1
|
Hahn EA, Pugh SL, Lu HL, Vela AM, Gillespie EF, Nichols EM, Wright JL, MacDonald SM, Cahlon O, Baas C, Braunstein LZ, Fang LC, Freedman GM, Jimenez RB, Kesslering CM, Mishra MV, Mutter RW, Ohri N, Rosen LR, Urbanic JJ, Jagsi R, Mitchell SA, Bekelman JE, Cella D. Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Comprehensive Nodal Irradiation in the RadComp Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00436-X. [PMID: 38739047 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to evaluate the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures used in the ongoing RadComp pragmatic randomized clinical trial (PRCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS The deidentified and blinded data set included 774 English-speaking female participants who completed their 6-month posttreatment assessment. Eleven PRO measures were evaluated, including the Trial Outcome Index from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes, the BREAST-Q, and selected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures. PROs were measured at 3 timepoints: baseline, completion of radiation therapy (RT), and 6 months post-RT. Ten variables were used as validity anchors. Pearson or Spearman correlations were calculated between PROs and convergent validity indicators. Mean PRO differences between clinically distinct categories were compared with analysis of variance methods (known-groups validity). PRO change scores were mapped to change in other variables (sensitivity to change). RESULTS Most correlations between PROs and validity indicators were large (≥0.5). Mean score for Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes was higher (better) for those with a lumpectomy compared with those with a mastectomy (P < .001). Mean scores for the FACT-B Trial Outcome Index and for PROMIS Fatigue and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities were better for those with good baseline performance status compared with those with poorer baseline performance status (P < .05). At completion of RT and post-RT, mean scores for Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes and BREAST-Q Radiation were significantly different (P < .001) across categories for all Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy -Treatment Satisfaction - General items. There were medium-sized correlations between change scores for FACT-B Trial Outcome Index, Fatigue, Anxiety, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and change scores in the Visual Analog Scale. CONCLUSIONS For patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer receiving radiation in the RadComp PRCT, our findings demonstrate high reliability and validity for important PRO measures, supporting their psychometric strength and usefulness to reflect the effect of RT on health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Hahn
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Hien L Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Alyssa M Vela
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elizabeth M Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jean L Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Carole Baas
- Alamo Breast Cancer Foundation, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Lior Z Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - L Christine Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Gary M Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel B Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology, Mayo Clinic Axis School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nisha Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Lane R Rosen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis-Knighton Health System, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - James J Urbanic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Justin E Bekelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mitchell SA, Cowen EW. Improving Outcomes in Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease. JAMA Dermatol 2024; 160:388-391. [PMID: 38416464 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.6276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra A Mitchell
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Edward W Cowen
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eng L, Chan RJ, Chan A, Charalambous A, Darling HS, Grech L, van den Hurk CJG, Kirk D, Mitchell SA, Poprawski D, Rammant E, Ramsey I, Fitch MI, Cheung YT. Perceived Barriers Toward Patient-Reported Outcome Implementation in Cancer Care: An International Scoping Survey. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2300715. [PMID: 38457755 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collection is an important priority in cancer care. We examined perceived barriers toward implementing PRO collection between centers with and without PRO infrastructure and administrators and nonadministrators. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a multinational survey of oncology practitioners on their perceived barriers to PRO implementations. Multivariable regression models evaluated for differences in perceived barriers to PRO implementation between groups, adjusted for demographic and institutional variables. RESULTS Among 358 oncology practitioners representing six geographic regions, 31% worked at centers that did not have PRO infrastructure and 26% self-reported as administrators. Administrators were more likely to perceive concerns with liability issues (aOR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.12 to 3.57]; P = .02) while having nonsignificant trend toward less likely perceiving concerns with disruption of workflow (aOR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.32 to 1.03]; P = .06) and nonadherence of PRO reporting (aOR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.26 to 1.08]; P = .08) as barriers. Respondents from centers without PRO infrastructure were more likely to perceive that not having access to a local PRO expert (aOR, 6.59 [95% CI, 3.81 to 11.42]; P < .001), being unsure how to apply PROs in clinical decisions (aOR, 4.20 [95% CI, 2.32 to 7.63]; P < .001), and being unsure about selecting PRO measures (aOR, 3.36 [95% CI, 2.00 to 5.66]; P < .001) as barriers. Heat map analyses identified the largest differences between participants from centers with and without PRO infrastructure in agreed-upon barriers were (1) not having a local PRO expert, (2) being unsure about selecting PRO measures, and (3) not recognizing the role of PROs at the institutional level. CONCLUSION Perceived barriers toward PRO implementation differ between administrators and nonadministrators and practitioners at centers with and without PRO infrastructure. PRO implementation teams should consider as part of a comprehensive strategy including frontline clinicians and administrators and members with PRO experience within teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawson Eng
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raymond J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Alexandre Chan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA
| | - Andreas Charalambous
- Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
- Department of Nursing, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - H S Darling
- Department of Medical Oncology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bangalore, India
| | - Lisa Grech
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Medicine Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Deborah Kirk
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Bunbury, WA, Australia
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Dagmara Poprawski
- Department of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Elke Rammant
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Imogen Ramsey
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Margaret I Fitch
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yin Ting Cheung
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Griffin JM, Kroner BL, Wong SL, Preiss L, Wilder Smith A, Cheville AL, Mitchell SA, Lancki N, Hassett MJ, Schrag D, Osarogiagbon RU, Ridgeway JL, Cella D, Jensen RE, Flores AM, Austin JD, Yanez B. Disparities in electronic health record portal access and use among patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:476-484. [PMID: 37930884 PMCID: PMC10919330 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health record-linked portals may improve health-care quality for patients with cancer. Barriers to portal access and use undermine interventions that rely on portals to reduce cancer care disparities. This study examined portal access and persistence of portal use and associations with patient and structural factors before the implementation of 3 portal-based interventions within the Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium. METHODS Portal use data were extracted from electronic health records for the 12 months preceding intervention implementation. Sociodemographic factors, mode of accessing portals (web vs mobile), and number of clinical encounters before intervention implementation were also extracted. Rurality was derived using rural-urban commuting area codes. Broadband access was estimated using the 2015-2019 American Community Survey. Multiple logistic regression models tested the associations of these factors with portal access (ever accessed or never accessed) and persistence of portal use (accessed the portal ≤20 weeks vs ≥21 weeks in the 35-week study period). RESULTS Of 28 942 eligible patients, 10 061 (35%) never accessed the portal. Male sex, membership in a racial and ethnic minority group, rural dwelling, not working, and limited broadband access were associated with lower odds of portal access. Younger age and more clinical encounters were associated with higher odds of portal access. Of those with portal access, 25% were persistent users. Using multiple modalities for portal access, being middle-aged, and having more clinical encounters were associated with persistent portal use. CONCLUSION Patient and structural factors affect portal access and use and may exacerbate disparities in electronic health record-based cancer symptom surveillance and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan M Griffin
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Robert E. and Patricia D. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Barbara L Kroner
- Center for Clinical Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Liliana Preiss
- Center for Clinical Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Wilder Smith
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrea L Cheville
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicola Lancki
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jennifer L Ridgeway
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Robert E. and Patricia D. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roxanne E Jensen
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ann Marie Flores
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jessica D Austin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Betina Yanez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paudel R, Enzinger AC, Uno H, Cronin C, Wong SL, Dizon DS, Hazard Jenkins H, Bian J, Osarogiagbon RU, Jensen RE, Mitchell SA, Schrag D, Hassett MJ. Effects of a change in recall period on reporting severe symptoms: an analysis of a pragmatic multisite trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024:djae049. [PMID: 38445744 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal methods for deploying electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) to manage symptoms in routine oncologic practice remain uncertain. The eSyM symptom management program asks chemotherapy and surgery patients to self-report 12 symptoms regularly. Feedback from nurses and patients led to changing the recall period from the past 7 days to the past 24 hours. METHODS Using questionnaires submitted during the 16-weeks surrounding the recall period change, we assessed the likelihood of reporting a severe, or a moderate-severe, symptom across all 12 symptoms and separately for the 5 most prevalent symptoms. Interrupted time series analyses modeled the effects of the change using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Surgery and chemotherapy cohorts were analyzed separately. Study-wide effects were estimated using a meta-analysis method. RESULTS In total, 1,692 patients from 6 institutions submitted 7,823 eSyM assessments during the 16-weeks surrounding the recall period change. Shortening the recall period was associated with lower odds of severe symptom reporting in the surgery cohort (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.93; p = .02) and lower odds of moderate-severe symptom reporting in the chemotherapy cohort (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.97; p = .02). Among the most prevalent symptoms, 24-hour recall was associated with lower rate of reporting post-operative constipation, but no differences in reporting rates for other symptoms. CONCLUSION A shorter recall period was associated with a reduction in the proportion of patients reporting moderate-severe symptoms. The optimal recall period may vary depending on whether ePROs are collected for active symptom management, as a clinical trial endpoint, or another purpose. (Clinicaltrails.gov (NCT03850912).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hajime Uno
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sandra L Wong
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Don S Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
McCallion J, Borsi A, Noel W, Lee J, Karmous W, Sattler S, Boggia GM, Hardy EJ, Mitchell CR, Mitchell SA, Gilhus NE. Systematic review of the patient burden of generalised myasthenia gravis in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. BMC Neurol 2024; 24:61. [PMID: 38336636 PMCID: PMC10858594 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03553-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by muscle weakness, and progression from ocular (oMG) to generalised (gMG) symptoms results in a substantial negative impact on quality of life (QoL). This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the patient burden experienced by people living with gMG. METHODS Electronic database searches (conducted March 2022), supplemented by interrogation of grey literature, were conducted to identify studies reporting patient burden outcomes in patients with gMG in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Results were synthesised narratively due to the heterogeneity across trials. RESULTS In total, 39 patient burden publications (representing 38 unique studies) were identified as relevant for inclusion in the systematic review, consisting of 37 publications reporting formal patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and two publications describing alternative qualitative assessments of patient experience. The studies included a variety of measures including generic and disease-specific PROMs, as well as symptom-specific PROMs focusing on key comorbidities including depression, anxiety, fatigue and sleep disturbance. The findings showed some variation across studies and PROMs; however, in general there was evidence for worse QoL in patients with gMG than in healthy controls or in patients with oMG, and a trend for worsening QoL with increasing MG severity. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights the importance of considering patient QoL when developing and assessing treatment and management plans for patients with gMG. However, the heterogeneity identified across studies illustrates the need for further representative and well-powered studies in large cohorts administering consistent, validated questionnaires. TRIAL REGISTRATION The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42022328444.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A Borsi
- Janssen EMEA, Beerse, Belgium
| | - W Noel
- Janssen EMEA, Beerse, Belgium
| | - J Lee
- Janssen EMEA, Beerse, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - E J Hardy
- Mtech Access, Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK
| | | | | | - Nils Erik Gilhus
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mitchell SA, Hunter R, Fry A, Pavletic SZ, Widemann BC, Wiener L. Development and psychometric testing of a pediatric chronic graft-versus-host disease symptom scale: protocol for a two-phase, mixed methods study. Front Psychol 2024; 14:1243005. [PMID: 38259542 PMCID: PMC10800914 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a debilitating late complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It is often accompanied by extensive symptom burden. No validated cGVHD patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure exists to evaluate cGVHD symptom bother in children and adolescents younger than 18 years. This paper presents the study protocol for a multi-center, two-phase protocol to develop a psychometrically valid pediatric cGVHD Symptom Scale (PCSS) and a companion caregiver-proxy measure to capture the symptom burden experienced by children with cGVHD. In the first phase of the study, our aim is to evaluate the comprehension, clarity and ease of response of the PCSS through cognitive interviewing and to iteratively refine the measure to optimize content validity. In the second phase of the study, we will quantitatively examine the measurement properties of the PCSS in children and their caregiver-proxies. Methods and analysis Eligible participants are children/adolescents ages 5-17 with cGVHD who are receiving systemic immunosuppressive treatment or have recently tapered to discontinuation. In the first phase, we are enrolling 60 child and caregiver-proxy dyads in three child age strata (5-7, 8-12, and 13-17 years old). Semi-scripted cognitive debriefing interviews are conducted to assess comprehension, clarity, and ease of response of each PCSS item with the child alone, and then jointly with the caregiver-proxy to explore discordant ratings. In phase two, an age-stratified cohort of 120 child-caregiver dyads will be enrolled to evaluate test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. Anchors for known-groups validity include the PedsQL module and clinical variables, including cGVHD clinician-rated severity scores. In participants ages 13-17, we will also compare responses on the PCSS with those from the Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale, to gauge the youngest age at which adolescent respondents can comprehend this adult measure. Discussion This study will yield a well-validated, counterpart measure to the Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale for use in children with cGVHD and their caregiver-proxies. This new patient-reported outcome measure can be integrated into clinical trials and care delivery for pediatric transplant survivors to improve the precision and accuracy with which their cGVHD symptom experience is captured. Clinical trial registration www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04044365.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra A. Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Abigail Fry
