Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand position statement: The safe clinical use of sputum induction for bio-sampling of the lower airways in children and adults

Sputum induction is widely used in clinical settings for collection of biological samples from the lower airways. However, in recent years sputum induction has been associated with serious adverse events and even death. This position statement was commissioned by the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand to address major adverse events of two deaths associated with sputum induction that have occurred in Australia in 2021, and outlines best practice for the safe use of sputum induction. The statement resulted from systematic literature searches by a multi-disciplinary group including respiratory physicians, nurses and physiotherapists (paediatric and adults focused). Consumers had input to an advanced draft of the position statement. The position statement covers indications for sputum induction, informed consent, scope of practice of personnel administering the procedure, infection control considerations, details about the sputum induction procedure, safety considerations and risk assessment in clinical settings.

Screening for Cystic Fibrosis Related Complications in the Context of a Pandemic and Altered Models of Care

Background

Standard of care recommend that patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) require screening investigations to assess for complications. Changing models of care due to the COVID19 pandemic may have impacted completion of recommended screening.

Objective

To compare the frequency of screening investigations completed in people with CF before and after the onset of the COVID19 pandemic.

Methods

Medical records were reviewed at 4 CF-specialist centers to identify screening investigations completed in the 12-months before and after pandemic onset.

Results

Records of 625 patients were reviewed. Prior to pandemic onset, there was between center variability in completion of screening investigations. There was greatest baseline variation between centers in performing oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); range 38%-69%, exercise tests; 3%-51% and sputum screening for non-tuberculous mycobacteria; 53%-81%. Following pandemic onset, blood tests, and sputum cultures were maintained at the highest rates. Exercise testing, CXR and OGTT exhibited the greatest declines, with reductions at individual centers ranging between 10%-24%, 22%-43%, and 20%-26%, respectively. Return to in-person visits following pandemic onset was variable, ranging from 16% to 74% between centers.

Conclusion

Completion of screening investigations varies between CF centers and changes in models of care, such as increased virtual care in response to COVID19 pandemic was associated with reduction in completion of investigations. Centers would benefit from auditing their adherence to standards of care, particularly considering recent changes in care delivery.

Saline at lower tonicity in cystic fibrosis (SALTI-CF) trial comparing 0.9% versus 3% versus 6% nebulised saline

BACKGROUND

In people with cystic fibrosis (CF), regular nebulisation of 6% or 7% saline improves lung function; however, these concentrations are not always tolerable. Clinically, some CF patients report using lower concentrations of saline to improve tolerability, yet the effects of lower concentrations are unknown. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the relative effectiveness and tolerability of 0.9% versus 3% versus 6% saline nebulised twice daily with an eFlow rapid nebuliser.

METHODS

This was a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study where subjects inhaled 4 mL of 0.9%, 3% or 6% saline twice daily for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was forced expiratory volume in 1 s. The secondary outcomes were: forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of FVC; quality of life; exercise capacity; acquisition or loss of bacterial organisms in expectorated sputum; tolerability of nebulised saline; pulmonary exacerbations; and adverse events.

RESULTS

140 participants were randomised to 0.9% (n=47), 3% (n=48) or 6% (n=45) saline. 134 participants (96%) contributed to the intention-to-treat analysis. 3% saline significantly improved lung function and increased the time to first pulmonary exacerbation compared with 0.9% saline but did not improve quality of life. 6% saline had similar benefits to 3% saline but also significantly improved quality of life compared with 3% saline. Only 6% saline delayed the time to intravenous antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbation. Tolerability and adherence were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Dilution of 6% saline to 3% maintains the benefits for lung function and exacerbation prevention; however, the positive impacts of 6% saline on quality of life and time to i.v. antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations are lost.

Web-based physical activity promotion in young people with CF: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Physical activity levels are known to decline following hospitalisation for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). However, optimal physical activity promotion strategies are unclear. This study investigated the effect of a web-based application (ActivOnline) in promoting physical activity in young pwCF.

