The potential role of micro-RNA-211 in the pathogenesis of sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy

Sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE) is a rare epileptic syndrome characterized by epileptic seizures which occur during the non-rapid eye movement (NREM) stage of sleep. It manifests with hypermotor semiology resembling violent limb movements and an asymmetric tonic-dystonic posture. The genes which are responsible for the autosomal dominant form of SHE (ADSHE) and whose function is to code the sub-unit of the neuronal acetylcholine receptor are well known. Considering that ADSHE is a prototype of SHE, it is thought that the dysfunction of the cortico-subcortical cholinergic network, which regulates the cycle of sleep, has a key role in the epileptogenesis of this syndrome. Namely, studies to date, have shown that the hypercholinergic activity is sufficient for the development of epileptic seizures, even though the exact mechanism remains to be elucidated. NREM parasomnias are sleep disorders that are the most difficult to differentiate from SHE due to a similar clinical presentation. Considering the clinical similarities, NREM occurrence and probable genetic connection, it is considered that fundamentally, both of these conditions share a common pathophysiological mechanism i.e. cholinergic dysfunction. The main difference between SHE and NREM parasomnias are the genuine epileptic seizures that are responsible for the semiology in SHE. These genuine seizures are not present in NREM parasomnias. Why this is so, remains to be elucidated. Considering that animal studies have shown that dynamic changes and the decreased levels of microRNA-211 contribute to epileptic seizures and to changes in cholinergic pathways, our hypothesis is that epileptic seizures and the development of epileptogenesis in SHE are a consequence of cholinergic dysfunction and decreased levels of microRNA-211 as opposed to NREM parasomnias where there is a stable level of microRNA-211, preventing epileptogenesis despite the cholinergic system dysfunction.

Effect of clonidine on the cutaneous silent period during spinal anesthesia

AIM

To investigate the effect of clonidine on the cutaneous silent period (CSP) during spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

A total of 67 adult patients were included in this randomized, prospective, single-center, double-blind trial. They did not have neurological disorders and were scheduled for inguinal hernia repair surgery. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NTC03121261). The patients were randomized into two groups with regards to the intrathecally administered solution: (1) 15 mg of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 50 µg of 0.015% clonidine, or (2) 15 mg of 0.5% levobupivacaine alone. There were 34 patients in the levobupivacaine-clonidine (LC) group and 33 patients in the levobupivacaine (L) group. CSP and its latency were measured four times: prior to the subarachnoid block (SAB), after motor block regression to the 0 level of the Bromage scale, with ongoing sensory blockade, and both 6 and 24 h after SAB.

RESULTS

Only data from 30 patients in each group were analyzed. There were no significant differences between the groups investigated preoperatively and after 24 h. The CSP of the L group at the time point when the Bromage scale was 0 was 44.8 ± 8.1 ms, while in the LC group it measured 40.2 ± 3.8 ms (P = 0.007). The latency in the L group at the time point when the Bromage scale was 0 was 130.3 ± 10.2 ms, and in the LC group it was 144.7 ± 8.3 ms (P < 0.001). The CSP of the L group after 6 h was 59.6 ± 9.8 ms, while in the LC group it was 44.5 ± 5.0 ms (P < 0.001). The latency in the L group after 6 h was 110.4 ± 10.6 ms, while in LC group it was 132.3 ± 9.7 ms (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal addition of clonidine to levobupivacaine for SAB in comparison with levobupivacaine alone results in a diminished inhibitory tonus and shortened CSP.