Abstract P4-07-06: Implementation of A Bone Modifying Agent Pathway at UChicago Medicine for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Background: In 2019, a quality improvement (QI) research project was conducted at UChicago Medicine (UCM) to evaluate bone modifying agent (BMA) use for skeletal-related event (SRE) prevention in patients with metastatic breast cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Denosumab was the preferred BMA agent at UCM in this setting. Compared to zoledronic acid (ZA), denosumab was associated with higher drug cost and lower adherence rate mainly due to the difficulty of maintaining the 4-weekly frequency. Studies have shown that ZA can be de-escalated from 4-weekly to 12-weekly for SRE prevention. There is still no convincing evidence to show that this de-escalated schedule can be applied to denosumab. One study evaluated the noninferiority of 12-weekly compared with 4-weekly denosumab suggested that the health-related quality of life was non-inferior (Clemons et al., 2021). However, the study was not powered to evaluate the statistical difference in SRE rates. Based on the results of the 2019 QI project, a BMA pathway was generated at UCM in September 2020 with the purpose of guiding physician prescribing patterns, improving adherence rate, and reducing drug costs. This pathway recommended using ZA as the preferred agent for SRE prevention instead of denosumab. Methods: This was a retrospective study that included 198 patients who had metastatic breast cancer and received at least one dose of ZA or denosumab from UCM outpatient oncology clinic for SRE prevention. All included patients must have bone metastases. 107 patients from the pre-implementation study period (July 1st, 2018 to June 30th, 2019) and 91 patients from the post-implementation study period (November 10th, 2020 to November 10th, 2021) were included. Patients were divided into four groups based on study time (pre- or post-implementation period) and BMA agent (ZA and denosumab). The primary outcome was BMA therapy adherence rate, which was defined by those who received greater than or equal to 80% of appropriately scheduled doses. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients on ZA or denosumab, SREs, BMA-associated adverse effects, and BMA cost. Descriptive statistics were used SREs and BMA-associated adverse effects. Results: The percentage of patients on ZA significantly increased from 12% to 64% after BMA pathway implementation (P< 0.0001). Denosumab use decreased from 88% to 36% (P< 0.0001). The overall BMA adherence rate including both ZA and denosumab patients during the post-implementation period was 68%, which was not significantly different compared to the overall adherence rate of 74% during the pre-implementation period (P=0.5461). The adherence rates in denosumab groups (63% in pre and 30% in post) were lower than in ZA groups (100% in pre and 90% in post). The most common reason for the lower adherence rates in denosumab groups was scheduling convenience. During the study period, there were 2, 0, 3, and 3 patients who had SREs in the above four groups respectively. The predominant adverse events among all groups were hypocalcemia and hypophosphatemia. The cost analysis showed using ZA as the primary BMA agent saved 1.1 million dollars of drug costs during the post-implementation study period at UCM. Conclusion: Implementing a BMA pathway encouraged the providers to choose ZA as the preferred agent for SRE prevention in metastatic breast cancer patients with bone metastasis, which dramatically reduced drug costs. The overall BMA adherence rate was not significantly improved with the implementation. The difficulty of maintaining a 4-weekly denosumab frequency continued to exist.

Citation Format: Kun Lin, Jordan Baur, Sandeep Parsad, Heng Yang. Implementation of A Bone Modifying Agent Pathway at UChicago Medicine for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-06.

Impact of electronic interventions on guideline concordant ordering of rituximab infusion rate

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab carries a boxed warning for severe or fatal infusion reactions; most occurring with the initial infusion. Prior studies established that if the initial rituximab infusion is tolerated, subsequent infusions can be given safely over 90 min. The University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) did not have a standardized method to document infusion reactions for outpatient chemotherapy patients, making it challenging for providers to know a patients' eligibility for rapid infusion. This quality improvement project focused on a series of interventions to improve documentation and electronic ordering of rituximab.

METHODS

A flowsheet for nurses to record patients' tolerance of chemotherapy infusions was created within the electronic health record (EHR). Following results of flowsheet impact, a second intervention was implemented to modify ordering of rituximab. The primary endpoint was the incidence of guideline concordant rate ordering of rituximab. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of accurate chair time scheduling pre- and post-interventions and nursing compliance with flowsheet documentation.

