1
|
Kulbe H, Wu Z, Taube E, Kassuhn W, Darb-Esfahani S, Jank P, Abobaker S, Ringel F, Sehouli J, Klein O, Braicu E. Discovery of prognostic markers for early-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer by MALDI-Imaging. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- H Kulbe
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
| | - Z Wu
- Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
| | - E Taube
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
| | - W Kassuhn
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
| | - S Darb-Esfahani
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
| | - P Jank
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
| | - S Abobaker
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
| | - F Ringel
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
| | - J Sehouli
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
| | - O Klein
- Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
| | - E.I Braicu
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Villegas SL, Darb-Esfahani S, von Minckwitz G, Huober J, Weber K, Marmé F, Furlanetto J, Schem C, Pfitzner BM, Lederer B, Engels K, Kümmel S, Müller V, Mehta K, Denkert C, Loibl S. Expression of Cyclin D1 protein in residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 168:179-187. [PMID: 29177689 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4581-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (BC) shows a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). New treatment targets like the Cyclin D1-CDK4/CDK6 complex are promising adjuvant/post-neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies. Evaluating Cyclin D1 overexpression in residual tumor could recognize those patients that benefit most from such post-neoadjuvant treatment. In this study, we determined Cyclin D1 expression in residual BC after NACT. Secondary aims were to correlate Cyclin D1 expression levels with clinicopathological parameters and to assess its prognostic value after NACT. METHODS We retrospectively assessed the nuclear expression of Cyclin D1 on tissue microarrays with residual tumor from 284 patients treated in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio (n = 186) and GeparQuattro (n = 98) trials. Evaluation was performed with a standardized immunoreactive score (IRS) after selecting a cut-off value. RESULTS A high expression level (IRS ≥ 6) of Cyclin D1 was found in 37.3% of the assessed specimens. An increased Cyclin D1 expression was observed in HR-positive tumors, compared to HR-negative tumors (p = 0.02). Low Cyclin D1 levels correlated with clinical tumor stage 1-3 (p = 0.03). Among patients with HR-positive/Her2-negative tumors and high Cyclin D1 expression, a better disease-free survival (DFS) was graphically suggested, but not significant (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates a measurable nuclear expression of Cyclin D1 in post-neoadjuvant residual tumor tissue of HR-positive BC. Cyclin D1 expression was not prognostic for DFS after NACT. Our results and defined cut-off suggest that the marker can be used to stratify tumors according to protein expression levels. Based on this, a prospective evaluation is currently performed in the ongoing Penelope-B trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S L Villegas
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Darb-Esfahani
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Pathology Spandau, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus, Stadtrandstr. 555, 13589, Berlin, Germany
| | - G von Minckwitz
- German Breast Group (GBG Forschungs GmbH), Martin-Behaim-Str. 12, 63263, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - J Huober
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - K Weber
- German Breast Group (GBG Forschungs GmbH), Martin-Behaim-Str. 12, 63263, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - F Marmé
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Furlanetto
- German Breast Group (GBG Forschungs GmbH), Martin-Behaim-Str. 12, 63263, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - C Schem
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Hostein, Kiel, Germany
| | - B M Pfitzner
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - B Lederer
- German Breast Group (GBG Forschungs GmbH), Martin-Behaim-Str. 12, 63263, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - K Engels
- Zentrum für Pathologie, Zytologie und Molekularpathologie Neuss, Neuss, Germany
| | - S Kümmel
- Breast Unit Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - V Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - K Mehta
- German Breast Group (GBG Forschungs GmbH), Martin-Behaim-Str. 12, 63263, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Charité, Berlin, Germany.
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG Forschungs GmbH), Martin-Behaim-Str. 12, 63263, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patel J, Sehouli J, Timms K, Solimeno C, Reid J, Lanchbury J, Braicu I, Darb-Esfahani S, Ganapathi M, Ganapathi R. Characteristics of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in paired primary and recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw363.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
4
|
Borrelli GM, Abrão MS, Taube ET, Darb-Esfahani S, Köhler C, Chiantera V, Mechsner S. (Partial) Loss of BAF250a (ARID1A) in rectovaginal deep-infiltrating endometriosis, endometriomas and involved pelvic sentinel lymph nodes. Mol Hum Reprod 2016; 22:329-37. [PMID: 26832958 DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaw009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY HYPOTHESIS Loss of protein BAF250a (ARID1A) expression is present in women with rectovaginal deep-infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) and endometriosis affecting the pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (PSLN). STUDY FINDING Partial loss of protein BAF250a was found in some of our patient samples, comprising all endometriosis entities, including rectovaginal DIE and endometriosis affecting the PSLN. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Loss of BAF250a (BRG-associated factor 250a)/ARIDIA (AT-rich interactive domain 1A) protein expression was identified among endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas and ovarian endometriosis, and this phenomenon was described as a possible early event in the transformation of endometriosis into cancer. DIE affecting the bowel/rectovaginal site is the most aggressive presentation of endometriosis and its 'risk' of malignant transformation has not been studied so far. STUDY DESIGN, SAMPLES/MATERIALS, METHODS We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of BAF250a protein in 70 samples from patients enrolled in this study who were surgically treated at a tertiary center, university Hospital. The samples submitted to investigation were from rectovaginal DIE (n= 25/30), endometriosis affecting the PSLN (n= 5/7), ovarian endometriosis (n= 20/20) and endometrium from patients without endometriosis used as controls (n= 20/20). