Education and suicidal ideation in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Understanding predictors of suicidal ideation (SI) is crucial for preventing suicides. Given Europe's high suicide rates and the complex nature of SI, it is essential to also examine social determinants like education as potential risk factors for SI in this region. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the association between formal/vocational education and SI in Europe.

METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX) were searched until November 2022. Included studies involved European populations examining associations between education and SI. Pooled Odds Ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed with the heterogeneity variance τ2 and I2 statistic; subgroup analyses were performed based on study characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using an adaption of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

From 20,564 initial studies, 41 were included in the meta-analysis (outlier-adjusted, 96,809 study participants). A negative, insignificant association (OR = 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.75; 1.00) was observed between education and SI, with significant heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.09, I2 = 73 %). Subgroup analyses indicated that population type, age group, categorization of education, timeframe of SI assessment, and study quality significantly moderated the effect size.

LIMITATIONS

Heterogeneity across studies limits generalizability. The cross-sectional design precludes establishing causal relationships, and social desirability bias may have underestimated the association between education and SI.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests a trend towards a protective effect of education on the emergence of SI in Europe. Future research, preferably with longitudinal study design examining various covariates, should systematically consider educational inequalities in SI.

Intersectional inequalities in somatic symptom severity in the adult population in Germany found within the SOMA.SOC study

Somatic symptoms are common in a wide range of medical conditions. In severe cases, they are associated with high individual and economic burden. To explore social inequalities in somatic symptom severity (SSS) and to identify social groups with highest SSS, we applied an intersectional research approach. Analyses are based on cross-sectional data of the adult population living in Germany (N = 2413). SSS was assessed with the Somatic Symptom Scale-8. A multiple linear regression model with three-way interaction of gender, income and history of migration and post-hoc pairwise comparison of estimated marginal means was conducted. Analyses revealed intersectional inequalities in SSS along the axis of gender, income, and history of migration. Highest SSS was found in males with low income whose parent(s) immigrated, females with low income who immigrated themselves, and females with low income and no history of migration. Intersectional approaches contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of health disparities. To reduce disparities in SSS, proportionate universal interventions combining universal screening and targeted treatment seem promising.

Public knowledge and beliefs about the irritable bowel syndrome - results from the SOMA.SOC study

BACKGROUND

Despite the epidemiological and economic relevance of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), there is a lack of research on what the general public knows and thinks about this condition (IBS literacy). Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore public knowledge and beliefs about IBS in Germany. Moreover, associations of knowledge and beliefs about IBS with socio-demographic characteristics as well as illness and treatment experiences were analysed.

METHODS

Analyses made use of a national telephone survey (N = 1,205). A carefully developed vignette describing a person with typical symptoms of IBS was presented. Respondents were then asked to name the disease in question and beliefs about causes and treatment options were assessed. For the analyses respondents were divided into three groups: (1) people who never had IBS symptoms, (2) people who had or have IBS symptoms but never were in treatment and (3) individuals who reported to be or have been treated for IBS symptoms.

RESULTS

Less than 4% of the respondents recognized IBS after presentation of the vignette. About 75% positively evaluated treatability while psychotherapy was evaluated more effective than medication. Stress and unhealthy lifestyle were the most frequently endorsed possible causes of the presented IBS symptoms. There were variations in knowledge and beliefs about IBS according to age, gender, and education. We found minor differences in beliefs and knowledge between individuals who had or have symptoms but never were in treatment and those without respective illness experience. Respondents with illness/treatment experiences rated their knowledge significantly better than those without any experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate low levels of public knowledge about IBS regarding illness recognition in Germany. A majority disagreed that they have good knowledge about IBS symptoms. Against this background, it seems reasonable to develop and test interventions to improve IBS literacy by increasing knowledge about symptoms, causes and treatment options.

Public stigma toward fatigue-do social characteristics of affected persons matter? Results from the SOMA.SOC study

Objectives

Although public stigma imposes a great burden on those affected with manifold negative consequence there is not much known about public stigma related to fatigue. Therefore, this study addresses the following research questions: (1) What is the magnitude of public stigma toward individuals with fatigue? (2) Are there differences in public stigma depending on the social characteristics of the affected person (sex, occupation, and migration)?

Methods

Analyses are based on a national telephone survey in Germany (N = 1,209). A vignette describing a person with symptoms of fatigue was presented to the respondents. Vignettes were varied according to sex, occupational status, and migration status. Stigma toward the person presented in the vignette was measured by stereotypes and negative emotional reactions (anger).

Results

Of the stereotypes under study, "hypersensitive" was most frequently endorsed by the respondents (35.7%), followed by "weak will" (27.2%). About 15-20% of the respondents agreed that they react with anger, annoyance or incomprehension. There were considerable differences in fatigue stigma according to the social characteristics of the affected person. In two social groups public stigma was particularly pronounced: (1) male persons with a low occupational status and a migration background; (2) female persons with a high occupational status and without a migration status. In contrast, women with a low occupational status and a migration background were less stigmatized.