RESULTS

Prior to flowsheet implementation, 85% of patients were infused at the guideline concordant rate, compared to 79% post-implementation. Prior to modification of rituximab ordering in the EHR, 85% of patients were infused at the guideline concordant rate, compared to 87% after implementation. Complete nursing documentation was done 89% of the time when the flowsheet was utilized, compared to 11% pre-interventions.

CONCLUSION

No difference in primary or secondary endpoints was found following our interventions. However, the infusion documentation flowsheet, when used, provided more complete reaction data compared to when it was not used.

Implementation of pharmacogenomic testing in oncology care (PhOCus): study protocol of a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Many cancer patients who receive chemotherapy experience adverse drug effects. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) has promise to personalize chemotherapy drug dosing to maximize efficacy and safety. Fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan have well-known germline PGx associations. At our institution, we have delivered PGx clinical decision support (CDS) based on preemptively obtained genotyping results for a large number of non-oncology medications since 2012, but have not previously evaluated the utility of this strategy for patients initiating anti-cancer regimens. We hypothesize that providing oncologists with preemptive germline PGx information along with CDS will enable individualized dosing decisions and result in improved patient outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with oncologic malignancies for whom fluoropyrimidine and/or irinotecan-inclusive therapy is being planned will be enrolled and randomly assigned to PGx and control arms. Patients will be genotyped in a clinical laboratory across panels that include actionable variants in UGT1A1 and DPYD. For PGx arm patients, treating providers will be given access to the patient-specific PGx results with CDS prior to treatment initiation. In the control arm, genotyping will be deferred, and dosing will occur as per usual care. Co-primary endpoints are dose intensity deviation rate (the proportion of patients receiving dose modifications during the first treatment cycle), and grade ⩾3 treatment-related toxicities throughout the treatment course. Additional study endpoints will include cumulative drug dose intensity, progression-free survival, dosing of additional PGx supportive medications, and patient-reported quality of life and understanding of PGx.

DISCUSSION

Providing a platform of integrated germline PGx information may promote personalized chemotherapy dosing decisions and establish a new model of care to optimize oncology treatment planning.

Changes in Intravenous Immunoglobulin Usage for Hypogammaglobulinemia After Implementation of a Stewardship Program

PURPOSE

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is used to replenish immunoglobulins in hypogammaglobulinemia (HG) caused by hematologic malignancies (HM) or their treatment (autologous stem-cell transplantation [ASCT] and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy [CAR-T]), in an effort to reduce the risk of infections. However, there is limited evidence to support this use, and IVIG supplies are limited and shortages are common.

METHODS

An IVIG stewardship program (ISP) was implemented with the following requirements for IVIG administration: immunoglobulin G (IgG) level < 400 mg/dL (corrected for paraprotein) for post-ASCT and post-CAR-T patients, or IgG < 400 mg/dL with a history of a bacterial infection within the preceding 3 months for those with HM. Comparisons of the amount of IVIG administered, the incidence of infections, and the use of antimicrobials were performed between the 3 months before ISP and the 3 months after ISP.

RESULTS

IVIG administered for HG decreased from 4,902 g in 86 patients before ISP to 1,777 g in 55 patients after ISP, a cost savings of $44,700. Adherence to ISP guidelines was 80%. Compared with before ISP, patients who stopped receiving IVIG after ISP had lower nadir IgG, fewer infections/patient-months, less antimicrobial usage, and a lower hospitalization rate for infection; no deaths occurred. Compared with before ISP, patients receiving IVIG after ISP had lower predose IgG and fewer infections/patient-months; the antibiotic usage, hospitalization rate for infection, and deaths from infection remained stable.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first ISP to lead to a dramatic decrease in IVIG usage with high adherence, primarily by selecting out patients at low risk of infection after IVIG discontinuation. Such an ISP is replicable and warrants adoption.