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Steven Z. Pavletic
- Immune Deficiency Cellular Therapy Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Brigitte C. Widemann
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Lori Wiener
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schulz E, Pirsl F, Holtzman NG, Beshensky D, Cowen EW, Mitchell SA, Steinberg SM, Pavletic SZ. Red cell distribution width as a new prognostic biomarker in refractory chronic graft- versus-host disease. Haematologica 2024; 109:298-302. [PMID: 37584292 PMCID: PMC10772496 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Schulz
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; Myeloid Malignancies Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Filip Pirsl
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Noa G Holtzman
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; Myeloid Malignancies Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - David Beshensky
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Edward W Cowen
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850
| | - Seth M Steinberg
- Biostatistics and Data Management Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Steven Z Pavletic
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; Myeloid Malignancies Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith JD, Norton WE, Mitchell SA, Cronin C, Hassett MJ, Ridgeway JL, Garcia SF, Osarogiagbon RU, Dizon DS, Austin JD, Battestilli W, Richardson JE, Tesch NK, Cella D, Cheville AL, DiMartino LD. The Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS): feasibility, usability, and pilot testing of a novel method. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:153. [PMID: 38017582 PMCID: PMC10683230 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00529-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic approaches are needed to accurately characterize the dynamic use of implementation strategies and how they change over time. We describe the development and preliminary evaluation of the Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS), a novel methodology to document and characterize implementation strategies use over time. METHODS The development and initial evaluation of the LISTS method was conducted within the Improving the Management of SymPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Research Consortium (supported by funding provided through the NCI Cancer MoonshotSM). The IMPACT Consortium includes a coordinating center and three hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies testing routine symptom surveillance and integration of symptom management interventions in ambulatory oncology care settings. LISTS was created to increase the precision and reliability of dynamic changes in implementation strategy use over time. It includes three components: (1) a strategy assessment, (2) a data capture platform, and (3) a User's Guide. An iterative process between implementation researchers and practitioners was used to develop, pilot test, and refine the LISTS method prior to evaluating its use in three stepped-wedge trials within the IMPACT Consortium. The LISTS method was used with research and practice teams for approximately 12 months and subsequently we evaluated its feasibility, acceptability, and usability using established instruments and novel questions developed specifically for this study. RESULTS Initial evaluation of LISTS indicates that it is a feasible and acceptable method, with content validity, for characterizing and tracking the use of implementation strategies over time. Users of LISTS highlighted several opportunities for improving the method for use in future and more diverse implementation studies. CONCLUSIONS The LISTS method was developed collaboratively between researchers and practitioners to fill a research gap in systematically tracking implementation strategy use and modifications in research studies and other implementation efforts. Preliminary feedback from LISTS users indicate it is feasible and usable. Potential future developments include additional features, fewer data elements, and interoperability with alternative data entry platforms. LISTS offers a systematic method that encourages the use of common data elements to support data analysis across sites and synthesis across studies. Future research is needed to further adapt, refine, and evaluate the LISTS method in studies with employ diverse study designs and address varying delivery settings, health conditions, and intervention types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin D Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Spencer Fox Eccles, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science and Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Wynne E Norton
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christine Cronin
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Quality & Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jennifer L Ridgeway
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery and Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sofia F Garcia
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science and Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Raymond U Osarogiagbon
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Don S Dizon
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Legoretta Cancer Center, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, USA
| | - Jessica D Austin
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Whitney Battestilli
- Center for Clinical Research Informatics, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joshua E Richardson
- Center for Health Informatics, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Fayetteville, NC, USA
| | - Nathan K Tesch
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrea L Cheville
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lisa D DiMartino
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith AW, DiMartino L, Garcia SF, Mitchell SA, Ruddy KJ, Smith JD, Wong SL, Cahue S, Cella D, Jensen RE, Hassett MJ, Hodgdon C, Kroner B, Osarogiagbon RU, Popovic J, Richardson K, Schrag D, Cheville AL. Systematic symptom management in the IMPACT Consortium: rationale and design for 3 effectiveness-implementation trials. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad073. [PMID: 37930033 PMCID: PMC10627528 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer and its treatment produce deleterious symptoms across the phases of care. Poorly controlled symptoms negatively affect quality of life and result in increased health-care needs and hospitalization. The Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium was created to develop 3 large-scale, systematic symptom management systems, deployed through electronic health record platforms, and to test them in pragmatic, randomized, hybrid effectiveness and implementation trials. Here, we describe the IMPACT Consortium's conceptual framework, its organizational components, and plans for evaluation. The study designs and lessons learned are highlighted in the context of disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Wilder Smith
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lisa DiMartino
- Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- RTI International, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sofia F Garcia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Justin D Smith
- Division of Health Systems Innovation and Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - September Cahue
- American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roxanne E Jensen
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christine Hodgdon
- Guiding Researchers and Advocates to Scientific Partnerships, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea L Cheville
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lai JS, Jensen SE, Peipert JD, Mitchell SA, Garcia SF, Cella D, Goldman S, Lenzen A. Using IT to Improve Outcomes for Children Living With Cancer (SyMon-SAYS): Protocol for a Single-Institution Waitlist Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e50993. [PMID: 37682593 PMCID: PMC10517385 DOI: 10.2196/50993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children and adolescents with cancer may experience multiple disease- and treatment-related symptoms that negatively affect health-related quality of life. Routine symptom surveillance thus constitutes an important component of supportive care in pediatric oncology. The Symptom Monitoring and Systematic Assessment and Reporting System in Young Survivors (SyMon-SAYS) system will administer, score, interpret, and display the results of symptom assessments captured weekly using patient-reported outcomes presented via the electronic health record (EHR) portal between clinic visits in oncology ambulatory settings, when patients are likely to be more symptomatic. This study is testing a digital system for routine symptom surveillance that includes EHR-based reports to clinicians and alerts for severe symptoms. OBJECTIVE In this randomized trial, we are examining the effects of the SyMon-SAYS system on perceived barriers to symptom management, self-efficacy, and symptom severity. Better self-management and timely clinical intervention to address symptoms promote adherence to treatment plans, strengthen child and parent self-efficacy, improve interactions between children, parents, and their clinical providers, and optimize clinical outcomes. METHODS The SyMon-SAYS system is integrated into the EHR to streamline the presentation of symptom scores and delivery of alerts for severe symptoms to clinicians using EHR (Epic) messaging functionalities. Children (aged 8 to 17 years) complete the weekly symptom assessment and review the symptom report by logging into the patient portal (Epic MyChart). This single-institution waitlist randomized controlled trial is recruiting 200 children (aged 8-17 years) with cancer and their parents, guardians, or caregivers. Participating dyads are randomly assigned to receive the intervention over 16 weeks (Group A: 16-week SyMon-SAYS intervention; Group B: 8-week usual care and then an 8-week SyMon-SAYS intervention). Analyses will (1) evaluate the efficacy of SyMon-SAYS at week 8 and the maintenance of those effects at week 16; (2) evaluate factors associated with those efficacy outcomes, including contextual factors, adherence to the SyMon-SAYS intervention, demographic characteristics, and clinical factors; and (3) evaluate predictors of adherence to the SyMon-SAYS intervention and preference of SyMon-SAYS versus usual care. RESULTS Data collection is currently in progress. We hypothesize that at 8 weeks, those receiving the SyMon-SAYS intervention will report decreased parent-perceived barriers to managing their children's symptoms, increased parent and child self-efficacy, decreased child symptom burden, and ultimately better child health-related quality of life, compared to waitlist controls. Feasibility, acceptability, and engagement from the perspectives of the children with cancer, their parents, and their clinicians will be examined using mixed methods. CONCLUSIONS We anticipate that this system will facilitate prompt identification of problematic symptoms. Additionally, we hypothesize that with the availability of graphical symptom reports over time, and timely provider responses, children or parents will become better informed and take an active role in managing their symptoms, which will further improve clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04789720; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04789720. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/50993.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Shei Lai
- Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Sally E Jensen
- Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - John Devin Peipert
- Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Sofia F Garcia
- Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - David Cella
- Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Stewart Goldman
- Department of Child Health, College of Medicine - Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States
- Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Alicia Lenzen
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, Neuro-Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Ann & Robert Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Basch E, Dueck AC, Mitchell SA, Mamon H, Weiser M, Saltz L, Gollub M, Rogak L, Ginos B, Mazza GL, Colgrove B, Chang G, Minasian L, Denicoff A, Thanarajasingam G, Musher B, George T, Venook A, Farma J, O'Reilly E, Meyerhardt JA, Shi Q, Schrag D. Patient-Reported Outcomes During and After Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the PROSPECT Trial (Alliance N1048). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3724-3734. [PMID: 37270691 PMCID: PMC10351948 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer in North America is neoadjuvant pelvic chemoradiation with fluorouracil (5FUCRT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is an alternative that may spare patients the morbidity of radiation. Understanding the relative patient experiences with these options is necessary to inform treatment decisions. METHODS PROSPECT was a multicenter, unblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial of neoadjuvant FOLFOX versus 5FUCRT, which enrolled adults with rectal cancer clinically staged as T2N+, cT3N-, or cT3N+ who were candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery. Neoadjuvant FOLFOX was given in six cycles over 12 weeks, followed by surgery. Neoadjuvant 5FUCRT was delivered in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks, followed by surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was suggested but not mandated in both groups. Enrolled patients were asked to provide patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, during neoadjuvant treatment, and at 12 months after surgery. PROs included 14 symptoms from the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Additional PRO instruments measured bowel, bladder, sexual function, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). RESULTS From June 2012 to December 2018, 1,194 patients were randomly assigned, 1,128 initiated treatment, and 940 contributed PRO-CTCAE data (493 FOLFOX; 447 5FUCRT). During neoadjuvant treatment, patients reported significantly lower rates of diarrhea and better overall bowel function with FOLFOX while anxiety, appetite loss, constipation, depression, dysphagia, dyspnea, edema, fatigue, mucositis, nausea, neuropathy, and vomiting were lower with 5FUCRT (all multiplicity adjusted P < .05). At 12 months after surgery, patients randomly assigned to FOLFOX reported significantly lower rates of fatigue and neuropathy and better sexual function versus 5FUCRT (all multiplicity adjusted P < .05). Neither bladder function nor HRQL differed between groups at any time point. CONCLUSION For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer choosing between neoadjuvant FOLFOX and 5FUCRT, the distinctive PRO profiles inform treatment selection and shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Basch
- Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Amylou C. Dueck
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | | | - Harvey Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Martin Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Leonard Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lauren Rogak
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brenda Ginos
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Gina L. Mazza
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Brian Colgrove
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - George Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Benjamin Musher
- The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas George
- NRG Oncology, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL
| | - Alan Venook