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Partial loss (i.e. in one tissue section some cells stained positive for BAF250a while other cells, usually an adjacent group, were negative) of BAF250a protein was identified in 36% (9/25) of rectovaginal DIE samples, 40% (2/5) of endometriosis lesions involving the PSLN, 30% (6/20) of endometriomas, and also in 25% (5/20) of endometrium from controls. We found no statistical correlation between occurrence of partial loss of BAF250a protein and the use or not of hormone medications (P = 0.106), cycle phase (P = 0.917) and stage of disease (P = 0.717). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION We only found partial loss of BAF250a protein expression, and in a small population of women, with relatively high frequency in all benign tissues assessed in the present analysis. Therefore, this finding alone should not be correlated directly with the risk of malignant transformation in these lesions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The occurrence of partial loss of BAF250a protein expression in women with rectovaginal DIE and endometriosis affecting the PSLN is described for the first time. The value of this finding as a predictor of malignant transformation in endometriosis must still be clarified and further studied in association with other molecular events, such as PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) deletion and PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha) mutation. We might then be able to identify in the future which patients with endometriosis are at higher risk of cancer. STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTERESTS This study was supported by an internal Charité grant to the Endometriosis Research Center and the authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G M Borrelli
- Clinic for Gynecology - Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - M S Abrão
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - E T Taube
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Darb-Esfahani
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Köhler
- Clinic for Gynecology - Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany Department of Gynecology, Asklepios Klinik Harburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - V Chiantera
- Clinic for Gynecology - Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Mechsner
- Clinic for Gynecology - Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vasconcelos I, Darb-Esfahani S, Sehouli J. Serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumours: differences in clinical presentation, high-risk histopathological features, and lethal recurrence rates. BJOG 2015; 123:498-508. [PMID: 26705090 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucinous and serous borderline ovarian tumours (mBOTs and sBOTs) are controversial diseases. OBJECTIVES With this systematic review we aim to evaluate the different high-risk histopathological features and recurrence rates. SEARCH STRATEGY The PubMed database was searched using two terms: {serous AND [(borderline) OR (low malignant potential)] AND ovarian AND tumour} and {mucinous AND [(borderline) OR (low malignant potential)] AND ovarian AND tumour}. SELECTION CRITERIA Cohorts of either sBOT or mBOT, peer-reviewed, retrospective, or prospective. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Lethal recurrence data for micropapillary patterns (MPs), microinvasion, non-invasive and invasive implants, and intraepithelial carcinoma (IECA). The primary measure of effect was the odds ratio of lethal recurrence reduction. RESULTS Data from patients in 42 studies including 4414 sBOTs and 12 studies including 894 mBOTs were pooled. Of these, 53.3% presented early-stage typical sBOTs, 24.4% presented with MPs, 22.3% presented with microinvasion, 34.4% presented with non-invasive implants, and 7.3% presented with invasive implants. The pooled lethal recurrence rates were, respectively: 18.3, 16.8, 10.7, 16.2, and 33.8%. Patients with MPs were more likely to suffer lethal recurrence when compared with high-stage sBOTs (odds ratio, OR 0.501; P = 0.003), whereas the trend in microinvasive sBOTs did not reach statistical significance. Regarding mBOTs, 61.6% presented with early-stage typical mBOTs, 19.6% presented with microinvasion, 34.8% presented with IECA, and six patients presented with non-invasive implants; none presented with invasive implants. The lethal recurrence rates were, respectively: 3.6, 0, 3.7, and 0%. CONCLUSION Micropapillary patterns (MPs) showed a higher risk for lethal recurrence when compared with high-stage sBOTs. Regarding mBOTs, IECA and microinvasion do not play a role in the lethal recurrence rate. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Micropapillary pattern confirmed as high-risk in BOT. IECA and microinvasion don't play a role in mucinous BOT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Vasconcelos
- Department of Gynaecology, Charité Medical University of Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Darb-Esfahani
- Department of Pathology, Charité Medical University of Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Sehouli
- Department of Gynaecology, Charité Medical University of Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dietel M, Jöhrens K, Laffert MV, Hummel M, Bläker H, Pfitzner BM, Lehmann A, Denkert C, Darb-Esfahani S, Lenze D, Heppner FL, Koch A, Sers C, Klauschen F, Anagnostopoulos I. A 2015 update on predictive molecular pathology and its role in targeted cancer therapy: a review focussing on clinical relevance. Cancer Gene Ther 2015; 22:417-30. [PMID: 26358176 DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2015.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Revised: 07/31/2015] [Accepted: 08/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In April 2013 our group published a review on predictive molecular pathology in this journal. Although only 2 years have passed many new facts and stimulating developments have happened in diagnostic molecular pathology rendering it worthwhile to present an up-date on this topic. A major technical improvement is certainly given by the introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS; amplicon, whole exome, whole genome) and its application to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue in routine diagnostics. Based on this 'revolution' the analyses of numerous genetic alterations in parallel has become a routine approach opening the chance to characterize patients' malignant tumors much more deeply without increasing turn-around time and costs. In the near future this will open new strategies to apply 'off-label' targeted therapies, e.g. for rare tumors, otherwise resistant tumors etc. The clinically relevant genetic aberrations described in this review include mutation analyses of RAS (KRAS and NRAS), BRAF and PI3K in colorectal cancer, KIT or PDGFR alpha as well as BRAF, NRAS and KIT in malignant melanoma. Moreover, we present several recent advances in the molecular characterization of malignant lymphoma. Beside the well-known mutations in NSCLC (EGFR, ALK) a number of chromosomal aberrations (KRAS, ROS1, MET) have become relevant. Only very recently has the clinical need for analysis of BRCA1/2 come up and proven as a true challenge for routine diagnostics because of the genes' special structure and hot-spot-free mutational distribution. The genetic alterations are discussed in connection with their increasingly important role in companion diagnostics to apply targeted drugs as efficient as possible. As another aspect of the increasing number of druggable