HIPEC with cisplatin in a patient with a prior hypersensitivity reaction to systemic oxaliplatin

Platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents are commonly used in the treatment of several cancers. While effective, they are often discontinued due to toxicities and hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) that occur more frequently with repeated exposure. Following discontinuation of one agent, therapy may be continued with a second platinum salt, though the cross-reactivity between agents in this class is not well understood. This is particularly true for alternative routes of administration such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). In this case report, we describe the use of cisplatin during HIPEC in a patient who previously experienced an HSR to systemic oxaliplatin. The patient tolerated HIPEC including 200 mg cisplatin for 1 hour without any adverse effects and did not require a desensitization protocol prior to therapy. This case suggests that HIPEC with platinum-based agents can be performed in patients with prior HSRs to systemic therapy, though further studies are needed to understand safety parameters, the cross-reactivity between agents and the necessity of skin testing or desensitization protocols.

Evaluation of prescribing practices of denosumab and zoledronic acid in breast and prostate cancer patients at University of Chicago Medicine

e24144

Background: Zoledronic acid (ZA) and denosumab are both bone-modifying agents (BMAs) approved for use in patients with bone metastases with breast or prostate cancer as well as patients who are receiving aromatase inhibitors (breast cancer) or androgen deprivation therapy (prostate cancer). There are various frequencies of administration, doses, and duration of these agents depending on indication and extent of disease. Currently there is data to show that ZA can be given every 3 months in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer, however, there is no data that clearly indicates that denosumab every 3 months is non-inferior to every 28 days. This study aimed to analyze current prescribing patterns of ZA and denosumab in metastatic breast cancer and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients at The University of Chicago Medicine (UCM). Methods: This was a retrospective study of 80 patients who received at least one dose of ZA or denosumab between July 1st 2018 to June 30th 2019 from UCM outpatient oncology clinic for the purpose of treating metastatic breast cancer or metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer in conjunction with standard antineoplastic therapy. All included patients must have bone metastases. Patients were divided into four groups by disease state (breast or prostate cancer) and BMA agent (ZA or denosumab). The primary outcome was BMA therapy adherence rate, which was defined by those who received greater than or equal to 80% of appropriately scheduled doses. Descriptive statistics were used for skeletal-related events (SREs) and BMA associated adverse effects. Results: Patients who received ZA achieved higher adherence rates (100% breast, 86% prostate) compared to patients that received denosumab (63% breast, 23% prostate). The most common reason for the lower adherence rate in denosumab groups was scheduling convenience. During the study period, there were 3, 0, 2 and 5 patients had SREs in the above four groups respectively. The predominant adverse event across all groups was hypocalcemia and two patients with prostate cancer on denosumab developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. The cost analysis showed using ZA as primary BMA agent might save up to 2.5 million dollars per year at UCM. Conclusions: The use ofZA was associated with higher adherence rates compared to denosumab. Implementing a pharmacy driven protocol for ZA use for patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer may improve BMA regimen adherence rates and significantly reduce costs.

Changes in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) usage for hypogammaglobulinemia (HG) after implementation of a stewardship program

e19225

Background: IVIG is used to replenish immunoglobulins in HG due to hematologic malignancies (HM) or their treatment (stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T)), in an effort to reduce the risk of infections. There is limited high-level evidence to support this use, and IVIG supplies are limited with a recent shortage leading to restricted allotments. We report the results of a stewardship program designed to safely reduce IVIG usage. Methods: An IVIG stewardship plan (ISP) was implemented with the following requirements for IVIG administration: IgG level < 400 mg/dL (corrected for paraprotein) for post-ASCT and post-CAR-T patients, or IgG < 400 mg/dL with evidence of a bacterial infection within the last 3 months that required hospitalization or an emergency department encounter for those with HM. We evaluated the amount of IVIG administered, the incidence of infections, and antibiotic administration before and after implementation of an ISP. Results: In the 3 months pre-ISP, HG accounted for 38% (72/188) of total IVIG orders. 86 pts received IVIG for HG in the 3 months pre-ISP. The amount of IVIG given decreased from 1907 g/month pre-ISP to 670 g/month post-ISP; estimated cost savings in IVIG was $57,561/month. The pre-ISP median IgG level prior to dosing of IVIG was 550 (range 40-1189) mg/dL. Compared to pre-ISP, pts who stopped receiving IVIG post-ISP had lower median pre-dose IgG (444, range 93-819 mg/dL, p<0.05), infections/patient-months (14/141 vs 56/255, p<0.001), antibiotic usage (12/47 vs 44/86, p<0.05), and hospitalization rate for infection (4/55 vs 21/86, p<0.05); no deaths occurred. For those receiving IVIG post-ISP, adherence to guidelines was 64%. Compared to pre-ISP, median pre-dose IgG was lower (328, range 51-1011 mg/dL, p<0001), infections/patient-months decreased (27/163 vs 56/255, p<0.001), and antibiotic usage, hospitalization rate for infection, and deaths from infection all remained stable. Conclusions: An ISP for HG led to a dramatic and sustainable decrease in IVIG usage, primarily by selecting out patients who are low risk for infection after discontinuation of IVIG. Such an ISP is replicable and warrants adoption.