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jeffrey Farma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eileen O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee MK, Basch E, Mitchell SA, Minasian LM, Langlais BT, Thanarajasingam G, Ginos BF, Rogak LJ, Mendoza TR, Bennett AV, Schrag D, Mazza GL, Dueck AC. Reliability and validity of PRO-CTCAE® daily reporting with a 24-hour recall period. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:2047-2058. [PMID: 36897529 PMCID: PMC10241696 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03374-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard recall period for the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE®) is the past 7 days, but there are contexts where a 24-hour recall may be desirable. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the reliability and validity of a subset of PRO-CTCAE items captured using a 24-hour recall. METHODS 27 PRO-CTCAE items representing 14 symptomatic adverse events (AEs) were collected using both a 24-hour recall (24 h) and the standard 7 day recall (7d) in a sample of patients receiving active cancer treatment (n = 113). Using data captured with a PRO-CTCAE-24h on days 6 and 7, and 20 and 21, we computed intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC); an ICC ≥ 0.70 was interpreted as demonstrating high test-retest reliability. Correlations between PRO-CTCAE-24h items on day 7 and conceptually relevant EORTC QLQ-C30 domains were examined. In responsiveness analysis, patients were deemed changed if they had a one-point or greater change in the corresponding PRO-CTCAE-7d item (from week 0 to week 1). RESULTS PRO-CTCAE-24h captured on two consecutive days demonstrated that 21 of 27 items (78%) had ICCs ≥ 0.70 (day 6/7 median ICC 0.76), (day 20/21 median ICC 0.84). Median correlation between attributes within a common AE was 0.75, and the median correlation between conceptually relevant EORTC QLQ-C30 domains and PRO-CTCAE-24 h items captured on day 7 was 0.44. In the analysis of responsiveness to change, the median standardized response mean (SRM) for patients with improvement was - 0.52 and that for patients with worsening was 0.71. CONCLUSION A 24-hour recall period for PRO-CTCAE items has acceptable measurement properties and can inform day-to-day variations in symptomatic AEs when daily PRO-CTCAE administration is implemented in a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Lee
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - E Basch
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - B T Langlais
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - B F Ginos
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - L J Rogak
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - A V Bennett
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - D Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - G L Mazza
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - A C Dueck
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lapin B, Cohen ML, Corsini N, Lanzi A, Smith SC, Bennett AV, Mayo N, Mercieca-Bebber R, Mitchell SA, Rutherford C, Roydhouse J. Development of consensus-based considerations for use of adult proxy reporting: an ISOQOL task force initiative. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:52. [PMID: 37266745 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Many large-scale population-based surveys, research studies, and clinical care allow for inclusion of proxy reporting as a strategy to collect outcomes when patients are unavailable or unable to provide reliable self-report. Prior work identified an absence of methodological guidelines regarding proxy reporting in adult populations, including who can serve as a proxy, and considerations for data collection, analysis, and reporting. The primary objective of this work by the ISOQOL Proxy Task Force was to review documents and clinical outcome assessment measures with respect to proxy reporting and to develop, through consensus, considerations for proxy reporting. METHODS We assembled an international group with clinically relevant and/or methodological expertise on proxy use in adult populations. We conducted a targeted review of documentation based on regulatory, non-regulatory, professional society, and individual measure sources. Using a standardized collection form, proxy-related information was extracted from each source including definitions of a proxy, characteristics of a proxy, domains addressable or addressed by a proxy, and observer-reporting. RESULTS The definition of proxy was inconsistent across 39 sources, except regulatory documents which defined a proxy as a person other than the patient who reports on an outcome as if she/he were the patient. While proxy report was discouraged in regulatory documentation, it was acknowledged there were instances where self-report was impossible. Many documentation sources indicated proxies would be well-justified in certain contexts, but did not indicate who could act as a proxy, when proxies could be used, what domains of patient health they could report on, or how data should be reported. Observer-reported outcomes were typically defined as those based on observed behaviors, however there was not a consistent differentiation between proxy and observer reporting. Based on information extracted from these resources, we developed a checklist of considerations when including proxy-reported measures or using proxies in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation and reporting of proxy reported data. CONCLUSION Our targeted review highlights a lack of clarity in capturing, interpreting and reporting data from proxies in adult populations. We provide a checklist of considerations to assist researchers and clinicians with including proxies in research studies and clinical care. Lastly, our review identified areas where further guidance and future research are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Lapin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, JJN3, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Matthew L Cohen
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Nadia Corsini
- Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Alyssa Lanzi
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Sarah C Smith
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Antonia V Bennett
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nancy Mayo
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Divisions of Clinical Epidemiology, Geriatrics, Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE) McGill University Health Centre (MUHC)-Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney Quality of Life Office, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jessica Roydhouse
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pickard T, Hylton H, Mitchell SA. Science of Teams and Provision of Team-Based Care in Oncology: An Advanced Practice Provider Perspective. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:16-18. [PMID: 36516365 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Todd Pickard
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Minasian LM, O’Mara A, Mitchell SA. Clinician and Patient Reporting of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Cancer Clinical Trials: Using CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE ® to Provide Two Distinct and Complementary Perspectives. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2022; 13:249-258. [PMID: 36524232 PMCID: PMC9744864 DOI: 10.2147/prom.s256567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Inclusion of the patient perspective in the reporting of symptomatic adverse events provides different and complementary information to clinician reporting using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE®) is designed for patients to self-report their symptomatic adverse events in a manner that complements CTCAE reporting. Using CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE together offers the potential to refine our understanding of the prevalence and trajectory of lower grade AEs that can lead to elective discontinuation of therapy and diminished quality of life. This review addresses the development of PRO-CTCAE with an emphasis on the differences between PRO-CTCAE scores and CTCAE severity grades. This distinction is important when evaluating, grading and reporting toxicity and tolerability in cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori M Minasian
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ann O’Mara
- Consultant, ICF, Fairfax, VA, USA
- Consultant to Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Naik HB, Pichard DC, Schwartz DM, O'Brien M, Masciocchi M, Thompson J, Sen HN, Steinberg SM, Mitchell SA, de Jesus AA, McCalmont TH, Dey A, Rosenstein RK, Deng Z, Goldbach-Mansky R, Mehta NN, Cowen EW. Anakinra for refractory pustular psoriasis: A phase II, open-label, dose-escalation trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022; 87:1380-1383. [PMID: 36116584 PMCID: PMC10673680 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.07.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Haley B Naik
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| | - Dominique C Pichard
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Daniella M Schwartz
- Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Michelle O'Brien
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthew Masciocchi
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Julie Thompson
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - H Nida Sen
- Clinical and Translational Immunology Unit, Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Seth M Steinberg
- Biostatistics and Data Management Section, Office of the Clinical Director, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Outcomes Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Adriana A de Jesus
- Translational Autoinflammatory Diseases Section (TADS), LCIM, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Timothy H McCalmont
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Amit Dey
- Section of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Diseases, National Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rachel K Rosenstein
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Zuoming Deng
- Biodata Mining and Discovery Section, Office of Science and Technology, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky
- Translational Autoinflammatory Diseases Section (TADS), LCIM, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nehal N Mehta
- Section of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Diseases, National Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Edward W Cowen
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Madariaga A, Mitchell SA, Pittman T, Wang L, Bowering V, Kavak N, Quintos J, Chang K, Ramsahai J, Karakasis K, Welch SA, Dhani NC, Lheureux S, Oza AM. Patient self-reporting of tolerability using PRO-CTCAE in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial comparing gemcitabine in combination with adavosertib or placebo in patients with platinum resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:226-233. [PMID: 36055813 PMCID: PMC10731422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial assessed gemcitabine in combination with the wee1 inhibitor adavosertib or placebo in platinum resistant or refractory high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), demonstrating improved progression free and overall survival favouring the adavosertib/gemcitabine arm. An exploratory objective of the study included the PRO-CTCAE assessment, to capture self-reporting of frequency, severity and/or interference of symptomatic adverse events (syAEs). METHODS PRO-CTCAE items at baseline, days 1 and 15 of each cycle and off treatment, were completed in two centres, with the objective of characterizing syAEs in the first three months of therapy. The maximum post-baseline score proportion for each syAE was tabulated per patient. The 12-week area under the curve (AUC12w) as a measure of syAE over-time and incremental AUC12w (iAUC12w) for adjustment to baseline syAEs. RESULTS Sixty-one patients were approached for PRO-CTCAE surveys and 55 were evaluable. Among patients with HGSOC, 28 received gemcitabine/adavosertib (arm A) and 19 gemcitabine/placebo (arm B). Survey completion rates were high. The proportion of participants with positive (≥1) PRO-CTCAE scores was higher for difficulty swallowing with gemcitabine/adavosertib (arm A 35.7% vs arm B 5.3%, p = 0.02). The high score (≥3) syAEs showed more frequent diarrhea with gemcitabine/adavosertib (arm A 25% vs arm B 0%, p = 0.03). The proportions of worsening syAEs over time were higher in patients receiving gemcitabine/adavosertib for difficulty swallowing (arm A 35.7% vs arm B 5.3%; p = 0.03) and fatigue severity (arm A 71.43% vs arm B 42.1%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The longitudinal assessment of patient self-reported tolerability showed greater difficulty swallowing and fatigue severity in patients receiving gemcitabine/adavosertib, compared to gemcitabine/placebo. PRO-CTCAE provides complementary and objective assessment of drug tolerability from a patient's perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainhoa Madariaga
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Rockville, USA
| | - Tyler Pittman
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Wang
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valerie Bowering
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nisan Kavak
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Judy Quintos
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Chang
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janelle Ramsahai
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Karakasis
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen A Welch
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, London Health Science, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neesha C Dhani
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sleight A, Gerber LH, Marshall TF, Livinski A, Alfano CM, Harrington S, Flores AM, Virani A, Hu X, Mitchell SA, Varedi M, Eden M, Hayek S, Reigle B, Kerkman A, Neves R, Jablonoski K, Hacker ED, Sun V, Newman R, McDonnell KK, L'Hotta A, Schoenhals A, Dpt NLS. Systematic Review of Functional Outcomes in Cancer Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 103:1807-1826. [PMID: 35104445 PMCID: PMC9339032 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.01.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the evidence regarding rehabilitation interventions targeting optimal physical or cognitive function in adults with a history of cancer and describe the breadth of evidence as well as strengths and limitations across a range of functional domains. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Plus, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. The time scope was January 2008 to April 2019. STUDY SELECTION Prospective, controlled trials including single- and multiarm cohorts investigating rehabilitative interventions for cancer survivors at any point in the continuum of care were included, if studies included a primary functional outcome measure. Secondary data analyses and pilot/feasibility studies were excluded. Full-text review identified 362 studies for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION Extraction was performed by coauthor teams and quality and bias assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence Scheme (class I-IV). DATA SYNTHESIS Studies for which the functional primary endpoint achieved significance were categorized into 9 functional areas foundational to cancer rehabilitation: (1) quality of life (109 studies), (2) activities of daily living (61 studies), (3) fatigue (59 studies), (4) functional mobility (55 studies), (5) exercise behavior (37 studies), (6) cognition (20 studies), (7) communication (10 studies), (8) sexual function (6 studies), and (9) return to work (5 studies). Most studies were categorized as class III in quality/bias. Averaging results found within each of the functional domains, 71% of studies reported statistically significant results after cancer rehabilitation intervention(s) for at least 1 functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS These findings provide evidence supporting the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions for individuals with a cancer history. The findings should be balanced with the understanding that many studies had moderate risk of bias and/or limitations in study quality by AAN criteria. These results may provide a foundation for future work to establish clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitative interventions across cancer disease types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alix Sleight
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States; Center for Integrated Research in Cancer and Lifestyle (CIRCL), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States; Cedars Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, California, United States; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
| | - Lynn H Gerber
- College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax County, Virginia, United States; Inova Health System, Inova Medicine Services, Falls Church, Virginia, United States
| | | | - Alicia Livinski
- National Institutes of Health Library, Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Catherine M Alfano
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, New York, United States; Center for Personalized Health, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, United States; Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York, United States
| | - Shana Harrington
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Ann Marie Flores
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Survivorship Institute, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Aneesha Virani