mutations, we discuss the challenges personalized therapies pose for the design of clinical studies to prove optimal efficacy particularly with respect to combination therapies of multiple targeted drugs and conventional chemotherapy. Such combinations would lead to an extremely high complexity that would hardly be manageable by applying conventional study designs for approval, e.g. by the FDA or EMA. Up-coming challenges such as the application of methylation assays and proteomic analyses on FFPE tissue will also be discussed briefly to open the door towards the ultimate goal of reading a patients' tissue as 'deeply' as possible. Although it is yet to be shown, which levels of biological information are most informative for predictive pathology, an integrated molecular characterization of tumors will likely offer the most comprehensive view for individualized therapy approaches. To optimize cancer treatment we need to understand tumor biology in much more detail on morphological, genetic, proteomic as well as epigenetic grounds. Finally, the complex challenges on the level of drug design, molecular diagnostics, and clinical trials make necessary a close collaboration among academic institutions, regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dietel
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - K Jöhrens
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M V Laffert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Hummel
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - H Bläker
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - B M Pfitzner
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Lehmann
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Darb-Esfahani
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - D Lenze
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - F L Heppner
- Institute of Neuropathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Koch
- Institute of Neuropathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Sers
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - F Klauschen
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - I Anagnostopoulos
- Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Borrelli GM, Abrão MS, Taube ET, Darb-Esfahani S, Köhler C, Kaufmann AM, Chiantera V, Mechsner S. Immunohistochemical Investigation of Metastasis-Related Chemokines in Deep-Infiltrating Endometriosis and Compromised Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Nodes. Reprod Sci 2015; 22:1632-42. [PMID: 26169037 DOI: 10.1177/1933719115592711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Endometriosis is a prevalent benign disease, despite sharing several similarities with malignancies, such as the possibility of lymphatic spread. In malignancies, chemokines play a sovereign role in the process of metastasis. Metastasis-related chemokine axes have not yet been assessed in deep-infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), and this investigation was the aim of our study. The expression of these chemokines was investigated by immunohistochemistry in rectovaginal DIE lesions and in matched pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (PSLNs) of patients with endometriosis (n = 27), and their expression in the eutopic endometrium (EE) of endometriosis-free women (n = 20) was used as controls. Their staining pattern in rectovaginal DIE, in endometriotic lesions affecting the PSLN as well as in the EE of patients without endometriosis was characterized for the first time. Overall, these chemokines were highly expressed in DIE and endometriosis in PSLN. Chemokines might be involved in the spread of endometriosis and should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G M Borrelli
- Clinic for Gynecology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - M S Abrão
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - E T Taube
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Darb-Esfahani
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Köhler
- Clinic for Gynecology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany Department of Gynecology, Asklepios Klinik Harburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A M Kaufmann
- Clinic for Gynecology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - V Chiantera
- Clinic for Gynecology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Mechsner
- Clinic for Gynecology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Darb-Esfahani S, Weichert W, Denkert C, von Minckwitz G, Nekljudova V, Lindner J, Endris V, Khandan F, Loibl S. p53 mutations in HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy – A translational subproject of the GeparSixto trial. Ann Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv117.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
9
|
Lindner JL, Loibl S, Denkert C, Ataseven B, Fasching PA, Pfitzner BM, Gerber B, Gade S, Darb-Esfahani S, Sinn BV, Huober J, Engels K, Tesch H, Karn T, Pommerenke F, Liedtke C, Untch M, Müller V, Rack B, Schem C, von Minckwitz G. Expression of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) in breast cancer and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:95-100. [PMID: 25355716 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) has been suggested as a new biomarker and therapeutic target in breast cancer, as well as other tumor types. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated the frequency of SPARC expression among different molecular breast cancer subtypes and its role for therapy response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this study, pretherapeutic core biopsies of 667 patients from the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial were evaluated for SPARC expression by immunohistochemistry using a standardized immunoreactive score (IRS). RESULTS An increased SPARC expression (IRS ≥6) was observed in 26% of all tumors. In triple-negative tumors, SPARC expression was increased in 37% of tumors, compared with other molecular subtypes (23% HR+/HER2-, 29% HR+/HER2+ and 22% HR-/HER2+; P = 0.038). Increased SPARC expression was associated with an increased pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 27%, compared with 15% in tumors with low SPARC expression (P < 0.001). In the triple-negative subgroup, pCR rates were 47% in tumors with high SPARC expression, compared with 26% in tumors with low SPARC expression (P = 0.032). In multivariable analysis, SPARC was independently predictive in the overall population (P = 0.010) as well as the triple-negative subgroup (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS SPARC is frequently expressed in breast cancer with triple-negative breast cancer revealing the highest expression rate. High SPARC expression of the primary tumor is associated with a higher chance of achieving a pathological complete remission after TAC or TAC-NX chemotherapy. As SPARC is an albumin-binding protein and might mediate intratumoral accumulation of albumin bound drugs, SPARC should be further evaluated as a predictive marker especially for response to albumin-bound drugs like nab-paclitaxel. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER NCT00544765.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Lindner
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg; Department of Oncology, Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin.
