Quantitative pupillometry in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A post-hoc analysis of the TTH48 trial

Background

Quantitative pupillometry is an objective method to examine pupil reaction and subsequently grade the response on a neurological pupil index (NPi) scale from 0 to 5. The aim of the present sub‐study was to explore the long‐term prognostic value of NPi in comatose out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing targeted temperature management (TTM).

Methods

This planned sub‐study of the “Targeted temperature management for 48 versus 24 h and neurological outcome after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized clinical trial.” NPi was assessed from admission and throughout day 3 and linked to the Cerebral Performance Categories score at 6 months. We compared the prognostic performance of NPi in 65 patients randomized to a target temperature of 33 ± 1°C for 24 or 48 h.

Results

The NPi values were not different between TTM groups (p > .05). When data were pooled, NPi was strongly associated with neurological outcome at day 1 with a mean NPi of 3.6 (95% CI 3.4–3.8) versus NPi 3.9 (3.6–4.1) in the poor versus good outcome group, respectively (p < .01). At day 2, NPi values were 3.6 (3.1–4.0) and 4.1 (3.9–4.2) (p = .01) and at day 3, the values were 3.3 (2.6–4.0) and 4.3 (4.1–4.6), respectively (p < .01). The prognostic ability of NPi, defined by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was best at day three.

Conclusion

Quantitative pupillometry measured by NPi was not different in the two TTM groups, but overall, significantly associated with good and poor neurological outcomes at 6 months. NPI has a promising diagnostic accuracy, but larger studies are warranted.

COVID-19 with severe acute respiratory distress in a pregnant woman leading to preterm caesarean section: A case report

We report the case of a 25-year-old pregnant woman, parity one, at 34 + 2 weeks of gestation, with a body mass index of 41 kg/m2 but no other comorbidities. There was a family history of COVID-19 among her one-year-old son, husband, brother, father and mother. She was admitted with chest pain and a nasopharyngeal swap positive for COVID-19. Due to the severity of the infection, a multidisciplinary team of anaesthesiologists, intensivists, obstetricians, neonatologists, and infectious disease specialists recommended delivery by caesarean section at 35 + 0 weeks of gestation, with combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia. Three days after delivery, the patient developed severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and was intubated for 25 days. The neonate was observed in the neonatal intensive care unit and no vertical transmission occurred. This case highlights the importance of the timing of delivery, the need for extended postpartum observation and a beneficial effect of inhaled nitric oxide after delivery for women with COVID-19.

Copeptin as a Prognostic Marker in Prolonged Targeted Temperature Management After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

The aim was to investigate blood concentrations of copeptin and the prognostication in 24 versus 48 hours of targeted temperature management (TTM) in patients resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This is an exploratory biomarker substudy of the trial entitled; "Targeted temperature management for 48 vs 24 hours and neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest: A randomized clinical trial." Patients were randomized to target temperature of 33°C ± 1°C for 24 (TTM24) or 48 (TTM48) hours. The primary outcome was copeptin concentrations compared with TTM at admission, 24, 48, and 72 hours (t24, t48, and t72) after reaching target temperature. Secondary outcomes were the association between copeptin and cerebral performance category (CPC) score after 6 months, and copeptin level between cerebral or noncerebral causes of death. Blood samples from 117 patients were analyzed from two Scandinavian sites. No significant differences in copeptin concentrations were found between TTM24 versus TTM48 at admission 211.3 μg/L (148-276.6) versus 179.8 μg/L (127-232.6) (p = 0.45), t24: 23.3 μg/L (16.5-30.2) versus 18.6 μg/L (13.3-23.9) (p = 0.25), t48: 28.8 μg/L (20.6-36.9) versus 19.7 μg/L (14.3-25.1) (p = 0.06), and t72: 23.3 μg/L (13.8-26.8) versus 31.6 μg/L (22-41.2) (p = 0.05). Copeptin concentrations were significantly higher in poor neurological outcome group at t24, t48, and t72 (p < 0.01), but not at admission (p = 0.19). The prognostic ability of copeptin (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) was at admission: 0.59 (95% confidence intervals: 0.46-0.72), t24: 0.74 (0.63-0.86), t48: 0.8 (0.7-0.9), and t72: 0.76 (0.65-0.87). Copeptin levels were not significantly different in noncerebral compared with cerebral causes at admission: p = 0.41, t24: p = 0.52, t48: p = 0.15, and t72: p = 0.38. There were no differences in the level of copeptin in TTM24 versus TTM48. Blood concentrations of copeptin were associated with CPC at 6 months, and no association between levels of copeptin and cerebral versus noncerebral causes of death was observed.