- Rehabilitation Department, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Xiaorong Hu
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Rehabilitation Medicine School, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Mitra Varedi
- Epidemiology and Cancer Control Department, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
| | - Melissa Eden
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
| | - Samah Hayek
- Clalit Health Services, Clalit Research Institute, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Beverly Reigle
- College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Anya Kerkman
- Lincoln Cancer Rehabilitation, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States; CHI Health St Elizabeth, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
| | - Raquel Neves
- Czech Rehabilitation Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Kathleen Jablonoski
- Department of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States; Department of Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Eileen Danaher Hacker
- Department of Science of Nursing Care, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Virginia Sun
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States; Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States
| | - Robin Newman
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Boston University College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Karen Kane McDonnell
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Allison L'Hotta
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Alana Schoenhals
- Mrs T.H. Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Nicole L Stout Dpt
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States; Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Caminiti C, Bryce J, Riva S, Ng D, Diodati F, Iezzi E, Sparavigna L, Novello S, Porta C, Del Mastro L, Procopio G, Cinieri S, Falzetta A, Calabrò F, Lorusso V, Cogoni AA, Tortora G, Maruzzo M, Passalacqua R, Cognetti F, Adamo V, Capelletto E, Ferrari A, Bagnalasta M, Bassi M, Nicelli A, De Persis D, D'Acunti A, Iannelli Patient E, Perrone F, Mitchell SA. Cultural adaptation of the Italian version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (PRO-CTCAE®). Tumori 2022:3008916221099558. [PMID: 35674125 DOI: 10.1177/03008916221099558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION US National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE®) is a library of 78 symptom terms and 124 items enabling patient reporting of symptomatic adverse events in cancer trials. This multicenter study used mixed methods to develop an Italian language version of this widely accepted measure, and describe the content validity and reliability in a diverse sample of Italian-speaking patients. METHODS All PRO-CTCAE items were translated in accordance with international guidelines. Subsequently, the content validity of the PRO-CTCAE-Italian was explored and iteratively refined through cognitive debriefing interviews. Participants (n=96; 52% male; median age 64 years; 26% older adults; 18% lower educational attainment) completed a PRO-CTCAE survey and participated in a semi-structured interview to determine if the translation captured the concepts of the original English language PRO-CTCAE, and to evaluate comprehension, clarity and ease of judgement. Test-retest reliability of the finalized measure was explored in a second sample (n=135). RESULTS Four rounds of cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted. The majority of PRO-CTCAE symptom terms, attributes and associated response choices were well-understood, and respondents found the items easy to judge. To improve comprehension and clarity, the symptom terms for nausea and pain were rephrased and retested in subsequent interview rounds. Test-retest reliability was excellent for 41/49 items (84%); the median intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83 (range 0.64-0.94). DISCUSSION Results support the semantic, conceptual and pragmatic equivalence of PRO-CTCAE-Italian to the original English version, and provide preliminary descriptive evidence of content validity and reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Caminiti
- Research and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Jane Bryce
- Ascension St. John Clinical Research Institute, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Silvia Riva
- Department of Psychology, St Mary's University, London, UK
| | - Diane Ng
- Westat Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Francesca Diodati
- Research and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Elisa Iezzi
- Research and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Lucia Sparavigna
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Camillo Porta
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari A. Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Oncology Unit 1, Milan, Italy
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- Medical Oncology & Breast Unit, Antonio Perrino Hospital, Brindisi, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Calabrò
- Department of Oncology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Lorusso
- Medical Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ospedale Oncologico, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Department of Oncology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Maruzzo
- Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Cognetti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Università La Sapienza di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Adamo
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O. Papardo & Department of Human Pathology University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Enrica Capelletto
- Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Alessandra Ferrari
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Davide De Persis
- Federazione Italiana delle Associazioni di Volontariato in Oncologia - F.A.V.O., Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia D'Acunti
- Associazione Italiana Malati di Cancro, parenti ed amici - AIMaC, Rome Italy
| | | | - Francesco Perrone
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Outcomes Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kwon JY, Russell L, Coles T, Klaassen RJ, Schick-Makaroff K, Sibley KM, Mitchell SA, Sawatzky R. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement in Radiation Oncology: Interpretation of Individual Scores and Change over Time in Clinical Practice. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:3093-3103. [PMID: 35621641 PMCID: PMC9139498 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29050251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Tools for measuring patients’ perceived health and quality of life, such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), inform clinical decisions for patients requiring radiation therapy. However, there may be inconsistencies in how patients interpret and respond to PROMs due to cultural, environmental, personal, or experiential factors. Differential item functioning (DIF) and response shift (RS) refer to differences in the meaning of PROMs between patients or over time (respectively). DIF and RS can threaten the accurate interpretation and use of PROMs, potentially resulting in erroneous conclusions about effectiveness, and flawed individual-level clinical decision-making. Given the empirical evidence of DIF and RS, we aim to review clinical implications and solutions for addressing DIF and RS by providing vignettes from collaborative examinations with workshop participants, as well as the literature. By making these methodological concepts accessible and relevant, for practice, clinicians may feel more confident to ask clarifying questions of patients when PROM scores and the contextual patient information do not align. PROM scores need to be interpreted via dialogue with the patient to avoid misinterpretation due to DIF and RS, which could diminish patient–clinician communication and impede shared decision-making. This work is part of an interdisciplinary knowledge translation initiative focused on the interpretation of PROM scores by clinically-oriented audiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Yung Kwon
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
- Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, Victoria, BC V8N 5C2, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | - Lara Russell
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1, Canada; (L.R.); (R.S.)
| | - Theresa Coles
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27701, USA;
| | - Robert J. Klaassen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
| | | | - Kathryn M. Sibley
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W3, Canada;
- George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W3, Canada
| | - Sandra A. Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA;
| | - Richard Sawatzky
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1, Canada; (L.R.); (R.S.)
- Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2K5, Canada
- Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Williams KM, Pavletic SZ, Lee SJ, Martin PJ, Farthing DE, Hakim FT, Rose J, Manning-Geist BL, Gea-Banacloche JC, Comis LE, Cowen EW, Justus DG, Baird K, Cheng GS, Avila D, Steinberg SM, Mitchell SA, Gress RE. Prospective phase II trial of montelukast to treat bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after hematopoietic cell transplant and investigation into BOS pathogenesis. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:264.e1-264.e9. [PMID: 35114411 PMCID: PMC9081205 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a severe manifestation of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Montelukast interrupts cysteinyl leukotriene activity and may diminish the activation and homing of cells to bronchioles and subsequent fibrosis. OBJECTIVE We performed a prospective phase II trial to test whether montelukast altered lung decline for patients with BOS after HCT. STUDY DESIGN We performed a single arm, open-label, multi-institutional study with primary endpoints of: i) FEV1 stability or improvement (<15% decline) and ii) slope of FEV1<1 point decline after six months treatment. Secondary endpoints included symptom and functional response, and immune correlates investigating the role of leukotrienes in BOS progression. RESULTS 25 patients enrolled with moderate to severe lung disease after three months of stable cGVHD therapy. Montelukast was well-tolerated and no patient required escalation of BOS-directed therapy. At the primary endpoint, all evaluable patients (n=23) met criteria for treatment success using FEV1% predicted, and all but one had stable or improved FEV1 slope. In those with >5% FEV1 improvement, clinically meaningful improvements were seen in the Lee scores of breathing, energy, and mood. Improvements in the Human Activity Profile and 6-minute-walk test were observed in those with <5% FEV1 decline. Overall survival was 87% at two-years. Immune correlates showed elevated leukotriene receptor levels on blood eosinophils and monocytes vs. healthy controls, elevated urine leukotrienes in 45% of cohort, and cysteinyl leukotriene receptors on bronchoalveolar lavage subsets and a predominance of Th2 T cells, all pre-treatment. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that montelukast may safely halt progression of BOS after HCT and that leukotrienes may play a role in the biology of BOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten M Williams
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, 1760 Haygood Drive, 3rd floor W362, Atlanta GA, US, 30322.
| | - Steven Z Pavletic
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda MD, US, 20892
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave, Seattle, WA, US 98109
| | - Paul J Martin
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave, Seattle, WA, US 98109
| | - Don E Farthing
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunotherapy Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, US, 20892
| | - Frances T Hakim
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunotherapy Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, US, 20892
| | - Jeremy Rose
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunotherapy Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, US, 20892
| | - Beryl L Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, US, 10065
| | - Juan C Gea-Banacloche
- Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Immunology, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, US, 20892
| | - Leora E Comis
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Edward W Cowen
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, 10 Center Dr, Room 12N240A, Bethesda, MD, US, 20892
| | - David G Justus
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, US
| | - Kristin Baird
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Guang-Shing Cheng
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, US, 98109; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave, Seattle, WA, US 98109
| | - Daniele Avila
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda MD, US, 20892
| | - Seth M Steinberg
- Biostatistics and Data Management Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, US, 20892
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda MD, US, 20892
| | - Ronald E Gress
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunotherapy Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, US, 20892
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Retzer A, Aiyegbusi OL, Rowe A, Newsome PN, Douglas-Pugh J, Khan S, Mittal S, Wilson R, O'Connor D, Campbell L, Mitchell SA, Calvert M. The value of patient-reported outcomes in early-phase clinical trials. Nat Med 2022; 28:18-20. [PMID: 35039659 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01648-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ameeta Retzer
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anna Rowe
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Philip N Newsome
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jessica Douglas-Pugh
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sheeba Khan
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Roger Wilson
- NCRI Consumer Forum National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Daniel O'Connor
- Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), London, UK
| | - Lisa Campbell
- Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), London, UK
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- UK SPINE, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ramsey I, Chan A, Charalambous A, Cheung YT, Darling HS, Eng L, Grech L, Hart NH, Kirk D, Mitchell SA, Poprawski D, Rammant E, Fitch MI, Chan RJ. Exercise counselling and referral in cancer care: an international scoping survey of health care practitioners' knowledge, practices, barriers, and facilitators. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:9379-9391. [PMID: 36173560 PMCID: PMC9521001 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07342-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence supports the role of prescribed exercise for cancer survivors, yet few are advised to exercise by a healthcare practitioner (HCP). We sought to investigate the gap between HCPs' knowledge and practice from an international perspective. METHODS An online questionnaire was administered to HCPs working in cancer care between February 2020 and February 2021. The questionnaire assessed knowledge, beliefs, and practices regarding exercise counselling and referral of cancer survivors to exercise programs. RESULTS The questionnaire was completed by 375 participants classified as medical practitioners (42%), nurses (28%), exercise specialists (14%), and non-exercise allied health practitioners (16%). Between 35 and 50% of participants self-reported poor knowledge of when, how, and which cancer survivors to refer to exercise programs or professionals, and how to counsel based on exercise guidelines. Commonly reported barriers to exercise counselling were safety concerns, time constraints, cancer survivors being told to rest by friends and family, and not knowing how to screen people for suitability to exercise (40-48%). Multivariable logistic regression models including age, gender, practitioner group, leisure-time physical activity, and recall of guidelines found significant effects for providing specific exercise advice (χ2(7) = 117.31, p < .001), discussing the role of exercise in symptom management (χ2(7) = 65.13, p < .001) and cancer outcomes (χ2(7) = 58.69, p < .001), and referring cancer survivors to an exercise program or specialist (χ2(7) = 72.76, p < .001). CONCLUSION Additional education and practical support are needed to equip HCPs to provide cancer survivors with exercise guidelines, resources, and referrals to exercise specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imogen Ramsey
- Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Alexandre Chan
- School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Clinical Pharmacy Practice, University of California, Irvine, CA USA
| | - Andreas Charalambous
- Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus ,Department of Nursing, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Yin Ting Cheung
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - H. S. Darling
- Department of Medical Oncology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bangalore, India
| | - Lawson Eng
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa Grech