| | - B Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology, Kliniken-Essen-Mitte, Essen
| | - P A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - B M Pfitzner
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - B Gerber
- Department of Gynecology, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock
| | - S Gade
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg
| | - S Darb-Esfahani
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - B V Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - J Huober
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm
| | - K Engels
- Department of Pathology, Zentrum für Pathologie, Zytologie und Molekularpathologie, Neuss
| | - H Tesch
- Oncological Center, Bethanien-Hospital, Frankfurt am Main
| | - T Karn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/Main
| | - F Pommerenke
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock
| | - C Liedtke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck
| | - M Untch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
| | - V Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - B Rack
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München
| | - C Schem
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - G von Minckwitz
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/Main
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Taube ET, Denkert C, Pietzner K, Dietel M, Sehouli J, Darb-Esfahani S. Prognostic impact of neuroendocrine differentiation in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2014; 466:333-42. [PMID: 25522951 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1710-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2014] [Revised: 11/29/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2014] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine differentiation in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas has only rarely been described. However, in our consultancy experience, we have been pointed at a case of neuroendocrine relapse in a patient with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma where retrospectively, a minor neuroendocrine component in the primary tumor could be detected. Hypothesizing that immunohistochemical evidence of neuroendocrine differentiation might be more frequent in ovarian carcinoma than suspected by morphology, we immunophenotyped the tissue microarrays (TMAs) of a cohort of 178 high-grade serous carcinomas for chromogranin and synaptophysin expression. Synaptophysin expression was found in 12 (6.7 %) out of 172 patients, and chromogranin A expression was seen in 36 (20.7 %) out of 174 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that carcinomas with synaptophysin expression of >20 % of positive cells (n = 4) had a significantly shorter survival time than those with 0-20 % of positive cells (p < 0.0001). Synaptophysin expression remained a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (HR = 10.82, 95 % confidence interval 3.10-37.71, p < 0.0001), independently of age, FIGO stage, and residual tumor after surgery. A trend toward shorter survival was seen in patients with tumors that expressed chromogranin, irrespective of the amount of positive cells (p = 0.173). A neuroendocrine differentiation is important to keep in mind when a neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary is detected in regional or temporal connection with an ovarian carcinoma. A minor neuroendocrine component in ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas might imply a dismal prognosis.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Cell Differentiation
- Chromogranins/metabolism
- Female
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Humans
- Immunophenotyping
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/diagnosis
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/metabolism
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/pathology
- Neurosecretory Systems/pathology
- Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Prognosis
- Retrospective Studies
- Synaptophysin/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E T Taube
- Institute of Pathology, Charité University Hospital, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ruscito I, Dimitrova D, Vasconcelos I, Gellhaus K, Schwachula T, Bellati F, Zeillinger R, Benedetti-Panici P, Vergote I, Mahner S, Cacsire-Tong D, Concin N, Darb-Esfahani S, Lambrechts S, Sehouli J, Olek S, Braicu EI. BRCA1 gene promoter methylation status in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients--a study of the tumour Bank ovarian cancer (TOC) and ovarian cancer diagnosis consortium (OVCAD). Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:2090-8. [PMID: 24889916 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2014] [Revised: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/05/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mutations in BRCA1/2 genes are involved in the pathogenesis of breast and ovarian cancer. Inactivation of these genes can also be mediated by hypermethylation of CpGs in the promoter regions. Aim of this study was to analyse the clinical impact of BRCA1 promoter gene methylation status in a homogenous cohort of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients. METHODS The cohort included 257 primary HGSOC patients treated by cytoreduction and platinum-based chemotherapy. DNA was extracted from fresh frozen tissue samples. BRCA1 gene promoter methylation rate was assessed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS 14.8% of patients presented hypermethylation within a selected region of the BRCA1 promoter. The rate of hypermethylation was significantly higher in younger patients (20.8% hypermethylation in the age group ⩽ 58 years versus 8.7% hypermethylation in the age group >58 years; p = 0.008). Optimal tumour debulking could be reached in 63% of patients, without significant differences in the extent of residual disease with respect to the methylation status. No impact of BRCA1 gene promoter methylation status on progression free- and overall-survival rates was found. No significant differences within BRCA1 promoter methylation status between primary and metastatic tissue could be observed. These results on BRCA1 promoter methylation status were also confirmed in a subgroup of 107 patients found negative for BRCA1 exon 11 mutations. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that BRCA1 methylation determines the earlier onset of HGSOC. Furthermore our study supports the idea that BRCAness is not only due to mutations but also to epigenetic changes in BRCA1 promoter gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Ruscito
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - D Dimitrova
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - I Vasconcelos
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - K Gellhaus
- Ivana Türbachova Laboratory for Epigenetics, Epiontis GMBH, Berlin, Germany
| | - T Schwachula
- Ivana Türbachova Laboratory for Epigenetics, Epiontis GMBH, Berlin, Germany
| | - F Bellati
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Zeillinger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Oncology Group, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - P Benedetti-Panici
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - I Vergote
- Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Mahner
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - D Cacsire-Tong
