Associations of diabetes, hypertension and obesity with COVID-19 mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Despite a growing body of scholarly research on the risks of severe COVID-19 associated with diabetes, hypertension and obesity, there is a need for estimating pooled risk estimates with adjustment for confounding effects. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled adjusted risk ratios of diabetes, hypertension and obesity on COVID-19 mortality.

METHODS

We searched 16 literature databases for original studies published between 1 December 2019 and 31 December 2020. We used the adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the risk of bias. Pooled risk ratios were estimated based on the adjusted effect sizes. We applied random-effects meta-analysis to account for the uncertainty in residual heterogeneity. We used contour-funnel plots and Egger's test to assess possible publication bias.

RESULTS

We reviewed 34 830 records identified in literature search, of which 145 original studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled adjusted risk ratios were 1.43 (95% CI 1.32 to 1.54), 1.19 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.30) and 1.39 (95% CI 1.27 to 1.52) for diabetes, hypertension and obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) on COVID-19 mortality, respectively. The pooled adjusted risk ratios appeared to be stronger in studies conducted before April 2020, Western Pacific Region, low- and middle-income countries, and countries with low Global Health Security Index scores, when compared with their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes, hypertension and obesity were associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 mortality independent of other known risk factors, particularly in low-resource settings. Addressing these chronic diseases could be important for global pandemic preparedness and mortality prevention.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021204371.

Mapping an EPA-based comprehensive curricular proposal for UME

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. In medical education, there have been three important reforms: science-based curriculum, problem-based learning, and competency-based education. Currently, the concept of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) goes a step beyond competencies. The aim of this paper is twofold: first, to present a proposal for an EPA-based curriculum for undergraduate medical education, and second, to describe its curricular framework, educational model and organization. This curricular proposal integrates EPA-based education with the foundations of the interpretive epistemology, the constructivist paradigm and the health care transformations. Using Actividades Profesionales Confiables (APROC) as a curricular guideline helps the educators define knowledge, skills, and attitudes; teachers can plan activities that link theory to practice; evaluators can assess the student's performance and provide him with feedback, and Faculty leaders and collaborators can implement projects to improve educational quality. The curriculum proposal includes a flexible modular system, the integration of biomedical, socio-medical and clinical sciences, and a close link between theory and practice. This curriculum puts medical education at the forefront, it favors the comprehensive education of future physicians, and it constitutes a true educational revolution.

Importance of context in entrustable professional activities on surgical undergraduate medical education

This article was migrated. The article was not marked as recommended. Objective: The aim of this study was to emphasize the importance of integrating the context to the construction of the specific Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) for Undergraduate Medical Education (UME). Design: Mixed study with three phases: 1) Exploratory, we searched context with focus groups technique. 2) Construction, we analyzed academic program of our faculty and the national epidemiology. Therefore, we selected the contents and generated each EPA with its milestones and competence levels. 3) Implementation, we conformed a formative assessment tool which was tested at surgery rotation. Setting: We worked with 10 public and private health institutions of secondary and tertiary health care levels which were used as clinical settings for surgery rotation of fifth year medicine course at the Faculty of Medicine of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City. Participants: In exploratory focus groups, were involved 10 surgeons and 12 medical students. At implementation 64 students participated and 25 gave feedback. All participants were involved voluntary for this study. Results: We constructed eleven surgery specific EPAs for UME, within specific context of the clinical environment of our faculty. Conclusions: We propose these EPAs because they reflected the most important topics or diseases in our country and as educative developers we support the idea that our graduates should be able to attend the population needs of health.