Impact of an oncology clinical pharmacist specialist in an outpatient multiple myeloma clinic

e14030

Background: Improvements in cancer treatment, supportive care, and the approval of oral chemotherapy medications over the past decade have resulted in an increasing number of cancer patients treated in outpatient settings. Transitioning cancer treatments to the outpatient setting places greater emphasis on proper medication counseling and optimal side effect management. Current literature demonstrates improvements in medication adherence and effective cancer related symptom management with the addition of an oncology pharmacist. Historically, the University of Chicago Medical Center (UCMC) has not employed pharmacists into their ambulatory oncology clinics. UCMC is evaluating pharmacist’s roles in these clinics. Methods: The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the clinical and financial impacts of an oncology clinical pharmacist specialist in an interdisciplinary multiple myeloma (MM) clinic. This will be evaluated by monitoring the interventions made by the pharmacist in clinic through a validated scoring tool. This tool associates a value for each type of intervention made based on current literature and internal evaluations at UCMC. The oncology clinical pharmacist specialist will be available for consult by the MM clinic staff. The pharmacist may be consulted for any medication related inquiry. Based on the consult the pharmacist will categorize their interventions into twelve predefined intervention categories. Results: Study results showed the implementation of a clinical pharmacist specialist into the MM clinic over 39 clinic days resulted in 241 patient consults and 474 interventions made by the pharmacist. The most frequent interventions made by the pharmacist were medication teaching (97), dose adjustments by pharmacist (82) and medication reconciliation (63). Based on the dollar values associated with each intervention type, the value of interventions made by the pharmacist during the study period was $189,441 with a predicted annual value of $757,764. Conclusions: An clinical pharmacist specialist in the MM clinic lead to dramatic and sustainable financial and clinical impacts. Further investigation into other oncology clinics is warranted.

Factors influencing infusion-related reactions following dosing of reference rituximab (RTX) and PF-05280586, a RTX biosimilar

e20049

Background: Rituximab (RTX) is an effective therapy for some patients with CD20 positive (CD20+), B-cell malignancies. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are the most common adverse event (AE) associated with infusion of RTX. The objective of this analysis was to assess if IRRs were correlated with infusion rates of the first dose of the RTX biosimilar PF-05280586 (RTX-PF) or reference RTX sourced from the EU (RTX-EU). Methods: This analysis incorporates data from a randomized, double-blind comparative trial of 394 patients (RTX-PF, n = 196; RTX-EU, n = 198) with low tumor burden follicular lymphoma. RTX was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 (one cycle), with a follow-up period through 52 weeks. Logistic regression analysis was performed with infusion rate and treatment or maximum serum concentration (Cmax) as independent variables. Treatment or Cmax was excluded from the model if not significant. Descriptive statistics of baseline CD20+ B-cell level, baseline anti-drug antibody (ADA) status and baseline tumor burden (Ann Arbor stage and bone marrow biopsy lymphoma results) were summarized by occurrence of IRR (yes/no). Results: The median RTX infusion duration on day 1 was 3.50 h for each of the two treatments. There was a significant positive correlation between infusion rate and all-grade IRR AEs occurring within 24 h after infusion (p < 0.0001). The estimated probability of developing an IRR was 0.16 and 0.29 at infusion rates of 189 mg/h and 227 mg/h, respectively. The estimated odds ratio with an increase in rate of 100 mg/h was 7.7. Treatment (RTX-PF or RTX-EU) was not a significant covariate and was excluded from the model. There was a non-significant trend between Cmax of RTX and developing an IRR; the estimated probability of developing an IRR was 0.26 at the median Cmax (196.5 μg/mL) of RTX. Patients who developed IRRs had a higher median baseline CD20+ B-cell level. The trough plasma concentration (Ctrough), collected before the second dose, and baseline tumor burden did not correlate with increased IRR incidence. Baseline ADA status did not predict IRR outcome. Conclusions: The results of this analysis suggest that higher infusion rates of RTX, administered as RTX-PF or RTX-EU, are positively correlated with IRR after the first dose. Clinical trial information: NCT02213263 .

