1
|
Chi KN, Sandhu S, Smith MR, Attard G, Saad M, Olmos D, Castro E, Roubaud G, Pereira de Santana Gomes AJ, Small EJ, Rathkopf DE, Gurney H, Jung W, Mason GE, Dibaj S, Wu D, Diorio B, Urtishak K, Del Corral A, Francis P, Kim W, Efstathiou E. Niraparib plus abiraterone acetate with prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and homologous recombination repair gene alterations: second interim analysis of the randomized phase III MAGNITUDE trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:772-782. [PMID: 37399894 PMCID: PMC10849465 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and BRCA alterations have poor outcomes. MAGNITUDE found patients with homologous recombination repair gene alterations (HRR+), particularly BRCA1/2, benefit from first-line therapy with niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP). Here we report longer follow-up from the second prespecified interim analysis (IA2). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with mCRPC were prospectively identified as HRR+ with/without BRCA1/2 alterations and randomized 1 : 1 to niraparib (200 mg orally) plus AAP (1000 mg/10 mg orally) or placebo plus AAP. At IA2, secondary endpoints [time to symptomatic progression, time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy, overall survival (OS)] were assessed. RESULTS Overall, 212 HRR+ patients received niraparib plus AAP (BRCA1/2 subgroup, n = 113). At IA2 with 24.8 months of median follow-up in the BRCA1/2 subgroup, niraparib plus AAP significantly prolonged radiographic progression-free survival {rPFS; blinded independent central review; median rPFS 19.5 versus 10.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.78]; nominal P = 0.0007} consistent with the first prespecified interim analysis. rPFS was also prolonged in the total HRR+ population [HR = 0.76 (95% CI 0.60-0.97); nominal P = 0.0280; median follow-up 26.8 months]. Improvements in time to symptomatic progression and time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy were observed with niraparib plus AAP. In the BRCA1/2 subgroup, the analysis of OS with niraparib plus AAP demonstrated an HR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.58-1.34; nominal P = 0.5505); the prespecified inverse probability censoring weighting analysis of OS, accounting for imbalances in subsequent use of poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors and other life-prolonging therapies, demonstrated an HR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.33-0.90; nominal P = 0.0181). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS MAGNITUDE, enrolling the largest BRCA1/2 cohort in first-line mCRPC to date, demonstrated improved rPFS and other clinically relevant outcomes with niraparib plus AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC, emphasizing the importance of identifying this molecular subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K N Chi
- University of British Columbia, BC Cancer-Vancouver Center, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - S Sandhu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M R Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - G Attard
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - M Saad
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - D Olmos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid
| | - E Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - E J Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - D E Rathkopf
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - H Gurney
- Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - W Jung
- Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
| | - G E Mason
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House
| | - S Dibaj
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego
| | - D Wu
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Los Angeles
| | - B Diorio
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville
| | - K Urtishak
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House
| | | | - P Francis
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Bridgewater
| | - W Kim
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Los Angeles
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stecklein SR, Babiera GV, Bedrosian I, Shaitelman SF, Ballo MT, Tereffe W, Arzu IY, Perkins GH, Strom EA, Reed VK, Dvorak T, Smith BD, Woodward WA, Hoffman KE, Schlembach PJ, Chronowski GM, Shah SJ, Kirsner SM, Nelson CL, Guerra W, Dibaj SS, Bloom ES. Abstract P2-11-12: Prospective comparison of late toxicity and cosmetic outcome after accelerated partial breast irradiation with conformal external beam radiotherapy or single-entry multi-lumen intracavitary brachytherapy. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p2-11-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s):
To prospectively compare late toxicity after accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with 3D-conformal external beam radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or single-entry multi-lumen intracavitary brachytherapy.
