Institutional Validation Study Inferring 2% MGMT Methylation Positive Impact on Survival in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (GBM) Patients

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) MATERIALS/METHODS: is a well-established prognostic factor in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, there is no consensus on a standardized method of threshold for MGMT testing. Previous studies have reported levels of as little as 1-3% to confer better prognosis. This study reports a single institutional experience of determining methylation status via methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM). Previous literature suggests 10% cutoff for MGMT methylation using MS-HRM. We hereby report clinical outcomes using a lower threshold of 2%.

MATERIALS/METHODS

GBM patients treated at our institution retrospectively reviewed between the years 2013 and 2022 were included in the study. Patients who received hypofractionated radiation (<60 Gy) were excluded. All patients had MS-HRM test for MGMT methylation status. A real-time PCR assay was used to amplify a 62 base-pair region of MGMT for both methylated and unmethylated alleles. PCR products underwent HRM analysis and the fraction of methylated DNA was determined by comparison with a standard curve. Clinical data were collected retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were performed to compare survival.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients with newly diagnosed GBM were initially included in this study. 42 patients treated with hypofractionated radiation were excluded. All patients received concurrent and maintenance temozolomide. Median age was 61.5 years. A total of 84 patients had MGMT methylation levels <2%, and 55 patients had MGMT methylation level ≥ 2% with a median methylation level of 28.5% (Range 0.8%-100%). Patients with MGMT methylation level ≥ 2% had an improved median overall survival (25.1 vs 16.0 months; p = 0.006) and improved median progression free survival (11.3 vs 7.9 months; p = 0.017). In a multivariable mode that included age, use of tumor-treating fields, KPS, sex, and BMI, only age, KPS, and MGMT remained significant.

CONCLUSION

Our institutional review confirmed low level of MGMT hypermethylation (≥ 2%) predicts improved outcome in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Further investigation on optimal cut off level for MGMT methylation is still warranted.

Outcomes of MR-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) for Adrenal Metastases: A Multi-Institutional Pooled Analysis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for adrenal metastases, but it is technically challenging and there are concerns about toxicity due to the proximity of organs at risk. We hypothesized that MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) using a 0.35 T MR-Linac for adrenal metastases can achieve durable local control (LC) with a low probability of toxicity.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In an ethics-approved study, we analyzed clinical and dosimetric data of patients treated with MRgSBRT at 10 institutions between 2016-2022. LC, local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Responses were evaluated using RECIST criteria. Toxicity was graded according to CTCAE (v4.0). OS and DPFS were calculated on a per-patient basis, while LC and LPFS were calculated on a per-lesion basis.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients (260 adrenal lesions) were included; median age was 65 years (range 28-91), 65.5% were male, 83.9% had ECOG PS 0-1. The most common primary tumor was lung cancer (69.1%). Adrenal metastases were synchronous, metachronous, oligoprogressive or oligopersistent in 20%, 41.5%, 35.8% and 2.7% of patients, respectively. Metastatic pattern was solitary in 26.9%, oligometastatic in 57.3% and polymetastatic in 15.8% of patients. Right-sided metastases comprised 40%, left-sided 51.5% and lesions were bilateral in 8.5%. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy were administered in 67.1% and 60.6% of patients, respectively. Median gross tumor volume was 21.8 cc (range 1.1-383.2) and median planning target volume was 36.9 cc (range 3.6-516.9). Median total dose was 45 Gy (range 16-60), median fraction number was 5 (range 1-8) and median fraction dose used was 10 Gy (range 5-24). Median BED10 was 100 Gy (range 37.5-132); 87.8% of fractions used adapted plans. At a median follow-up was 17.7 months (IQR 5.5-21.7), local responses were scored as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) in 36.9%, 28.2%, 25.7%, and 9.1%, respectively. Median OS was 30.4 months, with 1- and 2- year OS rates of 75.3% and 57.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, significantly higher OS rates were seen in patients achieving a CR (p = 0.007, HR 0.50) and with ECOG scores of 0-1 (p = 0.001, HR 0.43). One- and 2- year LPFS rates were 94.5% and 88.8%, respectively. No local recurrences were observed after treatment to a BED10>100 or with single fraction (range 16-24 Gy). Only 2 patients (0.8%) had ≥grade 3 chronic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This multi-institutional study of MRgSBRT outcomes for adrenal metastases revealed a 2-year LPFS of 89%, with a <1% risk of ≥grade 3 toxicity. Daily adaptation was performed in 90% of plans, indicating a beneficial role for MR guidance.

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy vs. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma: Local Control, Hearing Preservation, and Toxicities

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The use of radiation therapy (RT) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) is well-established, but limited studies detail outcomes in patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). In this study, we provide an outcome-based comparison of FSRT versus SRS in patients with VS with emphases on local control, hearing preservation, and toxicities. We hypothesize that FSRT and SRS will have similar rates of local control with FSRT having improved rates of hearing preservation.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients treated at a single tertiary referral center between 2013 and 2018 for VS using FSRT (46.8 Gy in 26 fractions) or SRS (12 Gy in 1 fraction) were identified. Records from radiation oncology, neurosurgery, and otolaryngology were included. Endpoints included local control, defined as absence of tumor progression or need for salvage treatment, hearing preservation, quantified by Gardner-Robinson (GR) scoring and defined as maintaining GR1-2 hearing, and toxicities as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients with VS were identified, of which 50 had FSRT and 27 had SRS. In the FSRT group, the median patient age was 58 years (range 23-81) and 50% were female, whereas the median patient age was 68 years (range 24-90) and 41% females were in the SRS group. 81% (n = 35) patients in the FSRT group and 24% (n = 6) in the SRS group had serviceable hearing prior to RT. Median follow-up was 51.2 months (range 4.3-103.2) in the FSRT group and 21.0 months (range 2.7-98.6) in the SRS group. The 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year local control rates in the FSRT and SRS groups were 100% and 100%, 97% and 76%, 94% and 76%, respectively. Of those with local progression, 33% (n = 1) in the FSRT group was salvaged with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and 100% (n = 2) in the SRS group was salvaged with FSRT. For patients with serviceable hearing prior to RT, hearing preservations rates were 46% and 17% with a median time to hearing loss of 8.2 months (range 4.0-59.5) and 7.7 months (range 2.0-11.9) in the FSRT and SRS groups, respectively. Progression-free survival analyses showed superior hearing preservation in those treated with FSRT compared to SRS (p-value = 0.0064), especially those receiving FSRT who initially presented with GR1 vs GR2 hearing (p-value = 0.0095). There were 60 reported toxicities with 12% (n = 7) Grade 2+ in the FSRT group, whereas the SRS group had 5 toxicities with 40% (n = 2) Grade 2+.

