1
|
Hsieh RCE, Lee CH, Huang HC, Wu SW, Chou CY, Hung SP, Lee CW, Krishnan S, Venkatesulu BP, Lee JC, Chou YC, Chan KM, Lin PT, Lee WC, Lin CC, Lin SY, Hong JH. Clinical and Dosimetric Results of Proton or Photon Radiation Therapy for Large (>5 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:712-724. [PMID: 37778426 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to report the clinical and dosimetric attributes of patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing proton or photon radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes and dosimetric indices of 159 patients with >5 cm nonmetastatic HCC who underwent definitive radiation therapy using either protons (N = 105) or photons (N = 54) between 2014 and 2018. Additional photon plans were performed in the 105 proton-treated patients using the same dose prescription criteria for intragroup dosimetric comparison. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 47 months, patients with biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥ 75 Gy exhibited significantly better local control (LC; 2-year: 85.6% vs 20.5%; P < .001), progression-free survival (PFS; median, 7.4 vs 3.2 months; P < .001), and overall survival (OS; median, 18.1 vs 7.3 months; P < .001) compared with those with BED10 < 75 Gy. Notably, proton-treated patients had a significantly higher BED10 (96 vs 67 Gy; P < .001) and improved LC (2-year: 88.5% vs 33.8%; P < .001), PFS (median, 7.4 vs 3.3 months; P = .001), and OS (median, 18.9 vs 8.3 months; P < .001) than those undergoing photon radiation therapy. Furthermore, patients treated with protons had significantly lower V1 of the liver (P < .001), mean upper gastrointestinal tract dose (P < .001), and mean splenic dose (P < .001), with significantly decreased incidences of radiation-induced liver disease (P = .007), grade ≥3 upper gastrointestinal bleeding (P = .001), and grade ≥3 lymphopenia (P = .003). On multivariate analysis, proton radiation therapy consistently correlated with superior LC (P < .001), PFS (P < .001), and OS (P < .001). In intragroup dosimetric comparison, photon plans demonstrated significantly higher mean liver dose (P < .001) compared with actually delivered proton treatments, and 72 (69%) of them had mean liver dose exceeding 28 Gy, which necessitated target dose de-escalation. CONCLUSIONS In the context of large HCC radiation therapy, a higher target BED10 was associated with improved outcomes. Notably, proton therapy has demonstrated the capability to deliver ablative doses while also being accompanied by fewer instances of severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney Cheng-En Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Science, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Cancer Genome Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
| | - Ching-Hsin Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Chieh Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Wei Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Yu Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Ping Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Wei Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
| | - Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois; Edward Hines Veteran Affairs Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jin-Chiao Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Chih Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Oncology, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Ming Chan
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Po-Ting Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chen Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Chun Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Shen-Yen Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Ji-Hong Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hsieh RCE, Chou YC, Hung CY, Lee LY, Venkatesulu BP, Huang SF, Liao CT, Cheng NM, Wang HM, Wu CE, Kang CJ, Chen MF, Cheng YF, Yeh KY, Wang CH, Chou WC, Lin CY. A multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with salivary gland carcinoma treated with postoperative radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109891. [PMID: 37659659 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to interrogate if the use of postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) correlated with superior oncological outcomes for certain subgroups of patients with high-risk salivary gland carcinoma (SGC), compared with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) alone. METHODS This multicenter retrospective study included 411 patients with surgically resected SGC who underwent PORT (n = 263) or POCRT (n = 148) between 2000 and 2015. Possible correlations of clinical parameters with outcomes were examined using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression model. RESULTS The median follow-up of survivors is 10.9 years. For the entire cohort, adding concurrent chemotherapy to PORT was not associated with OS, PFS, or LRC improvement. However, patients with nodal metastasis who underwent POCRT had significantly higher 10-year OS (46.2% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.009) and PFS (38.7% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.009) rates than those treated with PORT alone. The presence of postoperative macroscopic residual tumor (R2 resection) was identified as an independent prognosticator for inferior OS (P = 0.032), PFS (P = 0.001), and LRC (P = 0.007). Importantly, POCRT significantly correlated with higher 10-year LRC rates in patients with R2 resection (74.2% vs. 40.7%, P = 0.034) or adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC, 97.6% vs. 83.6%, P = 0.039). On multivariate analyses, the use of POCRT significantly predicted superior OS (P = 0.037) and PFS (P = 0.013) for node-positive patients and LRC for patients with R2 resection (P = 0.041) or AdCC (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS For surgically resected SGC, POCRT was associated with improved long-term OS and PFS for patients with nodal metastasis and superior LRC for patients with R2 resection or AdCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney Cheng-En Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Cancer Genome Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Institute of Stem Cell and Translational Cancer Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Chih Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Oncology, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Yen Hung