- Ivana Türbachova Laboratory for Epigenetics, Epiontis GMBH, Berlin, Germany
| | - N Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - S Darb-Esfahani
- Institute of Pathology, Charite Medical University, Berlin, Campus Mitte, Germany
| | - S Lambrechts
- Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - S Olek
- Ivana Türbachova Laboratory for Epigenetics, Epiontis GMBH, Berlin, Germany
| | - E I Braicu
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sinn BV, von Minckwitz G, Denkert C, Eidtmann H, Darb-Esfahani S, Tesch H, Kronenwett R, Hoffmann G, Belau A, Thommsen C, Holzhausen HJ, Grasshoff ST, Baumann K, Mehta K, Dietel M, Loibl S. Evaluation of Mucin-1 protein and mRNA expression as prognostic and predictive markers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2316-24. [PMID: 23661292 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucin-1 (MUC1) is a promising antigen for the development of tumor vaccines. We evaluated the frequency of MUC1 expression and its impact on therapy response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pre-treatment core biopsies of patients from the GeparTrio neoadjuvant trial (NCT 00544765) were evaluated for MUC1 by immunohistochemistry (IHC; N = 691) and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR; N = 286) from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. RESULTS MUC1 protein and mRNA was detectable in the majority of cases and was associated with hormone-receptor-positive status (P < 0.001). High MUC1 protein and mRNA expression were associated with lower probability of pathologic complete response (P = 0.017 and P < 0.001) and with longer patient survival (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, MUC1 protein and mRNA expression were independently predictive (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001). MUC1 protein and mRNA expression were independently prognostic for overall survival (P = 0.029 and P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS MUC1 is frequently expressed in breast cancer and detectable on mRNA and protein level from FFPE tissue. It provides independent predictive information for therapy response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In clinical immunotherapy trials, MUC1 expression may serve as a predictive marker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B V Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Denkert C, Loibl S, Kronenwett R, Budczies J, von Törne C, Nekljudova V, Darb-Esfahani S, Solbach C, Sinn B, Petry C, Müller B, Hilfrich J, Altmann G, Staebler A, Roth C, Ataseven B, Kirchner T, Dietel M, Untch M, von Minckwitz G. RNA-based determination of ESR1 and HER2 expression and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:632-9. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
14
|
Untch M, Prinzler J, Fasching P, Müller BM, Gade S, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Huober J, Karn T, Liedtke C, Loibl S, Müller V, Rack B, Schem C, Darb-Esfahani S, von Minckwitz G, Denkert C. Abstract P3-06-05: Expression of SPARC in human breast cancer and its predictive value in the GeparTrio neoadjuvant trial. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p3-06-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is an albumin-binding protein and associated with poor prognosis in multiple cancers.
The aim of this analysis was to determine the frequency of SPARC expression among different molecular breast cancer subtypes and to evaluate its predictive value for therapy response after neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane based chemotherapy (CTX) in participants of the GeparTrio trial.
Methods: We evaluated tumoral SPARC expression by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays (TMAs) constructed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) pre-treatment core biopsies from 667 patients (pts) of the GeparTrio trial. The details of the GeparTrio study design are described elsewhere (von Minckwitz, JNCI 2008). Cutoffs for SPARC expression were determined using the web-based software Cutoff Finder (http://molpath.charite.de/cutoff/).
Results: SPARC protein expression was measurable by IHC on the TMAs and 176 (26.4 %) of 667 tumors were SPARC positive. SPARC expression was increased in pts with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) compared to hormone receptor or HER2 positive subtypes (p = 0.039).
SPARC positivity was associated with an increased pCR rate in the overall population (p < 0.001). SPARC negative tumors had a pCR rate of 15%, which increased to 27% in SPARC positive tumors. Similarly, in TNBC the pCR rate increased from 26% in SPARC negative tumors to 47% in SPARC positive tumors (p = 0.032).
In multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for standard clinicopathological factors, SPARC was independently predictive in the overall population (p = 0.010) as well as the subgroups of pts with TNBC (p = 0.036).
Conclusions: SPARC is expressed in all biological breast cancer subtypes with TNBC revealing the highest expression rate. Our data suggest that SPARC expression may provide predictive information for response to neoadjuvant CTX.
As SPARC is an albumin-binding protein and might mediate intratumoral accumulation of nab-Paclitaxel, prospective analysis of SPARC expression is planned in the GeparSepto trial.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Untch
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - J Prinzler
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - P Fasching
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - BM Müller
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - S Gade
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - I Meinhold-Heerlein
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - J Huober
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - T Karn
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - C Liedtke
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - S Loibl
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - V Müller
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - B Rack
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - C Schem
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - S Darb-Esfahani
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - G von Minckwitz
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - C Denkert
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum München; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Woopen H, Sehouli J, Pietzner K, Darb-Esfahani S, Braicu E, Fotopoulou C. Clinical experience of young patients with small cell ovarian carcinoma of the hypercalcemic type (OSCCHT). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 165:313-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2012] [Revised: 06/28/2012] [Accepted: 07/29/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
16
|