CONCLUSION

Both FSRT and SRS provide favorable local control for VS, with most progressions salvageable. Hearing preservation rate is higher in the FSRT group. This favors the use of FSRT in those with serviceable hearing, with patients with baseline GR1 hearing demonstrating additional benefit. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to better identify treatment outcomes and prognostic factors.

Early Outcomes of MR-Guided SBRT for Patients with Recurrent Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Local treatment options for patients with locally recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma (L-PAC) are limited, with expected median survival time (MST) of 8-11 months (mo) following recurrence. MRI-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) provides the ability to dose escalate while sparing normal tissue. The literature for MR-guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) for L-PAC is sparse. Here we report on the early outcomes of MRgSBRT in patients with L-PAC.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with prior resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with post-operative chemotherapy as indicated followed by local recurrence of disease at prior surgical site and treated with MRgSBRT at a single tertiary referral center from 5-2021 to 8-2022 for L-PAC were identified from our prospective database. MRgSBRT was delivered to 40-50 Gy in 4-5 fractions with target and OAR delineation per institutional standards. Descriptive analysis of the patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were performed. Endpoints included local control, defined as absence of tumor progression per RECIST criteria, distant failure, overall survival (OS), and acute and chronic toxicities per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.

RESULTS

Eleven patients with L-PAC were identified with median follow-up of 10.7 mo (3.2 - 22.3). Ten of those underwent surgical resection at the treating radiation facility and one patient underwent preoperative radiation for 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions followed by surgical resection at an outside hospital. MRgRT was delivered a median of 18.8 mo (3.5 - 48.0) following resection. There were 5 females and 6 males, with a median age of 72 years (52-83) and median KPS of 80 (60-100). OS rates following initial diagnosis at 12, 18 and 24 mo were 100%, 82%, and 61%, respectively, with an MST of 25.3 mo (12.4-53.1). OS rates following recurrence at 6 and 12 mo were 82% and 52%, respectively, with an MST of 10.7 mo (3.2 - 21.9). One patient experienced local failure at 7.8 mo, and 9 patients experienced distant failure at a median of 3.4 mo (0.3 - 21.9) following MRgSBRT. Five patients experienced distant failure less than 3 mo following radiation. Grade 1 or 2 acute GI toxicity was noted in 45% of patients and chronic GI toxicity, in 18% of patients. No Grade≥3 AEs were noted.

CONCLUSION

MRgSBRT for recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma demonstrates good local control with acceptable acute and chronic toxicity as well as reasonable overall survival. Distant failure remains a substantial problem with a significant number of patients demonstrating metastases immediately following radiation, suggesting the presence of micro-metastatic disease prior to local therapy. Adequate patient selection for MRgSBRT, and proper integration of systemic therapy in this patient population remains a topic of discussion that requires further exploration.

Body Mass Index (BMI) at Time of Diagnosis as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (GBM)

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain cancer in adults with very poor prognosis. Metabolic drivers of tumorigenesis are highly relevant within the central nervous system, where glucose is the sole source of energy. The impact of obesity on survival outcomes in patients with GBM has not been well reported and some initial results are inconsistent. This study investigates the factor of body mass index (BMI) in patients diagnosed with GBM. This study evaluated the prognostic association of BMI with survival outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed GBM.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patientswith newly diagnosed GBM at our institution from 2015-2022 were included in this study. All patients were >18 years of age and received 60 Gy of radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide following maximal safe resection. Through retrospective chart review, patient BMI at the time of diagnosis and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Analysis was done between patient groups of underweight/normal weight (BMI <25) and overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25.00). The subgroup of overweight patients was also divided into subgroups of overweight (BMI 25.00-29.99) and obese (BMI≥30.00). A difference in clinical outcomes of overall survival was evaluated between the groups using Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Atotal of 393 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age 57.3 years, range 18.8-92.7. 185 female and 208 were male. 120 patients had a BMI <25 and 273 had a BMI ≥ 25.00. Median survival in patients with BMI <25 was 24.90 months and in patients with BMI ≥ 25.00, 18.20 months (p = 0.0001; HR 0.6552, 95% CI 0.5299-0.8101). We further divided patients with BMI ≥ 25.00 to 25-29.99 (n = 152) and BMI≥30.00 (n = 121). Both groups' OS were significantly worse than patients with BMI < 25 (p = 0.006). There was no difference in survival outcomes between patients with a BMI 25.00-29.99 and BMI≥30.00, with median OS 19.0 months and 18.1 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patient baseline BMI <25 appears to be a prognostic indicator and correlates to improves overall survival for patients with newly diagnosed GBM. This study adds to the existing literature supporting overweight/obesity is associated with worse survival for GBM patients. Additional studies are warranted for further analysis of BMI and survival outcomes in GBM patients across patient demographics.