERIC-CFIR classifications for consistency. Results: To date, 162 distinct strategies have been documented. On average, sites have implemented 23 strategies, 5 preparing for go-live and 18 remaining active beyond go-live. Preparation of clinical staff, training, and routine program evaluation are consistent high impact strategies. Other adaptive strategies have varied across sites, including various approaches to patient and provider engagement. Foundational strategies have been deployed by the coordinating center to support the multi-center initiative. Conclusions: Methodical deployment using theory-based implementation strategies may foster adoption of novel health care delivery systems by patients, clinicians, and institutions. Attention to the specific high-value strategies identified by the SIMPRO Consortium could support similar ePRO deployment at other institutions. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Liao W, Faris N, Fehnel C, Goss J, Pacheco A, Pinsky PF, Smeltzer M, Osarogiagbon RU. Lung cancer risk in persons enrolled in low-dose CT screening (LDCT) versus incidental lung nodule programs (ILNP). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.8553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8553 Background: LDCT screening saves lives, but <10% of eligible persons participate; eligibility criteria are imperfect; geographic, racial and socio-economic disparities have emerged. ILNP may expand access to early detection. We compared rates of lung cancer diagnosis in LDCT and ILNP population subsets. Methods: Prospective observational cohort study of enrollees in LDCT and ILNP in a community healthcare system in AR, MS and TN. We compared LDCT vs 4 ILNP cohorts (C) based on USPSTF 2021 LDCT eligibility criteria: <50 years (C1, too young); >80 years (C2, too old); 50 – 80 years (C3, ineligible smoking history); 50 – 80 years (C4, eligible). For certain analyses, we stratified the LDCT cohort by baseline (T0) Lung-RADS score (0-2 v 3-4). We used a Cox model to calculate crude and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for lung cancer diagnosis within 24 months of enrollment. Results: From 2015-2021, 7050 persons were in LDCT- 6073 (86%) Lung-RADS 0-2 (no/benign lesions), 977 (14%) Lung-RADS 3 or 4 (possibly malignant lesion) on T0 scan; 17,579 were in ILNP, 16%, 10%, 57% and 16% respectively in C1-4. Demographics and tobacco use history of the ILNP cohorts differed strikingly; C4 was very similar to LDCT (Table). Black persons were significantly more in C1 (too young) and C3 (insufficient tobacco use). Diagnosis of lung cancer at 36 months ranged from 1% in C1 to 15% in C4, compared to 3% in LDCT; aHR for lung cancer diagnosis within 2 years ranged from 0.23 to 5.12 (all LDCT ref), but ranged from 0.04 to 1.02 with reference to LDCT Lung-RADS 3-4. Most patients in LDCT and ILNP C2-4 had early stage. There were proportionately more Black lung cancer patients in C1-4, and 3 times more Black patients in C3 and 4 than in LDCT. Conclusions: ILNP provides early-detection access to a larger, more diverse population than LDCT, potentially alleviating race and socio-economics-based outcomes disparities. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liao
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Nicholas Faris
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Jordan Goss
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Alicia Pacheco
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Paul F Pinsky
- National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
6536 Background: Low-dose CT lung cancer screening (LDCT) saves lives, but only 5%-10% of eligible persons in the US have participated. Management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) identified on CT scans may also reduce lung cancer mortality. We assessed the frequency of IPNs, estimated cumulative lung cancer rates following IPNs, and compared characteristics of lung cancers diagnosed following IPNs versus LDCT screens. Methods: We defined 2 cohorts in the SEER-Medicare database: persons with 12+ months of Medicare Part A&B coverage during 2014-2019 comprised the 5% sample cohort; persons in SEER-Medicare diagnosed with lung cancer during 2015-2017 with Part A&B coverage for the prior 18-month period comprised the lung cancer cohort. We defined IPNs as chest CTs with ICD-10 codes of R91.1 (solitary pulmonary nodule) or R91.8 (other nonspecific abnormal finding of lung field) on the same date as the CT; we used corresponding ICD-9 codes through September 2015. We classified lung cancer cohort cases by whether they had an LDCT (LDCT group), an IPN without an LDCT screen (IPN-only), or neither (Referent) within 18 months before diagnosis. We compared cancer stage and survival between these groups. Results: Of 627,547 subjects in the 5% sample cohort, 58.6% were women; 85.6% were non-Hispanic White (NH-Whites) and 7.7% non-Hispanic Black (NH-Blacks). Over median 5.0 years follow-up, 26.3% had chest CTs and 12.0% had IPNs. The IPN rate was similar by sex but significantly higher in NH-Whites (12.7%) than NH-Blacks (9.7%). The cumulative lung cancer rate following initial IPNs was 2.27% at two years. Of the 44,194 lung cancer cohort cases (85.8% NH-White, 8.2% NH-Black), 26.9%, 2.9% and 70.2% were in the IPN-only, LDCT, and Referent groups, respectively. NH-Whites comprised a higher proportion of LDCT than of IPN-only cases (90.1% vs. 88.4%), while for NH-Blacks, the reverse was true (5.4% vs. 6.5%). The ratio of LDCT:IPN lung cancer cases was 1:9. Among IPN-only and LDCT group cases, 52.0% and 50.3%, respectively, were localized stage, compared to 21.5% for the Referent group. Among all localized cases, 45.4% and 4.9% were in the IPN-only and LDCT groups, respectively. Comparing 3-year survival between IPN vs LDCT vs Referent groups, respectively: aggregate overall survival rates were 53.5% v 59.2% v 29.2%; aggregate lung cancer-specific survival, 71.1% v 75.3% v 46.6%; overall survival for localized cases, 73.2% v 80.7% v 62.9%; lung cancer-specific survival rates for localized cases, 88.2%, 91.8% and 81.4%. Conclusions: Subjects with IPNs had similar stage distribution and survival as LDCT-screened subjects. Almost half of localized cases had prior IPNs, compared to a < 5% of LDCT-screened cases. IPN programs, by circumventing implementation barriers to LDCT, may expand access to early lung cancer detection, including to African American patients and in places where LDCT coverage is not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric A Miller
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Nicholas Faris
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Paul F Pinsky