- Department of Hema-oncology, Division on Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Yu Lee
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University, Chicago, IL, USA; Edward Hines Veteran Affairs Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Shiang-Fu Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Ta Liao
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Nai-Ming Cheng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Ming Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chiao-En Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Jan Kang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Miao-Fen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Fan Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Yun Yeh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hsu Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chi Chou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| | - Chien-Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Research Core Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Son J, Hsieh RCE, Lin HY, Krause KJ, Yuan Y, Biter AB, Welsh J, Curran MA, Hong DS. Inhibition of the CD47-SIRPα axis for cancer therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of emerging clinical data. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1027235. [PMID: 36439116 PMCID: PMC9691650 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1027235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
CD47-SIRPα interaction acts as a "don't eat me" signal and is exploited by cancer to downregulate innate and adaptive immune surveillance. There has been intense interest to develop a mechanism of blockade, and we aimed to analyze the emerging data from early clinical trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant databases and conference abstracts including clinical trials using CD47 and/or SIRPα inhibitors in cancer treatment. Nonlinear mixed models were applied for comparison of response and toxicity. We retrieved 317 articles, 24 of which were eligible. These included 771 response-evaluable patients with hematologic (47.1%) and solid tumors (52.9%). Of these, 6.4% experienced complete response, 10.4% partial response, and 26.1% stable disease for a 16.7% objective response rate (ORR), 42.8% disease control rate, and 4.8-month median duration of response. ORR was significantly higher for hematologic cancers (25.3%) than solid cancers (9.1%, p=0.042). Comparing by mechanism, seven CD47 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and six selective SIRPα blockers were given alone or combined with checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapy, and/or chemotherapy. In solid cancers, selective SIRPα blockade showed a higher ORR (16.2%) than anti-CD47 mAbs (2.8%, p=0.079), which was significant for combination therapies (ORR 28.3% vs 3.0%, respectively, p=0.010). Responses were seen in head and neck, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, hepatocellular, non-small cell lung, and HER2+gastroesophageal cancers. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in 3.3% of patients (5.4% anti-CD47 mAbs, 1.4% selective SIRPα blockers; p=0.01). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) ≥grade 3 was 18.0%, similar between the two groups (p=0.082), and mostly laboratory abnormalities. For anti-CD47 mAbs, the most common toxicities included grade 1-2 fatigue (27.2%), headache (21.0%), and anemia (20.5%). For selective SIRPα blockers, these included grade 1-2 infusion reaction (23.1%) and fatigue (15.8%). Anti-CD47 mAbs were significantly more likely than selective SIRPα blockers to cause grade 1-2 fever, chills, nausea/vomiting, headache, and anemia. In conclusion, combination therapies using selective SIRPα blockade had higher response rates in solid tumors than anti-CD47 mAb combinations. Hematologic changes were the main TRAEs, and selective SIRPα blockers seemed to have a better grade 1-2 toxicity profile. Treatment was well-tolerated with minimal DLTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Son
- Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Rodney Cheng-En Hsieh
- Departments of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Heather Y. Lin
- Departments of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kate J. Krause
- Departments of Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ying Yuan
- Departments of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Amadeo B. Biter
- Departments of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - James Welsh
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Michael A. Curran
- Departments of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David S. Hong
