|
1
|
Zeng Y, Verstraeten I, Trinh HK, Lardon R, Schotte S, Olatunji D, Heugebaert T, Stevens C, Quareshy M, Napier R, Nastasi SP, Costa A, De Rybel B, Bellini C, Beeckman T, Vanneste S, Geelen D. Chemical induction of hypocotyl rooting reveals extensive conservation of auxin signalling controlling lateral and adventitious root formation. New Phytol 2023; 240:1883-1899. [PMID: 37787103 DOI: 10.1111/nph.19292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Upon exposure to light, etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings form adventitious roots (AR) along the hypocotyl. While processes underlying lateral root formation are studied intensively, comparatively little is known about the molecular processes involved in the initiation of hypocotyl AR. AR and LR formation were studied using a small molecule named Hypocotyl Specific Adventitious Root INducer (HYSPARIN) that strongly induces AR but not LR formation. HYSPARIN does not trigger rapid DR5-reporter activation, DII-Venus degradation or Ca2+ signalling. Transcriptome analysis, auxin signalling reporter lines and mutants show that HYSPARIN AR induction involves nuclear TIR1/AFB and plasma membrane TMK auxin signalling, as well as multiple downstream LR development genes (SHY2/IAA3, PUCHI, MAKR4 and GATA23). Comparison of the AR and LR induction transcriptome identified SAURs, AGC kinases and OFP transcription factors as specifically upregulated by HYSPARIN. Members of the SAUR19 subfamily, OFP4 and AGC2 suppress HYS-induced AR formation. While SAUR19 and OFP subfamily members also mildly modulate LR formation, AGC2 regulates only AR induction. Analysis of HYSPARIN-induced AR formation uncovers an evolutionary conservation of auxin signalling controlling LR and AR induction in Arabidopsis seedlings and identifies SAUR19, OFP4 and AGC2 kinase as novel regulators of AR formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinwei Zeng
- Horticell, Department Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Inge Verstraeten
- Horticell, Department Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hoang Khai Trinh
- Horticell, Department Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Institute of Food and Biotechnology, Can Tho University, 900000, Can Tho City, Vietnam
| | - Robin Lardon
- Horticell, Department Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sebastien Schotte
- Horticell, Department Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Damilola Olatunji
- Horticell, Department Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Heugebaert
- Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Christian Stevens
- Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mussa Quareshy
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Richard Napier
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Sara Paola Nastasi
- Department of Biosciences, University of Milan, via Celoria 26, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Alex Costa
- Department of Biosciences, University of Milan, via Celoria 26, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Institute of Biophysics, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Bert De Rybel
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
- VIB Centre for Plant Systems Biology, Technologiepark 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Catherine Bellini
- Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Umeå University, SE-90736, Umeå, Sweden
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB), 78000, Versailles, France
| | - Tom Beeckman
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
- VIB Centre for Plant Systems Biology, Technologiepark 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Steffen Vanneste
- Horticell, Department Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Danny Geelen
- Horticell, Department Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Claes L, De Vylder V, De Stercke L, Muyshondt I, Schotte S, Van Hooimissen A, Van Paemel N, Mehuys E, Boussery KJ. [Reliability of OTC advertisement Relevance and quality of cited literature]. J Pharm Belg 2016:14-20. [PMID: 30281240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Pharmacist receive a lot of publicity for OTC products. Often one or more literature references are mentioned to support the advertising claims. Objective In this study we examine: [1) whether the advertising claim is consistent with what is stated in the literature references mentioned on the leaflet and [2] whether these literature references are trustworthy. Method Through 60 randomly selected community pharmacies, pharmacist-directed advertisements for OTC products I= medicines, medical devices, dietary supplements and parapharmacy) with at least one bibliographic reference, were collected. The literature references listed in these leaflets were assessed in terms of content [= is the claim consistent with the information in the reference) and technically [= evaluation of the quality of the references]. Results The 85 collected OTC advertisements made 214 claims that referred to 243 references. Of these, 128 references did not support the promotional claim. The remaining 84 references did support the corresponding claim. From 31 references no full text was obtained. Of the 84 supporting references 44 were of dubious quality. The remaining 40 references were found to be reliable. Conclusion This study shows that the literature references in advertising leaflets for OTC-products are not a reliable source of information on the advertised product. Pharmacists should deal critically with this information and should be encouraged to consult reliable scientific sources.
Collapse
|