- National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mileham KF, Garrett-Mayer E, Kaltenbaugh M, Kirkwood MK, Schenkel C, Bruinooge SS, Osarogiagbon RU, Jalal SI, Moore A, Basu Roy UK, Freeman-Daily J, Virani S, Garon EB, Silvestri GA, Rosenthal L, Smith RA, Johnson BE. Associations between biomarker testing and characteristics of patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC): An analysis of CancerLinQ Discovery (CLQD) data. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9127 Background: Guidelines have evolved from 2011-2019; there are now 23 approved therapies targeting various predictive biomarkers in mNSCLC. 2021 NCCN Guidelines advocate for a minimum of ALK, EGFR, BRAF, METex14, NTRK1/2/3, RET, KRAS, and ROS1 testing before determining a treatment regimen. The study objective was to estimate the association between the presence of biomarker testing and smoking status, age, sex, race, ethnicity, histology, and diagnosis year in patients with mNSCLC. Methods: CLQD is a real-world data source that provides de-identified electronic health record (EHR) data from more than 60 U.S. oncology practices utilizing 10 different EHRs. This retrospective analysis included patients initially diagnosed with mNSCLC from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. Standard logistic regression models were fit separately by practice to estimate practice-specific odds ratios to assess variability across practices in associations between covariates (smoking status, age, race, etc.) and the primary outcome of biomarker testing, defined as documented testing for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, KRAS, MET, RET, ERBB2, and/or PD-L1 within -60 to +365 days of mNSCLC diagnosis. Random effects logistic regression was then used to estimate associations with random intercepts, accounting for clustering by practices. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: 8704 patients from 31 practices were eligible. Testing rates increased from 31.5% in 2011 to a peak of 62.3% in 2017. Patients with a smoking history were half as likely to receive testing than patients without a smoking history (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.60); patients with unknown smoking history were 0.66 times as likely (95% CI: 0.52, 0.84). Females were more likely to be tested than males (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.32). After adjusting for other covariates, Asian patients were 1.51 times more likely to be tested than patients of other races (95% CI: 1.05, 2.17); Hispanic patients were 1.33 times more likely to be tested than patients without Hispanic ethnicity (95% CI: 0.99, 1.78). The odds of receiving biomarker testing were 6x greater for patients with non-squamous mNSCLC versus squamous mNSCLC (95% CI: 5.45, 7.20). Patients > 70 years old were less likely to be tested (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.93) than younger patients. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate annual increases in testing rates, reflecting guideline changes. However, in this cohort of patients with mNSCLC, biomarker testing was more likely for non-squamous mNSCLC patients, females, Asians, Hispanics, or those who did not have a history of smoking. Patient characteristics should no longer factor into obtaining biomarker testing. Non-discriminant, broad panel-based reflex molecular testing in mNSCLC can reduce treatment choice ambiguity and enhance patient opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amy Moore
- Bonnie J Addario Lung Cancer Foundation, San Carlos, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kehl KL, Zahrieh D, Yang P, Hillman SL, Tan AD, Sands JM, Oxnard GR, Gillaspie EA, Wigle D, Malik S, Stinchcombe TE, Ramalingam SS, Kelly K, Govindan R, Mandrekar SJ, Osarogiagbon RU, Kozono D. Rates of Guideline-Concordant Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy Among Patients With Early-Stage Lung Cancer in the US ALCHEMIST Study (Alliance A151216). JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:717-728. [PMID: 35297944 PMCID: PMC8931674 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Importance Standard treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes anatomic resection with adequate lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy for appropriate patients. Historically, many patients with early-stage NSCLC have not received such treatment, which may affect the interpretation of the results of adjuvant therapy trials. Objective To ascertain patterns of guideline-concordant treatment among patients enrolled in a US-wide screening protocol for adjuvant treatment trials for resected NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included 2833 patients with stage IB to IIIA NSCLC (per American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria) who enrolled in the Adjuvant Lung Cancer Enrichment Marker Identification and Sequencing Trial (ALCHEMIST) screening study (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A151216) from August 18, 2014, to April 1, 2019, and who did not enroll in a therapeutic adjuvant clinical trial; patients had tumors of at least 4 cm and/or with positive lymph nodes. Statistical analysis was conducted from June 1, 2020, through October 1, 2021. Exposures Care patterns were ascertained overall and by sociodemographic and clinical factors, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, educational level, marital status, geography, histologic characteristics, stage, genomic variant status, smoking history, and comorbidities. Main Outcomes and Measures Five outcomes are reported: whether patients (1) had anatomic surgical resection, (2) had adequate lymph node dissection (≥1 N1 nodal station plus ≥3 N2 nodal stations), (3) received any adjuvant chemotherapy, (4) received any cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, and (5) received at least 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results Of the 2833 patients (1505 women [53%]; mean [SD] age, 66.5 [9.2] years) included in this analysis, 2697 (95%) had anatomic surgical resection, 1513 (53%) had adequate lymph node dissection, 1617 (57%) received any adjuvant chemotherapy, 1237 (44%) received at least 4 cycles of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, and 965 (34%) received any cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Rates were similar across race and ethnicity. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found that among participants in a screening protocol for adjuvant clinical trials for resected early-stage NSCLC, just 53% underwent adequate lymph node dissection, and 57% received adjuvant chemotherapy, despite indications for such treatment. These results may affect the interpretation of adjuvant trials. Efforts are needed to optimize the use of proven therapies for early-stage NSCLC. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02194738.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth L. Kehl
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Zahrieh