- Departments of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hsieh RCE, Krishnan S, Wu RC, Boda AR, Liu A, Winkler M, Hsu WH, Lin SH, Hung MC, Chan LC, Bhanu KR, Srinivasamani A, De Azevedo RA, Chou YC, DePinho RA, Gubin M, Vilar E, Chen CH, Slay R, Jayaprakash P, Hegde SM, Hartley G, Lea ST, Prasad R, Morrow B, Couillault CA, Steiner M, Wang CC, Venkatesulu BP, Taniguchi C, Kim YSB, Chen J, Rudqvist NP, Curran MA. ATR-mediated CD47 and PD-L1 up-regulation restricts radiotherapy-induced immune priming and abscopal responses in colorectal cancer. Sci Immunol 2022; 7:eabl9330. [PMID: 35687697 DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abl9330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) of colorectal cancer (CRC) can prime adaptive immunity against tumor-associated antigen (TAA)-expressing CRC cells systemically. However, abscopal tumor remissions are extremely rare, and the postirradiation immune escape mechanisms in CRC remain elusive. Here, we found that irradiated CRC cells used ATR-mediated DNA repair signaling pathway to up-regulate both CD47 and PD-L1, which through engagement of SIRPα and PD-1, respectively, prevented phagocytosis by antigen-presenting cells and thereby limited TAA cross-presentation and innate immune activation. This postirradiation CD47 and PD-L1 up-regulation was observed across various human solid tumor cells. Concordantly, rectal cancer patients with poor responses to neoadjuvant RT exhibited significantly elevated postirradiation CD47 levels. The combination of RT, anti-SIRPα, and anti-PD-1 reversed adaptive immune resistance and drove efficient TAA cross-presentation, resulting in robust TAA-specific CD8 T cell priming, functional activation of T effectors, and increased T cell clonality and clonal diversity. We observed significantly higher complete response rates to RT/anti-SIRPα/anti-PD-1 in both irradiated and abscopal tumors and prolonged survival in three distinct murine CRC models, including a cecal orthotopic model. The efficacy of triple combination therapy was STING dependent as knockout animals lost most benefit of adding anti-SIRPα and anti-PD-1 to RT. Despite activation across the myeloid stroma, the enhanced dendritic cell function accounts for most improvements in CD8 T cell priming. These data suggest ATR-mediated CD47 and PD-L1 up-regulation as a key mechanism restraining radiation-induced immune priming. RT combined with SIRPα and PD-1 blockade promotes robust antitumor immune priming, leading to systemic tumor regressions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney Cheng-En Hsieh
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ren-Chin Wu
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Akash R Boda
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arthur Liu
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michelle Winkler
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wen-Hao Hsu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Cancer Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven Hsesheng Lin
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mien-Chie Hung
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Research Center for Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Li-Chuan Chan
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Krithikaa Rajkumar Bhanu
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anupallavi Srinivasamani
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Yung-Chih Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ronald A DePinho
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Cancer Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew Gubin
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.,Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo Vilar
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chao Hsien Chen
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Neurology, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ravaen Slay
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Priyamvada Jayaprakash
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shweta Mahendra Hegde
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Genevieve Hartley
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Spencer T Lea
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rishika Prasad
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brittany Morrow
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Madeline Steiner
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chun-Chieh Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cullen Taniguchi
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yon Son Betty Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Junjie Chen
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nils-Petter Rudqvist
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Curran
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hsieh RCE, Krishnan S, Wu RC, Boda A, Liu A, Winkler M, Hsu WH, Lin S, Hung MC, Chan LC, Bhanu K, Srinivasamani A, Azevedo RD, Chou YC, Depinho R, Gubin M, Vilar-Sanchez E, Chen CH, Slay R, Jayaprakash P, Hegde S, Hartley G, Lea S, Prasad R, Morrow B, Couillault C, Steiner M, Wang CC, Venkatesulu B, Taniguchi C, Kim B, Chen J, Rudqvist NP, Curran M. 592 ATR-mediated CD47 and PD-L1 upregulation restricts radiotherapy-induced immune priming and abscopal responses in colorectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundBackground: Radiotherapy of colorectal cancer (CRC) can prime adaptive immunity against tumor-associated antigen (TAA)-expressing CRC cells systemically; however, incidences of abscopal tumor remission are extremely rare. We sought to unravel the post-irradiation immune escape mechanisms in CRC.MethodsMethodsFlow cytometry, gene knockdown, RNA and T cell receptor sequencing, and multiple murine syngeneic CRC models were used to interrogate mechanisms of CRC immune evasion following radiotherapy. Comparison of immunohistochemistry staining between pretreatment biopsy and post-irradiation surgical specimens was performed in rectal patients who underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy with 5 Gy for 5 fractions.ResultsResultsWe find that CRC cells utilize a common DNA repair signaling pathway — ATR/Chk1/STAT3 — to upregulate both CD47 and PD-L1 in response to radiotherapy, which through engagement of SIRPα and PD-1 suppresses the capacity of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to phagocytose them thereby preventing TAA cross-presentation. This post-irradiation CD47 and PD-L1 upregulation can be observed in CRC cells treated with either photon or proton radiotherapy and across a wide variety of human solid tumor cells. Concordantly, rectal cancer patients who