COMPARISON OF THREE MIDAZOLAM-BASED SEDATION PROTOCOLS IN BUDGERIGARS (MELOPSITTACUS UNDULATUS) AND BLACK-CHEEKED LOVEBIRDS (AGAPORNIS NIGRIGENIS)

This randomized, crossover study evaluated three sedation protocols administered subcutaneously in nine budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and nine black-cheeked lovebirds (Agapornis nigrigenis). All protocols included midazolam (5 mg/kg), combined with butorphanol (5 mg/kg) (BM), medetomidine (20 lg/kg) (MM), or alfaxalone (13 mg/kg) (AM). Mortalities from suspected cardiorespiratory arrest were observed when AM was used in lovebirds, even after reduction of alfaxalone dosage to 3 mg/kg, and therefore this protocol was excluded from further use in this species. Induction and recovery times were recorded and their quality assessed. Sedation depth and heart and respiratory rates were measured every 5 min and radiographic positioning was attempted at 10 and 20 min. At 30 min, midazolam and medetomidine were reversed with flumazenil (0.05 mg/kg, SC), and atipamezole (0.2 mg/kg, SC), respectively. MM consistently provided deep sedation in both species, with successful radiographic positioning at every attempt. As expected, heart rate was often lower with MM than with other protocols, but no associated complications were noted. In budgerigars, BM had the lowest radiographic positioning success rate (10 min: 5/9, 20 min: 3/9), whereas in lovebirds it provided significantly deeper sedation (P < 0.001), allowing radiographic positioning in all subjects. In both species, BM provided the shortest recovery times. AM resulted in reliable radiographic positioning of all budgerigars at 10 min, but not at 20 min (5/ 9), and provided consistently poor recoveries. This study highlights how differently two psittacine species of similar size may react to the same sedation protocols. AM sedation cannot be fully reversed and produced significant undesirable effects, several of which have been previously reported with alfaxalone administration to avian species. The authors therefore caution against using alfaxalone-midazolam combinations in budgerigars and black-cheeked lovebirds. Both BM and MM provided reliable sedation in these species, and appear to be suitable alternatives to AM.

A computer algorithm for differentiating valid from distorted pulse oximeter waveforms in neonates

Current pulse oximeter technology is fraught with a significant false alarm rate. This is mainly due to motion artifacts at the sensor site which distort the pulse waveform and render the computation of SaO2 invalid. If the pulse waveform could be automatically recognized as either normal or distorted, then only valid SaO2 values would be displayed. We observed that the systolic upstroke time (Sy) of the pulse waveform has a narrow and consistent range in normal appearing pulses. The systolic upstroke time (Sy) is the time from the onset of systole to the peak of the pulse waveform. Comparison of a preset range of Sy was made against Sy obtained by computer analysis of each pulse waveform. Visual examination of 14,090 pulses was carried out to determine the sensitivity and false positive rate of the algorithm. Sensitivity of computer detection of valid pulses was 92% with a positive predictive value of 92%. When used on line for continuous recording of SaO2 in patients, this simple algorithm has the potential to decrease the false alarm rate of pulse oximeters and improve the accuracy of long-term SaO2 recordings.