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ping Yang
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Shauna L. Hillman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Angelina D. Tan
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jacob M. Sands
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Geoffrey R. Oxnard
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Erin A. Gillaspie
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Dennis Wigle
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Shakun Malik
- National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | - Karen Kelly
- University of California at Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento
| | - Ramaswamy Govindan
- Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | - David Kozono
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Osarogiagbon RU, Liao W, Faris NR, Meadows-Taylor M, Fehnel C, Lane J, Williams SC, Patel AA, Akinbobola OA, Pacheco A, Epperson A, Luttrell J, McCoy D, McHugh L, Signore R, Bishop AM, Tonkin K, Optican R, Wright J, Robbins T, Ray MA, Smeltzer MP. Lung Cancer Diagnosed Through Screening, Lung Nodule, and Neither Program: A Prospective Observational Study of the Detecting Early Lung Cancer (DELUGE) in the Mississippi Delta Cohort. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2094-2105. [PMID: 35258994 PMCID: PMC9242408 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Lung cancer screening saves lives, but implementation is challenging. We evaluated two approaches to early lung cancer detection-low-dose computed tomography screening (LDCT) and program-based management of incidentally detected lung nodules. METHODS A prospective observational study enrolled patients in the early detection programs. For context, we compared them with patients managed in a Multidisciplinary Care Program. We compared clinical stage distribution, surgical resection rates, 3- and 5-year survival rates, and eligibility for LDCT screening of patients diagnosed with lung cancer. RESULTS From 2015 to May 2021, 22,886 patients were enrolled: 5,659 in LDCT, 15,461 in Lung Nodule, and 1,766 in Multidisciplinary Care. Of 150, 698, and 1,010 patients diagnosed with lung cancer in the respective programs, 61%, 60%, and 44% were diagnosed at clinical stage I or II, whereas 19%, 20%, and 29% were stage IV (P = .0005); 47%, 42%, and 32% had curative-intent surgery (P < .0001); aggregate 3-year overall survival rates were 80% (95% CI, 73 to 88) versus 64% (60 to 68) versus 49% (46 to 53); 5-year overall survival rates were 76% (67 to 87) versus 60% (56 to 65) versus 44% (40 to 48), respectively. Only 46% of 1,858 patients with lung cancer would have been deemed eligible for LDCT by US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2013 criteria, and 54% by 2021 criteria. Even if all eligible patients by USPSTF 2021 criteria had been enrolled into LDCT, the Nodule Program would have detected 20% of the stage I-II lung cancer in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION LDCT and Lung Nodule Programs are complementary, expanding access to early lung cancer detection and curative treatment to different-risk populations. Implementing Lung Nodule Programs may alleviate emerging disparities in access to early lung cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wei Liao
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Nicholas R Faris
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Carrie Fehnel
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Jordan Lane
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Sara C Williams
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Anita A Patel
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Alicia Pacheco
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Amanda Epperson
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Joy Luttrell
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Denise McCoy
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Laura McHugh
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Raymond Signore
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Anna M Bishop
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Keith Tonkin
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN.,Mid-South Imaging and Therapeutics, Memphis, TN
| | - Robert Optican
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN.,Mid-South Imaging and Therapeutics, Memphis, TN
| | - Jeffrey Wright
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN.,Memphis Lung Physicians, Memphis, TN
| | - Todd Robbins
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Meredith A Ray
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - Matthew P Smeltzer
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hassett MJ, Cronin C, Tsou TC, Wedge J, Bian J, Dizon DS, Hazard-Jenkins H, Osarogiagbon RU, Wong S, Basch E, Austin T, McCleary N, Schrag D. eSyM: An Electronic Health Record-Integrated Patient-Reported Outcomes-Based Cancer Symptom Management Program Used by Six Diverse Health Systems. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2022; 6:e2100137. [PMID: 34985914 PMCID: PMC9848544 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can improve symptom control and quality of life, enhance doctor-patient communication, and reduce acute care needs for patients with cancer. Digital solutions facilitate PRO collection, but without robust electronic health record (EHR) integration, effective deployment can be hampered by low patient and clinician engagement and high development and deployment costs. The important components of digital PRO platforms have been defined, but procedures for implementing integrated solutions are not readily available. METHODS As part of the NCI's IMPACT consortium, six health care systems partnered with Epic to develop an EHR-integrated, PRO-based electronic symptom management program (eSyM) to optimize postoperative recovery and well-being during chemotherapy. The agile development process incorporated user-centered design principles that required engagement from patients, clinicians, and health care systems. Whenever possible, the system used validated content from the public domain and took advantage of existing EHR capabilities to automate processes. RESULTS eSyM includes symptom surveys on the basis of the PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) plus two global wellness questions; reminders and symptom self-management tip sheets for patients; alerts and symptom reports for clinicians; and population management dashboards. EHR dependencies include a secure Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant patient portal; diagnosis, procedure and chemotherapy treatment plan data; registries that identify and track target populations; and the ability to create reminders, alerts, reports, dashboards, and charting shortcuts. CONCLUSION eSyM incorporates validated content and leverages existing EHR capabilities. Build challenges include the innate technical limitations of the EHR, the constrained availability of site technical resources, and sites' heterogenous EHR configurations and policies. Integration of PRO-based symptom management programs into the EHR could help overcome adoption barriers, consolidate clinical workflows, and foster scalability and sustainability. We intend to make eSyM available to all Epic users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Hassett