METHODS

Multicentre randomised controlled trial with assessor blinding and qualitative evaluation. People with CF (12-35 years) admitted to hospital for a respiratory cause were eligible and randomised to the 12-week ActivOnline intervention (AO) or usual care (UC). The primary outcome was change in device-based time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) from baseline to post-intervention. Follow-up was at 6 months from hospital discharge when qualitative evaluation was undertaken.

RESULTS

107 participants were randomised to AO (n=52) or UC (n=55). Sixty-three participants (59%) contributed to the intention-to-treat analysis. Mean (SD) age was 21 (6) years (n=46, <18 years). At baseline, physical activity levels were high in both groups (AO 102 (52) vs UC 127 (73) min/day). There was no statistically significant difference in MVPA between groups at either timepoint (post-intervention mean difference (95% CI) -14 mins (-45 to 16)). Uptake of the intervention was low with only 40% (n=21) of participants accessing the web application.

CONCLUSION

A web-based application, including individualised goal setting, real-time feedback and motivation for behavioural change, was no better than usual care at promoting physical activity in young pwCF following hospital discharge. High levels of baseline physical activity levels in both groups, and limited engagement with the intervention, suggest alternative strategies may be necessary to identify and support young pwCF who would benefit from enhanced physical activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12617001009303, 13 July 13 2017.

Timing of dornase alfa inhalation for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of the enzyme dornase alfa reduces sputum viscosity and improves clinical outcomes of people with cystic fibrosis. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the timing of dornase alfa inhalation (in relation to airway clearance techniques or morning versus evening inhalation) has an impact on objective and subjective measures of clinical efficacy in people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

Relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), clinical trial registries and international cystic fibrosis conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search: 12 October 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any trial of dornase alfa in people with cystic fibrosis where timing of inhalation was the randomised element in the trial with either: inhalation before compared to after airway clearance techniques; or morning compared to evening inhalation.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data with disagreements resolved by discussion. Relevant data were extracted and, where possible, meta-analysed. We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 115 trial reports representing 55 trials, of which five trials (providing data on 122 participants) met our inclusion criteria. All five trials used a cross-over design. Intervention periods ranged from two to eight weeks. Four trials (98 participants) compared dornase alfa inhalation before versus after airway clearance techniques. Inhalation after instead of before airway clearance did not significantly change forced expiratory volume at one second (very-low quality evidence). Similarly, forced vital capacity (low-quality evidence) and quality of life (very-low quality evidence) were not significantly affected; forced expiratory flow at 25% was significantly worse with dornase alfa inhalation after airway clearance, mean difference -0.17 litres (95% confidence interval -0.28 to -0.05), based on the pooled data from two small trials in children (7 to 19 years) with well-preserved lung function. All other secondary outcomes were statistically non-significant. In one trial (25 participants), morning versus evening inhalation had no impact on lung function or symptoms (low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence derived from a small number of participants does not indicate that inhalation of dornase alfa after airway clearance techniques is more or less effective than the traditional recommendation to inhale nebulised dornase alfa 30 minutes prior to airway clearance techniques, for most outcomes. For children with well-preserved lung function, inhalation before airway clearance may be more beneficial for small airway function than inhalation after. However, this result relied on a measure with high variability and trials with variable follow-up. In the absence of strong evidence to indicate that one timing regimen is better than another, the timing of dornase alfa inhalation can be largely based on pragmatic reasons or individual preference with respect to the time of airway clearance and time of day. Further research is warranted.