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Medicine Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia ,Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia ,Health Sciences, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia ,Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicolas H. Hart
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA Australia ,Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA Australia ,School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD Australia ,Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA Australia
| | - Deborah Kirk
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA Australia
| | - Sandra A. Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Dagmara Poprawski
- Department of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ,College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia Australia
| | - Elke Rammant
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Margaret I. Fitch
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Raymond J. Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fry A, Mitchell SA, Wiener L. Considerations for conducting and reporting digitally supported cognitive interviews with children and adults. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:131. [PMID: 34921668 PMCID: PMC8683807 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00371-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive interviewing is a well-established qualitative method used to develop and refine PRO measures. A range of digital technologies including phone, web conferencing, and electronic survey platforms can be leveraged to support the conduct of cognitive interviewing in both children and adults. These technologies offer a potential solution to enrolling underrepresented populations, including those with rare conditions, functional limitations and geographic or socioeconomic barriers. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of digital technologies for qualitative interviewing will remain essential. However, there is limited guidance about adapting cognitive interviewing procedures to allow for remote data capture, especially with children. METHODS Synthesizing the literature and our research experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, we examine considerations for implementing digitally supported cognitive interviews with children, adolescents, and adults. We offer recommendations to optimize data quality and empirical rigor and illustrate the application of these recommendations in an ongoing cognitive interviewing study to develop and refine a new pediatric PRO measure. RESULTS Good research practices must address participant and researcher preparation for study-related procedures and should anticipate and pre-emptively manage technological barriers. Field notes should detail interview context, audio/video cues, and any impact of technological difficulties on data quality. The approaches we recommend have been tested in an ongoing cognitive interviewing study that is enrolling children/adolescents with cGVHD ages 5-17 and their caregivers [NCT04044365]. The combined use of telephone and videoconferencing to conduct cognitive interviews remotely is feasible and acceptable and yields meaningful data to improve the content validity of our new PRO measure of cGVHD symptom bother. CONCLUSION Digitally supported cognitive interviewing procedures will be increasingly employed. Remote data collection can accelerate accrual, particularly in multi-site studies, and may allow for interviewer personnel and data management to be centralized within a coordinating center, thus conserving resources. Research is needed to further test and refine techniques for remote cognitive interviewing, particularly in traditionally underrepresented populations, including children and non-English speakers. Expansion of international standards to address digitally supported remote qualitative data capture appears warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Fry
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Sandra A. Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 8909 Medical Center Drive, 3E-448, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
| | - Lori Wiener
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Goklemez S, Saligan LN, Pirsl F, Holtzman NG, Ostojic A, Steinberg SM, Hakim FT, Rose JJ, Kang Z, Yu Y, Cao L, Mitchell SA, Im A, Pavletic SZ. Clinical characterization and cytokine profile of fatigue in hematologic malignancy patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 2021; 56:2934-2939. [PMID: 34433916 PMCID: PMC8639672 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01419-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Limited information is available regarding clinical and biological properties of fatigue in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD). Patients with moderate-to-severe cGvHD per NIH criteria were enrolled on a cross-sectional study and categorized as "fatigued" if SF-36 vitality score was <40. Clinical and laboratory parameters of fatigued (n = 109) and nonfatigued patients (n = 72) were compared. In univariate analysis, walk velocity, NIH joint-fascia score, human activity profile, and SF-36 physical and mental health self-report scales were correlates of fatigue. No cGvHD biomarkers were associated with fatigue. NIH joint score, Lee sleep and depression questions, and PG-SGA activities and function score jointly predicted fatigue. Though higher rates of depression and insomnia were reported in the fatigued group, antidepressant or sleep aid use did not differ between groups. Survival ratio was not significantly different by fatigue status. Pathophysiology of fatigue in patients with cGvHD is complex and may involve mechanisms unrelated to disease activity. Patients with cGvHD experiencing fatigue had higher rates of untreated depression and insomnia, highlighting the need to focus clinical management of these conditions to improve health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sencer Goklemez
- Immune Deficiency and Cellular Therapy Program, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Filip Pirsl
- Immune Deficiency and Cellular Therapy Program, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD
| | - Noa G. Holtzman
- Immune Deficiency and Cellular Therapy Program, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD
| | - Alen Ostojic
- Immune Deficiency and Cellular Therapy Program, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD,Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Frances T. Hakim
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunotherapy Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jeremy J. Rose
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunotherapy Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Zhigang Kang
- Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Yunkai Yu
- Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Liang Cao
- Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sandra A. Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Annie Im
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Steven Z. Pavletic
- Immune Deficiency and Cellular Therapy Program, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Mitchell SA, Hong F, Salehi E, McCleary N, Ligibel JA, Reyes K, Berry DL. Measurement properties of brief neuropathy screening items in cancer patients receiving taxanes, platinums, or proteasome inhibitors. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:101. [PMID: 34568984 PMCID: PMC8473487 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00377-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely detection of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is critical to effectively tailor chemotherapy dose levels and offer supportive care. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine the reliability and validity of the two Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™) numbness and tingling severity and interference items to screen for CIPN in patients receiving taxanes, platinums, or proteasome inhibitors. METHODS Participants (N = 142) completed the two PRO-CTCAE items, a 0-10 numerical rating scale of worst CIPN pain intensity, and the Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN20 (QLQ-CIPN20) prior to three clinical visits (T1, T2, T3) during neurotoxic chemotherapy. Participants completed the two PRO-CTCAE items again following the T3 clinical visit (T4). In addition, study staff administered the modified Total Neuropathy Score-Clinical Version (TNSc©) at T3. We examined floor (i.e., no CIPN severity or interference) and ceiling effects, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, longitudinal validity, construct validity of the response categories, and sensitivity and specificity of the two PRO-CTCAE items. RESULTS At T3, 29% of participants had PRO-CTCAE severity scores at the floor; 60.1% of participants reported interference item scores at the floor. Agreements between scores reported at T3 and T4 for PRO-CTCAE severity (ICC = 0.79) and interference (ICC = 0.73) were moderate to strong. The PRO-CTCAE severity and interference items correlated moderately-strongly with QLQ-CIPN20 sensory (Spearman's ρ-range = 0.53-0.72) and motor (Spearman's ρ-range = 0.50-0.58) subscale scores. The Cohen's d from T1 to T3 for the PRO-CTCAE items were small (severity: d = 0.32, interference: d = 0.40) and comparable to the effect sizes for change observed with the QLQ-CIPN20. The PRO-CTCAE severity (0-3) and interference (0-2) response categories distinguished respondents with significantly different levels of QLQ-CIPN20 sensory and motor subscale scores (p < 0.001 via Jonckheere-Terpstra tests). The sensitivity and specificity of the PRO-CTCAE severity item (cutoff > 0) to detect probable sensory peripheral neuropathy were 95.83% and 65.22%, while the sensitivity and specificity of the PRO-CTCAE™ interference item (cutoff > 0) were 51.39% and 73.91%. CONCLUSION Preliminary evidence supports the reliability and validity of the PRO-CTCAE numbness and tingling items for CIPN screening, although there may be floor effects and limitations in the capacity of the PRO-CTCAE items to identify the full range of CIPN sensory and motor features beyond numbness and tingling. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03514680. Registered 21 April 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03514680.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Knoerl
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. .,University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Emanuele Mazzola
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Fangxin Hong
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elahe Salehi
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nadine McCleary
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kaitlen Reyes
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Donna L Berry
- Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Da Silva Lopes AM, Colomer-Lahiguera S, Mederos Alfonso N, Aedo-Lopez V, Spurrier-Bernard G, Tolstrup LK, Pappot H, Aspeslagh S, Rogiers A, Neyns B, Haanen JB, Mitchell SA, Addeo A, Michielin O, Eicher M. Patient-reported outcomes for monitoring symptomatic toxicities in cancer patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: A Delphi study. Eur J Cancer 2021; 157:225-237. [PMID: 34536946 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may not be fully covered by existing measures like the PRO-CTCAE™. Selecting PRO-CTCAE™ items for monitoring symptomatic adverse events is hindered by the heterogeneity and complexity of IrAEs, and no standardised selection process exists. We aimed to reach expert consensus on the PRO-CTCAE™ symptom terms relevant for cancer patients receiving ICIs and to gather preliminary expert opinions about additional symptom terms reflecting ICI symptomatic toxicities. Additionally, we gathered expert consensus about a core set of priority symptom terms for prospective surveillance and monitoring. DESIGN This Delphi study involved an international panel of experts (n = 6 physicians; n = 3 nurses, n = 1 psychiatrist and n = 1 patient advocates). Experts prioritised the relevance and importance of symptom terms to monitor in patients treated with ICIs. RESULTS Experts reached a consensus on the relevance of all (n = 80) PRO-CTCAE™ Symptom Terms. Consensus on the importance of these symptom terms for prospective monitoring in patients receiving ICIs was reached for 81% (n = 65) of these terms. Additional symptoms terms (n = 56) were identified, with a consensus that 84% (47/56) of these additional symptom terms should also be considered when monitoring symptomatic IrAEs. CONCLUSION This study identified a prioritised list of symptom terms for prospective surveillance for symptomatic IrAEs in patients receiving ICI treatment. Our results indicate the need to strengthen the validity of PRO measures used to monitor patients receiving ICIs. While these results provided some support for the content validity of the PRO CTCAE™ and resulted in a preliminary set of salient symptomatic adverse events related to the use of ICIs, broader international agreement and patient involvement are needed to further validate our initial findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Manuel Da Silva Lopes
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland; Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sara Colomer-Lahiguera
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland; Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Veronica Aedo-Lopez
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Lærke Kjær Tolstrup
- Department of Oncology, Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Anne Rogiers
- Department of Psychiatry, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel Oncologisch Centrum, Brussels, Belgium
| | - John B Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alfredo Addeo
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Michielin
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland; Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cheung YT, Chan A, Charalambous A, Darling HS, Eng L, Grech L, van den Hurk CJG, Kirk D, Mitchell SA, Poprawski D, Rammant E, Ramsey I, Fitch MI, Chan RJ. The use of patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer care: preliminary insights from a multinational scoping survey of oncology practitioners. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:1427-1439. [PMID: 34524527 PMCID: PMC8440726 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06545-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background There exists scant evidence on the optimal approaches to integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice. This study gathered oncology practitioners’ experiences with implementing PROs in cancer care. Methods Between December 2019 and June 2020, we surveyed practitioners who reported spending > 5% of their time providing clinical care to cancer patients. Respondents completed an online survey describing their experiences with and barriers to using PROs in clinical settings. Results In total, 362 practitioners (physicians 38.7%, nurses 46.7%, allied health professionals 14.6%) completed the survey, representing 41 countries (Asia–Pacific 42.5%, North America 30.1%, Europe 24.0%, others 3.3%). One quarter (25.4%) identified themselves as “high frequency users” who conducted PRO assessments on > 80% of their patients. Practitioners commonly used PROs to facilitate communication (60.2%) and monitor treatment responses (52.6%). The most commonly reported implementation barriers were a lack of technological support (70.4%) and absence of a robust workflow to integrate PROs in clinical care (61.5%). Compared to practitioners from high-income countries, more practitioners in low-middle income countries reported not having access to a local PRO expert (P < .0001) and difficulty in identifying the appropriate PRO domains (P = .006). Compared with nurses and allied health professionals, physicians were more likely to perceive disruptions in clinical care during PRO collection (P = .001) as an implementation barrier. Conclusions Only a quarter of the surveyed practitioners reported capturing PROs in routine clinical practice. The implementation barriers to PRO use varied across respondents in different professions and levels of socioeconomic resources. Our findings can be applied to guide planning and implementation of PRO collection in cancer care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06545-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Ting Cheung
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alexandre Chan
- School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Clinical Pharmacy Practice, University of California, Irvine, LA, USA
| | - Andreas Charalambous
- Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Nursing, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - H S Darling
- Department of Medical Oncology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bangalore, India
| | - Lawson Eng
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa Grech
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Medicine Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Health Sciences, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Deborah Kirk
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dagmara Poprawski
- Department of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Elke Rammant
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Imogen Ramsey
- Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Margaret I Fitch