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA,Michael J. Hassett, MD, MPH, Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail:
| | - Christine Cronin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | | - Sandra Wong
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Ethan Basch
- Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Nadine McCleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mileham KF, Schenkel C, Bruinooge SS, Freeman‐Daily J, Basu Roy U, Moore A, Smith RA, Garrett‐Mayer E, Rosenthal L, Garon EB, Johnson BE, Osarogiagbon RU, Jalal S, Virani S, Weber Redman M, Silvestri GA. Defining comprehensive biomarker-related testing and treatment practices for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a survey of U.S. oncologists. Cancer Med 2022; 11:530-538. [PMID: 34921524 PMCID: PMC8729042 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An ASCO taskforce comprised of representatives of oncology clinicians, the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable (NLCRT), LUNGevity, the GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer, and the ROS1ders sought to: characterize U.S. oncologists' biomarker ordering and treatment practices for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); ascertain barriers to biomarker testing; and understand the impact of delays on treatment decisions. METHODS We deployed a survey to 2374 ASCO members, targeting U.S. thoracic and general oncologists. RESULTS We analyzed 170 eligible responses. For non-squamous NSCLC, 97% of respondents reported ordering tests for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF. Testing for MET, RET, and NTRK was reported to be higher among academic versus community providers and higher among thoracic oncologists than generalists. Most respondents considered 1 (46%) or 2 weeks (52%) an acceptable turnaround time, yet 37% usually waited three or more weeks to receive results. Respondents who waited ≥3 weeks were more likely to defer treatment until results were reviewed (63%). Community and generalist respondents who waited ≥3 weeks were more likely to initiate non-targeted treatment while awaiting results. Respondents <5 years out of training were more likely to cite their concerns about waiting for results as a reason for not ordering biomarker testing (42%, vs. 19% with ≥6 years of experience). CONCLUSIONS Respondents reported high biomarker testing rates in patients with NSCLC. Treatment decisions were impacted by test turnaround time and associated with practice setting and physician specialization and experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Amy Moore
- LUNGevity FoundationChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Robert A. Smith
- American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer RoundtableAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | - Lauren Rosenthal
- American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer RoundtableAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Edward B. Garon
- University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of MedicineLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Fox AH, Jett JR, Roy UB, Johnson BE, King JC, Martin N, Osarogiagbon RU, Rivera MP, Rosenthal LS, Smith RA, Silvestri GA. Knowledge and Practice Patterns Among Pulmonologists for Molecular Biomarker Testing in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Chest 2021; 160:2293-2303. [PMID: 34181954 PMCID: PMC8727850 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic drivers have caused a paradigm shift in care. Biomarker testing is needed to assess eligibility for these therapies. Pulmonologists often perform bronchoscopy, providing tissue for both pathologic diagnosis and biomarker analysis. We performed this survey to define the existing knowledge and practices regarding the pulmonologists' role in biomarker testing for advanced NSCLC. RESEARCH QUESTION What is the current knowledge and practice of pulmonologists regarding biomarker testing and targeted therapies in advanced NSCLC? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This cross-sectional study was performed using an electronic survey of a random sample of 7,238 pulmonologists. Questions focused on diagnostic steps and biomarker analyses for NSCLC. RESULTS A total of 453 pulmonologists responded. Respondents vary by reported lung cancer patient volume, ranging from 51% evaluating one to four new cases per month to 19% evaluating > 10 cases per month. Interventional training, academic practice setting, and higher volume of endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) were associated with increased knowledge of practice guidelines for the number of recommended passes during EBUS-TBNA (P < .05). Academic pulmonologists more commonly performed or referred for EBUS-TBNA than community pulmonologists (96% and 83%, respectively; P < .0005). Higher testing rates were associated with interventional training, academic setting, and the presence of an institutional policy, whereas lower testing rates were associated with general pulmonologists, practice in community settings, and lack of a guiding institutional policy (P < .05). INTERPRETATION Substantial differences among pulmonologists' evaluation of advanced NSCLC, variation in knowledge of available biomarkers and the importance of targeted therapies, and differences in institutional coordination likely lead to underutilization of biomarker testing. Interventional training appears to drive improved knowledge and practice for biomarker testing more than practice setting. Improvements are needed in tissue acquisition and interdisciplinary coordination to ensure universal and comprehensive testing for eligible patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam H Fox
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - M Patricia Rivera
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Lauren S Rosenthal
- Prevention and Early Detection Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Robert A Smith
- Prevention and Early Detection Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Gerard A Silvestri