Timing of hypertonic saline inhalation for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of hypertonic saline improves sputum rheology, accelerates mucociliary clearance and improves clinical outcomes of people with cystic fibrosis. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the timing of hypertonic saline inhalation (in relation to airway clearance techniques or in relation to time of day) has an impact on its clinical efficacy in people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials from the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and international cystic fibrosis conference proceedings. Date of the last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 28 February 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any trial of hypertonic saline in people with cystic fibrosis where timing of inhalation was the randomised element in the study protocol with either: inhalation up to six hours before airway clearance techniques compared to inhalation during airway clearance techniques compared to inhalation up to six hours after airway clearance techniques; or morning compared to evening inhalation with any definition provided by the author.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently assessed the trials identified by the search for potential inclusion in the review. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 104 trial reports which represented 51 trials, of which three cross-over trials (providing data on 77 participants) met our inclusion criteria. We present three comparisons: inhalation before versus during airway clearance techniques; inhalation before versus after airway clearance techniques; and inhalation during versus after airway clearance techniques. One trial (50 participants), given its three-arm design, was eligible for all three comparisons. No trials compared morning versus evening inhalation of hypertonic saline. The evidence from the three trials was judged to be of low quality downgraded for limitations (high risk of bias due to blinding) and indirectness (all participants are adults, and therefore not applicable to children). Intervention periods ranged from one treatment to three treatments in one day. There were no clinically important differences between the timing regimens of inhaling hypertonic saline before, during or after airway clearance techniques in the mean amount of improvement in lung function or symptom scores (77 participants), with the between-group comparisons being non-significant (low-certainty evidence). While there may be little or no difference in the rating of satisfaction when hypertonic saline was inhaled before versus during the airway clearance techniques (64 participants) (with the 95% confidence interval including the possibility of both a higher and lower rating of satisfaction), satisfaction may be lower on a 100-mm scale when inhaled after the airway clearance techniques compared to before: mean difference (MD) 20.38 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.10 to 28.66) and when compared to during the techniques, MD 14.80 mm (95% CI 5.70 to 23.90). Perceived effectiveness showed similar results: little or no difference for inhalation before versus during airway clearance techniques (64 participants); may be lower when inhaled after the airway clearance techniques compared to before, MD 10.62 (95% CI 2.54 to 18.70); and also when compared to during the techniques, MD 15.60 (95% CI 7.55 to 23.65). There were no quality of life or adverse events reported in any of the trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Timing of hypertonic saline inhalation makes little or no difference to lung function (low-certainty evidence). However, inhaling hypertonic saline before or during airway clearance techniques may maximise perceived efficacy and satisfaction. The long-term efficacy of hypertonic saline has only been established for twice-daily inhalations; however, if only one dose per day is tolerated, the time of day at which it is inhaled could be based on convenience or tolerability until evidence comparing these regimens is available. The identified trials were all of very short intervention periods, so longer-term research could be conducted to establish the effects arising from regular use, which would incorporate the influence of changes in adherence with long-term use, as well as generating data on any adverse effects that occur with long-term use.

Exercise is commonly used as a substitute for traditional airway clearance techniques by adults with cystic fibrosis in Australia: a survey

QUESTIONS

What airway clearance techniques and exercise regimens are used by adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) in Australia when well or unwell? What proportion of these adults believe that exercise can be used as a substitute for traditional airway clearance techniques, and how have they come to this belief? What type of exercise is used as a substitute for traditional airway clearance techniques?

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey at 13 CF centres in Australia, using a purpose-designed questionnaire.

PARTICIPANTS

Six hundred and ninety-two adults with CF completed the questionnaire.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The questionnaire included questions about: the participants' current use of traditional airway clearance techniques and exercise, when well and unwell; and beliefs regarding the use of exercise as a substitute for traditional airway clearance techniques.

RESULTS

Coughing, huffing and positive expiratory pressure were the most commonly used airway clearance techniques. Walking, jogging and lifting weights were the most commonly used forms of exercise. Overall, 43% of participants believed that exercise could be used as a substitute for traditional airway clearance techniques, with 44% having substituted exercise for traditional airway clearance techniques in the previous 3 months. Personal experience was the most commonly reported factor influencing participants' beliefs about the use of exercise as a substitute for traditional airway clearance techniques.

CONCLUSION

Exercise is commonly used as a substitute for traditional airway clearance techniques. Physiotherapists should advise patients that whilst there is some research suggesting a possible mechanism for exercise as a form of airway clearance, there are currently no medium-term to long-term data supporting exercise as a stand-alone form of airway clearance. These results suggest that future research to investigate the clinical effectiveness of exercise as a substitute for traditional airway clearance techniques should be a priority.

REGISTRATION

ACTRN12616000994482.

