Phase I feasibility study of Olaparib in combination with loco-regional radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose

PARP-inhibitors have potent radiosensitizing properties in pre-clinical models. To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the PARP-inhibitor Olaparib in combination with radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer, a single institutional phase-I dose escalation trial was initiated.

Patients and methods

The starting dose of Olaparib was 25 mg BID, combined with radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions). The MTD was defined as the highest dose-level at which not more than 20 % of patients experience dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) or as the highest reached dose in the absence of DLT's.

Results

One week Olaparib-only treatment (25 mg QD) was administered to all patients prior to the start of radiotherapy. In dose-level I, Olaparib (25 mg BID) was combined with accelerated radiotherapy (70 Gy in 6 weeks). Because of DLT's in 3 of the 4 treated patients (acute tracheotomy 5 and 7 months and osteoradionecrosis 7 months after treatment), the Olaparib dose was de-escalated to 25 mg QD, and combined with conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks) (dose-level II). There were no DLT's observed in 5 patients treated within dose-level II. After a median follow-up of 60 months, the 4-year LRC and OS rates were 77.8 % and 88.9 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Olaparib 25 mg QD combined with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy was well tolerated and identified as the MTD while severe DLT's were observed when Olaparib 25 mg BID was combined with accelerated radiation. This combination might be further explored in future Olaparib dose escalation studies in patients with locally-advanced HNSCC unfit for cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy.

Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of Olaparib in Combination with High-dose Radiotherapy with and without Concurrent Cisplatin for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To identify an MTD of olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, in combination with loco-regional radiotherapy with/without cisplatin for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Olaparib dose was escalated in two groups: radiotherapy (66 Gy/24 fractions in 2.75 Gy/fraction) with and without daily cisplatin (6 mg/m²), using time-to-event continual reassessment method with a 1-year dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period. The highest dose level with a DLT probability <15% was defined as MTD. Poly ADP-ribose (PAR) inhibition and radiation-induced PAR-ribosylation (PARylation) were determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with loco-regional or oligometastatic disease (39%) were treated: 11 at olaparib 25 mg twice daily and 17 at 25 mg once daily. The lowest dose level with cisplatin was above the MTD due to hematologic and late esophageal DLT. The MTD without cisplatin was olaparib 25 mg once daily. At a latency of 1-2.8 years, severe pulmonary adverse events (AE) were observed in 5 patients across all dose levels, resulting in 18% grade 5 pulmonary AEs. Exploratory analyses indicate an association with the radiation dose to the lungs. At the MTD, olaparib reduced PAR levels by more than 95% and abolished radiation-induced PARylation. Median follow-up of survivors was 4.1 years. Two-year loco-regional control was 84%, median overall survival in patients with locally advanced NSCLC was 28 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined mildly hypofractionated radiotherapy and low-dose daily cisplatin and olaparib was not tolerable due to esophageal and hematologic toxicity. Severe pulmonary toxicity was observed as well, even without cisplatin. More conformal radiotherapy schedules with improved pulmonary and esophageal sparing should be explored.

Practicalities in running early-phase trials using the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM) for interventions with long toxicity periods using two radiotherapy oncology trials as examples

BACKGROUND

Awareness of model-based designs for dose-finding studies such as the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) is now becoming more commonplace amongst clinicians, statisticians and trial management staff. In some settings toxicities can occur a long time after treatment has finished, resulting in extremely long, interrupted, CRM design trials. The Time-to-Event CRM (TiTE-CRM), a modification to the original CRM, accounts for the timing of late-onset toxicities and results in shorter trial duration. In this article, we discuss how to design and deliver a trial using this method, from the grant application stage through to dissemination, using two radiotherapy trials as examples.

METHODS

The TiTE-CRM encapsulates the dose-toxicity relationship with a statistical model. The model incorporates observed toxicities and uses a weight to account for the proportion of completed follow-up of participants without toxicity. This model uses all available data to determine the next participant's dose and subsequently declare the maximum tolerated dose. We focus on two trials designed by the authors to illustrate practical issues when designing, setting up, and running such studies.

RESULTS

In setting up a TiTE-CRM trial, model parameters need to be defined and the time element involved might cause complications, therefore looking at operating characteristics through simulations is essential. At the grant application stage, we suggest resources to fund statisticians' time before funding is awarded and make recommendations for the level of detail to include in funding applications. While running the trial, close contact of all involved staff is required as a dose decision is made each time a participant is recruited. We suggest ways of capturing data in a timely manner and give example code in R for design and delivery of the trial. Finally, we touch upon dissemination issues while the trial is running and upon completion.

CONCLUSION

Model-based designs can be complex. We hope this paper will help clinical trial teams to demystify the conduct of TiTE-CRM trials and be a starting point for using this methodology in practice.