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 207 Chisholm Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Raymond J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wintheiser GA, Ruddy KJ, Herrin J, Rahman PA, Pachman DR, Leppin AL, Rutten LJF, Lee MK, Griffin JM, Tofthagen C, Chlan LL, Ridgeway JL, Mitchell SA, Cheville AL. Receptivity to a Nurse-Led Symptom Management Intervention Amongst Highly Symptomatic Patients with Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 114:458-466. [PMID: 34508602 PMCID: PMC8902324 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The symptom burden associated with cancer and its treatment can negatively impact patients' quality of life and survival. Symptom-focused collaborative care model (CCM) interventions can improve outcomes, but only if patients engage with them. We assessed the receptivity of severely symptomatic oncology patients to a remote nurse-led CCM intervention. METHODS In a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, stepped wedge trial conducted as part of the NCI IMPACT Consortium (E2C2, NCT03892967), patients receiving cancer care were asked to rate their sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, emotional distress, fatigue, and limitations in physical function. Patients reporting at least one severe symptom (≥7/10) were offered phone consultation with a nurse symptom care manager (RN SCM). Initially, patients had to "opt-in" to receive a call, but the protocol was later modified so they had to "opt-out" if they did not want a call. We assessed the impact of opt-in vs. opt-out framing and patient characteristics on receptiveness to RN SCM calls. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Of the 1204 symptom assessments (from 864 patients) on which at least one severe symptom was documented, 469 (39.0%) indicated receptivity to an RN SCM phone call. The opt-out period (odds ratio [OR] = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 2.32, p=.01), receiving care at a tertiary care center (OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 2.18 to 5.91, p<.001), and having severe pain (OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.24 to 2.62, p=.002), were associated with statistically significantly greater willingness to receive a call. CONCLUSION Many severely symptomatic patients were not receptive to an RN SCM phone call. Better understanding of reasons for refusal and strategies for improving patient receptivity are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jeph Herrin
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Parvez A Rahman
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Aaron L Leppin
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lila J Finney Rutten
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Minji K Lee
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joan M Griffin
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Cindy Tofthagen
- Department of Nursing, Nursing Research Division, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Linda L Chlan
- Department of Nursing, Nursing Research Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jennifer L Ridgeway
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrea L Cheville
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wolff D, Herzberg PY, Herrmann A, Pavletic SZ, Heussner P, Mumm F, Höfer C, Hilgendorf I, Hemmati PG, Holler E, Greinix H, Mitchell SA. Correction: Post-transplant multimorbidity index and quality of life in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease-results from a joint evaluation of a prospective German multicenter validation trial and a cohort from the National Institutes of Health. Bone Marrow Transplant 2021; 56:2618. [PMID: 34413472 PMCID: PMC8486661 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01404-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Wolff
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Philipp Y Herzberg
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Personality Psychology and Psychological Assessment, Helmut Schmidt University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Herrmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Steven Z Pavletic
- Immune Deficiency Cellular Therapy Program, Center of Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pia Heussner
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christina Höfer
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Inken Hilgendorf
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Philipp G Hemmati
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow Klinikum Charité-University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ernst Holler
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Byrne M, Leiser J, Mitchell SA, Kent EE, Siembida EJ, Somers T, Arem H. Trajectories of fatigue in a population-based sample of older adult breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors: an analysis using the SEER-MHOS data resource. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:7393-7402. [PMID: 34052930 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06267-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fatigue is one of the most common and distressing symptoms experienced by cancer survivors. Understanding fatigue trajectories from pre- to post-diagnosis could inform fatigue prevention and management strategies. METHODS We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) linked data resource to characterize fatigue trajectories and their predictors 1214 older adult survivors of breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer. Fatigue was measured prior to the cancer diagnosis (T0) and at two timepoints after diagnosis (T1: mean = 20 months and T2: mean = 39 months post-diagnosis). Latent growth curve modeling and mixed effects models for repeated measurements were used to investigate fatigue experiences before and after a cancer diagnosis. RESULTS Overall, mean fatigue T-scores declined (T0 = 50, T1 = 46, and T2 = 45) indicating worsening fatigue over time. Four latent trajectory subgroups were identified: severe fatigue worsening over time (8.2% of sample), severe fatigue persisting over time (14.4%), no fatigue pre-diagnosis and mild fatigue post-diagnosis (44.4%), and not fatigued (33%). Age, cancer stage, comorbidities, and depressed mood predicted membership in the two trajectory groups experiencing severe fatigue that persisted or that worsened post-diagnosis. Older age, advanced cancer stage at diagnosis, and depressed mood were significantly associated with worsening fatigue from T1 to T2 (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Evaluating cancer patients for depressive symptoms and considering prior fatigue levels, age, comorbid conditions, and cancer stage may help providers anticipate fatigue trajectories and implement pre-emptive strategies to lessen fatigue impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Byrne
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Consulting Service, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jaclyn Leiser
- Department of Epidemiology, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Erin E Kent
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Siembida
- Center for Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, NY, Manhasset, USA
| | - Tamara Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hannah Arem
- Healthcare Delivery Research, Medstar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Madariaga A, Mitchell SA, Pittman T, Wang L, Bowering V, Kavak N, Quintos J, Chang K, Ramsahai J, Karakasis K, Welch S, Dhani NC, Lheureux S, Oza AM. Patient self-reporting of tolerability using PRO-CTCAE: A randomized double-blind placebo controlled phase II trial comparing gemcitabine in combination with adavosertib or placebo in women with platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5541 Background: A 4 month improvement in OS was demonstrated when Wee1 inhibitor adavosertib (Ad) and gemcitabine (G; arm A) was compared to G and placebo (P; arm B) in a phase 2 trial in recurrent ovarian cancer (NCT02151292). The patient reported outcome version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE) was used to capture self-report of the frequency, severity and/or interference (scored 0-4; higher scores indicating worse symptomatic adverse events [syAEs]). Methods: Ad/P was given orally on D1-2, D8-9, D15-16 with G D1, D8, D15 in a 28-day cycle. English speaking pts in 2 centres completed PRO-CTCAE items electronically in clinic at baseline, D1 and D15 of each cycle and off treatment. An exploratory objective was to characterize syAEs in the first 3 months of therapy. We calculated 12-week area under the curve (AUC12w) as a measure of syAE over time and incremental AUC12w (iAUC12w) for adjustment to baseline syAEs and compared arms A and B using an independent samples t-test. We assessed proportion of scores 3-4 at 6 time-points and compared them using Fisher’s Exact Test at each survey. Results: 51 pts were enrolled and completed ≥1 survey, 47 were evaluable for primary outcome (arm A: 28, B: 19). ECOG status was ≤1 in 44/47 pts. Median number of cycles of therapy were 5 (1-16) in arm A, and 2 (1-16) in B. Survey completion rates were high (arm A 93%, B 95%). Mean AUC12w fatigue severity (A 152 [standard error 9] vs B 112 [10]; p = 0.005) and interference (A 144 [11] vs 98 [15]; p = 0.018), diarrhea frequency (A 70 [12] vs B 33 [9]; p = 0.014), mucositis (A 23 [6] vs B 6 [3]; p = 0.012) and difficulty swallowing severity (A 10 [3] vs B 2 [2]; p = 0.023) were higher in arm A (any grade). There were no statistically significant between-arm differences in abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, vomiting and anxiety. The iAUC12w was significantly higher in arm A vs B for difficulty swallowing severity (A 10.1 [3] vs B -2.7 [4.7]; p = 0.02), mucositis severity (A 19.9 [6.6] vs B -3.1 [6.9]; p = 0.02) and fatigue severity (A 35.2 [8.2] vs B -3.1 [9.8]; p = 0.005). Proportions with high scores (3-4) were only significantly higher at C1D15 for fatigue severity in arm A (A 55% vs B 19%, p = 0.044). No significant differences were seen in other 3-4 scores per survey time. Conclusions: This is the first study evaluating pts self-reported toxicity with adavosertib in a randomized setting, allowing pts self-evaluation of toxicity in the context of improved PFS and OS. Greater fatigue, diarrhea, mucositis and difficulty swallowing were experienced by pts receiving adavosertib and gemcitabine, but score 3-4 reached significance on C1D15 fatigue only. No significant differences were detected in syAE profile for nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating and anxiety. This approach allows objective assessment of pts perception of toxicity with complex therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02151292.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainhoa Madariaga
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sandra A. Mitchell
- National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Tyler Pittman
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Valerie Bowering
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nisan Kavak
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Judy Quintos
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karen Chang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Katherine Karakasis
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Neesha C. Dhani
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Amit M. Oza
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Karpen SR, Klein A, Alloway RR, Albrecht R, Belen O, Campbell M, Kluetz P, Minasian LM, Mitchell SA, O'Doherty I, Papadopoulos E, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Spear N, van Gelder T, Velidedeoglu E, Page CA, Everly MJ. The Role of Patient-reported Outcomes and Medication Adherence Assessment in Patient-focused Drug Development for Solid Organ Transplantation. Transplantation 2021; 105:941-944. [PMID: 33901129 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rita R Alloway
- Division of Nephrology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | | | - Ozlem Belen
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | | | - Paul Kluetz
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Lori M Minasian
- National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | | | - Teun van Gelder
- Departments of Hospital Pharmacy and Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - C Alex Page
- University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gallicchio L, Tonorezos E, de Moor JS, Elena J, Farrell M, Green P, Mitchell SA, Mollica MA, Perna F, Gottlieb Saiontz N, Zhu L, Rowland J, Mayer DK. Evidence Gaps in Cancer Survivorship Care: A Report from the 2019 National Cancer Institute Cancer Survivorship Workshop. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1136-1142. [PMID: 33755126 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Today, there are more than 16.9 million cancer survivors in the United States; this number is projected to grow to 22.2 million by 2030. While much progress has been made in understanding cancer survivors needs and in improving survivorship care since the seminal 2006 Institute of Medicine report From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition, there is a need to identify evidence gaps and research priorities pertaining to cancer survivorship. Thus, in April 2019, the National Cancer Institute convened grant-funded extramural cancer survivorship researchers, representatives of professional organizations, cancer survivors, and advocates for a one-day in-person meeting. At this meeting, and in a subsequent webinar aimed at soliciting input from the wider survivorship community, evidence gaps and ideas for next steps in the following six areas, identified from the 2006 Institute of Medicine report, were discussed: surveillance for recurrence and new cancers, management of long-term and late physical effects, management of long-term and late psychosocial effects, health promotion, care coordination, and financial hardship. Identified evidence gaps and next steps across the areas included the need to understand and address disparities among cancer survivors, to conduct longitudinal studies as well as longer-term (>5 years post-diagnosis) follow-up studies, to leverage existing data, and to incorporate implementation science strategies to translate findings into practice. Designing studies to address these broad evidence gaps, as well as those identified in each area, will expand our understanding of cancer survivors' diverse needs, ultimately leading to the development and delivery of more comprehensive evidence-based quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Gallicchio
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Emily Tonorezos
- Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Janet S de Moor
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Joanne Elena
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Margaret Farrell
- Division of Communications and Marketing, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health
| | - Paige Green
- Basic Biobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Health Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Michelle A Mollica
- Outcomes Research Branch, Health Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Frank Perna
- Health Behaviors Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Nicole Gottlieb Saiontz
- Office of the Director, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Li Zhu
- Statistical Research and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Julia Rowland
- Smith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington DC
| | - Deborah K Mayer
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Williams KM, Pavletic SZ, Lee SJ, Martin PJ, Lang H, Farthing DE, Hakim FT, Rose JJ, Manning-Geist B, Comis LE, Cowen EW, Justus D, Baird K, Cheng GS, Shelhamer JH, Blacklock-Schuver B, Avila D, Steinberg SM, Mitchell SA, Gress RE. Immune Correlates from a Prospective Trial Suggest Leukotriene Signaling and Alternative Macrophage Activation in Clinical Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome. Transplant Cell Ther 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-6367(21)00111-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
37
|
Molés-Poveda P, Comis LE, Joe GO, Mitchell SA, Pichard DC, Rosenstein RK, Solomon B, Pavletic SZ, Cowen EW. Rehabilitation Interventions in the Multidisciplinary Management of Patients With Sclerotic Graft-Versus-Host Disease of the Skin and Fascia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 102:776-788. [PMID: 33347890 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a multisystemic disorder that affects 30%-80% of patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 10%-15% of GVHD patients develop sclerotic features affecting the skin or deeper tissues, leading to functional limitations and poor quality of life. There is limited literature regarding the indications and efficacy of specific rehabilitative interventions in sclerotic GVHD (sclGVHD). In this article, we summarize the current evidence supporting rehabilitation intervention in sclGVHD and offer our approach to the multidisciplinary management of this disease. In addition, we review techniques that have been employed in other sclerotic skin diseases (eg, iontophoresis, extracorporeal shock waves, botulinum toxin A, adipose derived stromal vascular fraction), but that require further validation in the sclGVHD setting. Ultimately, optimal care for this complex disease requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes a rehabilitation and adaptive program tailored to each patient's needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Molés-Poveda
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario de la Plana, Catellón, Spain.