Timing of dornase alfa inhalation for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of the enzyme dornase alfa reduces sputum viscosity and improves clinical outcomes of people with cystic fibrosis. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the timing of dornase alfa inhalation (in relation to airway clearance techniques or morning versus evening inhalation) has an impact on objective and subjective measures of clinical efficacy in people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

Relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), clinical trial registries and international cystic fibrosis conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 06 June 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any trial of dornase alfa in people with cystic fibrosis where timing of inhalation was the randomised element in the trial with either: inhalation before compared to after airway clearance techniques; or morning compared to evening inhalation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data with disagreements resolved by discussion. Relevant data were extracted and, where possible, meta-analysed.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 115 trial reports representing 55 trials, of which five trials (providing data on 122 participants) met our inclusion criteria. All five trials used a cross-over design. Intervention periods ranged from two to eight weeks. Four trials (98 participants) compared dornase alfa inhalation before versus after airway clearance techniques. Inhalation after instead of before airway clearance did not significantly change forced expiratory volume at one second (very-low quality evidence). Similarly, forced vital capacity (low-quality evidence) and quality of life (very-low quality evidence) were not significantly affected; forced expiratory flow at 25% was significantly worse with dornase alfa inhalation after airway clearance, mean difference -0.17 litres (95% confidence interval -0.28 to -0.05), based on the pooled data from two small trials in children (7 to 19 years) with well-preserved lung function. All other secondary outcomes were statistically non-significant.In one trial (25 participants), morning versus evening inhalation had no impact on lung function or symptoms (low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence derived from a small number of participants does not indicate that inhalation of dornase alfa after airway clearance techniques is more or less effective than the traditional recommendation to inhale nebulised dornase alfa 30 minutes prior to airway clearance techniques, for most outcomes. For children with well-preserved lung function, inhalation before airway clearance may be more beneficial for small airway function than inhalation after. However, this result relied on a measure with high variability and trials with variable follow-up. In the absence of strong evidence to indicate that one timing regimen is better than another, the timing of dornase alfa inhalation can be largely based on pragmatic reasons or individual preference with respect to the time of airway clearance and time of day. Further research is warranted.

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cystic fibrosis in an Australian cystic fibrosis centre

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is used in selected patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) as a bridge to transplantation. Our aim was to describe briefly treatment and outcomes of six CF patients who received ECMO. One patient received a lung transplant and another recovered from acute respiratory failure. Four died despite ECMO support. Lack of timely availability of suitable donor lungs and patient selection are contributing factors.

Timing of hypertonic saline inhalation for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of hypertonic saline improves sputum rheology, accelerates mucociliary clearance and improves clinical outcomes of people with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the timing of hypertonic saline inhalation (in relation to airway clearance techniques or in relation to time of day) has an impact on its clinical efficacy in people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials from the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and international cystic fibrosis conference proceedings.Date of the last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 19 December 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any trial of hypertonic saline in people with cystic fibrosis where timing of inhalation was the randomised element in the study protocol with either: inhalation up to six hours before airway clearance techniques compared to inhalation during airway clearance techniques compared to inhalation up to six hours after airway clearance techniques; or morning compared to evening inhalation with any definition provided by the author.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently assessed the trials identified by the search for potential inclusion in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 97 trial reports which represented 46 studies, of which two studies (providing data on 63 participants) met our inclusion criteria. Both studies used a cross-over design. Both studies had low risk of all types of bias except the participants and the therapists who applied the treatments were not blinded. Intervention periods ranged from one treatment to three treatments in one day. The effects of the various regimens on lung function were non-significant. Satisfaction was rated significantly lower on a 100-mm scale when hypertonic saline was inhaled after the airway clearance techniques: mean differences 20.38 mm (95% confidence interval 12.10 to 28.66) compared to before airway clearance techniques and 14.80 mm (95% confidence interval 5.70 to 23.90) compared to during the techniques. Perceived effectiveness showed similar significant results. Other outcomes were unaffected by the timing regimen used. No trials compared morning versus evening inhalation of hypertonic saline.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

People with cystic fibrosis could be encouraged to inhale hypertonic saline before or during airway clearance techniques to maximise perceived efficacy and satisfaction, even though these timing regimens may not have any better effect on lung function than inhalation after airway clearance techniques. Given the long-term efficacy of hypertonic saline has only been established for twice-daily inhalations, clinicians should advise patients to inhale hypertonic saline twice daily. However, if only one dose per day is tolerated, the time of day at which it is inhaled could be based on convenience or tolerability until evidence comparing these regimens is available.

