Protein and Exercise to Reverse Frailty in Older Men and Women Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Design of the PERFORM-TAVR Trial

Despite the high procedural success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), 2 out of 5 older adults report poor physical performance and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the ensuing months, particularly those with frailty. There has yet to be a trial examining the synergistic effects of exercise and protein supplementation to counteract frailty and improve patient-centred outcomes following TAVR. The PERFORM-TAVR trial is a multicentre parallel-group randomised clinical trial that is enrolling 200 frail older adults ≥ 70 years of age undergoing TAVR. Patients will be randomly allocated to 1 of 2 treatment groups: standard-of-care lifestyle education (control group) or protein-rich oral nutritional supplement for 4 weeks before TAVR with the addition of home-based supervised exercise sessions for 12 weeks after TAVR (intervention group). The primary outcome will be physical performance as measured by a blinded observer using the Short Physical Performance Battery at 3 months. Secondary outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months will include HRQOL, as measured by the Short-Form 36 Physical and Mental Component summary scores, and a composite safety end point. The PERFORM-TAVR trial is testing a novel frailty intervention in older adults undergoing TAVR to optimise recovery and downstream HRQOL. This represents a potential paradigm shift that highlights the value of assessing and treating patients' frailty in parallel with their underlying heart valve disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03522454.

Rationale and Design of the Randomized Bayesian Multicenter COME-TAVI Trial in Patients With a New Onset Left Bundle Branch Block

Patients with new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at risk of developing delayed high-degree atrioventricular block. Management of new-onset LBBB post-TAVI remains controversial. In the Comparison of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-Guided Algorithmic Approach in Patients With a New LBBB After TAVI (COME-TAVI) trial, consenting patients with new-onset LBBB that persists on day 2 after TAVI, meeting exclusion/inclusion criteria, are randomized to an electrophysiological study (EPS)-guided approach or 30-day electrocardiographic monitoring. In the EPS-guided approach, patients with a His to ventricle (HV) interval ≥ 65 ms undergo permanent pacemaker implantation. Patients randomized to noninvasive monitoring receive a wearable continuous electrocardiographic recording and transmitting device for 30 days. Follow-up will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome designed to capture net clinical benefit. The endpoint incorporates major consequences of both strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVI, as follows: (i) sudden cardiac death; (ii) syncope; (iii) atrioventricular conduction disorder requiring a pacemaker (for a class I or IIa indication); and (iv) complications related to the pacemaker or EPS. The trial incorporates a Bayesian design with a noninformative prior, outcome-adaptive randomization (initially 1:1), and 2 prespecified interim analyses once 25% and 50% of the anticipated number of primary endpoints are reached. The trial is event-driven, with an anticipated upper limit of 452 patients required to reach 77 primary outcome events over 12 months of follow-up. In summary, the aim of this Bayesian multicentre randomized trial is to compare 2 management strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB post-TAVI-an EPS-guided approach vs noninvasive 30-day monitoring. Trial registration number: NCT03303612.

Effectiveness and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of observational studies

INTRODUCTION

Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCT) showed that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) are associated with reduced adverse events following primary percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI). However, the external validity of RCTs is generally limited due to their restricted inclusion of patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of GPI, as adjuvant therapy for primary PCI in real-life patients with myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI) from the general population.

METHODS

We identified all published peer-reviewed observational studies enrolling STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI. We performed random-effect meta-analyses to determine the association of GPI with major adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies, enrolling 12,253 patients, were retained for this meta-analysis. GPI was associated with approximately 53% reduction in short-term mortality (odds ratio (OR): 0.47, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.32-0.68). There was a 62% reduction in long-term mortality associated with GPI (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.30-0.50). GPI was associated with a 62% reduction in 30-day re-infarction (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.24-0.60) and 42% reduction in 30-day repeat PCI (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.94). A non-significant increase in major bleeding with GPI was observed with an OR of 1.55 (95% CI: 0.92-2.62).

CONCLUSIONS

GPI is associated with significant reductions in short-term mortality, re-infarction and repeat PCI, long-term mortality and an inconclusive increase in major bleeding. These results provide evidence for the safety and effectiveness of GPI as adjuvant therapy for primary PCI in real-life STEMI patients.

Demographics, response, and overall survival of patients with advanced renal cell cancer to sunitinib in a cohort of minority patient population

e16164

Background: Sunitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor active in renal cell cancer (RCC). There is scanty literature of its efficacy in minority population. Methods: 21 patients (pts) with RCC who received sunitinib between February 2006-September 2007 were identified and studied as a retrospective cohort. Clinical and survival data were analyzed using fisher's test, chi square test, Kaplan Meier analyses. Results: Of the 21 patients, 11 (52%) were female and 10 (47%) male, 7 (33.3%) African American, 7 (33.3%) Hispanic, and 5 (23.8%) Caucasian. Median age at diagnosis was 59 years (32–74). 7 (33.3%) had clear cell and 3 (14.3%) sarcomatoid pathology. Mixed, poorly differentiated, papillary and unknown histology were 2 (9.5%) each. 12 (57%) pts had stage 4 disease at diagnosis, stage 3 in 3 (14.3%), stage 2 in 1 (4.8%) and 5 (23%) had missing data. 14(66.7%) pts underwent nephrectomy while 7 (33.3%) did not. 6 (28.6%) pts has good MSKCC risk score, 11 (52.4%) intermediate risk and 3 (14.3%) poor risk. Sunitinib was given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 4 wks followed by 2 wks off. Median duration of treatment was 2.5 months (0–9 mts) and median follow up was 13 mts (1–21 mts). Common grade 3–4 toxicities observed were hand foot syndrome (n = 2), hypertension (n = 2) and thrombocytopenia (n = 1). 4 pts discontinued therapy due to adverse events. 5 (23.8%) has stable disease and 13 (61.9%) had progressive disease. Response to sunitinib was not influenced by sex, race, performance status, MSKCC Score, serum calcium level, LDH and hemoglobin level. Median survival of the group was 4 mts with no difference based on gender (p = 0.8), ethnicity (p = 0.8) or histologic type (p = 0.7). Survival of pts with ECOG performance status (PS) 1 was 8 mts, PS 2 was 4 mts, PS 3 was 2 mts (p = 0.001), MSKCC good risk was 9.4 mts, intermediate score was 9.4 mts and poor risk was 2 mts (p = 0.18). Hemoglobin (p = 0.6), LDH (p = 0.6), calcium (p = 0.2) did not affect the survival. Conclusions: In this minority cohort of pts with RCC treated with sunitinib, response and median survival is much lower than the historical controls. Tolerability and side effect profile are similar to reported literature. Prospective studies are warranted in the treatment of RCC with sunitinib in ethnic minority population.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Response, time to progression, and overall survival of patients with stage III lung cancer in a minority-based cohort