Biosimilars in Oncology in the United States: A Review

Importance

Biosimilars are biological medicines that contain a highly similar version of the active substance of an already approved biologic reference product. The availability of biosimilars might provide an opportunity to lower health care expenditures as a result of the inherent price competition with their reference product. Understanding how biosimilar cancer drugs are regulated, approved, and paid for, as well as their impact in a value-based care environment, is essential for physicians and other stakeholders in oncology.

Observations

Important structural and regulatory differences exist between biosimilar and generic medications. Minor differences in clinically inactive components with no clinically meaningful differences between biosimilars and their reference biologic are allowed. A biosimilar uses the same mechanism of action as the reference biologic, and its condition of use is the same as the approved indication, although extrapolation is permitted across indications under regulatory guidance. A biosimilar has to have a similar route of administration, dosage, and strength as the reference biologic. As patent expiration of multiple cancer biologics will occur in the next few years, more biosimilars might enter the market. Whether the approval and use of biosmilars as replacements for these heavily prescribed reference biologics will ultimately lead to cost savings is unknown and requires longer follow-up. Two biosimilars with an oncology supportive care indication are currently approved in the United States; both are myeloid growth factors.

Conclusions and Relevance

The financial impact of generic drug competition can be dramatic, but significant differences in regulatory and development processes between generics and biosimilars limit such comparisons and likely present significant challenges for biosimilar approval and adoption in the US market. However, a value-based care environment and their cost-savings potential make biosimilars an attractive option for the therapeutic arsenal. Oncologists' understanding of biosimilars is critical to moving forward.

The impact of initiating posaconazole on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Background

Posaconazole reduces the risk of invasive Aspergillus in transplant patients, but significantly inhibits tacrolimus metabolism. One study demonstrated that a three-fold dose reduction of tacrolimus was required to obtain therapeutic concentrations when used with posaconazole. However, with empiric dose reduction, there is a risk of subtherapeutic tacrolimus levels and subsequent graft failure or graft-versus-host disease. Overall, the existing data on the impact of posaconazole on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics is limited.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to determine whether tacrolimus doses should be decreased upon initiation of posaconazole in patients receiving an allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Methods

This is a retrospective chart review at an academic medical center. All allogeneic stem cell transplant adults who received concomitant posaconazole and tacrolimus from February 2016 through December 2017 were included.

Results

Seventy-nine patients identified using an internal electronic database were analyzed. The median time to therapeutic tacrolimus concentration was significantly longer in patients who did not receive an empiric dose reduction (0% DR, 10d; 1–30% DR, 4d; 31–65% DR, 5d; >65% DR, 4d; p = 0.0395). The rate of supratherapeutic levels was highest amongst patients who did not receive an empiric DR, and was noted to be significant compared to the group that had 31–65% DR ( p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study validates our current practice of instituting an empiric 50% dose reduction of oral tacrolimus to 0.03 mg/kg/day when used concomitantly with posaconazole to achieve therapeutic levels in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients.