Timing of dornase alfa inhalation for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of the enzyme dornase alfa reduces sputum viscosity and improves clinical outcomes of people with cystic fibrosis. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of timing of dornase alfa inhalation on measures of clinical efficacy in people with cystic fibrosis (in relation to airway clearance techniques or time of day).

SEARCH METHODS

Relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and international cystic fibrosis conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 25 April 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any trial of dornase alfa in people with cystic fibrosis where timing of inhalation was the randomised element in the study with either: inhalation before compared to after airway clearance techniques; or morning compared to evening inhalation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data with disagreements resolved by discussion. Relevant data were extracted and, where possible, meta-analysed.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 115 trial reports representing 55 studies, of which five studies (providing data on 122 participants) met our inclusion criteria. All five studies used a cross-over design. Intervention periods ranged from two to eight weeks. Four trials compared dornase alfa inhalation before versus after airway clearance techniques. Inhalation after instead of before airway clearance did not significantly change forced expiratory volume at one second. Similarly, forced vital capacity and quality of life were not significantly affected; forced expiratory flow at 25% was significantly worse with dornase alfa inhalation after airway clearance, mean difference -0.17 litres (95% confidence interval -0.28 to -0.05), based on the pooled data from two small studies in children (seven to 19 years) with well-preserved lung function. All other secondary outcomes were statistically non-significant.In one trial, morning versus evening inhalation had no impact on lung function or symptoms.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence derived from a small number of participants does not indicate that inhalation of dornase alfa after airway clearance techniques is more or less effective than the traditional recommendation to inhale nebulised dornase alfa 30 minutes prior to airway clearance techniques, for most outcomes. For children with well-preserved lung function, inhalation before airway clearance may be more beneficial for small airway function than inhalation after. However, this result relied on a measure with high variability and studies with variable follow up. In the absence of strong evidence to indicate that one timing regimen is better than another, the timing of dornase alpha inhalation can be largely based on pragmatic reasons or individual preference with respect to the time of airway clearance and time of day. Further research is warranted.

Physiotherapy for cystic fibrosis in Australia and New Zealand: A clinical practice guideline

Physiotherapy management is a key element of care for people with cystic fibrosis (CF) throughout the lifespan. Although considerable evidence exists to support physiotherapy management of CF, there is documented variation in practice. The aim of this guideline is to optimize the physiotherapy management of people with CF in Australia and New Zealand. A systematic review of the literature in key areas of physiotherapy practice for CF was undertaken. Recommendations were formulated based on National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) guidelines and considered the quality, quantity and level of the evidence; the consistency of the body of evidence; the likely clinical impact; and applicability to physiotherapy practice in Australia and New Zealand. A total of 30 recommendations were made for airway clearance therapy, inhalation therapy, exercise assessment and training, musculoskeletal management, management of urinary incontinence, managing the newly diagnosed patient with CF, delivery of non-invasive ventilation, and physiotherapy management before and after lung transplantation. These recommendations can be used to underpin the provision of evidence-based physiotherapy care to people with CF in Australia and New Zealand.

Inspiratory muscle training facilitates weaning from mechanical ventilation among patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review

QUESTION

Does inspiratory muscle training improve inspiratory muscle strength in adults receiving mechanical ventilation? Does it improve the duration or success of weaning? Does it affect length of stay, reintubation, tracheostomy, survival, or the need for post-extubation non-invasive ventilation? Is it tolerable and does it cause adverse events?

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomised trials.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults receiving mechanical ventilation.

