Delphi consensus statement for understanding and managing the subcostal hernia: subcostal hernias collaborative report (scholar study)

INTRODUCTION

Subcostal hernias are categorized as L1 based on the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification and frequently involve M1, M2, and L2 sites. These are common after hepatopancreatic and biliary surgeries. The literature on subcostal hernias mostly comprises of retrospective reviews of small heterogenous cohorts, unsurprisingly leading to no consensus or guidelines. Given the limited literature and lack of consensus or guidelines for dealing with these hernias, we planned for a Delphi consensus to aid in decision making to repair subcostal hernias.

METHODS

We adopted a modified Delphi technique to establish consensus regarding the definition, characteristics, and surgical aspects of managing subcostal hernias (SCH). It was a four-phase Delphi study reflecting the widely accepted model, consisting of: 1. Creating a query. 2. Building an expert panel. 3. Executing the Delphi rounds. 4. Analysing, presenting, and reporting the Delphi results. More than 70% of agreement was defined as a consensus statement.

RESULTS

The 22 experts who agreed to participate in this Delphi process for Subcostal Hernias (SCH) comprised 7 UK surgeons, 6 mainland European surgeons, 4 Indians, 3 from the USA, and 2 from Southeast Asia. This Delphi study on subcostal hernias achieved consensus on the following areas-use of mesh in elective cases; the retromuscular position with strong discouragement for onlay mesh; use of macroporous medium-weight polypropylene mesh; use of the subcostal incision over midline incision if there is no previous midline incision; TAR over ACST; defect closure where MAS is used; transverse suturing over vertical suturing for closure of circular defects; and use of peritoneal flap when necessary.

CONCLUSION

This Delphi consensus defines subcostal hernias and gives insight into the consensus for incision, dissection plane, mesh placement, mesh type, and mesh fixation for these hernias.

Management of ventral hernia in patients with BMI > 30 Kg/m2: outcomes based on an institutional algorithm

INTRODUCTION

Management of ventral hernia in obese is a complex problem. The methods of weight loss, alternatives if the patient cannot undergo bariatric surgery, timing, and type of hernia surgery lacks clarity and are dependent on resources and expertise. There is a need for algorithms based on local population and expertise. In this paper, we present the outcomes of our institutional algorithm.

METHODS

It was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Patients with body mass index (BMI) > 30Kg/m² were included to undergo surgery as per algorithm taking into account (a) presentation (symptomatic vs asymptomatic), (b) hernia characteristics (defect width, site, reducibility), and (c) obesity characteristics (BMI, subcutaneous fat, android vs gynecoid). Data on age, BMI, comorbidities, tobacco consumption, hernia width, location, contents, previous surgery, intraoperative parameters (the type of surgery, mesh, drain, fixation), and outcomes (seroma, hematoma, infection, recurrence) were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients underwent treatment as per the algorithm. Mean BMI was 36.6 ± 7.3 kg/m². The mean follow-up was 17.6 ± 7.2 months. The mean defect width was 4.8 ± 2.9 cm. There were two (4%) recurrences in patients who underwent an anatomical repair under emergency conditions. None of the patients who underwent an elective repair had a recurrence. Total surgical site occurrence was 12% and surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention was 8%. There was one (2%) mortality on postoperative day 7 due to myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

The algorithm has shown encouraging results in the short-to-medium term. Long-term evaluation with a higher number of patients is needed to confirm its usefulness.

Histopathological changes in gallbladder mucosa in cholelithiasis: correlation with chemical composition of gallstones

BACKGROUND

Cholelithiasis produces diverse histopathological changes in gallbladder mucosa namely acute inflammation, chronic inflammation, glandular hyperplasia, granulomatous inflammation, cholesterosis, dysplasia, and carcinoma. Gallstones have different chemical composition. They may be cholesterol, pigment or mixed stones. The aim of this prospective study was to see if any correlation existed between the chemistry of gallstones and any particular histopathologic picture.

METHODS

Between May 1997 and December 1997 we diagnosed and operated on 40 patients with cholelithiasis. Diagnosis was established by ultrasound. After operation gallstones were sent for chemical analysis to detect presence of calcium bilirubinate and cholesterol. Serial sections of gallbladder from fundus to neck were stained by haematoxylin and eosin, and studied.

RESULTS

Out of 40 patients (n = 40) 29 were females and 11 were males. The mean age of our patients was 38 +/- 21 years with a median of 40 years. Median age of males was 48 years compared to 38 years for females. Twenty-eight patients had mixed stones, 8 had pigment stones and 4 had cholesterol stones. Out of 28 patients with mixed stones 14 had histological picture of chronic cholecystitis, 8 had granulomatous cholecystitis, 4 had adenomatous hyperplasia, 1 had dysplasia and 1 had carcinoma. All 8 patients having pigment gallstones had chronic cholecystitis. Out of 4 patients with cholesterol gallstones, 2 had chronic cholecystitis, 1 had adenomatous hyperplasia and 1 had cholesterosis. Gallbladder having pigment stones were devoid of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses.

CONCLUSION

Adenomatous hyperplasia and Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses were not seen in gallbladder containing pigment stones but seen in gallbladders containing mixed and cholesterol stones in our study. Cholesterol may be a more potent stimulus for glandular hyperplasia or glandular hyperplasia may responsible for formation of cholesterol rich stones.