Total Hip Arthroplasty: Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach in the First Year of Practice

Background

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been popularized as a less invasive technique, however outcomes within the first year of practice after fellowship have not been investigated. The primary aim was to determine differences in complications and outcomes between DAA and posterior approach (PA) in the first year of practice. The secondary aim was to determine if there was a learning curve factor in DAA and PA after fellowship training.

Methods

THA cases performed by two surgeons during their first year of practice were reviewed. Overall, 181 THAs (91 DAA, 90 PA) in 168 patients, were performed. Intraoperative differences (blood loss, operative time), hospital stay, complications, reoperations, and revisions were compared.

Results

Overall surgical complications were similar between DAA and PA (11% vs. 9%, p=0.64), but complication profiles were different: dislocation (1% vs. 4%, p=0.17), intraoperative femoral fracture (2% vs. 1%, p=0.32), postoperative periprosthetic fractures (2% vs. 3%, p=0.64). neuropraxia (3% vs. 0%, p=0.08). There was no difference in rate of reoperation (1% vs. 3%, p=0.31). There was a difference in rate of revision at final follow-up (0% vs. 6%, p=0.02). DAA consisted of longer operative time (111 vs. 99 minutes; p<0.001), however was only significant in the first 50 cases (p<0.001), while the subsequent cases were similar (p=0.31). There was no difference in the first 50 cases compared to the subsequent cases for either approach regarding blood loss, complications, reoperations, or revisions.

Conclusion

DAA and PA for THA performed within the first year of practice exhibit similarly low complication rates, but complication profiles are different. In our series, PA did demonstrate a higher risk of revision at final follow-up. A learning curve is not unique to the DAA. Both DAA and PA THA exhibited a learning curve in the first 50 cases performed at the start of a surgeon's practice. Level of Evidence: III.

What is the Impact of Body Mass Index Cutoffs on Total Knee Arthroplasty Complications?

BACKGROUND

Body mass index (BMI) cutoffs are commonly used to decide whether to offer obese patients elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, weight loss goals may be unachievable for many patients who are consequentially denied complication-free surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of different BMI cutoffs on the rates of complication-free surgery after TKA.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective, primary TKA from 2015 to 2018 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database using Common Procedural Terminology code 27447. The BMI and rates of any thirty-day complication were collected. BMI cutoffs of 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 kg/m² were applied to model the incidence of complications if TKA would have been allowed or denied based on the BMI.

RESULTS

A total of 314,719 patients underwent TKA, and 46,386 (14.7%) had a BMI ≥40 kg/m². With a BMI cutoff of 40 kg/m², 268,333 (85.3%) patients would have undergone TKA. A total of 282,552 (94.8%) would experience complication-free surgery, and 17.3% of all complications would be prevented. TKA would proceed for 309,479 (98.3%) patients at a BMI cutoff of 50 kg/m². A total of 293,108 (94.7%) would not experience a complication, and 2.8% of complications would be prevented. A BMI cutoff of 35 kg/m² would prevent 36.6% of all complications while allowing 94.8% of complication-free surgeries to proceed.

CONCLUSION

Lower BMI cutoffs can reduce complications, but will limit access to complication-free TKA for many patients. These data do not indicate TKA should be performed without consideration of risks from obesity; however, a holistic assessment and shared decision-making may be more valuable when deciding on appropriate goal weight reduction.

Early Emergency Department Visits Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Postoperative emergency department (ED) utilization remains an understudied aspect of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study is to characterize 30-day ED visits following TJA.

METHODS

We reviewed 4061 primary unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty cases performed at our hospital from 2013 to 2017. The primary outcome was presentation to our institution's ED within 30 days of surgery. Chief complaints and their association to the TJA encounter, as well as readmissions and reoperations, were recorded. One-to-three propensity score matched analysis was used to identify index admission variables associated with early ED visits.

RESULTS

There were 253 recorded ED visits within 30 days of TJA (218 cases, 5.4%). Nearly 60% of ED visits were directly related to the TJA encounter. The remainder were medically related, most commonly for gastrointestinal complaints. The most common TJA-related complaints were surgical limb pain (28%), wound concerns (20%), and swelling (20%). These complaints comprised two-thirds of TJA-related ED visits, though accounted for only 19.4% and 9.5% of readmissions and reoperations observed in this cohort, respectively. Perioperative transfusion, length of stay, primary insurer, and discharge disposition were not associated with an ED visit.

CONCLUSION

ED visits within 30 days of TJA were common (5.4%). Most visits related to the index procedure were due to surgical limb pain, wound concerns, and swelling. These complaints accounted for a minority of readmissions and reoperations. This study suggests that perioperative strategies addressing common postoperative concerns are warranted to mitigate acute care use after TJA.