Darb-Esfahani S, Kronenwett R, von Minckwitz G, Denkert C, Gehrmann M, Rody A, Budczies J, Brase JC, Mehta MK, Bojar H, Ataseven B, Karn T, Weiss E, Zahm DM, Khandan F, Dietel M, Loibl S. Thymosin beta 15A (TMSB15A) is a predictor of chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:1892-900. [PMID: 23079573 PMCID: PMC3504944 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Biomarkers predictive of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of breast cancer are urgently needed. Methods: Using a training/validation approach for detection of predictive biomarkers in HER2-negative breast cancer, pre-therapeutic core biopsies from four independent cohorts were investigated: Gene array data were analysed in fresh frozen samples of two cohorts (n=86 and n=55). Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT–PCR) was performed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from two neoadjuvant phase III trials (GeparTrio, n=212, and GeparQuattro, n=383). Results: A strong predictive capacity of thymosin beta 15 (TMSB15A) gene expression was evident in both fresh frozen cohorts (P<0.0001; P<0.0042). In the GeparTrio FFPE training cohort, a significant linear correlation between TMSB15A expression and pCR was apparent in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (n=61, P=0.040). A cutoff point was then defined that divided TNBC into a low and a high expression group (pCR rate 16.0% vs 47.2%). Both linear correlation of TMSB15A mRNA levels (P=0.017) and the pre-defined cutoff point were validated in 134 TNBC from GeparQuattro (pCR rate 36.8% vs 17.0%, P=0.020). No significant predictive capacity was observed in luminal carcinomas from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro. Conclusion: In TNBC, TMSB15A gene expression analysis might help to select patients with a high chance for pCR after NACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Darb-Esfahani
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Woopen H, Pietzner K, Darb-Esfahani S, Oskay-Oezcelik G, Sehouli J. Extraperitoneal response to intraperitoneal immunotherapy with catumaxomab in a patient with cutaneous lymphangiosis carcinomatosa from ovarian cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Med Oncol 2012; 29:3416-20. [DOI: 10.1007/s12032-012-0285-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2012] [Accepted: 06/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
18
|
Sinn B, von Minckwitz G, Denkert C, Eidtmann H, Darb-Esfahani S, Belau A, Kronenwett R, Holzhausen H, Mehta K, Loibl S. 8O_PR MUCIN-1 Protein and Mrna Expression in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
19
|
Von Minckwitz G, Darb-Esfahani S, Loibl S, Huober JB, Tesch H, Solbach C, Holms F, Eidtmann H, Diedrich K, Just M, Clemens M, Hanusch C, Schrader I, Henschen S, Hoffmann G, Tiemann K, Diebold K, Untch M, Denkert C. Responsiveness of adjacent ductal carcinoma in situ and changes in HER2 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy/trastuzumab treatment in early breast cancer: Results from the GeparQuattro study (GBG 40). J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.27_suppl.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6 Background: Adjacent ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is in found in approximately 45% of invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) of the breast. Pure DCIS overexpresses HER2 in approximately 45%. There is uncertainty whether adjacent DCIS impacts on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab as well as whether HER2 expression in IDC component or adjacent DCIS changes throughout treatment. Methods: Core biopsies and surgical tissue from participants of the GeparQuattro study with HER2-positive IDC were centrally examined for the area of invasive ductal component and adjacent DCIS before and after receiving neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-trastuzumab containing chemotherapy. HER2 overexpression in IDC and adjacent DCIS was quantified separately by immunohistochemistry using the Ventana automated staining system. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual invasive or non-invasive tumor tissue. Results: Fifty nine (37.3%) of 158 IDCs presented with adjacent DCIS at diagnosis. These tumors showed lower regression grades than pure IDC (p=0.033). Presence of adjacent DCIS was an independent negative predictor of pCR (odds ratio 0.42 [95% CI 0.2-0.9], p=0.027). Adjacent DCIS area decreased from pre-treatment to surgery (r=0.205) with 30 (50.8%) IDCs with adjacent DCIS showing complete eradication of adjacent DCIS. HER2 status of adjacent DCIS was highly correlated with HER2 status of IDC component before (r=0.892) and after treatment (r=0.676). Degree of HER2 overexpression of the IDC component decreased in 16 (33.3%) out of 49 patients without a pCR. These 16 IDCs showed lower RGs compared to the 33 IDCs with unchanged HER2 expression (p=0.055). Conclusions: HER2-positive IDCs with adjacent DCIS is less responsive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab compared to pure IDC. However, complete eradication of adjacent DCIS is frequently observed. HER2-overexpression of the invasive ductal component decreases in a subset of tumors, which showed less tumor regression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. Von Minckwitz
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - S. Darb-Esfahani
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - S. Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - J. B. Huober
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - H. Tesch
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - C. Solbach
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - F. Holms
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - H. Eidtmann
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - K. Diedrich
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - M. Just
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - M. Clemens
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - C. Hanusch
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - I. Schrader
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - S. Henschen
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - G. Hoffmann
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - K. Tiemann
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - K. Diebold
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - M. Untch
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| | - C. Denkert
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Fachpraxis, Frankfurt, Germany; UFK Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Barbaraklinik, Hamm, Germany; University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany; Mutterhaus der Boromaerinnen,
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Denkert C, Kronenwett R, Loibl S, Nekljudova V, Darb-Esfahani S, Gerber B, Sinn B, Petry C, Bauerfeind I, Budczies J, Rezai M, Dietel M, Schrader I, Kunz G, Von Minckwitz G. RNA-based molecular tumor typing and immunological infiltrate as response predictors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Prospective validation in the GeparQuinto-PREDICT substudy. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.10526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
21
|
Loibl S, Bruey J, Von Minckwitz G, Huober JB, Press MF, Darb-Esfahani S, Solbach C, Denkert C, Tesch H, Holms F, Fehm TN, Mehta K, Untch M. Validation of p95 as a predictive marker for trastuzumab-based therapy in primary HER2-positive breast cancer: A translational investigation from the neoadjuvant GeparQuattro study. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
22
|
Ruckhäberle E, Karn T, Denkert C, Loibl S, Ataseven B, Reimer T, Hanker LC, Sänger N, Holtrich U, Kaufmann M, Darb-Esfahani S, Nekljudova V, Von Minckwitz G. Predictive value of sphingosine kinase-1 expression in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
23
|