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Osarogiagbon RU, Mullangi S, Schrag D. Medicare Spending, Utilization, and Quality in the Oncology Care Model. JAMA 2021; 326:1805-1806. [PMID: 34751724 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.18765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Associate Editor, JAMA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Smeltzer M, Liao W, Taylor MB, Fehnel C, Faris N, Lane JG, Williams SC, Akinbobola O, Pacheco A, Epperson A, Luttrell J, McCoy D, Smith E, Adams K, Ray M, Robbins T, Wright J, Osarogiagbon RU. Comparing U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 2013 versus 2021 lung cancer screening eligibility. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
13 Background: Early detection of lung cancer provides the best opportunity for long-term survival. In 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) expanded the 2013 risk-based Low-dose CT (LDCT) screening criteria, in part to reduce unintended race and gender disparities in lung cancer detection. We evaluated the impact of the updated USPSTF criteria in a cohort of patients from an incidental lung nodule program (ILNP). Methods: We implemented an ILNP in a community healthcare system in the mid-south US. Patients with lung lesions on routinely-performed radiologic studies were triaged using evidence-based guidelines. We prospectively tracked patient demographics, clinical characteristics, procedures, complications, and health outcomes. We classified all patients in the ILNP cohort based on USPSTF 2013 and 2021 screening criteria. Statistical analysis used the chi-square test. Results: The ILNP cohort included 14,642 patients from 2015-2021. This cohort was 56% female, 65% White, 29% Black, with a median age of 64 years. Overall 1,581 (10.8%) met 2013 and 2,051 (14.0%) met 2021 USPSTF criteria. 1.9% of subjects eligible by 2013 criteria were diagnosed with lung cancer compared to 2.2% by 2021 criteria. 470 additional patients met screening criteria when we expanded from USPSTF 2013 to 2021. As expected, these patients were younger and less likely to have Medicare insurance. These additional eligible patients were significantly more likely to be female (58% v 49%, p = 0.0011) or Black (28% vs. 18%, p < 0.0001) compared to those eligible by 2013 criteria. 44 of the 470 (9%) were diagnosed with cancer: 36% adenocarcinoma, 18% squamous, and 11% small cell, 11% non-lung primary, 9% non-small cell lung cancer NOS, and 15% other or unknown histology. The median tumor size was 3 cm with an interquartile range from 1.7 to 4.2 cm. The clinical stage distribution was 34% I, 4.5% II, 15.9% III, and 31.8% IV. Conclusions: In this selective community-based cohort, USPSTF 2021 criteria identified a higher percentage of subjects with lung cancer and were more inclusive of women and minorities compared to USPSTF 2013 criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wei Liao
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Meghan Brooke Taylor
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Nicholas Faris
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Sara Cat Williams
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Olawale Akinbobola
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Alicia Pacheco
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Amanda Epperson
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Joy Luttrell
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Denise McCoy
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Elizabeth Smith
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Kim Adams
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Meredith Ray
- University of Memphis, School of Public Health, Memphis, TN
| | - Todd Robbins
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Taylor MB, Ray M, Faris N, Smeltzer M, Fehnel C, Pacheco A, Patel A, Berryman C, McHugh L, Kershner P, Parker S, Lammers PE, Satpute SR, Walsh W, Wright J, Fox R, Optican R, Tokin K, Robbins ET, Osarogiagbon RU. A disease-based evaluation of lung cancer care quality in a community healthcare system. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
251 Background: Lung cancer care is complex, but, for quality improvement, can be simplified into five ‘nodal points’: lesion detection, diagnostic biopsy, radiologic staging, invasive staging, and treatment. We previously demonstrated great heterogeneity in passage through these nodal points in patients who received surgical resection for lung cancer in our healthcare system. However, examining only surgical patients may underestimate the enormity of the opportunity for quality improvement. With the aim of identifying quality gaps in pre-treatment evaluation for lung cancer, we evaluated the flow of care through these nodal points within a community-based healthcare system. Methods: We classified lung cancer care procedures received by all suspected lung cancer patients treated within the Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program at Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis TN between 2014 and 2019, into five nodal points. We compared the frequency of, and time intervals between, nodal points among patients receiving surgical, nonsurgical (chemotherapy/radiation), or no definitive treatment, using Chi-square or Kruskal Wallis tests, where appropriate. Results: Of 1304 eligible patients: 11% had no pre-treatment diagnostic procedure, 20% no PET/CT, and 39% no invasive staging. 39% of patients underwent surgical resection, 51% received non-surgical treatment, and 10% received no treatment. Patients who had surgery were less likely than those who had non-surgical treatment to get a diagnostic test, radiologic staging, and invasive staging (Table). Patients who had non-surgical treatment were more likely to pass through all five nodal points (50% v 68%, p<0.0001). The median (IQR) duration from initial lesion identification to treatment (n=1126) was 77 days (45-190); 27 days (10-90) from lesion identification to diagnostic biopsy (n=1115); and 38 days (26-63) from diagnostic biopsy to treatment (n=1041). Patients who had surgery received less timely care than those who had non-surgical or no treatment: median 122 v 66 v 68 days from lesion identification to treatment; 40 v 21 v 29 days from lesion identification to diagnostic biopsy; 46 v 38 v 31 days from diagnostic biopsy to treatment (p<0.0001 all comparisons). Conclusions: Quality improvement initiatives within our healthcare system, such as the establishment of a coordinated multidisciplinary program, enhanced care quality over previous benchmarks. Despite improvements, lung cancer patients who had surgery received less frequent and less timely pre-treatment evaluation than those without surgery. Implementing a standardized cancer care pathway from diagnosis to surgery could help to reduce variations in optimal care delivery.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Brooke Taylor
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Meredith Ray