| | - Leora E Comis
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Galen O Joe
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Dominique C Pichard
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Rachel K Rosenstein
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Beth Solomon
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Steven Z Pavletic
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Edward W Cowen
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women are at risk of mood disturbance during treatment for breast cancer. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to identify classes of women experiencing similar trajectories of depressed mood and anxiety while receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer and to determine associated antecedents and outcomes. The specific aims were to (1) determine the distinct trajectory classes associated with severity of depressed mood and anxiety reported by women undergoing cycles 2 and 3 of chemotherapy for breast cancer, (2) determine if class membership is associated with various antecedent variables, and (3) determine if class membership is associated with days of missed work and hours spent lying down. METHODS In a secondary analysis, classes were identified using Latent Growth Mixture Modeling. Antecedents and outcomes related to class membership were explored. RESULTS Participants (n = 166; mean age, 53 [SD, 10.8] years) were mostly white (91.46%); half had early-stage disease. Two trajectories of depressed mood and anxiety were identified. Receipt of doxorubicin was associated with the higher severity class for depressed mood (P < .01) and anxiety (P = .04). No college education (P = .03) or spending more hours lying down (P = .03) was associated with the higher severity class for anxiety. CONCLUSIONS Distinct trajectories of mood disturbance are distinguished by baseline severity. Further study is needed to determine if biologic or genomic factors are associated with class membership. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Identification of women at risk of mood disturbance may allow clinicians to intensify symptom management. Mood disturbance early in the treatment trajectory warrants management to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meagan Whisenant
- Author Affiliations: Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Whisenant); College of Nursing (Drs Wong, Beck, and Mooney) and Huntsman Cancer Institute (Drs Beck and Mooney), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; and Outcomes Research Brant, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland (Dr Mitchell)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Veldhuijzen E, Walraven I, Mitchell SA, Moore EY, McKown SM, Lauritzen M, Kim KJ, Belderbos JSA, Aaronson NK. Dutch translation and linguistic validation of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™). J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020; 4:81. [PMID: 33025309 PMCID: PMC7538479 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00249-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™) is a library of items for assessing symptomatic adverse events by patient self-report in oncology trials. The aim of this multi-site study was to generate and linguistically validate a Dutch language version of the U.S. PRO-CTCAE for use in the Netherlands and Dutch-speaking Belgium. METHODS All 124 items in the PRO-CTCAE item library were translated into Dutch using established translation procedures, including dual forward translations, reconciliation, back-translation, reconciliation of the source with the back-translation, and expert reviews. Harmonization of the translation for use in both the Netherlands and Belgium was achieved via an iterative review process in which the translations were discussed and reconciled by consensus of PRO experts, clinicians and bilingual Dutch translators. The translated PRO-CTCAE™ items were completed by a geographically-diverse sample of Dutch speaking patients from the Netherlands (n = 40) and Belgium (n = 60), and who were currently receiving or who had recently completed cancer-directed therapy. Patients were diverse with respect to age, sex, educational attainment, and cancer diagnosis. Cognitive debriefing, using a semi-structured interview guide, probed for comprehension and clarity of PRO-CTCAE symptom terms, attributes (e.g. frequency, severity, interference), response choices, and understanding of 'at its worst' and 'in the last 7 days'. Items for which the patient data indicated possible difficulties were considered for revision. RESULTS Three items underwent minor phrasing revision and retesting was not deemed necessary. The symptom term for stretch marks was poorly understood by 12.5% of participants, and this item was revised to include parenthetical phrasing. It was retested with 10 participants from Belgium (n = 5) and the Netherlands (n = 5) and demonstrated acceptable comprehension. CONCLUSIONS The Dutch language version of PRO-CTCAE has been successfully developed and linguistically validated for use in oncology studies in the Netherlands and Dutch-speaking Belgium. Extending the availability of NCI PRO-CTCAE in languages beyond English increases international consistency in the capture of Patient-Reported outcomes in patients participating in cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evalien Veldhuijzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Walraven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | | | | | | | - Katherine J Kim
- Genentech - a member of the Roche Group, South San Francisco, USA
| | - José S A Belderbos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wolff D, Herzberg PY, Herrmann A, Pavletic SZ, Heussner P, Mumm F, Höfer C, Hilgendorf I, Hemmati PG, Holler E, Greinix H, Mitchell SA. Post-transplant multimorbidity index and quality of life in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease-results from a joint evaluation of a prospective German multicenter validation trial and a cohort from the National Institutes of Health. Bone Marrow Transplant 2020; 56:243-256. [PMID: 32737446 PMCID: PMC8376641 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-01017-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Comorbidity after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) impairs quality of life (QoL), physical functioning, and survival. We developed a new standardized measure to capture comorbidity after transplantation, the Post-transplant Multimorbidity Index (PTMI) in a cohort of 50 long term survivors. We subsequently evaluated the content validity and impact on survival and QoL within a multicenter trial, including 208 patients (pts) after alloHSCT, who were prospectively evaluated applying the FACT-BMT, the Human Activity Profile (HAP), the SF-36 v.2, PTMI and the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI). The most prevalent comorbidities were compensated arterial hypertension (28.4%), ambulatory infections (25.5%), iron overload (23%), mild renal function impairment (20%), and osteoporosis (13%). Applying the PTMI 13% of patients had no comorbidity, while 37.1% had 1–3 comorbidities, 27.4% had 4–6 comorbidities, and 13.5% had > 6 comorbidities. Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) was significantly associated with the PTMI, while age and prior acute GvHD were not. In contrast, the HCT-CI was not associated with the presence of cGvHD. cGvHD was significantly associated with depression (r = 0.16), neurological disease (r = 0.21), osteoporosis (r = 0.18) and nonmelanoma skin cancer (r = 0.26). The PTMI demonstrated strong measurement properties and compared to the HCT-CI captured a wider range of comorbidities associated with cGvHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Wolff
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Philipp Y Herzberg
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Personality Psychology and Psychological Assessment, Helmut Schmidt University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Herrmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Steven Z Pavletic
- Immune Deficiency Cellular Therapy Program, Center of Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pia Heussner
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christina Höfer
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Inken Hilgendorf
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Philipp G Hemmati
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow Klinikum Charité-University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ernst Holler
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
de Moor JS, Gray SW, Mitchell SA, Klabunde CN, Freedman AN. Oncologist Confidence in Genomic Testing and Implications for Using Multimarker Tumor Panel Tests in Practice. JCO Precis Oncol 2020; 4:PO.19.00338. [PMID: 32923869 PMCID: PMC7446310 DOI: 10.1200/po.19.00338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The evolution of precision oncology increasingly requires oncologists to incorporate genomic testing into practice. Yet, providers' confidence with genomic testing is poorly documented. This article describes medical oncologists' confidence with genomic testing and the association between genomic confidence and test use. METHODS We used data from the 2017 National Survey of Precision Medicine in Cancer Treatment to characterize oncologists' confidence with genomic testing. Genomic confidence was examined separately by type of test user: next-generation sequencing (NGS) only, gene expression (GE) only, both NGS and GE, or nonuser. Predictors of genomic confidence were examined with multinomial logistic regression. The association between genomic confidence and test use was examined with multivariable linear regression. RESULTS More than 75% of genomic test users were either moderately or very confident about using results from multimarker tumor panel tests to guide patient care. Confidence with using multimarker tumor panel tests was highest among both NGS and GE test users, with 60.1% very confident in using test results, and lowest among NGS-only test users, with 38.2% very confident in using test results. Oncologists were most confident in using single-gene tests and least confident in using whole-genome or -exome sequencing to guide patient care. Genomic confidence was positively associated with self-reported test use. In adjusted models, training in genomics, larger patient volume, and treating patients with solid tumors predicted higher genomic confidence. Onsite pathology services and receipt of electronic medical record alerts for genomic testing predicted lower genomic confidence. CONCLUSION Oncologists' confidence varies by testing platform, patient volume, genomic training, and practice infrastructure. Research is needed to identify modifiable factors that can be targeted to enhance provider confidence with genomic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet S. de Moor
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Stacy W. Gray
- Department of Population Sciences and Medical Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Sandra A. Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Carrie N. Klabunde
- Office of Disease Prevention, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Andrew N. Freedman
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yoon J, Sim SH, Kang D, Han G, Kim Y, Ahn J, Oh D, Lee ES, Kong SY, Cho J, Mitchell SA. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Language Version of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 59:1082-1088.e6. [PMID: 32044423 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 01/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT To improve precision and accuracy in the capture of symptomatic adverse events (AEs) by self-report, the U.S. National Cancer Institute has developed a library of 124 patient-reported outcome (PRO) items reflecting 78 symptomatic AEs drawn from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The PRO-CTCAE™ item library has been translated and linguistically validated in the Korean language. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of PRO-CTCAE-Korean. METHODS PRO-CTCAE-Korean and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) were administered to 1358 Korean-speaking individuals receiving treatment for cancer at two medical centers in Korea (mean age 55.1 years; SD ±11.9; 60% females; and 61% high school education or less). A subset of 82 study participants completed the same two measures on a second occasion approximately three days later. RESULTS Correlations between PRO-CTCAE-Korean and conceptually relevant QLQ-C30 items were all greater than r = 0.30 except for headache severity. Most PRO-CTCAE-Korean items correlated at least moderately with QLQ-C30 summary scores. Monotonically decreasing total QLQ-C30 scores were observed across worsening levels of symptom frequency, severity, and interference (all P < 0.01), indicating that PRO-CTCAE-Korean response choices are well comprehended, and that PRO-CTCAE-Korean discriminates respondents with different levels of symptom burden. PRO-CTCAE-Korean also demonstrated generally acceptable to good reliability (88% of items intraclass correlation coefficient >0.50). CONCLUSION PRO-CTCAE-Korean is a reliable and valid instrument to capture symptomatic AEs by self-report in patients on cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junghee Yoon
- Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea; Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Hoon Sim
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Danbee Kang
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gayeon Han
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngha Kim
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinseok Ahn
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dongryul Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Sook Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Division of Translational Science, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Sun Young Kong
- Division of Translational Science, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Juhee Cho
- Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea; Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Department of Health, Behavior and Society and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Goklemez S, Im AP, Cao L, Pirsl F, Steinberg SM, Curtis LM, Mitchell SA, Cowen EW, Baruffaldi J, Rose J, Mays J, Ostojic A, Holtzman NG, Hakim FT, Pavletic SZ. Clinical characteristics and cytokine biomarkers in patients with chronic graft-vs-host disease persisting seven or more years after diagnosis. Am J Hematol 2020; 95:387-394. [PMID: 31903638 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the leading late complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Many patients receive multiple lines of systemic therapy until cGVHD resolves, but about 15% remain on systemic treatment for more than 7 years after cGVHD diagnosis. This study describes the clinical and biological factors of patients who present with cGVHD persisting for ≥7 years (persistent cGVHD). Patients with persistent cGVHD (n = 38) and those with cGVHD for <1 year (early cGVHD) (n = 83) were enrolled in a prospective cross-sectional natural history study. Patients in the persistent cGVHD group were a median of 10.2 years from cGVHD diagnosis (range 7-27 years). Fifty-eight percent of persistent cGVHD patients (22/38) were receiving systemic immunosuppression, compared to 88% (73/83) in the early cGVHD group. In multivariable analysis, bone marrow (BM) stem cell source, presence of ENA autoantibodies, higher NIH lung score, higher platelet counts, and higher IgA levels were significantly associated with persistent cGVHD. A high sensitivity panel of serum biomarkers including seven cytokines diagnostic for cGVHD was analyzed and showed significantly lower levels of BAFF and CXCL10 in patients with persistent cGVHD. In conclusion, standardly accepted clinical measures of disease severity may not accurately reflect disease activity in patients with persistent cGVHD. However, many patients with persistent cGVHD are still receiving systemic immunosuppression despite lacking evidence of disease activity. Development of reliable clinical biomarkers of cGVHD activity may help guide future systemic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sencer Goklemez
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Annie P. Im
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
| | - Liang Cao
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Filip Pirsl
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Seth M. Steinberg
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | | | - Sandra A. Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Edward W. Cowen
- Dermatology Branch National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Judy Baruffaldi
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Jeremy Rose
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Jacqueline Mays
- Oral Immunobiology Unit, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Alen Ostojic
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Noa G. Holtzman
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Frances T. Hakim
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Steven Z. Pavletic
