Management of Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Purpose

This review aims to compare recovery outcomes of conservative, early operative, and a combination of conservative and operative management for acute carpal tunnel syndrome (ACTS).

Methods

A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL from 1970 to 2022 was conducted using the keywords carpal tunnel syndrome and acute nerve compression. ACTS was defined as a case within 12 weeks of symptom onset. Primary data extracted included causes (traumatic or atraumatic), symptom duration (<1 day, 1-7 days, or 8-84 days), intervention (surgical, conservative, or conservative then surgical), follow-up duration, and outcome (full recovery or non-full recovery). Logistic regression analyses and χ2 tests were performed to investigate associations among these variables.

Results

A total of 197 patients involving 127 (64.5%) traumatic and 70 (35.3%) atraumatic cases were included. Forty-seven percent of patients were managed conservatively followed by surgery, 30% conservative only, and 23% surgery only. The traumatic group was associated with better recovery than the atraumatic group. Recovery outcomes were not associated with symptom duration or follow-up time. The choice of intervention was not associated with traumatic or atraumatic etiology, nor did it affect recovery outcomes in either group.

Conclusions

Traumatic ACTS is associated with better recovery outcomes than atraumatic etiologies. Surgical intervention was not found to be associated with better outcomes than conservative management, regardless of the etiologies. Further prospective studies are warranted to compare surgical versus conservative management.

Clinical Relevance

Currently, there are no guidelines for the best management of ACTS, and it is not known if early or delayed surgical treatment is optimal. This review compiles the current evidence and identifies gaps in the literature, highlighting the need for further investigation to provide the best clinical practice.