Noske A, Loibl S, Darb-Esfahani S, Roller M, Kronenwett R, Müller BM, Steffen J, von Toerne C, Wirtz R, Baumann I, Hoffmann G, Heinrich G, Grasshoff ST, Ulmer HU, Denkert C, von Minckwitz G. Comparison of different approaches for assessment of HER2 expression on protein and mRNA level: prediction of chemotherapy response in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial (NCT00544765). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 126:109-17. [PMID: 21190079 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1316-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2010] [Accepted: 12/16/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing is an essential part of pathological assessment in breast cancer patients, as HER2 provides not only prognostic but also predictive information on response to targeted therapy. So far, HER2 test accuracy of immunohistochemistry/in situ-hybridization techniques is still under debate, and more reliable and robust technologies are needed. To address this issue and to evaluate the predictive value of HER2 on chemotherapy, we investigated a cohort of 278 patients from the GeparTrio trial, a prospective neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based multicenter study. In the GeparTrio trial, patients were not treated with any anti-HER2 therapy, as this was not standard therapy at this time. The HER2 status was analyzed by three different approaches: local and central evaluation using immunohistochemistry combined with in situ-hybridization as well as evaluation of HER2 mRNA expression using kinetic RT-PCR from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples using a predefined cutoff. HER2 overexpression/amplification was observed in 37.3% (91/244) and 17.9% (41/229) of the informative samples in the local and central evaluations, respectively. Positive HER2 mRNA levels were found in 19.8% (55/278). We observed a highly significant correlation between central HER2 expression and HER2 status measured by kinetic RT-PCR (r = 0.856, P < 0.0001) and an overall agreement of 95.6% (κ statistic, 0.862, CI 0.77-0.94). Further, central HER2 as well as HER2 mRNA expression were predictors for a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based primary chemotherapy in a univariate binary logistic regression analysis (OR 3.29, P = 0.002; OR 2.65, P = 0.004). The predictive value could be confirmed for the central HER2 status by multivariate analysis (OR 3.04, P = 0.027). The locally assessed HER2 status was not predictive of response to chemotherapy. Our results suggest that standardized methods are preferable for evaluation of HER2 status. The kinetic RT-PCR from FFPE tissue might be an additional approach for assessment of this important prognostic and predictive parameter but has to be confirmed by other studies.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Capecitabine
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics
- Carcinoma, Lobular/metabolism
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage
- Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage
- Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives
- Docetaxel
- Doxorubicin/administration & dosage
- Female
- Fluorouracil/administration & dosage
- Fluorouracil/analogs & derivatives
- Humans
- Immunoenzyme Techniques
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Prognosis
- Prospective Studies
- RNA, Messenger/genetics
- Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
- Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Survival Rate
- Taxoids/administration & dosage
- Vinblastine/administration & dosage
- Vinblastine/analogs & derivatives
- Vinorelbine
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Noske
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gehrmann N, Fotopoulou C, Darb-Esfahani S, Podrabsky P, Lichtenegger W, Sehouli J. „Frau Doktor, ich verwandele mich in meinen Vater!“ – Auswirkungen eines seltenen Eierstocktumors. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2010. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1269977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
25
|
Fotopoulou C, Savvatis K, Braicu EI, Brink-Spalink V, Darb-Esfahani S, Lichtenegger W, Sehouli J. Adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary: tumor dissemination pattern at primary and recurrent situation, surgical outcome. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 119:285-90. [PMID: 20637497 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2010] [Revised: 06/27/2010] [Accepted: 06/29/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Granulosa-cell-tumors of the ovary (GCT) constitute a rare group of neoplasms with malignant potential. Due to the rarity of the disease intraoperative tumor-dissemination-patterns are not well defined and are mostly based on retrospective data. Aim of the present study was to describe surgical and clinical outcome and dissemination pathways in the primary and recurrent situation of the disease. METHODS All primary and relapsed GCT-patients, operated between 01/2001 and 02/2010 in our institution were evaluated using a systematic intraoperative documentation-tool (IMO). Surgical outcome, intraoperative tumor-dissemination-pattern and pathological and findings were separately analyzed for the primary and recurrent situation. RESULTS Overall, 45 patients were analyzed; including eighteen patients with primary and 27 patients with recurrent GCT. Tumor-dissemination-patterns differed significantly between primary and recurrent patients, by the latter having significantly higher rates of diffuse peritoneal involvement (15.8% vs. 52%; p=0.027) and of extraovarian tumor involvement of the middle (15.8% vs. 48.1%; p=0.05) and upper abdomen (0 vs. 33.3%; p=0.006). While all primary patients could be operated tumor-free, this was the case for 85.2% of the relapsed patients (p=0.13). A multivisceral operative approach with extensive peritonectomy, intestinal or diaphragmatic resection, splenectomy and partial hepatectomy/panceratectomy had to be performed only in recurrent GCT (55.6%). CONCLUSIONS Tumor-dissemination-pathways followed in primary and recurrent GCT differ significantly by higher rates of multivisceral tumor involvement in the recurrent situation of the disease. While at primary presentation extrapelvic involvement with peritoneal carcinosis appears only rare, surgical cytoreduction during relapse is more challenging involving a multivisceral approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Centre for Ovarian Cancer, Charité-University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Darb-Esfahani S, Kronenwett R, Von Minckwitz G, Kuemmel S, Budczies J, Rody A, Gehrmann M, Denkert C, Du Bois A, Loibl S. Identification of thymosin beta 15 A (TMSB15A) mRNA expression as a predictor for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.10514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
27
|