Conclusion

Individuals suffering from fatigue symptoms are confronted with stereotypes and negative emotional reactions by the public. Magnitude of public stigma considerably varies according to social characteristics of the afflicted person. Future studies should consider applying an intersectional approach to identify groups that are at risk of multiple stigma.

Social inequalities in aggravating factors of somatic symptom persistence (SOMA.SOC): study protocol for a mixed-method observational study focusing on irritable bowel syndrome and fatigue

INTRODUCTION

Some studies indicate that persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) are more prevalent among individuals with a low socioeconomic status (SES) and a migration background. However, factors explaining social inequalities in PSS are largely unknown. It is expected that aggravating factors of PSS like illness perception, illness beliefs (health literacy, stigma), illness behaviour and health anxiety may play an important role for this explanation. The SOMA.SOC study will examine social inequalities (according to SES and migration) in factors contributing to symptom persistence in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and fatigue.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The project will collect both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data will be gathered via a representative telephone survey in Germany (N=2400). A vignette design will be used depicting patients varying in sex, condition (IBS/fatigue), occupational status (low/high) and migration (yes/no). In the survey, we will assess public knowledge and beliefs (eg, health literacy), attitudes (stigma) and personal experiences with the condition (eg, somatic symptom burden). Complementary, longitudinal qualitative interviews will be conducted with patients (n=32 at three time points, resulting in N=96 interviews) who will also vary according to sex, condition, occupational status and migration. Patients will be recruited from primary care practices in Hamburg. The interviews will cover origin and development of the condition, coping and help-seeking as well as social interactions and perception of the disease by others (eg, perceived stigma). SOMA.SOC is part of the interdisciplinary SOMACROSS (Persistent SOMAtic Symptoms ACROSS Diseases) research unit.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hamburg Medical Association on 25 January 2021 (reference number: 2020-10194- BO-ff). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The main findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals within 12 months of study completion.

Ethnic and migration-related inequalities in health anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Health anxiety exists on a continuum ranging from the absence of health awareness to the obsessive fear of having a serious illness despite reassurance. Its pathological manifestation can be diagnosed as hypochondriacal or illness anxiety or somatic symptom disorder. Health anxiety is associated with psychological distress and adverse life events, among others, and leads to considerable economic burden. Compared to the majority population, migrants, and ethnic minorities often face major health inequalities. Several mental illnesses and psychosomatic complaints are more common among these groups. To date, potential ethnic and migration-related inequalities in health anxiety have not been clearly described. However, they are of high relevance for the provision of adequate health care of this diverse and potentially vulnerable group. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of health anxiety in migrants and ethnic minorities.

Methods

A systematic literature search of PubMED, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and PSYNDEX was conducted, covering all studies published until 1st of December 2021. Studies were selected if they employed validated measurement tools of health anxiety and examined migrants and/or ethnic minorities in comparison with the majority population. Meta-analytic methods were applied by using a random-effect model. The study quality was assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool (EPHPP).

Results

We identified 18 studies from 445 studies initially screened. Of these, 14 studies conducted in North America with a total number of 5,082 study participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled effect size indicated a higher risk of health anxiety in migrants and ethnic minorities compared to the majority population (OR 1.39, 95%-CI 1.01-1.92). The results proved not to be robust according to publication bias (adjusted OR 1.18, 95%-CI 0.83-1.69) and fail-safe N (2/3 < benchmark N = 75) and are limited due to heterogeneity (I 2 = 57%), small sample sizes and an overall low quality of included studies.

Conclusion

To address the diversity of migrants and ethnic minorities, inter-sectional approaches across different countries are needed in research to shed further light on social inequalities in health anxiety linked to migration.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO, registration number CRD42022298458.

[Socio-Culturally Sensitive Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: Development of a Theoretical Framework and Results of a Survey of Physical Activity Promotion Projects.]

OBJECTIVE

To develop a framework for socio-culturally sensitive disease prevention and health promotion and to assess which components of socio-cultural appropriateness are used in physical activity projects targeting migrants.

METHODS

Based on 9 expert interviews and a rapid review in PubMed and PsycInfo, we identified domains and strategies of socio-cultural sensitivity for disease prevention and health promotion. The domains were used as a basis for a survey of physical activity projects targeting migrants as listed in a national project data base ("Gesundheitliche Chancengleichheit").

RESULTS

We identified 5 domains for socio-cultural adaptation of prevention programs (peripheral, evidential, linguistic, constituent-involving and socio-cultural strategies). Using multiple strategies seems to increase the efficacy of the interventions. Of the 48 contacted projects, 29 participated in the survey. Almost all projects used strategies from 4 of the 5 domains. Evidential strategies were used to a lesser extent.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed framework can be used for both, planning and evaluating prevention programs targeting migrants. The project survey shows how socio-cultural appropriateness can be improved through a variety of strategies.