responded poorly (tumor regression grade 4–5, n = 10) to neoadjuvant radiotherapy exhibited significantly elevated post-irradiation CD47 levels (P = 0.005). In murine CRC models, the combination of radiotherapy, αSIRPα, and αPD-1 (RSP) profoundly enhances TAA uptake, activation of innate immune sensors, and TAA cross-priming across various antigen-presenting myeloid populations in the irradiated tumor microenvironment and facilitates TAA-presenting APC migration to secondary lymphoid organs. Furthermore, we observed robust production of TAA-specific CD8 T cells, functional activation of effector T cells, and increased tumor-infiltrating T cell clonality and clonal diversity in mice treated with RSP. Importantly, radiotherapy coupled with phagocytosis checkpoint blockade significantly improves complete response rates in both irradiated and abscopal tumors and prolongs survival in three distinct murine CRC models, including a cecal orthotopic model. In addition, αSIRPα exerts superior tumoricidal efficacy than αCD47 in combination with RT and αPD-1. We find RSP efficacy to be STING dependent as knockout animals lose most benefit of phagocytosis checkpoint blockade.ConclusionATR-mediated CD47 and PD-L1 upregulation restrains radiation-induced immune priming in CRC. Blockade of the phagocytosis checkpoints SIRPα and PD-1 during radiotherapy promotes vigorous anti-CRC immune priming leading to systemic tumor regression.AcknowledgementsThis study is supported in part by NIH grant P30 CA16672, the MD Anderson Andrew Sabin Family Fellowship, and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital grant CMRPG3K1751. RCH was supported by the CPRIT Research Training Grant (RP170067) and Ralph B. Arlinghaus Ph.D. Scholarship. The authors are grateful to the members of the Advanced Cytometry & Sorting Facility at South Campus, Tissue Bank of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, and MHC Tetramer Core Facility at Baylor College of Medicine for their invaluable help.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan; approval number: 202001191B0C601.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lea S, Chen CH, Hartley G, Hsieh RCE, Curran M. 763 Intratumoral delivery of high potency STING agonists modulates the immunosuppressive myeloid compartment and induces curative responses in checkpoint-refractory glioblastoma models. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundGlioblastoma is an aggressive primary brain malignancy that is characterized by a highly suppressive tumor microenvironment, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and brain-resident microglia, but lacking significant T cell infiltration.1 2 This phenotype is reflected in the recently developed QKi-/- Pten-/- P53-/- (QPP) tumor model,3 which we show is resistant to PD1 or CTLA-4 blockade, but sensitive to agonists of the innate immune sensor Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING). We have previously shown that agonists of the innate dsDNA-sensing cGAS-STING pathway are capable of proinflammatory repolarization in in vitro models of suppressive myeloid cells, although their function in the context of the Glioblastoma myeloid compartment in vivo remains poorly understood.4MethodsWe utilized the synthetic cyclic di-nucleotide STING agonists IACS-8803 (8803) and ML-RR-S2-CDA (MLRR) to assess survival and tumor immune infiltrate functional reprogramming in two orthotopic transplantable human and murine Glioblastoma tumor models, U87 and the recently developed QPP8 (Qki-/- Pten-/- P53-/-). Using in vitro models of M2-polarized microglia, we investigated the ability of natural (2'3'-cGAMP) and synthetic (MLRR and 8803) STING agonists to reverse immunosuppressive microglial polarization.ResultsWe found that intratumoral delivery of STING agonists significantly prolonged survival in the murine QPP8 orthotopic Glioblastoma tumor model, in contrast to checkpoint blockade which had no benefit on survival. In huNOG-EXL mice engrafted with human hematopoietic stem cells implanted with orthotopic U87 Glioblastoma, intratumoral delivery of STING agonists significantly prolonged survival and reduced expression of CD163 and CD206 on human tumor-infiltrating myeloid populations. Preliminary data suggests that in vitro suppressively-polarized microglia reduce expression of M2 functional markers, and increase expression of iNOS, PD-L1, CD80, and CD86 in a STING agonist potency-dependent manner.ConclusionsWe found that STING agonists can induce curative responses in checkpoint-refractory murine Glioblastoma models and mediate significant extension of survival in a humanized mouse U87 xenograft setting. This prolonged survival is associated with a decrease in immunosuppressive M2 functional markers in human tumor infiltrating myeloid populations. Additionally, M2-polarized microglia demonstrated a reduction in M2 functional markers and upregulation of proinflammatory M1 markers following treatment with STING agonists. Together these results indicate that delivery of STING agonists can induce proinflammatory repolarization of the Glioblastoma myeloid stroma, including both infiltrating myeloid populations and brain-resident microglia, to drive prolonged survival in refractory models of Glioblastoma.ReferencesGabrusiewicz K, Rodriguez B, Wei J, et al. Glioblastoma-infiltrated innate immune cells resemble M0 macrophage phenotype. JCI Insight 2016;1(2).Quail DF, Joyce JA. The microenvironmental landscape of brain tumors. Cancer Cell 2017;31(3):326–41.Shingu T, Ho AL, Yuan L, et al. Qki deficiency maintains stemness of glioma stem cells in suboptimal environment by downregulating endolysosomal degradation. Nat Genet 2017;49(1):75–86.Ager C, Boda A, Rajapakshe K, et al. (2021) “High potency STING agonists engage unique myeloid pathways to reverse pancreatic cancer immune privilege. JITC (in press)Ethics ApprovalAll experiments were conducted according to protocols approved by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Collapse
|