Abstract C009: Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses support biological effectivity of the PARP inhibitor olaparib as radiosensitizer at low doses

Introduction: PARP inhibitors are promising radiosensitizers. Currently identified recommended phase II doses of PARP inhibitors in combination with radiotherapy are 10-fold lower than the EMA and FDA approved dose as single agent. The purpose of this study is to investigate the biologically effective dose range of olaparib for its use as radiosensitizer by assessing pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Both the inhibition of pre-treatment PAR levels and the inhibition of radiation induced PARylation therefore have to be determined. Methods: We included PK and PD samples of all NSCLC and breast cancer patients treated at olaparib doses up to 50mg bi-daily (BID) in two phase 1 trials combining radical radiotherapy with olaparib. Plasma samples were collected for PK analysis (ranging from steady state pre-dose olaparib until +12/24 hrs after intake) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for PD analysis (pre-treatment, +3 hrs and +12/24 hrs after olaparib intake). Breast cancer patients with the primary tumor in situ had biopsies taken pre-treatment and during olaparib treatment (+3 hrs after intake) before the first fraction of radiotherapy. Olaparib concentrations were determined by HPLC-MS/MS. PAR levels were determined by commercially available ELISA, following both the NCI protocol and REP assay (de Haan et al, 2017) that includes ex vivo irradiation of intact cells to activate PARylation by PARP. PAR levels determined by the REP assay were used to calculate PAR level inhibition during treatment. Results: PK/PD data from blood samples were available from 28 NSCLC patients and 7 breast cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy and olaparib (17 at 25mg once daily (QD), 14 at 25mg BID and 4 at 50mg BID). Repeat biopsies were available from six out of seven breast cancer patients. The plasma olaparib concentrations increased with the dose levels and showed an expected wide intra-patient variation. In tumors the olaparib concentration varied between 178 and 1441 ng/g with a median tumor to plasma ratio of 0.47. PD analyses demonstrate a significant reduction in PAR levels in PBMCs during olaparib treatment (&gt;95% at +3 hrs after olaparib intake for all dose levels, &gt;90% at +12 hrs in the 25mg BID dose level and 66-99% at +24 hrs in the 25mg QD dose level; all p&lt;0.0001). In pre-treatment samples, ex vivo radiation induced PAR levels by 66-fold (range 23 to 174). This radiation induced PARylation was abolished during olaparib treatment. Compared to corresponding pre-treatment PBMC samples, PAR levels in pre-treatment tumor biopsy samples were higher in all but one patient (median 7-fold higher, range 0.6-60), and increased by only 1.5-fold after ex vivo radiation. Also in tumors, olaparib abolished radiation induced PARylation. PAR levels were reduced by 89% (range 83-99.7%, p&lt;0.0001). Conclusion: Olaparib doses as low as 25mg once and twice daily inhibit PARP activation by irradiation and reduce PAR levels &gt;95% in PBMCs and &gt;83% in tumors, thereby showing biological effectivity. The tumor olaparib concentrations determined in this study were all within a range that has been shown to radiosensitize in preclinical models. Together this supports further development of PARP inhibitors as radiosensitizer at low doses.

Citation Format: Rosemarie de Haan, Dick Pluim, Manon Verwijs, Gabe Sonke, Michel van den Heuvel, Baukelien van Triest, Marcel Verheij, Conchita Vens. Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses support biological effectivity of the PARP inhibitor olaparib as radiosensitizer at low doses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C009. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-C009

Improved pharmacodynamic (PD) assessment of low dose PARP inhibitor PD activity for radiotherapy and chemotherapy combination trials

BACKGROUND

PARP inhibitors are currently evaluated in combination with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. As sensitizers, PARP inhibitors are active at very low concentrations therefore requiring highly sensitive pharmacodynamic (PD) assays. Current clinical PD-assays partly fail to provide such sensitivities. The aim of our study was to enable sensitive PD evaluation of PARP inhibitors for clinical sensitizer development.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PBMCs of healthy individuals and of olaparib and radiotherapy treated lung cancer patients were collected for ELISA-based PD-assays.

RESULTS

PAR-signal amplification by ex vivo irradiation enabled an extended quantification range for PARP inhibitory activities after ex vivo treatment with inhibitors. This "radiation-enhanced-PAR" (REP) assay provided accurate IC50 values thereby also revealing differences among healthy individuals. Implemented in clinical radiotherapy combination Phase I trials, the REP-assay showed sensitive detection of PARP inhibition in patients treated with olaparib and establishes strong PARP inhibitory activities at low daily doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination trials of radiotherapy and novel targeted agent(s) often require different and more sensitive PD assessments than in the monotherapy setting. This study shows the benefit and relevance of sensitive and adapted PD-assays for such combination purposes and provides proof of clinically relevant cellular PARP inhibitory activities at low daily olaparib doses.

Retinal arteriolar geometry is associated with cerebral white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Cerebral small vessel disease (lacunar stroke and cerebral white matter hyperintensities) is caused by vessel abnormalities of unknown aetiology. Retinal vessels show developmental and pathophysiological similarities to cerebral small vessels and microvessel geometry may influence vascular efficiency.

Hypothesis

Retinal arteriolar branching angles or coefficients (the ratio of the sum of the cross-sectional areas of the two daughter vessels to the cross-sectional area of the parent vessel at an arteriolar bifurcation) may be associated with cerebral small vessel disease.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional observational study in a UK tertiary referral hospital. An experienced stroke physician recruited consecutive patients presenting with lacunar ischaemic stroke with a control group consisting of patients with minor cortical ischaemic stroke. We performed brain magnetic resonance imaging to assess the recent infarct and periventricular and deep white matter hyperintensities. We subtyped stroke with clinical and radiological findings. We took digital retinal photographs to assess retinal arteriolar branching coefficients and branching angles using a semi-automated technique.

Results

Two hundred and five patients were recruited (104 lacunar stroke, 101 cortical stroke), mean age 68-years (standard deviation 12). With multivariate analysis, increased branching coefficient was associated with periventricular white matter hyperintensities (P=0·006) and ischaemic heart disease (P<0·001), and decreased branching coefficient with deep white matter hyperintensities (P=0·003), but not with lacunar stroke subtype (P=0·96). We found no associations with retinal branching angles.

Conclusions

Retinal arteriolar geometry differs between cerebral small vessel phenotypes. Further research is needed to ascertain the clinical significance of these findings.