- University of Memphis, School of Public Health, Memphis, TN
| | - Nicholas Faris
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Carrie Fehnel
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Alicia Pacheco
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Anita Patel
- Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation, Memphis, TN
| | - Courtney Berryman
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Laura McHugh
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Penny Kershner
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Samantha Parker
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Shailesh R. Satpute
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - William Walsh
- Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Roy Fox
- Midsouth Pulmonary Specialists, Memphis, TN
| | - Rob Optican
- Midsouth Imaging and Therapeutics, Memphis, TN
| | - Keith Tokin
- Midsouth Imaging and Therapeutics, Memphis, TN
| | - Edward Todd Robbins
- Baptist Memorial Hospital, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Shao H, Faris N, Taylor MB, Fehnel C, Patel A, Weller S, Berryman C, Akinbobola O, Pacheco A, McHugh L, Debon M, Smeltzer M, Ray M, Robbins T, Ward KD, Osarogiagbon RU. Patient and caregiver’s satisfaction with multidisciplinary vs. serial lung cancer care in a community setting. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
200 Background: Few existing studies examined lung cancer patients and caregivers’ satisfaction with the team-based multidisciplinary care (MD) in comparison to the usual serial care (SC). We hypothesized that MD, by providing early and concurrent input from key specialists collaborating as a team with patients and caregivers to develop a consensus care plan, can improve patients and caregivers’ satisfaction with care, compared to SC, in which multiple specialists independently screen, diagnose, and treat patients through a fragmented sequence of referrals. Methods: Data on newly diagnosed lung cancer patients, enrolled in a prospective matched cohort comparative effectiveness trial of MD or SC between Oct. 9th, 2014 and July 5th, 2017 in a Mid-South community hospital system, were collected at baseline, 3- and 6-month periods to assess patient and caregiver’s satisfaction with these two care-delivery models. Measures of satisfaction were adapted from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey. Multivariate mixed linear models were used to examine the cross-group differences, the time-related variances, and how the interaction between groups and time-periods influenced patients’ and caregivers’ satisfaction. Results: Compared with SC (N = 297), patients in MD (N = 159) were older (66 vs. 69 years), more in an early cancer stage (33% vs. 41% in stage I or II), and lower in performance score (35% vs. 45% asymptomatic). Demographic and social-economic characteristics of caregivers in MD (N = 97) and SC (N = 122) were not significantly different. Patients and caregivers in MD were more likely than those in SC to perceive their care to be better than that received by other patients (p =.003 and p <.001 respectively). Greater satisfaction with their treatment plan at 6-month was observed among the MD patients (p =.004). Also, MD patients reported better overall satisfaction with team members (p =.038). Consistent with the findings among the patients in MD, caregivers in MD were more satisfied with the quality of care (p <.001) and with care received from team members (p <.001) than that reported by caregivers in SC. Conclusions: Coordinated MD care improved patients and caregivers’ satisfaction with lung cancer care in a community healthcare system. Further research will compare the quality of life and financial burden on patients in the MD and SC treatment models to provide more evidence for stakeholders to refine cancer care models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas Faris
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Meghan Brooke Taylor
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Anita Patel
- Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation, Memphis, TN
| | - Samantha Weller
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Memphis, TN
| | - Courtney Berryman
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Olawale Akinbobola
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Alicia Pacheco
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Laura McHugh
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | - Meredith Ray
- University of Memphis, School of Public Health, Memphis, TN
| | - Todd Robbins
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tran HTT, Nguyen S, Nguyen KK, Pham DX, Nguyen UH, Le AT, Nguyen GH, Tran DV, Phung SDH, Do HM, Tran TV, Shu XO, Osarogiagbon RU. Lung Cancer in Vietnam. J Thorac Oncol 2021; 16:1443-1448. [PMID: 34425998 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Huong T T Tran
- Vietnam National Cancer Institute and Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
| | - Sang Nguyen
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kiem K Nguyen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Dung X Pham
- Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital, Ho chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Uoc H Nguyen
- Cardiovascular and Thoracic Center, Viet Duc University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Anh T Le
- Cho Ray Cancer Center, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Giang H Nguyen
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Dung V Tran
- Department of International Collaboration and Research, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Son D H Phung
- Cardiovascular and Thoracic Center, Viet Duc University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Hung M Do
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ray MA, Faris NR, Fehnel C, Derrick A, Smeltzer MP, Meadows-Taylor MB, Ariganjoye F, Pacheco A, Optican R, Tonkin K, Wright J, Fox R, Callahan T, Robbins ET, Walsh W, Lammers P, Satpute S, Osarogiagbon RU. Survival Impact of an Enhanced Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference in a Regional Community Health Care System. JTO Clin Res Rep 2021; 2:100203. [PMID: 34590046 PMCID: PMC8474211 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We compared NSCLC treatment and survival within and outside a multidisciplinary model of care from a large community health care system. METHODS We implemented a rigorously benchmarked "enhanced" Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference (eMTOC) and used Tumor Registry data (2011-2017) to evaluate guideline-concordant care. Because eMTOC was located in metropolitan Memphis, we separated non-MTOC patient by metropolitan and regional location. We categorized National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-concordant treatment as "preferred," or "appropriate" (allowable under certain circumstances). We compared demographic and clinical characteristics across cohorts using chi-square tests and survival using Cox regression, adjusted for multiple testing. We also performed propensity-matched and adjusted survival analyses. RESULTS Of 6259 patients, 14% were in eMTOC, 55% metropolitan non-MTOC, and 31% regional non-MTOC cohorts. eMTOC had the highest rates of African Americans (34% versus 28% versus 22%), stages I to IIIB (63 versus 40 versus 50), urban residents (81 versus 78 versus 20), stage-preferred treatment (66 versus 57 versus 48), guideline-concordant treatment (78 versus 70 versus 63), and lowest percentage of nontreatment (6 versus 21 versus 28); all p values were less than 0.001. Compared with eMTOC, hazard for death was higher in metropolitan (1.