7558

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. Response and survival of patients (pts) with stage III lung cancer in minority population is not well studied. Methods: 79 pts treated between 2001 and 2006 were studied as a retrospective cohort. Clinical and survival data were analyzed using fisher's test, chi square test, Kaplan Meier analyses. Results: 33 Pts had Stage IIIA; Median age at diagnosis was 58 yrs (37–75). 14 were males (42.4%) 19 females (57.6%) 26 African American (78.8%) and 7 Caucasians (21.2%). Median number of co morbidities 2 (0–4). Mean follow up was 25 months (mo) (2 - 93), 19 had surgery (12 Lobectomy (36.4%), 7 Pneumonectomy (21.2%)) and 14 were unresectable (42.4%). All pts received adjuvant chemotherapy. Unresectable pts received chemotherapy and radiation, 8 carboplatin and gemcitabine and 6 cisplatin and etoposide. Median time to progression in resectable IIIA was 23 mo (2- 67), unresectable IIIA was 12 mo (3–93). Median survival in pts with resection was 26 mo (2 - 67), unresectable was 12 mo (5 - 93). Overall survival and time to progression was not influenced by sex, race, tumor type. 46 pts had stage IIIB, median age at diagnosis 57.5 yrs (40–68). 31 were males (67.4%) 15 females (32.6%) 29 African Americans (63%) 11 Caucasians (23.9) 3 Asians (6.5%) and 3 Hispanics (6.5%). Median follow up was 10 mo (3–97). All pts received chemotherapy and radiation. 23 received cisplatin and etoposide (50%), 14 carboplatin and gemcitabine (30%), 5 carboplatin and etoposide (9%), 5 carboplatin and paclitaxel (9%). 13 had complete response (28.3%), 15 partial response (32.6%), 2 stable disease (4.3%) and 10 Progression (21.7%). Median time to progression was 9 mo (3–97). Median overall survival was 10 mo (3–97). Overall survival and time to progression was not influenced by sex, race, tumor type, chemotherapy regimen. Conclusions: In this minority based cohort response, time to progression, overall survival in both IIIA and IIIB pts is much lower then historical controls. The overall survival and time to progression in both IIIA and IIIB is not influenced by race, sex, tumor type and type of chemotherapy regimen. Further investigations of disease and healthcare disparities in the underserved minority population, are warranted.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Characteristics of Hodgkin lymphoma in Hispanics compared to other ethnic groups

18510

Background: There is scant literature on the characteristics of Hodgkin’s disease in Hispanics. We studied the characteristics of this disease in Hispanics compared to other ethnic-racial groups in our large multiethnic Hodgkin’s disease caseload. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all the Hodgkin’s disease cases diagnosed between 2003 and 2006 was undertaken, using Fisher exact test. Results: Of 289 cases of lymphoma diagnosed, 65 (23%) were Hodgkin’s disease compared to SEER data of 11%; Hispanics 40%, African Americans (AA) 41%, Caucasians 19%. Median age at diagnosis: Hispanics 26, AA 27, Caucasians 38. Among the AA: 85% were men 15% women, Hispanics: 58% men 42% women, Caucasians: 33% men, 67% women (p value 0.004). Histological subtypes: Nodular sclerosis 82 % (58): AA 45%, Hispanics 34%, Caucasians 21%; Mixed cellularity 21% (8): Hispanics 75%, AA 12.5%, Caucasians12.5% (p value 0.079). Among Hispanics 62% were clinical stage 1 or 2, 38% stage 3 or 4; Caucasians 75% stage 1 or 2, 25% stage 3 or 4; AA 33% stage 1 or 2 and 66% stage 3 or 4 (p value 0.029). Among the 16 patients with limited stage disease 50% were Hispanics, 25% Caucasians and 25% AA. Of the 49 patients with advanced stage disease, 70% of the Hispanics had IPS Score 0–3, 30% had Score 4–7. Among the AA, 70% had IPS Score 0–3, 30% Score 4–7, while 33% of the Caucasians had IPS Score 0–3, 67% had Score 4–7 (p value 0.077). Conclusions: Mixed cellularity subtype is more common in the Hispanics while the nodular sclerosis subtype is relatively common in African Americans. Hispanics had early clinical and limited stage disease at diagnosis. Among the patients with advance stage disease, Caucasians had a higher IPS Score than the Hispanics. The clinical relevance of these observations remains to be determined with further studies.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.