Patients/Methods:
Two hundred eighty-one patients with pTis or pT2N0 (≤3.0 cm) breast cancer treated with segmental mastectomy were prospectively enrolled on a multi-institution observational protocol from 12/2008 – 8/2014. Patients were enrolled and treated at primary, satellite, and affiliated academic institutions. APBI was delivered using 3D-CRT or with a Contura®, MammoSite®, or SAVI® brachytherapy catheter. 3D-CRT patients were treated to 34.0 Gy (7%) or 38.5 Gy (93%) at 3.4-3.85 Gy/fx BID and brachytherapy patients were treated to 34.0 Gy at 3.4 Gy/fx BID. Per protocol, patients were clinically evaluated at 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and then annually. At each clinical evaluation the radiation oncologist scored cosmetic outcome (excellent/good/fair/poor according to the Harvard Cosmesis Scale), toxicity (seroma/infection/fat necrosis/pain/telangiectasia/radiation dermatitis/hyperpigmentation/hypopigmentation/fibrosis/induration/edema/other according to CTCAE v3.0) and recurrence status.
Results:
The median age was 61 years. Of 281 patients, 211 (75%) had invasive breast cancer and 70 (25%) had in situ disease. Among patients with invasive disease, 90% were HR+/HER2-, and among patients with in situ disease, 83% were HR+. APBI was delivered with 3D-CRT in 29 (10%) patients and with single-entry multi-lumen intracavitary brachytherapy in 252 (90%) patients. Among the brachytherapy patients, APBI was delivered with the SAVI®, Contura®, and MammoSite® devices in 176 (70%), 56 (22%), and 20 (8%) patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 49 months, rates of Grade 1 (G1) and Grade 2-3 (G2-3) toxicity are:
3D-CRTBrachytherapy G1G2-3G1G2-3G1G2-3 N (%)N (%)N (%)N (%) Fibrosis13 (46%)1 (4%)176 (72%)6 (2%)p=0.008p=0.54Fat Necrosis0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)4 (2%)p=1.00p=1.00Telangiectasia6 (21%)1 (4%)44 (18%)5 (2%)p=0.61p=0.48Seroma2 (7%)1 (4%)135 (55%)12 (5%)p<0.0001p=1.00
Mean skin dose of the maximally-irradiated 0.1 cc (D0.1cc) of skin was significantly higher in patients who developed telangiectasia (103.4% ± 16.1% compared to 96.5% ± 18.6% of prescription dose, p=0.007) and fibrosis (100.1% ± 15.5% compared to 92.8% ± 23.0% of prescription dose, p=0.02). Crude rates of fair or poor cosmetic outcome at 2-4 and 4-6 years were 6.9% and 14.8%, respectively, for 3D-CRT and 14.8% and 21.3%, respectively, for brachytherapy (p>0.05 at both timepoints). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 96.3% with 3D-CRT and 96.1% for brachytherapy (p>0.05).
Conclusion:
APBI with single-entry multi-lumen intracavitary brachytherapy is associated with increased rates of grade 1 fibrosis and seroma than APBI with 3D-CRT. Higher mean skin D0.1cc is associated with increased risk of telangiectasia and fibrosis. Despite increased low-grade fibrosis, there is no significant difference in radiation oncologist-reported fair or poor cosmetic outcome out to six years, or rate of five-year ipsilateral breast recurrence.
Citation Format: Stecklein SR, Babiera GV, Bedrosian I, Shaitelman SF, Ballo MT, Tereffe W, Arzu IY, Perkins GH, Strom EA, Reed VK, Dvorak T, Smith BD, Woodward WA, Hoffman KE, Schlembach PJ, Chronowski GM, Shah SJ, Kirsner SM, Nelson CL, Guerra W, Dibaj SS, Bloom ES. Prospective comparison of late toxicity and cosmetic outcome after accelerated partial breast irradiation with conformal external beam radiotherapy or single-entry multi-lumen intracavitary brachytherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SR Stecklein
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - GV Babiera
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - I Bedrosian
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - SF Shaitelman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - MT Ballo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - W Tereffe
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - IY Arzu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - GH Perkins
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - EA Strom
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - VK Reed
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - T Dvorak
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - BD Smith
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - WA Woodward
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - KE Hoffman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - PJ Schlembach
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - GM Chronowski
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - SJ Shah
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - SM Kirsner
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - CL Nelson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - W Guerra
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - SS Dibaj
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - ES Bloom
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; UFHealth Cancer Center / Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| |
Collapse
|