A Pilot, Open-Label, Proof-of-Concept Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Asthiposhak® Tablets in Participants Suffering From Asthikshaya or Osteopenia

Introduction Both osteoporosis and osteopenia are prevalent public health concerns worldwide and can lead to debilitating bone fractures. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Asthiposhak® Tablets in individuals with Asthikshaya (osteopenia) by measuring changes in the bone mineral density (BMD) score before and after the intervention, specifically between visit 1 (baseline) and visit 8 (after 180 days of treatment). Methods The single-arm study involved the screening of participants for Asthikshaya (osteopenia) using baseline investigations, which included a bone mineral density (BMD) assessment through a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. A total of 36 participants were enrolled in the study, who took two Asthiposhak Tablets three times a day with lukewarm water, for a period of 180 days. Safety assessments, along with evaluations of BMD (DEXA Scan), Ayurvedic Symptom Score, and serum biochemical markers, were conducted through blood investigations. Efficacy and safety data were analyzed using 'intention-to-treat' analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to express data in percentages, mean ± SD, or median (IQR). Data at different intervals were compared using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction tested the significance between visits for the Ayurvedic Symptom Score, and Friedman's two-way analysis of variance by ranks measured differences in vital parameters. The significance level used was p<0.05. Results Out of the initially recruited 36 participants, 30 successfully completed the study, consisting of 12 males and 18 females, with an age range of 40 to 70 years and a mean age of 51.33 years. After 180 days of treatment with Asthiposhak Tablets, a statistically significant (p<0.05) improvement in hip and spine BMD (T-score) was observed. Additionally, significant reductions in the mean Total Ayurvedic Symptom Score were noted at both 90 and 180 days of treatment compared to day 0. Moreover, the levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin, serum bone markers, showed statistically significant (p<0.05) reduction after 180 days of treatment compared to day 0. Importantly, all safety variables, including laboratory investigations, remained within the normal range following the 180-day treatment with Asthiposhak Tablets. Conclusion Asthiposhak Tablets exhibited significant efficacy in enhancing both BMD (T-score) and Ayurvedic Symptom Score, thereby substantiating their osteoprotective potential in individuals with Asthikshaya (osteopenia). Furthermore, the tablets were found to reduce the levels of biochemical markers, such as serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin, suggesting their anti-resorptive action.

A Pilot, Prospective, Randomized-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Arsha Hita™ in the Treatment of Anal Fissures

Introduction Anal fissures are tears in the anal canal that cause pain, bleeding, and spasms. They can be treated with non-operative options such as sitz baths, local anesthetics, topical nitrates, oral fiber, and calcium channel blockers, but some patients require surgery. Topical nitrates have side effects such as severe headaches, while topical calcium channel blockers can cause itching. There is a need to explore alternative treatments with fewer side effects. This proof-of-concept pilot study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of Arsha Hita™ tablets and ointment (Shree Dhootapapeshwar Limited, Mumbai Maharastra, India) (test treatment) with a combination of lidocaine 1.5% w/w + nifedipine 0.3% w/w cream for local application and Isabgol powder (6 g) orally as an active comparator (standard treatment), which is the standard treatment of anal fissures as per the Association of Colon and Rectal Surgeons of India (ACRSI) guidelines. Methodology This study was a single-center, prospective, randomized-controlled study conducted in Karnataka, India. Participants were screened for anal fissures and randomized to receive either standard treatment (Group A) or test treatment (Group B) for 14 days, and were re-evaluated after two, four, and six weeks. The study assessed signs and symptoms related to anal fissures, such as pain post-defecation on Visual Analog Scale (VAS), bleeding per anus grading, wound healing grade, stool consistency, and stool frequency. Compliance, inter-current illness, and concomitant therapy were noted at each visit. The study used independent sample t-tests to compare variables at baseline and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests to compare the number/proportion of participants achieving primary and secondary endpoints. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare median composite scores at baseline and Visit 4, and Friedman's two-way analysis of variance was used to compare median composite scores across the four visits (p < 0.05 was considered significant). Descriptive analysis was used to assess VAS, bleeding, and healing grades. Results The study included 53 participants with anal fissures, of which 25 out of 27 allocated in Group A (two drop-outs) received standard treatment, and all 26 allocated in Group B received Arsha Hita treatment. At the end of the study, 11 participants in Group B achieved a 90% reduction in composite scores compared to only three patients in Group A (p<0.05). Both groups showed improvement in pain on defecation, severity of bleeding, healing of anal fissure wound, and participant's and physician's global impression score. Group B had significantly better results in terms of VAS score, resolution of per-anal bleeding, and physician's global impression score (p<0.05). There were no adverse events in either group during the six-week treatment period. Conclusion The pilot study provides evidence that the combination of Arsha Hita tablets and Arsha Hita ointment may be more effective and safer for treating anal fissures than the standard treatment. The test treatment group experienced greater pain relief, complete resolution of per-anal bleeding, and better global impression scores than the standard treatment group. These findings suggest the need for further research through larger, randomized controlled trials to determine the efficacy and safety of Arsha Hita in treating anal fissures.