Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption of regular healthcare leading to reduced hospital attendances, repurposing of surgical facilities, and cancellation of cancer screening programmes. This study aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 on surgical care in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A nationwide study was conducted in collaboration with the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing. Eight surgical audits were expanded with items regarding alterations in scheduling and treatment plans. Data on procedures performed in 2020 were compared with those from a historical cohort (2018-2019). Endpoints included total numbers of procedures performed and altered treatment plans. Secondary endpoints included complication, readmission, and mortality rates.

RESULTS

Some 12 154 procedures were performed in participating hospitals in 2020, representing a decrease of 13.6 per cent compared with 2018-2019. The largest reduction (29.2 per cent) was for non-cancer procedures during the first COVID-19 wave. Surgical treatment was postponed for 9.6 per cent of patients. Alterations in surgical treatment plans were observed in 1.7 per cent. Time from diagnosis to surgery decreased (to 28 days in 2020, from 34 days in 2019 and 36 days in 2018; P < 0.001). For cancer-related procedures, duration of hospital stay decreased (5 versus 6 days; P < 0.001). Audit-specific complications, readmission, and mortality rates were unchanged, but ICU admissions decreased (16.5 versus 16.8 per cent; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The reduction in the number of surgical operations was greatest for those without cancer. Where surgery was undertaken, it appeared to be delivered safely, with similar complication and mortality rates, fewer admissions to ICU, and a shorter hospital stay.

Lipoedema in patients after bariatric surgery: report of two cases and review of literature

Lipoedema is a disorder of adipose tissue that is characterized by abnormal subcutaneous fat deposition, leading to swelling and enlargement of the lower limbs as well as the trunk. This entity is often misdiagnosed as lymphoedema or obesity and, therefore, may be overlooked and missed in patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. Patients with lipoedema who undergo bariatric surgery may have to continue to have extensive lower extremity and trunk adiposity despite adequate weight loss. In this report, we present two patients who had extensive trunk and lower extremity adiposity, one of them before and the other after the bariatric surgery.

Microbiological outcomes and antibiotic overuse in Emergency Department patients with suspected sepsis

OBJECTIVE

To study the presence of bacterial disease and antibiotic use in patients in the emergency department (ED) included in the local sepsis protocol.

METHODS

An observational retrospective cohort study. Adults aged > 18 years, presenting to the ED of a large teaching hospital, from 1 January to 1 June 2011, with more than two SIRS criteria and a clinical suspicion of sepsis were included.

RESULTS

Bacterial disease was suspected or confirmed in only 71% of all the patients with suspected sepsis (2008 definition) and consequently treated with antibiotics. Most of these patients (58%) suffered from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) without signs of organ dysfunction, hypotension or hypoperfusion. Despite absence of bacterial disease in 29% of the patients after rigorous diagnostics, median antibiotic treatment in this group was still seven days (IQR 4-10).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard sepsis detection using SIRS criteria and clinical suspicion identified patients with suspected or confirmed bacterial disease in 71% of the cases. A significant proportion of patients were exposed to prolonged antibiotic use without proof of bacterial disease. This study illustrates the difficulties in correctly identifying bacterial disease and sepsis, and shows that overuse of antibiotics may be the consequence.