von Minckwitz G, Budczies J, Loibl S, Darb-Esfahani S, Kaufmann M, Huober J, Engels K, Denkert C. Validated 3 Gene Signature Predicts Response to Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer – Results from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro. Cancer Res 2009. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-09-2132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:Luminal breast cancers (LBC), defined as positive for estrogen receptor (ER) and negative for HER2, are of variable prognosis. We hypothesize that those showing potential sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are those with an unfavorable prognosis unless they achieve a pathological complete response (pCR = no invasive residual in breast and nodes). We therefore aimed to develop a Neoadjuvant Luminal Response Score (NLRS), identifying luminal tumors with a high chance for a pCR.Patients and methods:We examined mRNA expression of 57 candidate genes and 3 normalization genes by kinetic RT-PCR in FFPE tissues from pre-therapeutic core biopsies from 380 patients with LBC and cT2-T4 disease either receiving NACT with 6x docetaxel/ doxorubicin/ cyclophosphamide in GeparTrio (n=148, training cohort) or epirubicin/ cyclophosphamide followed by Docetaxel (+simultaneous or sequential capecitabine) in GeparQuattro (n=232, validation cohort). Samples were classified as LBC by mRNA expression analysis of ESR1 and Her2 using pre-defined cut-off values. The continuous NLRS was generated by linear combination of expression values of 3 out of 57 genes.The first pre-specified primary objective of training part was to demonstrate that the percentage of patients with LBC with a pCR is higher in NLRS+ tumors than in all LBC. The second pre-specified primary objective for validation part was to demonstrate that the NLRS score is able to identify the pCR cases in the LBC with a sensitivity of ≥80% (upper confidence interval [CI] limit) and a positive predictive value (PPV) of ≥20%.Results:In the GeparTrio training cohort, the NLRS was predictive of pCR by logistic regression analysis (AUC=0.88). Using a cutoff defined on the basis of the ROC curve, the NLRS was able to predict pCR with a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 77%. While the pCR rate in all LBC was only 8.2%, this rate increased to 24% in the group of 57 patients with a NLRS above the cutoff. The pCR rate in 91 patients with a NLRS below the cutoff was 1.1%.When patients of all 3 treatment arms of the GeparQuattro validation cohort were analyzed together, AUC was 0.69 (p=0.004). Using the pre-defined cutoff, sensitivity was 52% (95% CI: 33-71%), specificity 74% (69-79%) and PPV 16%. However, if only patients treated without capecitabine containing NACT (to be more comparable to GeparTrio) (N=68) were included, AUC was 0.72 and sensitivity increased to 63 (23-89)% and PPV to 21%, passing the pre-defined limits for positive validation.Conclusion:Our study provides proof-of-principle that it is possible to develop and validate predictive signatures for response to NACT based on pretherapeutic FFPE biopsies. The 3-gene NLRS is a first validated gene signature selecting LBC with a high chance for pCR to NACT. The results are a basis for further development of predictive signatures. A prospective evaluation will be performed in the PREDICT study, a substudy to GeparQuinto.Supported by a BMBF grant.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 2132.
Collapse
|
28
|
Loibl S, Müller B, Roller M, Kronenwett R, Darb-Esfahani S, Komor M, von Toerne C, Wirtz R, von Minckwitz G, Denkert C. Local versus central HER2 immunohistochemistry correlates with kinetic RT-PCR but only central immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR predict pathological complete response: results from the neoadjuvant multicenter GeparTrio trial. Cancer Res 2009. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-1070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract #1070
Background: There are several methods for determination of HER2 overexpression. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been set up as the gold standard in routine diagnostics to identify patients eligible for anti-HER2 therapy. Nonetheless, there is still controversy about the predictive value of HER2 overexpression and pathological response to neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy.
 Methods: In this study, we investigated the HER2 expression levels in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pre-treatment punch biopsies by kinetic one-step RT-PCR (kRT-PCR); local IHC performed at the pathological institutes of the participating centers; and centrally performed IHC in 150 patients from the neoadjuvant GeparTrio study (NCT00544765), where patients were treated with docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) but received no trastuzumab therapy regardless of the individual HER2 status. HER2 was considered positive for IHC if expression was 3+ and for mRNA expression if normalized level was >/= 18.0 arbitrary units (as defined by bimodal expression for this cohort). We evaluated the associations by Spearman's rho correlation between the different methods as well as the best method that might predict a pathological complete response to this neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
 Results: A randomly selected subset out of 150 of 2,090 patients was included in this analysis. This is a representative collective of TAC-treated patients from the GeparTrio trial with a pCR rate (ypT0; ypTis/ypN0) of 23%. The different methods revealed a HER2 positivity of 31% for the local analyses, 16% for the central HER2 testing and 20% positivity for kRT-PCR analyses for this study collective, compared to 28% for the entire trial population. Local determination of HER2 showed a correlation with central laboratory (RS=.418, P<.001, N=106) and kRT-PCR results (RS=.428, P<.001, N=120), and centrally assessed HER2 expression correlated with the results of kRT-PCR (RS=.923, P<.001, N=115). Binary logistic regression with the locally determined HER2 expression revealed no significant results in prediction of a pathological complete response (P=.802, N=121), whereas the results from central IHC (P=.038, OR 2.84, N=119) as well as the results from kRT-PCR (P=.047, OR 2.47, N=134) were significant.
 Conclusions: The value of HER2 expression and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still controversial. Our results on this subset of patients show that kRT-PCR of HER2 mRNA expression and centrally performed IHC but not local HER2 assessment predicts pCR for neoadjuvant TAC chemotherapy. Theses results need further confirmation on a larger group of patients.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 1070.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- 1 GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - B Müller
- 2 Department of Pathology, Charite University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Roller
- 1 GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - R Kronenwett
- 3 Molecular Research Germany, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Darb-Esfahani
- 2 Department of Pathology, Charite University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Komor
- 1 GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - C von Toerne
- 3 Molecular Research Germany, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Cologne, Germany
| | - R Wirtz
- 3 Molecular Research Germany, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Cologne, Germany
| | - G von Minckwitz
- 1 GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
- 4 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - C Denkert
- 2 Department of Pathology, Charite University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zamagni C, Wirtz RM, Sinn B, De Iaco P, Darb-Esfahani S, Rosati M, Dietel M, Massari F, Martoni AA, Denkert C. Estrogen receptor 1 mRNA expression as a strong prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with chemotherapy in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.16547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|