A Meta-Analysis To Ascertain the Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 Infection in North America

The challenges in controlling the pandemic have been exacerbated by the disease's morbidity and the emergence of additional COVID-19 variants. The use of emergency vaccines to circumvent these challenges has sparked mixed opinions on their effectiveness. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines on clinical outcomes such as incidence, hospitalization, and ventilation rates in both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials were searched on April 21, 2022, to extract published articles comparing vaccinated COVID-19 patients versus unvaccinated COVID-19 patients and their clinical outcomes. The clinical outcomes studied were incidence rate, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and hospitalization rates. The analysis was performed with Review Manager (RevMan) software. Random-effect models were used to calculate pooled odds ratio and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). In our meta-analysis, we have identified a total of 250 published findings, encompassing 15 studies that involved a cumulative count of 24,164,227 individuals diagnosed with COVID-19. Being unvaccinated had a significant association with severe clinical outcomes in patients infected with COVID-19. Unvaccinated individuals were 2.36 times more likely to be infected, with a 95% CI ranging from 1.13 to 4.94 (p = 0.02). Unvaccinated subjects with COVID-19 infection were 6.93 times more likely to be admitted to the ICU than their vaccinated counterparts, with a 95% CI ranging from 3.57 to 13.46 (p < 0.0001). The hospitalization rate was 3.37 higher among the unvaccinated compared to those vaccinated, with a 95% CI ranging from 1.92 to 5.93 (p < 0.0001). In addition, patients with COVID-19 infection who are unvaccinated were 6.44 times more likely to be mechanically ventilated than those vaccinated, with a 95% CI ranging from 3.13 to 13.23 (p < 0.0001). Overall, our study revealed that vaccination against COVID-19 disease is beneficial and effective in mitigating the spread of the infection and associated clinical outcomes. However, more awareness and proper education must be made to increase vaccine acceptance. We, therefore, recommend and urge all stakeholders involved in COVID-19 prevention, management, and control to strengthen awareness and educate the people on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination.

Green Smoke, Red Flag: Cannabis and the Risk of Orbitopathy and Dermopathy in Thyrotoxicosis

Background The use of cannabis has been associated with an array of multi-systemic physiological effects. However, the medical literature on the potential role of cannabinoids in the management and outcomes of thyrotoxicosis remains scarce. We studied the association between cannabis use and orbitopathy, dermopathy, and the length of hospital stay for thyrotoxicosis admissions. Methods A thorough analysis was conducted on adult hospitalizations in 2020 with a primary discharge diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis, using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). To ensure data completeness and consistency, hospitalizations with missing or incomplete information, as well as those involving patients under 18 years of age, were excluded from the study. The remaining study sample was categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of cannabis use, as determined by ICD-10-CM/PCS codes. Subtypes of orbitopathy, dermopathy, and potential confounding factors were identified based on previous literature and defined using validated ICD-10-CM/PCS codes. The association between cannabis use and the outcomes was evaluated using multivariate regression analysis. The primary focus was on thyroid orbitopathy, while dermopathy and the average length of hospital stay were considered as secondary outcomes. Results A total of 7,210 hospitalizations for thyrotoxicosis were included in the analysis. Among them, 404 (5.6%) were associated with cannabis use, while 6,806 (94.4%) were non-users serving as controls. Cannabis users were predominantly female (227, 56.3%), which was similar to the control group (5,263, 73%), and they were primarily of Black descent. Notably, the cohort of cannabis users was significantly younger than the control group (37.7 ± 1.3 vs. 63.6 ± 0.3). Upon conducting multivariate regression analysis, it was found that cannabis use was linked to a significant increase in the odds of orbitopathy among patients with thyrotoxicosis (AOR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.12-4.94; P = 0.02). Additionally, a history of tobacco smoking was also correlated with higher odds of orbitopathy in the study (AOR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.76-1.93; p = 0.04). However, no significant association was observed between cannabis use and the odds of dermopathy (AOR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.51-1.54; p = 0.65) or the average length of hospital stay (IRR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.58-1.46; p = 0.40). Conclusion The study identified a significant association between cannabis use and increased odds of orbitopathy in patients with thyrotoxicosis. Additionally, a history of tobacco smoking was also found to be correlated with augmented odds of orbitopathy.