Pharmacy Operationalization of the Intralesional Oncolytic Immunotherapy Talimogene Laherparepvec

Objective: Oncolytic immunotherapy involves the use of viruses to target and destroy cancer cells and to induce immune responses for an enhanced antitumor effect. Talimogene laherparepvec, a genetically modified herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) that selectively replicates in tumors to induce lytic cell death, tumor antigen release, and the local production of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), has been approved for the treatment of a defined population of patients with metastatic melanoma. Talimogene laherparepvec is administered as a series of intralesional injections, and specific procedures are implemented to minimize the risk of viral exposure. Because talimogene laherparepvec represents a novel therapeutic modality, its preparation, administration, and handling requirements differ from current therapies; pharmacists have an important role in developing new procedures to incorporate it into clinical practice. Methods: In this review, pharmacists with experience dispensing talimogene laherparepvec, in the clinical trial setting and/or as a commercially available product at US academic institutions, synthesized their personal experiences through group discussions to provide insights on the ordering, receipt, storage, preparation, administration, and handling of talimogene laherparepvec. Results: Suggestions for patient education and practical guidance to assist hospital pharmacists and decision makers with implementing talimogene laherparepvec at their institutions are provided. Conclusion: These insights may further inform the development of policies or procedures to incorporate talimogene laherparepvec into clinical settings and improve patient outcomes.

Impact of a clinical pathway on appropriate empiric vancomycin use in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia

Objectives Febrile neutropenia management guidelines recommend the use of vancomycin as part of an empiric antimicrobial regimen when specific criteria are met. Often, vancomycin use among patients with febrile neutropenia is not indicated and may be over utilized for this indication. We sought to evaluate the impact of implementing a febrile neutropenia clinical pathway on empiric vancomycin use for febrile neutropenia and to identify predictors of vancomycin use when not indicated. Methods Adult febrile neutropenia patients who received initial therapy with an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam with or without vancomycin were identified before (June 2008 to November 2010) and after (June 2012 to June 2013) pathway implementation. Patients were assessed for appropriateness of therapy based on whether the patient received vancomycin consistent with guideline recommendations. Using a comorbidity index used for risk assessment in high risk hematology/oncology patients, we evaluated whether specific comorbidities are associated with inappropriate vancomycin use in the setting of febrile neutropenia. Results A total of 206 patients were included in the pre-pathway time period with 35.9% of patients receiving vancomycin therapy that was inconsistent with the pathway. A total of 131 patients were included in the post-pathway time period with 11.4% of patients receiving vancomycin inconsistent with the pathway ( p = 0.001). None of the comorbidities assessed, nor the comorbidity index score were found to be predictors of vancomycin use inconsistent with guideline recommendations. Conclusion Our study has demonstrated that implementation of a febrile neutropenia pathway can significantly improve adherence to national guideline recommendations with respect to empiric vancomycin utilization for febrile neutropenia.

Evaluation of risk factors for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia among previously colonized hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients colonized with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) may have an increased risk of developing VRE bacteremia. Identification of risk factors for the development of subsequent VRE bacteremia among colonized HSCT recipients is necessary to predict which patients may benefit the most from receiving anti-VRE antibiotic therapy as part of an initial antimicrobial regimen when gram-positive bacteremia is suspected.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective chart review conducted from May 2008 to May 2011. Adult HSCT patients admitted to the hospital found to have positive VRE surveillance cultures were included. A multivariate analysis was completed to identify risk factors for the development of VRE bacteremia in the study population.

RESULTS

Of 152 patients, 19 (13%) patients developed subsequent VRE bacteremia. Risk factors identified for patients with current VRE colonization for VRE bacteremia were the utilization of vancomycin subsequent to VRE surveillance culture positivity (P = 0.017), prolonged duration of neutropenia (P = 0.001), immunosuppression (P < 0.001), and timing of first VRE surveillance screen positivity at week 1 (P = 0.005). A history of VRE colonization on a prior admission was not an independent risk factor for bacteremia in HSCT patients (P = 1.0). HSCT patients with VRE bacteremia had a 30-day all-cause inpatient mortality rate of 29% (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

HSCT patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, who have been exposed to vancomycin subsequent to surveillance culture positivity, have had prolonged neutropenia of >30 days, or first surveillance culture positive at week 1 of admission are potential candidates for early implementation of anti-VRE therapy when a gram-positive bacteremia is suspected.