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chung AE, Shoenbill K, Mitchell SA, Dueck AC, Schrag D, Bruner DW, Minasian LM, St Germain D, O'Mara AM, Baumgartner P, Rogak LJ, Abernethy AP, Griffin AC, Basch EM. Patient free text reporting of symptomatic adverse events in cancer clinical research using the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 26:276-285. [PMID: 30840079 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study sought to describe patient-entered supplemental information on symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer clinical research reported via a National Cancer Institute software system and examine the feasibility of mapping these entries to established terminologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients in 3 multicenter trials electronically completed surveys during cancer treatment. Each survey included a prespecified subset of items from the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Upon completion of the survey items, patients could add supplemental symptomatic AE information in a free text box. As patients typed into the box, structured dropdown terms could be selected from the PRO-CTCAE item library or Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), or patients could type unstructured free text for submission. RESULTS Data were pooled from 1760 participants (48% women; 78% White) who completed 8892 surveys, of which 2387 (26.8%) included supplemental symptomatic AE information. Overall, 1024 (58%) patients entered supplemental information at least once, with an average of 2.3 per patient per study. This encompassed 1474 of 8892 (16.6%) dropdowns and 913 of 8892 (10.3%) unstructured free text entries. One-third of the unstructured free text entries (32%) could be mapped post hoc to a PRO-CTCAE term and 68% to a MedDRA term. DISCUSSION Participants frequently added supplemental information beyond study-specific survey items. Almost half selected a structured dropdown term, although many opted to submit unstructured free text entries. Most free text entries could be mapped post hoc to PRO-CTCAE or MedDRA terms, suggesting opportunities to enhance the system to perform real-time mapping for AE reporting. CONCLUSIONS Patient reporting of symptomatic AEs using a text box functionality with mapping to existing terminologies is both feasible and informative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene E Chung
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Program on Health and Clinical Informatics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kimberly Shoenbill
- Program on Health and Clinical Informatics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Amylou C Dueck
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deborah W Bruner
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | - Ann M O'Mara
- National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Lauren J Rogak
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amy P Abernethy
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Flatiron Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ashley C Griffin
- Program on Health and Clinical Informatics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ethan M Basch
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Program on Health and Clinical Informatics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Coens C, Pe M, Dueck AC, Sloan J, Basch E, Calvert M, Campbell A, Cleeland C, Cocks K, Collette L, Devlin N, Dorme L, Flechtner HH, Gotay C, Griebsch I, Groenvold M, King M, Kluetz PG, Koller M, Malone DC, Martinelli F, Mitchell SA, Musoro JZ, O'Connor D, Oliver K, Piault-Louis E, Piccart M, Quinten C, Reijneveld JC, Schürmann C, Smith AW, Soltys KM, Taphoorn MJB, Velikova G, Bottomley A. International standards for the analysis of quality-of-life and patient-reported outcome endpoints in cancer randomised controlled trials: recommendations of the SISAQOL Consortium. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:e83-e96. [PMID: 32007209 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30790-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as symptoms, function, and other health-related quality-of-life aspects, are increasingly evaluated in cancer randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to provide information about treatment risks, benefits, and tolerability. However, expert opinion and critical review of the literature showed no consensus on optimal methods of PRO analysis in cancer RCTs, hindering interpretation of results. The Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data Consortium was formed to establish PRO analysis recommendations. Four issues were prioritised: developing a taxonomy of research objectives that can be matched with appropriate statistical methods, identifying appropriate statistical methods for PRO analysis, standardising statistical terminology related to missing data, and determining appropriate ways to manage missing data. This Policy Review presents recommendations for PRO analysis developed through critical literature reviews and a structured collaborative process with diverse international stakeholders, which provides a foundation for endorsement; ongoing developments of these recommendations are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corneel Coens
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Madeline Pe
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Amylou C Dueck
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Jeff Sloan
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ethan Basch
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research and National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Charles Cleeland
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kim Cocks
- Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Laurence Collette
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nancy Devlin
- Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lien Dorme
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hans-Henning Flechtner
- Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Carolyn Gotay
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Mogens Groenvold
- Department of Public Health, Bispebjerg Hospital and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Madeleine King
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul G Kluetz
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Michael Koller
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jammbe Z Musoro
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel O'Connor
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | | | | | - Martine Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Chantal Quinten
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Surveillance and Response Support Unit, Epidemiological Methods Section, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jaap C Reijneveld
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Ashley Wilder Smith
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK; International Society for Quality of Life Research, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Andrew Bottomley
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rosenthal EA, Ho PS, Joe GO, Mitchell SA, Booher S, Pavletic SZ, Baird K, Cowen EW, Comis LE. Motor ability, function, and health-related quality of life as correlates of symptom burden in patients with sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease receiving imatinib mesylate. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:3679-3689. [PMID: 31811481 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05207-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore improvement in motor ability, function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and symptom severity in patients with sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease (ScGVHD) in response to treatment as well as the relationship among changes on such measures. METHODS This study was a secondary analysis of data from 13 individuals with severe ScGVHD enrolled in a clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of imatinib mesylate (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00702689). Self-reported, clinician-reported, and performance-based indicators of motor ability, function, HRQOL, and symptom severity were assessed at baseline and 6 months following the administration of imatinib mesylate. RESULTS Participants did not show statistically significant improvement on any measures over time. Approximately one-third of patients displayed clinically significant improvement on measures of motor ability (palmar pinch strength, dominant hand, 30.8%), functioning (Manual Ability Measure-36, 41.7%), HRQOL (Short Form 36 [SF-36] Mental Component Summary, 33.3%), and symptom severity (Lee Symptom Scale, 38.5%). Improvement in cGVHD symptom burden was correlated with improvement in function (Assessment of Motor and Process Skills [AMPS] and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] scores) and HRQOL (SF-36 Physical Component Summary scores). CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest the potential utility of administering patient-reported and performance-based functional measures, such as the DASH and the AMPS, to patients with cGVHD. By understanding the functional consequences of ScGVHD, interdisciplinary teams of health care providers, including rehabilitation professionals, can work to improve long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Rosenthal
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, MSC 1604, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Pei-Shu Ho
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, MSC 1604, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Galen O Joe
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, MSC 1604, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Susan Booher
- Autoimmunity and Mucosal Immunology Branch, Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Steven Z Pavletic
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kristin Baird
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Edward W Cowen
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Leora E Comis
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, MSC 1604, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Smith TG, Dunn ME, Levin KY, Tsakraklides SP, Mitchell SA, van de Poll-Franse LV, Ward KC, Wiggins CL, Wu XC, Hurlbert M, Aaronson NK. Cancer survivor perspectives on sharing patient-generated health data with central cancer registries. Qual Life Res 2019; 28:2957-2967. [PMID: 31399859 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02263-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Central cancer registries collect data and provide population-level statistics that can be tracked over time; yet registries may not capture the full range of clinically relevant outcomes. Patient-generated health data (PGHD) include health/treatment history, biometrics, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Collection of PGHD would broaden registry outcomes to better inform research, policy, and care. However, this is dependent on the willingness of patients to share such data. This study examines cancer survivors' perspectives about sharing PGHD with central cancer registries. METHODS Three U.S. central registries sampled colorectal, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and metastatic breast cancer survivors 1-4 years after diagnosis, recruiting them via mail to participate in one of seven focus groups (n = 52). Group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. RESULTS Most survivor-participants were unaware of the existence of registries. After having registries explained, all participants expressed their willingness to share PGHD with them if treated confidentially. Participants were willing to provide information on a variety of topics (e.g., medical history, medications, symptoms, financial difficulties, quality of life, biometrics, nutrition, exercise, and mental health), with a focus on long-term effects of cancer and its treatment. Participants' preferred mode for providing data varied. Participants were also interested in receiving information from registries. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that registry-based collection of PGHD is acceptable to most cancer survivors and could facilitate registry-based efforts to collect PGHD/PROs. Central cancer registry-based collection of PGHD/PROs, especially on long-term effects, could enhance registry support of cancer control efforts including research and population health management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T G Smith
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, 250 Williams Street, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - L V van de Poll-Franse
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases (CoRPS), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - K C Ward
- Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - C L Wiggins
- New Mexico Tumor Registry, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - X C Wu
- Louisiana Tumor Registry/ School of Public Health Epidemiology Program, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - M Hurlbert
- Metastatic Breast Cancer Alliance, New York, NY, USA
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
George GC, Barata PC, Campbell A, Chen A, Cortes JE, Hyman DM, Jones L, Karagiannis T, Klaar S, Le-Rademacher JG, LoRusso P, Mandrekar SJ, Merino DM, Minasian LM, Mitchell SA, Montez S, O'Connor DJ, Pettit S, Silk E, Sloan JA, Stewart M, Takimoto CH, Wong GY, Yap TA, Cleeland CS, Hong DS. Improving attribution of adverse events in oncology clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 76:33-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
49
|
Cho J, Yoon J, Kim Y, Oh D, Kim SJ, Ahn J, Suh GY, Nam SJ, Mitchell SA. Linguistic Validation of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Korean. J Glob Oncol 2019; 5:1-10. [PMID: 30917069 PMCID: PMC6449075 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.18.00193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to translate and linguistically validate a Korean-language version of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). METHODS All 124 PRO-CTCAE items were translated into Korean (PRO-CTCAE-Korean) using International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research best practices and linguistically validated in a diverse sample of patients undergoing cancer treatment (n = 120) to determine whether the Korean translation captured the original concepts. During the cognitive interviews, participants first completed approximately 60 PRO-CTCAE-Korean questions and were then interviewed to evaluate the conceptual equivalence of the translation to the original PRO-CTCAE English-language source. Interview probes addressed comprehension, clarity, and ease of judgement. Three rounds of interviews were conducted. Items that met the a priori threshold of 10% or more of respondents with comprehension difficulties were considered for rephrasing and retesting. RESULTS A majority of PRO-CTCAE-Korean items were well comprehended in round 1; 14 items posed comprehension difficulties for at least 10% of respondents in round 1. Four symptom terms (mouth and throat sores, feeling like nothing could cheer you up, frequent urination, and pain, swelling, redness at drug injection or intravenous insertion site) were revised and retested in rounds 2 and 3. For the other 10 symptom terms, no suitable alternative phrasing was identified, and the terms were retested in rounds 2 and 3. After rounds 2 and 3, no item presented difficulties in 20% or more of participants. CONCLUSION PRO-CTCAE-Korean has been linguistically validated for use in Korean-speaking populations. Quantitative evaluation of this new measure to establish its measurement properties and responsiveness in Korean speakers undergoing cancer treatment is in progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juhee Cho
- Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Junghee Yoon
- Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngha Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dongryul Oh
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok Jin Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinseok Ahn
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gee Young Suh
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok Jin Nam
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pappot H, Baeksted C, Knoop A, Mitchell SA, Nissen A, Johansen C. Routine surveillance for symptomatic toxicities with real-time clinician reporting in Danish breast cancer patients-Organization and design of the first national, cluster randomized trial using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of Common Terminology C. Breast J 2019; 25:269-272. [DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology; The Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Christina Baeksted
- Department of Oncology; The Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen Denmark
- Documentation & Quality; Danish Cancer Society; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Ann Knoop
- Department of Oncology; The Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Sandra A. Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences; National Cancer Institute; Rockville Maryland
| | - Aase Nissen
- Documentation & Quality; Danish Cancer Society; Copenhagen Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|