P2552Triple vs. double antithrombotic therapy in patients needing oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis

Background

The optimal antithrombotic therapy strategy in patients undergoing PCI who need OAC is currently debated.

Purpose

To determine the best regimen in terms of safety and efficacy.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of RCT and adjusted results reporting outcomes of patients who underwent PCI and were on TT or DAPT or DT. All-cause death was the primary end point, while MACE was the secondary outcome, along with its individual components, and major bleedings.

Results

15 studies encompassing 27070 patients were included. After a follow up of 12 (11–14) months, TT reduced all-cause death compared to DAPT (OR 0.52, 0.35–0.78), mainly driven by a lower incidence of MI (OR 0.81, 0.69–0.85) and stroke (OR 0.76, 0.56–1.03) despite higher rates of major bleedings (OR 2.81, 1.54–5.12). Comparing TT vs. DT with warfarin, all-cause death was non-significantly different (OR 1.23, 0.60–2.53), nor MI (OR 0.77, 0.23–2.59) and stroke (OR 4.01, 0.80–20.07), while major bleeding was increased with TT (OR 2.40, 1.34–4.38). When compared to DT with NOACs, TT did not reduce risk of MI (OR 0.96, 0.67–1.36) or stroke (OR 0.82, 0.55–1.24), but increased major bleedings (OR 1.98, 1.43–2.73). The non-randomized comparison between DT with warfarin and DT with NOACs showed a neutral effect on death and major bleedings, with similar rates also of MI (OR 0.47, 0.20–1.11, all CI 95%).

Conclusion

Double therapy with warfarin or with NOAC plus a single antiplatelet agent reduces the risk of major bleeding compared to triple therapy, with a neutral impact of subsequent ischemic events.

P6409Ticagrelor and prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and chronic renal dysfunction: safety and efficacy

Introduction

Safety and efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor in real-life ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome) with renal dysfunction remain to be established.

Methods

Consecutive patients from RENAMI and BLEEMACS were stratified according to renal function and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Myocardial infarction (MI) and BARC major bleedings (MB; BARC type 3 or 5) were the primary end-point. Independent impact of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor were evaluated with Cox multivariate analysis.

Results

19255 patients were enrolled (mean eGFR: 90±39 ml/min/1.73m2). Patients with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2, constituted the 12.9% of the population (2490 pts). After a mean follow up of 13±5 months, the global incidence of re-AMI was of 5.8% and 2.9% in patients with and in those without eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2 (p<0.0001) respectively. MB occurred in 5.7% and 3% (p<0.0001). At Cox multivariate analysis, clopidogrel compared to prasugrel and ticagrelor was associated with increased risk of MI both in those with eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73m2 (HR=3.3: 2.4–4.4, p<0.0001) as well as in patients with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2 (HR=10.04: 3.1–32.3, p<0.0001). In contrast, both prasugrel (HR=0.07: 0.01–0.54, p=0.01) and Ticagrelor (HR=0.36: 0.16–0.81, p=0.01) were associated with decreased risk of MI in the latters. DAPT with ticagrelor or prasugrel did not increased risk of MB in patients with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2, while in patients with eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73m2, ticagrelor was associated to a slightly higher risk of MB (HR=1.43: 1.09–1.89, p=0.009).

Conclusion

In ACS patients with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2, prasugrel and ticagrelor are associated with lower risk of recurrent MI without significant increase in the risk of MB.

461Modulation of ischemic and bleeding risk by peripheral artery disease after an acute coronary syndrome

Introduction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with heightened ischemic and bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). With this study from real-life patients, we try to analyze the balance between ischemic and bleeding risk during treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after an ACS according to the presence or not of PAD.

Methods

The data analyzed in this study were obtained from the fusion of 3 clinical registries of ACS patients: BleeMACS (2004–2013), CardioCHUVI/ARRITXACA (2010–2016) and RENAMI (2013–2016). All 3 registries include consecutive patients discharged after an ACS with DAPT and undergoing PCI. The merged data set contain 26,076 patients. A propensity-matched analysis was performed to match the baseline characteristics of patients with and without PAD. The impact of prior PAD in the ischemic and bleeding risk was assessed by a competitive risk analysis, using a Fine and Gray regression model, with death being the competitive event. For ischemic risk we have considered a new acute myocardial infarction (AMI), whereas for bleeding risk we have considered major bleeding (MB) defined as bleeding requiring hospital admission. Follow-up time was censored by DAPT suspension/withdrawal.

Results

From the 26,076 ACS patients, 1,600 have PAD (6.1%). Patients with PAD were older, and with more cardiovascular risk factors. DAPT with prasugrel/ticagrelor was less frequently prescribed in patients with PAD in comparison with the rest of the population (8.2% vs 22.8%, p<0.001). During a mean follow-up of 12.2±4.8 months, 964 patients died (3.7%), and 640 AMI (2.5%) and 685 MB (2.6%) were reported. After propensity-score matching, we obtained two matched groups of 1,591 patients. Patients with PAD showed a significant higher risk of both AMI (sHR 2.17, 95% CI 1.51–3.10, p<0.001) and MB (sHR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07–2.12, p=0.018), in comparison with those without PAD. The cumulative incidence of AMI was 63.9 and 29.8 per 1,000 patients/year in patients with and without PAD, respectively. The cumulative incidence of MB was 55.9 and 37.6 per 1,000 patients/year in patients with and without PAD, respectively. The rate difference per 1,000 patient-years for AMI between patients with and without PAD was +34.1 (95% CI 30.1–38.1), and for MB +18.3 (16.1–20.4). The net balance between ischemic and bleeding events comparing patients with and without PAD was positive (+15.8 per 1,000 patients/year, 95% CI 9.7–22.0).

Conclusions

PAD was associated with higher ischemic and bleeding risk after hospital discharge for ACS treated with DAPT. However, the balance between ischemic and bleeding risk was positive for patients with PAD in comparison with patients without PAD. As summary, ACS patients with PAD had an ischemic risk greater than the bleeding risk.