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-1.7) and regional (1.7, 1.5-1.9) non-MTOC; hazards were higher in regional non-MTOC versus metropolitan (1.1, 1.0-1.2); all p values were less than 0.05 after adjustment. Results were generally similar after propensity analysis with and without adjusting for guideline-concordant treatment. CONCLUSIONS Multidisciplinary NSCLC care planning was associated with significantly higher rates of guideline-concordant care and survival, providing evidence for rigorous implementation of this model of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith A. Ray
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Nicholas R. Faris
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Anna Derrick
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Matthew P. Smeltzer
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Folabi Ariganjoye
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Alicia Pacheco
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Robert Optican
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
- Mid-South Imaging and Therapeutics, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Keith Tonkin
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
- Mid-South Imaging and Therapeutics, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jeffrey Wright
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
- Memphis Lung Physicians, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Roy Fox
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
- Mid-South Pulmonary Specialists, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Thomas Callahan
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
- Trumbull Laboratories, LLC, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Edward T. Robbins
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - William Walsh
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Philip Lammers
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Shailesh Satpute
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Raymond U. Osarogiagbon
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Smeltzer MP, Lee YS, Faris M Div NR, Fehnel C, Akinbobola O, Meadows-Taylor M, Spencer D, Sales E, Okun S, Giampapa C, Anga A, Pacheco A, Ray MA, Osarogiagbon RU. Trends in Accuracy and Comprehensiveness of Pathology Reports for Resected NSCLC in a High Mortality Area of the United States. J Thorac Oncol 2021; 16:1663-1671. [PMID: 34280563 PMCID: PMC9039869 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Complete and accurate pathology reports are vital to postoperative prognostication and management. We evaluated the impact of three interventions across a diverse group of hospitals on pathology reports of postresection NSCLC. Methods: We evaluated pathology reports for patients who underwent curative-intent surgical resection for NSCLC, at 11 institutions within four contiguous Dartmouth Hospital Referral Regions in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Tennessee from 2004 to 2020, for completeness and accuracy, before and after the following three quality improvement interventions: education (feedback to heighten awareness); synoptic reporting; and a lymph node specimen collection kit. We compared the proportion of pathology reports with the six most important items for postoperative management (specimen type, tumor size, histologic type, pathologic [p] T-category, pN-category, margin status) across the following six patient cohorts: preintervention control, postintervention with four different combinations of interventions, and a contemporaneous nonintervention external control. Results: In the postintervention era, the odds of reporting all key items were eight times higher than those in the preintervention era (OR = 8.3, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 6.7–10.2, p < 0.0001). There were sixfold and eightfold increases in the odds of accurate pT- and pN-category reporting in the postintervention era compared with the preintervention era (pT OR = 5.7, 95 % CI: 4.7–6.9; pN OR = 8.0, 95 % CI: 6.5–10.0, both p < 0.0001). Within the intervention groups, the odds of reporting all six key items, accurate pT category, and accurate pN-category were highest in patients who received all three interventions. Conclusions: Gaps in the quality of NSCLC pathologic reportage can be identified, quantified, and corrected by rationally designed interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Smeltzer
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Yu-Sheng Lee
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Carrie Fehnel
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Olawale Akinbobola
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Meghan Meadows-Taylor
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Elizabeth Sales
- Doctors Anatomic Pathology Services, P.A., Jonesboro, Arkansas
| | - Sherry Okun
- Tupelo Pathology Group, P.C., Tupelo, Mississippi
| | | | - Amal Anga
- VA Department of Pathology, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Alicia Pacheco
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Meredith A Ray
