Safety and efficacy of additional levofloxacin in tuberculous meningitis: A randomized controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Levofloxacin is an effective bactericidal category III antitubercular drug. There is paucity of studies comparing the role of additional levofloxacin to standard antitubercular regimen in the patients with tuberculous meningitis (TBM).

AIMS

To compare the safety and efficacy of adding levofloxacin to standard four drug ATT regimen (RHZE).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The patients with TBM diagnosed on the basis of clinical, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and MRI criteria were included. Children below 15 years, patients with pregnancy, seizures, liver failure, kidney failure and malignancy were excluded. The baseline clinical, CSF and MRI characteristics were noted and consciousness was evaluated by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The patients were randomized to RHZE (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol) and RHZEL (RHZE and levofloxacin) groups. Outcome was defined at 6 months. Primary outcome was death and secondary outcomes were disability as assess by Barthel Index score and adverse events.

RESULTS

Out of 110 TBM patients screened, 57 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their median age was 35 (15-75) years. 29 patients received RHZEL and 28 RHZE. The baseline clinical, biochemical and MRI characteristics were similar in the two groups. At 6 months, 11 (19.3%) patients died, 38 (66.7%) had good and 7 (12.3%) poor outcome. There was insignificant survival benefit in RHZEL group compared to RHZE (HR-2.61, 95% CI 0.73-9.36, P = 0.14), 25% patients died in RHZE where as 13.8% in RHZEL group. The disability was not significantly different between the two groups. The composite side effects were also similar between the two groups except for a higher frequency of seizure in RHZEL group (5 Vs 0) which resulted in withdrawal of levofloxacin.

CONCLUSION

There was insignificant survival benefit in RHZEL which was associated with high frequency of seizures.

Outcome of tuberculous meningitis patients requiring mechanical ventilation

PURPOSE

There is paucity of information about the outcome of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) patients on mechanical ventilation (MV). In this communication, we report the clinical characteristics, predictors of MV, and outcome of TBM patients requiring MV.

METHOD

Thirty-eight (18%) of 205 patients with TBM requiring MV were included; and their demographic, clinical, cerebrospinal fluid, and magnetic resonance imaging finding at admission and follow-up were noted. The ventilator-related and systemic complications, hospital death, and 3-month functional outcome were noted. The predictors of need of MV were derived by multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were 38 MV and 36 non-MV TBM patients who were matched for age, sex, and stage of meningitis on admission. The requirement of MV was independently related to leukocytosis, seizure, and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis on admission. Patients on MV had higher frequency of septicemia (9 vs 2), bedsores (6 vs 0), and gastric hemorrhage (4 vs 0) compared with non-MV patients. Only 29% of MV patients survived and had poor outcome at 3 months; but in the non-MV group, all the patients survived, and only 11% had poor outcome.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical ventilation was needed in 18% TBM patients because of TBM-related or systemic complications. Those requiring MV had high mortality and may be categorized separately.