INTERVENTION

Inspiratory muscle training versus sham or no inspiratory muscle training.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data were extracted regarding: inspiratory muscle strength and endurance; the rapid shallow breathing index; weaning success and duration; duration of mechanical ventilation; reintubation; tracheostomy; length of stay; use of non-invasive ventilation after extubation; survival; readmission; tolerability and adverse events.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 394 participants were included. Heterogeneity within some meta-analyses was high. Random-effects meta-analyses showed that the training significantly improved maximal inspiratory pressure (MD 7 cmH2O, 95% CI 5 to 9), the rapid shallow breathing index (MD 15 breaths/min/l, 95% CI 8 to 23) and weaning success (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.76). Although only assessed in individual studies, significant benefits were also reported for the time spent on non-invasive ventilation after weaning (MD 16 hours, 95% CI 13 to 18), length of stay in the intensive care unit (MD 4.5 days, 95% CI 3.6 to 5.4) and length of stay in hospital (MD 4.4 days, 95% CI 3.4 to 5.5). Weaning duration decreased in the subgroup of patients with known weaning difficulty. The other outcomes weren't significantly affected or weren't measured.

CONCLUSION

Inspiratory muscle training for selected patients in the intensive care unit facilitates weaning, with potential reductions in length of stay and the duration of non-invasive ventilatory support after extubation. The heterogeneity among the results suggests that the effects of inspiratory muscle training may vary; this perhaps depends on factors such as the components of usual care or the patient's characteristics.

Timing of dornase alfa inhalation for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of the enzyme dornase alfa reduces sputum viscosity and improves clinical outcomes of people with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of timing of dornase alfa inhalation on measures of clinical efficacy in people with cystic fibrosis (in relation to airway clearance techniques or time of day).

SEARCH METHODS

Relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and international CF conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 22 February 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any trial of dornase alfa in people with cystic fibrosis where timing of inhalation was the randomised element in the study with either: inhalation before compared to after airway clearance techniques; or morning compared to evening inhalation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data with disagreements resolved by discussion. Relevant data were extracted and, where possible, meta-analysed.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 99 trial reports representing 48 studies, of which five studies (providing data on 122 participants) met our inclusion criteria. All five studies used a cross-over design. Intervention periods ranged from two to eight weeks. Four trials compared dornase alfa inhalation before versus after airway clearance techniques. Inhalation after instead of before airway clearance did not significantly change FEV1. Similarly, FVC and quality of life were not significantly affected; FEF25 was significantly worse with dornase alfa inhalation after airway clearance, MD -0.17 litres (95% CI -0.28 to -0.05), based on the pooled data from two small studies in children (7 to 19 years) with well-preserved lung function. All other secondary outcomes were statistically non-significant.In one trial, morning versus evening inhalation had no impact on lung function or symptoms.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence derived from a small number of participants does not indicate that inhalation of dornase alfa after airway clearance techniques is more or less effective than the traditional recommendation to inhale nebulised dornase alfa 30 minutes prior to airway clearance techniques, for most outcomes. For children with well-preserved lung function, inhalation before airway clearance may be more beneficial for small airway function than inhalation after. However, this result relied on a measure with high variability and studies with variable follow up. In the absence of strong evidence to indicate that one timing regimen is better than another, the timing of dornase alpha inhalation can be largely based on pragmatic reasons or individual preference with respect to the time of airway clearance and time of day. Further research is warranted.

Timing of hypertonic saline inhalation for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of hypertonic saline improves sputum rheology, accelerates mucociliary clearance and improves clinical outcomes of people with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the timing of hypertonic saline inhalation (in relation to airway clearance techniques or in relation to time of day) has an impact on its clinical efficacy in people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials from the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and international cystic fibrosis conference proceedings.Date of the last search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 6 December 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any trial of hypertonic saline in people with cystic fibrosis where timing of inhalation was the randomised element in the study protocol with either: inhalation up to six hours before airway clearance techniques compared to inhalation during airway clearance techniques compared to inhalation up to six hours after airway clearance techniques; or morning compared to evening inhalation with any definition provided by the author.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently assessed the trials identified by the search for potential inclusion in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

The search strategy identified 50 trial reports which represented 24 unique studies. One study, published only as an abstract, is awaiting further assessment. None of the other studies compared timing regimens for the inhalation of hypertonic saline and we excluded these from the review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review did not identify any evidence comparing the timing of hypertonic saline inhalation in relation to airway clearance physiotherapy. Until such evidence becomes available, clinicians could advise patients to inhale hypertonic saline before airway clearance, because this is the only regimen evaluated in the studies that established the efficacy of the use of hypertonic saline. This review also did not identify any evidence comparing the timing of hypertonic saline inhalation in relation to time of day. Until such evidence becomes available, clinicians could advise patients to inhale hypertonic saline morning and evening; but if only one dose per day is tolerated, the time of day at which it is inhaled could be based on convenience or tolerability.Given the competing theoretical rationales about why hypertonic saline could be more effective if inhaled at certain times, a trial comparing these various timing regimens should be conducted.