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Meadows-Taylor M, Ward KD, Chen W, Faris NR, Fehnel C, Ray MA, Ariganjoye F, Berryman C, Houston-Harris C, McHugh LM, Pacheco A, Osarogiagbon RU. Interest in Cessation Treatment Among People Who Smoke in a Community-Based Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program. JTO Clin Res Rep 2021; 2:100182. [PMID: 34590029 PMCID: PMC8474282 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To evaluate the need for tobacco cessation services within a multidisciplinary clinic (MDC), we surveyed patients on their smoking status, interest in quitting, and willingness to participate in a clinic-based cessation program. We further evaluated the association between interest in cessation or willingness to participate in a cessation program and overall survival (OS). METHODS From 2014 to 2019, all new patients with lung cancer in the MDC at Baptist Cancer Center (Memphis, TN) were administered a social history questionnaire to evaluate their demographic characteristics, smoking status, tobacco dependence, interest in quitting, and willingness to participate in a cessation program. We used chi-square tests and logistic regression to compare characteristics of those who would participate to those who would not or were unsure and Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression to evaluate the association between cessation interest or willingness to quit and OS. RESULTS Of 641 total respondents, the average age was 69 years (range: 32-95), 47% were men, 64% white, 34% black, and 17% college graduates. A total of 90% had ever smoked: 34% currently and 25% quit within the past year. Among the current smokers, 60% were very interested in quitting and 37% would participate in a cessation program. Willingness to participate in a cessation program was associated with greater interest in quitting (p < 0.0001), better OS (p = 0.02), and reduced hazard of death (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.88), but no other characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Patients with lung cancer in an MDC expressed considerable interest in tobacco cessation services; patients willing to participate in a clinic-based cessation program had improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Meadows-Taylor
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kenneth D. Ward
- Division of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Weiyu Chen
- Division of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Nicholas R. Faris
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Meredith A. Ray
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Folabi Ariganjoye
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Courtney Berryman
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Cheryl Houston-Harris
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Laura M. McHugh
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Alicia Pacheco
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Osarogiagbon RU, Ray MA, Faris NR, Smeltzer MP. Response to: "Lymph Node Dissection for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer at Whose Discretion?". J Thorac Oncol 2021; 16:e36-e37. [PMID: 33896579 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.01.1627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meredith A Ray
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Nicholas R Faris
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Matthew P Smeltzer
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Smeltzer M, Liao W, Meadows-Taylor M, Faris N, Fehnel C, Goss J, Williams SC, Akinbobola O, Pacheco A, Epperson A, Luttrell J, McCoy D, Tokin K, Optican R, Wright J, Robbins ET, Satpute SR, Harris P, Ray M, Osarogiagbon RU. Early detection of lung cancer with an incidental lung nodule program (ILNP). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.8553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8553 Background: Lung cancer early detection improves survival, but risk-based low-dose CT screening (LDCT) only identifies a minority of patients. We implemented an ILNP in a community healthcare system, and evaluated its risks and benefits. Methods: Patients with lung lesions on routinely-performed radiologic studies were flagged by radiologists and triaged using evidence-based guidelines. We tracked demographics, clinical characteristics, procedures, complications, and health outcomes. We analyzed ILNP subjects’ eligibility for LDCT by National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), Center for Medicaid Services (CMS), NEderlands Leuvens Screening ONderzoek (NELSON), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Risk Groups 1 and 2 (screening recommended), NCCN Risk Group 3 (screening not currently recommended), and US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria from 2013 and 2020. Statistical analysis used the chi-square test and Kaplan Meier method. Results: From 2015-2020, 13,710 patients were evaluated in the ILNP program: median age, 64 years; 42% male; 65% White, 29% Black; 667 (4.9%) were diagnosed with lung cancer. Lung cancers diagnosed from ILNP were 39% adenocarcinoma / 20% Squamous Cell with clinical stage distribution 49% I, 8% II, 17% III, and 16% IV. 832 (6.1%) had invasive diagnostic testing- CT-guided biopsy (50%), bronchoscopy (30%), and/or EBUS (26%); 11% of the 832 had >1 invasive diagnostic test. The most common complications from invasive testing were pneumothorax and chest tube placement. Only 11%-20% of all ILNP patients would have been eligible for LDCT. In ILNP patients diagnosed with lung cancer, only 33% were eligible for screening by NLST criteria; the proportion increased substantially when USPSTF 2020 or NCCN Group 2 criteria were applied (Table). Compared to NLST, NCCN Group 2 criteria increased screening eligibility among cancer patients by 22% (from 33% to 55%), while only increasing screening eligibility by 6% (from 8% to 14%) in non-cancer patients. Aggregate 1-year and 3-year survival rates for lung cancer patient diagnosed through ILNP were 76% (95% CI: 73, 80) and 64% (95% CI: 59, 69). Conclusions: The ILNP identified early-stage lung cancer more frequently than most LDCT programs, with promising survival rates. The majority of subjects with lung cancer were not eligible for LDCT, we still need to optimize risk-based screening criteria. Even with new, expanded criteria for LDCT, structured ILNP is necessary to expand early detection of lung cancer.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wei Liao
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Nicholas Faris
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Jordan Goss
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Sara C. Williams
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Olawale Akinbobola
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Alicia Pacheco
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Amanda Epperson
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Joy Luttrell
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Denise McCoy
- Baptist Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Keith Tokin
- Midsouth Imaging and Therapeutics, Memphis, TN
| | - Rob Optican
- Midsouth Imaging and Therapeutics, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Edward Todd Robbins
- Baptist Memorial Hospital, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Shailesh R. Satpute
- Baptist Memorial Hospital, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Parker Harris
- Baptist Memorial Hospital, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Department, Memphis, TN
| | - Meredith Ray
- University of Memphis, School of Public Health, Memphis, TN
| | | |
Collapse
|