Timing of dornase alfa inhalation for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of the enzyme dornase alfa reduces sputum viscosity and improves clinical outcomes of people with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of timing of dornase alfa inhalation on measures of clinical efficacy in people with cystic fibrosis (in relation to airway clearance techniques or time of day).

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and international CF conference proceedings.Search date: 6 October 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any trial of dornase alfa in people with cystic fibrosis where timing of inhalation was the randomised element in the study with either: inhalation before compared to after airway clearance techniques; or morning compared to evening inhalation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data with disagreements resolved by discussion. Relevant data were extracted and, where possible, meta-analysed.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 92 trial reports representing 47 studies, of which five studies (providing data on 122 participants) met our inclusion criteria. All five studies used a cross-over design. Intervention periods ranged from two to eight weeks. Four trials compared dornase alfa inhalation before versus after airway clearance techniques. Inhalation after instead of before airway clearance did not significantly change FEV(1). Similarly, FVC and quality of life were not significantly affected; FEF(25) was significantly worse with dornase alfa inhalation after airway clearance, MD -0.17 litres (95% CI -0.28 to -0.05), based on the pooled data from two small studies in children (7 to 19 years) with well-preserved lung function. All other secondary outcomes were statistically non-significant.In one trial, morning versus evening inhalation had no impact on lung function or symptoms.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence derived from a small number of participants does not indicate that inhalation of dornase alfa after airway clearance techniques is more or less effective than the traditional recommendation to inhale nebulised dornase alfa 30 minutes prior to airway clearance techniques, for most outcomes. For children with well-preserved lung function, inhalation before airway clearance may be more beneficial for small airway function than inhalation after. However, this result relied on a measure with high variability and studies with variable follow-up. Apart from this, the timing of dornase alfa inhalation can be largely based on pragmatic reasons or individual preference with respect to the time of airway clearance and time of day. Further research is warranted.

Recombinant activated factor VII for massive hemoptysis in patients with cystic fibrosis

Massive hemoptysis is a common complication in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Conventional treatment with antibiotic therapy and early bronchial artery embolization (BAE) is usually successful in achieving hemostasis in the majority of patients. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), originally developed for use in patients with hemophilia, has emerged as a general hemostatic agent that is potentially useful in the management of many life-threatening bleeding conditions. In this article, we present four patients with CF lung disease and massive hemoptysis who were treated successfully with rFVIIa. We suggest that in patients with CF who present with massive hemoptysis, the use of rFVIIa can be considered in patients with refractory hemoptysis despite conventional therapy or as a temporizing therapy when BAE is not immediately available.

An investigation into the quality of life of individuals after laryngectomy

BACKGROUND

Little longitudinal data are available on the general physical, psychological, and social problems experienced as a result of laryngectomy or on the preoperative status of patients in regard to these aspects. In particular, prospective longitudinal data gathered from the same group of subjects over time and examining a variety of such outcomes is rare. This descriptive study addresses these issues.

METHODS

The study investigates the progress of a group of 34 laryngectomees from the preoperative stage up to 6 months after surgery. Medical complications, communication, swallowing, diet, physical, and psychosocial adjustment were measured using both the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and original outcome tools.

RESULTS

A large percentage of subjects demonstrated significant and persistent communication and swallowing problems throughout the period studied. Low preoperative and postoperative scores on the SF-36 demonstrate that this group had a poorer state of general health in many respects than those with serious medical conditions previously documented.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that communication and swallowing difficulties persist for many laryngectomees up to 6 months after surgery and still require further investigation. Poor preoperative and postoperative general health scores indicate that this group may require more long-term social support than is currently being offered to adjust to the laryngectomy.